>gen 7 has full models for every trainer >portraits are

>>26347343
why not both?
>portrait at start
>models in battle

>>26347393
This would be optimal. The art is too good to drop, but the models would be really cool to see.

>>26347393
no way it's gonna happen, they're gonna be pushing this 'full 3D' thing hard and won't want anything to do with the 2D portraits

>>26347343
I'd definitely prefer the portraits unless they significantly increase the quality of the 3D models. The game just looks so low-res and shitty in 3D. It's really gonna suck if they just stick to shitty 3D models.

Full models over portraits any day.
Especially if trainer battles have trainers in the background at all time like the little bits we've seen.

>>26347393
Battle models would be very annoying, seeing the camera pan over a trainer every match would get old fast.

>>26347800
You really think the engine can handle that?

I'm not confident

>>26348134
If Game Freak was competent? Sure.
In practice, I doubt it.

I'd prefer models, but I would like a return of Trainer's Eye with 2D art in it and for your Trainer Card to use similar

>>26347839
Didn't on the Gamecube

File: 1459814107099.jpg (37KB, 480x480px) Image search: [Google]

37KB, 480x480px

>all that potential for SFM porn

I'll take portraits over models any day of the week, especially because they tend to be done lately by the actual competent Pokemon artist who designs cuties, Ohmura.

>>26347343
I like portraits more than models.
They just look better.

>>26347343
>non sugi artwork
just using standard official artwork was kind of lazy and clashed with the 3d, but it's not like the 3d was very good.

I'd hope they were detailed models. maybe if they made portraits specifically for in-game.

>>26347343
Would be nice.

>>26347343
>wanting only shitty and poor quality 3d models instead of nice 2d artworks

I'm only okay with the non chibi overworld 3d models so far. Chibis aren't that bad but the SM ones look kinda better.