What the fuck is wrong with these things' eyes? Besides

>>26317319
(You)

File: oldnewdesigns5.png (724KB, 1394x2018px) Image search: [Google]

724KB, 1394x2018px

Each gen they make the eyes larger and larger to make them look cuter.

>>26317379
Stop this meme

>spheal
>hoothoot
>meowth
This is the 3rd worst possible outcome for starters.

>>26317396
It's not a meme. It's just a fact.

File: 250px-039Jigglypuff.png (49KB, 250x250px) Image search: [Google]

49KB, 250x250px

>>26317379
Because your cherrypicked examples were intended to be "cute" like pic related.

>>26317319
What's wrong with Rowlet's eyes? They look like less creepy (barn) owl eyes.

>>26317554
No. Just compare Charmander and Snivy for example. Both need to look cute because they're starter Pokemon. but Snivy's eyes take up a huge portion of its head while Charmander's don't. It's an obvious trend to appeal to the fags who like kawaii pokemon.

Growlithe can also be considered cute. Yet it's eyes aren't huge looking like Lillipup's or Zorua's are.

>>26317379
Hoothoot?

>spheal ripoff
are you talking about the owl or the dolphin?

>>26317615
Holy hell. Rowlett's final evolution is going to be fourth kind horrifying isn't it?

>>26317691
Hoothoot has small eyes.

>>26317512
>>26317379
>>26317554
>Realistic dress and hair
>Ignore these literal cartoon eyes

It's literal meme spouting bullshit, dude.

If anything, with the starters, its more realistic. Infants have massive eyes compared to their bodies. It's not Serperior has the same le desu kawaii eyes you seem to think Snivy has.

File: image.jpg (2MB, 1536x1536px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1536x1536px

>>26317379
Reaching for those cherries

>>26317721
Fuck yes
Gimme alien owl please

>>26317751
>Infants have massive eyes compared to their bodies

Not to the extent that new gen Pokemon do.

Gen 1 Pokemon still had bigger eyes in their pre-evos bro, it just wasn't retardedly exaggerated like it is now.

File: 250px-704Goomy.png (53KB, 250x250px) Image search: [Google]

53KB, 250x250px

>>26317662
Kawaii? They're designed by japanese people, and their main target are japanese children, what did you expect? They put big, cute eyes on almost everything.

Also, like pic related, there's a good amount of post-gen1 pokemon that are cute and don't have big anime eyes.

File: here we go.jpg (572KB, 800x3198px) Image search: [Google]

572KB, 800x3198px

>>26317379

>>26317787
>They're designed by japanese people, and their main target are japanese children, what did you expect?

Same quality as gen 1 designs. Which last I checked, were also made by Japanese people to appeal to children.

>>26317379
You do know the reason darumakka has a simpler, rounder shape is because it's based off of a Daruma, right?

>>26317845
They have the same quality, children still love them. And, they need to be pretty innovative with each set of new starters in order to not look like a ripoff of the previous ones.

But if you still disagree, well then, show us better and new ideas for starters with the "same quality" of Gen 1.

>>26317379
>cherrypicking this hard

Wew

File: oldnewdesigns11.png (1MB, 1818x2922px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1818x2922px

>>26317752
"Cherrypicking," huh? Even though I can work with almost all your examples?

File: image.jpg (46KB, 250x166px) Image search: [Google]

46KB, 250x166px

>>26317841
>>26317379

>>26317968
>>26317379

>2010+6
>saying that gen 1 was better designed than x gen.

>>26317968
Why would smooth armor need detail?

>>26317977
>>26317946
>>26317752
>le cherrypicking meme
>even though the ones who are denying these images are the ones cherrypicking by picking the same 5 exceptions like jigglypuff and dragonite over and over

File: 1463169708663.jpg (737KB, 1800x2160px) Image search: [Google]

737KB, 1800x2160px

>>26317319

>>26317968
All the eyes on the Gen 1 side look fucking enormous when you take proportions into account

>>26317841
This just shows that Gen5 is trying to rip of the designs of Gen1. And if something is ripped of, it has done something right.

File: Chrto6tVIAIQIR_.png (165KB, 600x615px) Image search: [Google]

165KB, 600x615px

>>26318052

File: image.png (98KB, 300x267px) Image search: [Google]

98KB, 300x267px

>>26318052

File: dd82e71a0b8f9dfe267303c6c74cbb4a[1].jpg (63KB, 653x299px) Image search: [Google]

63KB, 653x299px

>>26318088
Less so compared to gen 5 and 6.

>>26318136
Yeah? What about it?

They made its eyes big to mimic the eye patterns on actual caterpillars, they didn't do it for the sake of making it cute, unlike something like Scatterbug where they made it big just to make it look cute. And even compared to Scatterbug it's not as bad proportionally because the rest of its body isn't tiny.

>>26318160
>koffing
>cute and oversized eyes

Are we looking at the same Pokemon?

>>26318196
>koffing
>stupid cartoon eyes
>so silly XD mouth

File: 4299941-1419641297037.jpg (38KB, 600x375px) Image search: [Google]

38KB, 600x375px

>>26318166
>ALL FUCKING NEW POKEMON LOOK TOO MUCH LIKE ANIMALS REEEEEEEEEEEE

now

>FUCKING NEW POKEMON DON'T LOOK LIKE ACTUAL ANIMALS REEEEEEEEEEEE

File: rowlet.png (188KB, 999x932px) Image search: [Google]

188KB, 999x932px

Ex-fuckin-cuse me, this owl is tight as FUCK.
That main picture just sucks. When you see it move it's a lot cooler.

>>26318236
>>FUCKING NEW POKEMON DON'T LOOK LIKE ACTUAL ANIMALS REEEEEEEEEEEE

Do you see me complaining about Bulbasaur? Or Nidoran? Or Rhydon? Or Kangaskhan? Or Lickitung? Or Magmar? Or Electabuzz?

>>26318018
Who said anything about it being inherently better? You'd have to be a retard to deny that the art style of the series has changed over time, it's natural. It's not an inherently good or bad thing, but it is different.

>>26318236
I'm not a genwunner and even I think you're retarded.

The argument is that newer Pokemon RESEMBLE real animals too much, but the way they're RENDERED is too unlike real animals. Lacking details of fur, claws, feathers, etc. It's the execution that's being criticized.

Again, not a genwunner, my favorite generation is gen 4, but I hate seeing shitty arguments like this going around.

File: 025Pikachu_Dream_zpsv1bgce6c.png (106KB, 1021x1280px) Image search: [Google]

106KB, 1021x1280px

You can even see a similar trend with older pokemon that have been redesigned to fit into the new style. They keep updating how Pikachu looks since it's still the series mascot.

File: Sin título.png (205KB, 540x295px) Image search: [Google]

205KB, 540x295px

>>26318052
More, anon?

So what happened to all the Gen6.5fags? Did they give up?

ITT: Gen one had the best designs, even the unreleased pokemon will look like shit.

>>26318303
Most of them are lurking for a month or so and the other half killed themselves

>>26318052
You do realize you have a much larger selection pool, the most important thing to note would be the ratio of shitdesigns:gooddesigns, honestly i think it would be close to no difference

>>26318321
And by larger I meant smaller, I fucked up

>>26317939
Not that anon but
>innovative for new starters
Like the cat... the owl... and the sea lion.

>>26317319
S E A O T T E R
E
A

O
T
T
E
R

>>26317438
>looks nothing like spheal
>2 pokemon based on the same animal!?!
>the most unique cat weve gotten so far because it isnt normal type.

>>26318965
purrloin

File: TERMINALLY ILL ZYGARDE FIX.png (73KB, 432x431px) Image search: [Google]

73KB, 432x431px

>>26318801
Use this one, and get well soon, Zygarde.