Why is the 1st gen Pokemon so perfect? Seriously It seemed like

>>26274920
They actually tried with most gen 1 pokemon.
Gen 2 had some love and effort put into it too.
Gen 3 and beyond were all done only for money.

>>26274920
>Gen 3 and beyond were all done only for money.
not that that's a bad thing. Also Gen 1 sucks because the system is broken, no checks for Psychic types, and outside of it no Dark Pokemon except, I guess, Mega Gyarados

File: 1418409167067.jpg (186KB, 500x376px) Image search: [Google]

186KB, 500x376px

Gen 1 and 5 tie for the best dex.

Is this ba-
>Those names.

Okay, this is bait.

So many ugly Pokemon in Gen 1. The only gen that is uglier is Gen 4.

Gen 1 had pokemon that looked good. That's really the issue with the new pokemon: they've got some crazy idea or a couple they try to work into a design. Resulting in some crazy lore and whatnot, but the designs themselves being rather awful

>>26274920
Gen 1 has some of the most blandest and forgettable Pokemon. Gen 2 as well.
And my first Pokemon game was Blue back in the day.

>>26276571
Damn can i suck your dick

I know it's bait, but I think the first gen has the worst designs on average out of all gens.

I rate the mon designs like this

5 > 4 > 6 > 3 > 2 = 1