Masuda just confirmed SM will only have a dozen of new pokemon

>>25808799

He said there's going to be ''at least 10'' and everyone laughed.

It was a joke you turd.

>B-b-but new pokemon don't mean new gen

File: 1456031436258.jpg (8KB, 265x265px) Image search: [Google]

8KB, 265x265px

>>25808799
>frogposters being retarded
not even surprised
They asked how many new Pokemon there were, and he responded "more than ten" as a joke.
Stop posting.

>>25808844
Have you seen his face after the general reaction?
It wasnt a joke, but they thought it was

lol gen7fags

>retards not knowing 6.5 is just a funposting meme
top zozzle

Gen 6.1 Bros, we did it

>>25808799
Go back to middle school and learn reading.
He said OVER 10 new pokemon, not just 10 in all. You fucking cuck

File: IMG_3443.png (689KB, 830x770px) Image search: [Google]

689KB, 830x770px

>>25808799
>they're still shilling Megas
>the plot is likely still going to revolve around Megas
>suspiciously low number of "new Pokemon" confirmed by Masuda
Holy shit gen7fags couldn't be BTFO any harder even if they tried.

>>25808799
Even if there were only 10 new mons, how would that not mean a new generation? Kalos only introduced, what, 72 mons? Yet it was still a new generation. I guess that understanding that is too much to be expected of a frog poster.

File: 1429382154555-1.jpg (47KB, 700x504px) Image search: [Google]

47KB, 700x504px

>GEN 7

>>25810306
A dozen = from 10 to 19 aka the most probable number of new pokemon in SM
Otherwise he'd have said "more than 20"

>>25810315
New pokemon means new gen.
Gen 6.5 fags btfo ed once again.
Also nice reply to your own post you fucking asperger.

>>25808799
Are you too autistic to understand what a joke is?

>>25810315
Who shilled megas was the people of pokenchi, not the GF directors.

>>25810270
>I'm only pretending to be retarded

>>25810370
What is a comical understatement?

>>25810393
>New pokemon means new gen.
Until now it did, but SM will set a new precedent. That's the point.
Also, even forms and Megas were referred to as "new Pokemon" before.
>Gen 6.5 fags btfo ed once again.
grasping as straws much? literally nothing has changed since february
>Also nice reply to your own post you fucking asperger.
>people who hold opinions I don't like are 1 person!!!
sorry we don't practice circlejerks around these parts, perhaps reddit or tumblr would be more up your alley?

>>25810370
he would have flat out said "at least "70-100", then there would be no doubts that it's indeed a new gen

"more than 10" is actually suspiciously low, like REALLY suspiciously low

>>25810409
they didn't deny there would be new Megas, Masuda himself talked about Mega Pikachu

then he went ahead and said there would be at least 10 new Pokemon, implying Megas also count as new Pokemon (as if there was any doubt before)

>>25808930
no one is surprised an autist doesnt understand when a person is joking

File: Why live.jpg (140KB, 463x375px) Image search: [Google]

140KB, 463x375px

>>25810500
>Mega Pikachu

Please be joking.

File: merely a jest.jpg (39KB, 358x568px) Image search: [Google]

39KB, 358x568px

>>25808799

>>25810500
>megas are new pokemon
Except they aren't. Thats literally marketing talk. If the sell it as a unique entity for figures, they make more money.

In-game its literally the same as a form, and we only care about in-game.

>>25810682
the raichu hate is real anon

he had a completely serious face when he said that too

>>25810370
screencap this

File: msd.png (539KB, 607x410px) Image search: [Google]

539KB, 607x410px

>>25808930
>>25810531
This is Masuda's face just after everyone laughed when he revealed the number
Does that look like someone who just made a joke?

>>25810452
>gets proven wrong
>y-you're from r-reddit!!!!1!!

File: dozen.jpg (177KB, 1103x928px) Image search: [Google]

177KB, 1103x928px

>>25811302
Done
Dont forget to post it when the 17 new mons are revealed

>>25811477
kek

>>25811305
he knows he fucked up but he's in too deep

>>25811305
Haha, the fucker was dead serious

File: holo smug.jpg (38KB, 382x371px) Image search: [Google]

38KB, 382x371px

>gen 6.5ers grasping at any straw they can
Does it really matter if it's a gen 6.5, or gen 7, though?

>>25812908
Yes. It do.

File: Ring around the Rosie, a bunch of sprinting Corgis, dashes, dashes, they won't fall down!.gif (2MB, 356x200px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 356x200px

>>25812925
For what reason?

>>25812908
Yes it is

File: New Pokémon.png (47KB, 480x388px) Image search: [Google]

47KB, 480x388px

>>25808799
Magearna isn't in the National Pokédex of 6th generation of Pokémon.

So....7th generation confirm...

>>25810370
>dozen=range
Go back to school and learn that a dozen =12 and only 12

>>25813004
>checked it out
>mfw its true

Wow, I learn more about English language everyday
In my language, we have a word very similar but that comprises anything from 10 to 19, always assumed it was the same in English

>>25808799
>tfw only smart enough to frogpost
Sorry anon

File: 1458514279811.jpg (299KB, 608x1070px) Image search: [Google]

299KB, 608x1070px

>>25811362

This is good.

I feel that if they only release a few pokemon every generation then there will be less shit pokemon fucking up the series by existing which has been something that has been happening since gen 3.

>>25815722
>since Gen. 3

shut up nostalgiafag.

>>25812953
>Deoxys Speed Forme
>Giratina Origin Form
>B/W Kyurems
Joe you fucking retard

>>25815755
>forms
They aren't pokemon you shitlord.

>>25815755
are you that retarded?

>>25811305
Whatever it is, we might see a decline in sales soon and Pokemon might actually be a history in the nearest future.