A few years ago I had a fucking stupid idea. I thought it'd

I'm sure /tg/ has done this.

>>25709313
/tg/ started a Pokemon tabletop quite a while ago, and it's still around. They even had an edition war, so to speak, but both parties are still on good terms. I'm running Pokemon Tabletop United in a few hours, in fact.

>>25709313
>>25709333
>>25709341
Yeah, if it exists, there's a TTRPG for it. Especially for something as popular as pokemon.

PTU is really the most in-depth system out there, though if you don't like the level of detail it goes to, you probably won't enjoy playing it.

>>25709313
>set a program up to so it all for you?
What?

I'm not sure Pokémon would be the best for a tabletop RPG, I'd like to see one but I'm not sure how it could be done without being shit.

I'm actually working on converting everything from Pokemon so it functions under D&D 3.5e rules.

It's a long task.

>>25709371
Like this anon said PTU already did it and did it well. Though I would keep your game group small as when you have too many players with 6 pokemon each it gets a little hard to stay on top of it all. Check 1d4chan for the books, it's all player made and free.

>>25711461
Holy shit you 3.5 shitters are retarded. It'd be easier to use an existing Pokemon system or hell even make your own than convert to fucking 3.5

>>25709313
I had the exact same idea a few years ago in college. I even have a bunch of ideas written in this tiny black notebook.
Now where is that thing...

>>25712355

3.5 is all I know. Sorry for trying to have fun.

>not trying to play Pokemon, trying to incorporate Pokemon into D&D