>try to have a legitimate discussion about a somewhat controversial

>>60676
Who are you quoting?

File: 1494810985703.gif (64KB, 118x109px) Image search: [Google]

64KB, 118x109px

>>60679
>hurr durr how do i green text properly

you're the same colossal faggot who posted in my thread about reporting no doubt. KYS my man

>>60679
*whome

>>60679
Yeah, like that.

>>60687
Sir, you do realize that saying "Who are you quoting?" is a meme, right?

Anyway, don't think about it too much. A lot of people don't actually come to 4chan for conversation and will get turned off from it for petty reasons. If you can have a decent conversation with someone, that's great, if people are just memeing on you then accept it and move on.

>>60690
who me?

>>60728
Yes, you.

>>60730
I barely know him.

>>60679
His life experience, you low-content yellow belly.

File: 1491775494873.jpg (552KB, 2544x1432px) Image search: [Google]

552KB, 2544x1432px

>type out a really long, insightful post rich with content
>"autism" replies

Why bother.

>a legitimate discussion about a somewhat controversial topic
Was it some kind of political bullshit? Sorry, but your post reads like something a typical /pol/ack would write.

>>60844
>Was it some kind of political bullshit? Sorry, but your post reads like something a typical /pol/ack would write.
>or posting smug, one-line reactions
Thanks for proving my point.

>>60676
>quality posts
Where are you seeing these at?

>>60841
Late reply, but there can be someone who can benefit from your insight. Even if it's not the person you directed it to.

File: 1489841294031.png (138KB, 411x536px) Image search: [Google]

138KB, 411x536px

>>60676
Basically no way around this. The only way to avoid it would be significantly increased mod and janitor presence, which would just lead to 4chan being something like Reddit or Neogaf 2.0. You just need to treasure the good threads while you have them, and come to terms with the fact that you'll probably deal with rampant shitposting.