[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / bant / biz / c / can / cgl / ck / cm / co / cock / d / diy / e / fa / fap / fit / fitlit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mlpol / mo / mtv / mu / n / news / o / out / outsoc / p / po / pol / qa / qst / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / spa / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vint / vip / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y ] [Search | Free Show | Home]

/scg/edg/ Star Citizen: Dangerous Elite Episode #80 80 80 80

This is a blue board which means that it's for everybody (Safe For Work content only). If you see any adult content, please report it.

Thread replies: 757
Thread images: 165

File: Nomadsland.png (2MB, 1920x1090px) Image search: [Google]
Nomadsland.png
2MB, 1920x1090px
WE LADS 80th THREAD EDITION


Old thread: >>157890634

>Star Citizen information:
http://pastebin.com/NhBwT5Zk
>subscriber jewry brought to you free in a handy browsable format
https://mega.nz/#F!3tpUlapR!knV_JazwxfM-xct6PJyPEw

2.6 has been sent to avocado

>Latest ATV:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rRsF6_lwLas
>Bugsmashers:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2zOaOSaVL2k
>Referral code randomizer:
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1WNKNAuruiI1p5XGPjtVi_uwi8wPmuEYawOKQuhRXfdw/edit#gid=953337098
>Citizencon Demo:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pdCFTF8j7yI
>CitCon2016 Full Presentation:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XuDj5v81Nd0
_______________________________
>Elite: Dangerous information:
http://pastebin.com/ZT9GWmaC

>Gamescom info:
https://community.elitedangerous.com/eventseason16
http://www.heise.de/newsticker/bilderstrecke/bilderstrecke_3298445.html?back=3298273
http://www.gamestar.hu/gamescom/elite-dangerous-horizons-2-2-guardians-update-gamescom-2016-frissites-ujdonsagok-215519.html
>Latest videos
https://www.youtube.com/user/FrontierDevelopments/videos
__________________________________
>Other games:
http://pastebin.com/cugkem8w
>>
1st for Sand Nomad cloth is made from Sandworm leather, offering protection from heat as well as laser weaponry.
>>
File: Untitled.png (60KB, 582x856px) Image search: [Google]
Untitled.png
60KB, 582x856px
20-30million UEC to buy a Polaris in-game.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XcUmA4wcuno&feature=youtu.be&t=37m [Embed]

"No grind" - Chris Roberts, 2012.
"Not pay2win" - Chris Roberts, 2012.
"LTI is insignificant" - Unknown

>but he isnt in charge of the economy, i'm sure it will be more like 10,000 UEC to buy a polaris!
>>
>>158107383
>capital class ship
>surprised it costs millions
>>
>>158107383
Trusting a random event manager is worse than trusting Ben.
Also this >>158107416
>>
>>158107383
This is great, you can only buy 125,000~ UEC at a time so that means people who buy UEC post-release will be severely limited. This is fantastic.
>>
>>158107416
>$1 = 1000 UEC
>$750 ship should cost 750,000 UEC
>costs 30million
>hurrr being surprised it costs millions
OK, stop posting now.
>>
>>158107383
Pff, that's only 30 000 satellites to repair. Easy.
>>
>>158107525
>30 000 satellites to repair
"No grind" - Chris Roberts
>>
>>158107507
Are you retarded?

We don't even know how the economy will be.

Pledge Costs =/= In-game costs you bumblefuck.
>>
>>158107579
>"No grind" - Chris Roberts
What some of niggers believed that ?
>>
>>158107634
>Are you retarded?
I'm not the one shilling for this game. Look at your own life first, kid.
>>
File: ShipPrices.png (71KB, 1118x542px) Image search: [Google]
ShipPrices.png
71KB, 1118x542px
>>158107507
>he thinks ship prices area direct UEC translation to USD 1000UEC/1USD
>he isn't aware /every/ ship price will be much more than the ship's USD price to UEC.

Anon, it's time for you to stop posting. You're embarrasing yourself, it's not news that ships ingame cost will be much more. Picrelated for all interested.
>>
should have let it die
>>
File: DataminedPUPrices.png (24KB, 453x739px) Image search: [Google]
DataminedPUPrices.png
24KB, 453x739px
>>158107708
Woopsey! Wrong image. Here's the last datamined XML price data.
>>
File: cultists IRL.png (45KB, 597x499px) Image search: [Google]
cultists IRL.png
45KB, 597x499px
"If the Constellation = 60 hours it means it would take 4166 hours to earn the Polaris, 1388 days (3 hrs p/night) or 3.8 years...."

"Well, Polaris' are going to be goals for orgs so it should be impossible for a solo player to earn one"

Leddit/starcitizen

$30,000 ship
$750 in the LTI sale
1/40th of its in-game value

>just buy them in game, you don't need the LTI concept sale
>>
File: 1449937263242 - копия.jpg (79KB, 490x585px) Image search: [Google]
1449937263242 - копия.jpg
79KB, 490x585px
>>158107579
>2016
>mmo
>no grind
>>
Buy a polaris now for $750 (current 750 000 uec)
Game release in 2024
Ingame value is 30 mil uec
Sell for maximum profit?
>>
>>158107683
>of niggers
of you Googles*
>>
>>158107708
Your picture is stupid. Americans don't pay VAT.

A £10 UEC gift card costs more than £10.

How can an American buy 1000 UEC for $1 but a British person can buy 1500 for £1?

Please stop posting.
>>
>>158107943
>I posted it on reddit and it didn't get any traction :(
>better post it in /scg XD

So you want to see Militarys ships running around after how long, 250 hours? It's literally a org mission to afford and run a Capital ship (which the Polaris is).

4166 divided by Polaris crew number of 24 = 173 hours work each to afford a Polaris for their crew. I see nothing wrong with this, it's meant to be a dificult expense.
>>
File: tmp_9927-Staanz127952334.jpg (175KB, 484x540px) Image search: [Google]
tmp_9927-Staanz127952334.jpg
175KB, 484x540px
Nth for Career Garboligist.
>>
>>158107842
$1000 for a 350R...

Wow, such cheap.
>>
>>158107976
Depreciation of 90%.
>>
>>158108142
>I posted it on reddit and it didn't get any traction :(
No, I posted their cult conversation here. Sorry to burst your bubble.
>>
>>158107943
>Constellation = 60 hours
$275 for conny in store. 60 hours in game. 275.000 UEC in PU, 275k/60=4,5k uec/hour~ 5k uec/hour. 5 commlink missions in hour, 12min for each. But now in aPU this misions completed in 3-4min, so 60 connie hours/4 = 15 hours of gameplay. Not bad at all.
>>
>>158108276
Thanks the for bumps, it helped getting the thread started.


>>158108175
Is the Reclaimer a Garboligist chapel, church, or Cathedral?
>>
>>158108321
Well...that's easier than a Fed Corvette I reckon.
>>
>>158108321

30million / 750,000
=40

275,000 * 40
=11million

11million / 60hours
= earning 183,333 uec/hour
>>
>>158108142
>you want to see Militarys ships running around after how long, 250 hours?

Are you so emotional at seeing this game criticized that you conveniently block out of your mind the fact that literally millions of military space ships have been bought in LTI sales over the last 4 years and will be flying around at day 1?

Please, compose yourself, stop posting. Come back later.
>>
>>158108381
Garbology is not a religion, it is a science. You aren't just out there picking up random trash in bulk, you have to find that sweet haul that you can drag around the galaxy until the one day you meet someone who is looking for 1,000,000 vintage bottles of Skywalker Brüe. (Slightly used condition.)
>>
>>158108419
>earning 183,333 uec/hour
Carrak, Hull D-E, BMM and other $250+ ships can earn that money/hour, i guess.
>>
File: BillNyeIsJudgingYou.jpg (33KB, 600x606px) Image search: [Google]
BillNyeIsJudgingYou.jpg
33KB, 600x606px
>>158108526
>literally millions
>pic related
We know the total number of Javelins and Idris sold +/- 100 (wiggle for given and sold), and the Polaris is the only one sold openly and is in the 11k numbers max and that's pushing it.
>>
if you're an org who can afford to run a Polaris you're going to spend even longer outfitting it with components and torpedos when it gets wrecked even if you buy insurance for it, calculating how long it takes to get one doesn't seem to have a point to me for me
>>
>>158108574
>1,000,000 vintage bottles of Skywalker Brüe
Is it a joke on the 2000 Diamant Bleu of Heidsieck & Co that sank with the ship that were delivering them to the Imperial family of Russia during WWI, and that were salvaged years later ?
>>
>>158108759
I mean, for now, when we don't even know how will it work
>>
>>158108795
Part of Garbology is knowing what is truly garbage and what has value. Skywalker Brüe, for example, was taken off the market a few years after it was manufactured due to the deleterious effects of (admittedly habit forming) conspicuous consumption, including but not limited to: diabetes, liver failure, pancreatic cancer, glowing genitals, and radiation sickness due to the unstable bond on the 4th and 5th electron quadrings.
A Garbologist worth his salt knows that not only is it a rare vintage of beverage it is also a low to mid-grade fuel for fusion reactors.
>>
File: Jawa-Scavengers.jpg (158KB, 1210x850px) Image search: [Google]
Jawa-Scavengers.jpg
158KB, 1210x850px
>>158109075
Garbology is just a cheap knockoff Jawaism. You idiots pick up small components and cargo on the basis of "This might be worth something to someone, guys" when you can just grab and sell everything. A part valuable and you've got a buyer? Sell it! You've made money. Then you can sell the rest of the scrap too and make even more MAXIMUM PROFIT!
>>
File: JabbasPleasureBarge-EotE.png (968KB, 1198x680px) Image search: [Google]
JabbasPleasureBarge-EotE.png
968KB, 1198x680px
>>158109534
>tfw no sail barge to fly around the Leir deserts and feed people off a plank to the desert worms

CIG MAKE IT NOW and skifts too
>>
>>158109534
Barbarians. Barbarians all! Anyone can run a bulldozer into a pile of scrap metal and dump it into a smelter. I'm talking about dignity! I'm talking reclaimation of the worthy! I'm talking the salvage of civilization!
>>
>>158108795
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heidsieck_%26_Co
Link to the story
>>
File: Smug-gler.png (65KB, 193x159px) Image search: [Google]
Smug-gler.png
65KB, 193x159px
>>158110060
Civilization? Heh! History? Heh! A salvager craves not these things. You are not profitable!
>>
>>158090646

This is why I basically dropped ED. Frontier's decisions and their "listening" only to the shitty part of the community is intolerable. I have no interest in playing a game that not only doesn't respect my time, but spits in my face regarding it.
>>
File: tmp_9927-03_brokkoli1342773932.jpg (31KB, 489x367px) Image search: [Google]
tmp_9927-03_brokkoli1342773932.jpg
31KB, 489x367px
>>158110275
That's what differentiates a mere scavenger and a Garbogist. I do care, I do seek those things...and my time and knowledge are worth a tidy sum to those in the know and seeking that rare, special thing.
>>
What the fuck is this Garbage-autism meme?
>>
>>158110461
A Garbologist is merely an unprofitable Salvager; A BAD SALVAGER. You're better off with a Merchantman and just admit you're only a trader.
>>
>>158110461
>>158108175
Why does this guy have an asshole on his forehead?
>>
>>158110767
It's to give everyone a heads up beofre they try to talk to them.
>>
>>158110614
If I wanted a life of sub-charts, tabletures, and mass to fuel consumption ratio records like some common plebian I could have it. But how boring and tedious that would be. Garbology is adventure.
>>
File: tmp_9927-Falaak-760802737.jpg (13KB, 273x361px) Image search: [Google]
tmp_9927-Falaak-760802737.jpg
13KB, 273x361px
>>158110767
>>158110796
>Not watching Farscape.
>>
>>158110965
Garbologists are not scavengers. They are not Salvagers. They are unprofitable crews that are one bad day away from becoming the salvage to a true salvager.
>>
>decide to get Star Citizen's free fly thing
>opens up a command window with ascii art after the launcher.

Ok, that's pretty cute. You got me there.

Now to wait half a day to see if my aussie internet to download it to see if my 970m can even run it.
>>
>>158111065
Into the trash with Lexx it goes.
>>
>>158111156
970 can but you really need a desktop
>>
File: nope.gif (3MB, 200x170px) Image search: [Google]
nope.gif
3MB, 200x170px
>>158111065
i tried to get into that show when i needed more space after finishing all the star treks for the 50th fucking time and i couldn't get over the "Syfy" original series cheap feel it had everything felt kinda weird.
>>
>>158111156
>my aussie internet to download it
It might be faster to have an anon mail you a flash drive with the files.
>>
>>158111078
Scavengers are vultures. They destroy treasures and history for a handful of credits having no idea the value of what they're looking at. No idea that, because they turned the hull plating of a Polaris into a glorified puncture repair kit they overlooked and jetisoned the crate of Zinitan cruxiform candellabras stored in the head. Those babies are worth thousands to Zinitan pilgrims looking to bring a worthy gift to the Great Hrud.
>>
>>158111357
Ahhh ya gotta give it another chance. Jim Henson puppetry, batshit storylines, fun characters, and a really, really good collection or recurring antagonists. It ain't Trek by any means. It is space fantasy...and I really don't think it's any cheaper looking than Trek just different. More organic and lived in. The people making the show really loved it.

Great alien space babes too.
>>
>>158112058
A Salvager knows the value of what they're salvaging and always know where they can sell it, we take everything else of value including stripping the hull for metal. Anything in a cargo box is valuable and can be sold: That's a rule of thumb.
>>
>>158112297
If that holds true then you, my friend, are a Garbologist. Just a rather...ambitious one. Getting the thing to the person that wants it is one of the core advantages of a career in Garbology. I just don't understand why so many misconstrue a love of history and methodical study in derelicts, laggen, and salvage into some sort of quasi religion. I have a degree, damnit!
>>
>>158112687
Your are mistaken. Garbologists turn their noses up at the less valuable items and only take the most expensive; True Jawaists take everything and sell everything. Cargo and the ship crew's belongings, then components, then the hull plating, then the remaining parts of the vessell are Reclaimer feed. Nothing is left, everything is sold, MAXIMUM PROFIT is gained.
>>
>>158113014
Filthy Jawas. May the shifting sands swallow them all. Let the ferro-fibrous shards of a broken hulk worm into their blood and into their black hearts.
>>
twitch tv/citcon
German fan event today, they'll be livestreaming a QA with Brian Chambers in ~1,5 hours.
>>
In all seriousness I hope SC is as feature rich as they promise. I need another game to play with my Saitek. I'll get in on it even if the Grand Dream doesn't quite reach the architecture Chris had in mind.
>>
boom bye bye inna botty bwoy head
>>
File: ScreenShot0002.jpg (73KB, 800x480px) Image search: [Google]
ScreenShot0002.jpg
73KB, 800x480px
Guess the FPS


it's not high
>>
>>158118658
1
>>
>starting up ED crashed VLC
this is like the worst possible thing that could happen
>>
anyone else watching this german citcon stream?
>>
>>158120218
Why is it the worst possible thing?
>>
>>158120256
Does Brian Chambers talk in german?
Other than that I've got enough SC fan cringe online don't need it with real people too
>>
>>158120517
I take it you never played ED
>>
>>158121796
What does VLC have to do with anything? Are you trying to play custom music?
>>
>>158120218
>>158121796
I only had it freeze on exit. I run it windowed now and it's perfectly fine.
>>
>>158120817
they are all speaking in english and answering questions.
>>
Redpill me on the Redeemer, /scg/

Can the design ever be redeemed?
>>
>>158122641

Not without a massive RSI forum shitstorm.
>>
>>158121913
>custom music
what did he mean by this?
>>
File: meme loving fuck.jpg (100KB, 854x640px) Image search: [Google]
meme loving fuck.jpg
100KB, 854x640px
>>158122918
kys
>>
>>158120218
that's fdev telling you to use a non-shit media player
>>
>>158122641
maybe they can use the "modular engines" concept that was briefly mentioned to justify adding better looking engines for the ship while leaving the hair curlers around as an option for the idiots?
>>
>>158108667
spotted a carrackfag
>>
File: 1476981170636.jpg (4MB, 4000x1999px) Image search: [Google]
1476981170636.jpg
4MB, 4000x1999px
>>158113014
You are being sloppy, you should be recycling cadavers and their soul as well.
>>
So, we won't see 4.0 for another year, even in a best case scenario from CIG.

At that point, we'll theoretically have all gameplay mechanics in, but it doesn't sound like we'll even have all ships, a significant percentage of the final 100 systems, or anything close to a completed PU.

So, what, late 2018 at the earliest? Are they even still gonna have funds by then?
>>
>>158128732
Only fresh cadavers have valuable spare organ parts.
>>
>>158131687
<Occupied Escape Pod>
Not for long.
>>
>>158108132
He's obviously some kind of idiot who thinks GBP is a strong currency or something

God I hate those idiots, it's like they checked the store page of the site, as if that's necessary
>>
>>158107383
The reddit thread got immediately frozen despite all the replies
>>
ded gem ded thred

need some new stuff, CIG is slow
>>
File: 1454599305636.gif (358KB, 500x357px) Image search: [Google]
1454599305636.gif
358KB, 500x357px
>he bought a retaliator
>>
File: Mustang-Beta_v5.jpg (2MB, 3600x1800px) Image search: [Google]
Mustang-Beta_v5.jpg
2MB, 3600x1800px
Who owns the camper van here?
>>
>>158136265
begone anime poster
>>
#RehabilitateTheRetaliator
>>
>>158136592
Maybe if we didn't move like epileptic pigeons
>>
>>158110767
>guy
>>
File: BLAGE_002.png (2MB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]
BLAGE_002.png
2MB, 1920x1080px
Idiot Vanduboos...
>>
>>158136265
And he doesn't regret it, he does hope they improve it a bit, but even if they don't stats and supremacy are not in fact everything, particularly in a game with no defined win conditions and vast unoccupied spaces.

The games not entirely about combat after all.
>>
File: ScreenShot0024.jpg (549KB, 2560x1440px) Image search: [Google]
ScreenShot0024.jpg
549KB, 2560x1440px
>>158136592
I wonder if I could jerry rig a bed into the torpedo bay? I am half German.
>>
>>158137839
>I am half German.

"muh heritage" American detected
>>
File: 5CFOMEr.gif (221KB, 798x1140px) Image search: [Google]
5CFOMEr.gif
221KB, 798x1140px
>tfw vanduul ships are ridiculously expensive
>>
>>158138008
>Be euro
>Be unable to detect levity.
Half my people are from County Cork in Ireland, the other Half from Wurttemberg. Being aware and proud of your heritage is nothing to be ashamed you goddamn self hating nu-male and/or Syrian.
>>
>>158138367
you are just an amerifat, SHART IN MART

>muhhh heritage
>WE WUZ GERMUNS AND WORLDSTAR
>>
>>158138287
What a funny and original joke
>>
>>158138710
>posted from my cuckshed

You probably have more afro in you than I do Hans, but still not as much as your Fraulein has in her.
>>
>>158138367
I'm proud of my heritage we just don't bring it up constantly out of insecurity.
We don't need to tell everyone where we're from because everyone fucking knows.
>>
>>158139503
>beeing that triggered

top kek

>>158142326
this
>>
>I don't disagree with ether of you, but what bugs me most is when playing in the PU if I come a cross a Vanduul fighter instead of being all "Oh CRAP, a Duul!", I'm going to be thinking, "hmf, just another player with deep pockets". No fear, no excitement.

Are you ready to fight the Duul in your Rack?
>>
Any evocati?

How's the Avenger and Gladius handling?
>>
How do I NOT think about star citizen or feel the need to spend all my spare moments searching for that sweet shred of juicy information about the game i dont know already

ATV/RTV has been the most important part of my week for months now i cant control myself but i just want to stop til 3.0 is out
>>
>>158143996
You must spread the gospel to the non believers
>>
people still bitching about supercruise?
>>
>>158108667

You really think the Rack can make that much UEC per hour?
>>
>>158145484
He probably thinks it will earn more than the Crucible and Reclaimer
>>
>>158143996
>but i just want to stop til 3.0 is out
>he thinks the ride stops at 3.0
Oh my sweet summer child...
>>
>>158143996
This is a real issue for me. This development model whatever is super cool but it's also the worst.
>>
>>158145959

Then the Carrack really is the meme ship.
>>
>>158143872
Avenger handles a bit worse than on live and is slow as fuck besides afterburner. Gladius is handling better than on live, but so is the hornet, also is slow as fuck

Frankly I think the gladius will be in even worse shape balance wise vs the hornet and sabre than it is now.
>>
>>158107265
>fully covered face, neck, etc, no skin exposed anywhere
>no gloves at all
>>
>>158148096

Sounds shitty, and I don't imagine it will be fixed because of sabreshits and hornetniggers needing to be top dog at all times.

My disappointment is already rising.
>>
>>158148096

>Avenger handles a bit worse than on live and is slow as fuck besides afterburner. Gladius is handling better than on live, but so is the hornet, also is slow as fuck

Im really starting to convince myself that CIG has no idea what the fuck balance is. They need to pretend that the ship prices dont exist, and learn to tell backers to fuck off. CIG is just fucking spinning their wheels.

Why the fuck did I back this fucking game? There's like 5 people including Chris that know what they're doing, and the rest are just cheap retarded employees who have no idea what they are doing. Fuck crowdfunding. I'm so fucking stupid for putting in nearly 200 in this game.
>>
>>158148358

>I don't imagine it will be fixed because of sabreshits and hornetniggers needing to be top dog at all times.

This is why I fucking hate this community of backers. It's because of shit like this that CIG takes 400% longer than they should for developing the game.
>>
>>158148358
>sabreshits and hornetniggers needing to be top dog at all times

So what you're saying is, you're dissatisfied that the 2 ships meant for combat superiority out-perform poorly-armed $40 starter ships, roleplay police vans and multirole ships, in combat?

Are you going to raise this issue in the forums?
>>
>>158148714

>gladius
>multirole

neck yourself cunt
>>
>>158138367
>Half my people are from County Cork in Ireland
me too! what are the odds
>>
>>158148538
>They need to pretend that the ship prices dont exist

The game has never had any indication of being balanced that way

It's like saying a zergling can't beat an ultralisk so it's pointless
>>
>>158148889
I'm not familiar with the verb "neck" except for meaning to drink, can you please elaborate?

Gladius is a light fighter, it isn't supposed to be equal in combat. It's supposed to be launched from escort carrier groups to intercept bombers and targets smaller than capital ships.
>>
>>158137839
what's this sexy beast?
>>
>>158148538
>i bought a stupid penguin ship avenger because i want to roleplay as a police officer and arrest people

>wahh why do i get killed by military-tier fighters?

Just leave it to the professionals and stop whining. Just buy the combat ships in-game with UEC and stop complaining.

Also get gud.
>>
>>158149141

It's a fighter that can only dogfight and has no other role

meanwhile the hornet can slap a cargo box on itself and still outgun the gladius handily

not to mention the sabre heavily outguns it and goes barely slower

maybe if it had overwhelming performance advantages could I overlook the underwhelming armament, but that isn't the fucking case and never will be because shitcunts who spent 170+ dollars on sabres and SH think everyone else should just be cannon fodder
>>
>>158149206
It's Gladiator-chans lewd backside.
>>
>>158149695
>It's a fighter that can only dogfight and has no other role
A light fighter. It's supposed to engage targets at short range. The fighter you'll find flying above an Idris on a patrol escort. It's not supposed to solo enemy fleets.

Why are you complaining about being sub-optimal in a combat role when you saw the stats page and probably got to test the Gladius first hand, and knew that it wasn't as armed as the Super Hornet?

The Gladius is a nice-looking ship but it's not designed to be a heavy fighter. It's nimble and able to chip away hitpoints gradually.
>>
>>158137839
An older Comm-link mentions Gladiators are sometimes refitted for salvage work by civilian owners, so maybe. That article was like 3 years ago, though.
>>
>>158147725
i know it's not over at 3.0 but I'll at least have all my drake shipfus and some basic content to use them for while 3.1+ happens.

hopefully theres enough baseline content thru 3.+ to warrant the formation of orgs that arent just 10,000 member youtuber/streamer bait
>>
Any german anons go to the citcon event? Apparently they had some special presentation no one is able to talk about.
>>
>>158149695
>the hornet can slap a cargo box on itself and still outgun the gladius handily
By how much?

The cargo box is garbage. Are you seriously suggesting anyone remotely interested in trading is going to use a Hornet? Once the have enough credits they'll just get a Hull A and then work up to a Hull E. The box is just a gimmick, surely?

I know what you're saying, but if you're a skilled pilot can't you blow up other ships in your Gladius? I don't own one but I like them, they are smaller and more nimble.

Also, should CIG just make every combat ship in the game have the same weapons and same DPS? Then refund the difference anyone who bought more expensive ships than the Aurora, like the Saber?

What is your solution?
>>
>>158149936

since you can't read or are just being willfully obtuse

>maybe if it had overwhelming performance advantages

currently it doesn't which it should considering the extremely large gap in firepower, nor will it ever because of retards like you
>>
>>158148096
how are they orchestrating these flight changes? do you feel like theyre balancing everything around a certain ship or are they just making flat global changes across the board?

i'd have thought they'd just adjust everything by a % across the board then finetune from there
>>
>>158150404

I want them to make the gladius performance actually worth the tradeoff in firepower (its speed and agility)

right now it doesn't, and next patch it's looking to be even worse
>>
>>158150314
>not on youtube
>stream not saved as video playback

WHAT ARE YOU HIDING FROM US I MUST KNOW
>>
>>158150410
>currently it doesn't
Good.

>which it should
Nope. It's a cheaper light fighter for interception and escorts.

>considering the extremely large gap in firepower
I feel like you're overstating the difference.

You can just buy a SH and Sabre in the game with UEC, and treat the Gladius as your starter ship. Or upgrade it and stop worrying.
>>
File: harmless patch of tall grass.jpg (679KB, 1920x1200px) Image search: [Google]
harmless patch of tall grass.jpg
679KB, 1920x1200px
>slap the free SH turret onto my ghost
>mount 5 Strife mass drivers
>mfw deleting people at 6km
>>
>>158150741

>90 USD
>starter ship

good idea anon, everyone should just run only 2 ships that are better by almost every metric

truly a shining example of horizontal progression
>>
>>158151167
Your ship is faster, cheaper and more nimble.

But you want it to be even better.

If you want fighter superiority, buy the better ships.

Are you going to stick with your Gladius as your only ship? Upgrade it or enjoy it as it is.
>>
>>158149794
thanks senpai
>>
>>158149318

You might be retarded. Seriously. Nowhere in my post did I say I have any military ships, or an Avenger.

Go read some books, Anon. Might help your reading comprehension.
>>
>>158149102

>The game has never had any indication of being balanced that way

I really cant tell if you're trolling, or just incredibly stupid.
>>
>>158152057
explain then?
>>
>>158152325

Star Citizen's development speaks for itself.
>>
It happens.


German Citcon event had Brian chambers doing a q&, he confirmed they're now making the crossbow
>>
>>158153851
T-the SOTA crossbow... Just as the /scg/ ancient threads foretold. Well, this is it
>>
>>158153851
An elegant weapon... for a more civilized age.
>>
>>158143543
>The deemer predates the current Aegis style guide and wasn't made by CIG, is from next great starship competition

WEW I'M GONNA KILL SOMEONE
>>
>>158153851
did he confirm it's going to be a giant log of antitechnology shit like all the early designs?
>>
>>158153851
they should just source one from the kingdom come guys they're already sharing technology with
>>
>>158155481
It'll be the unfucked good version with actual cord and not """"" energy cord"""". Can someone post the good SOTA crossbow art?
>>
>>158143543
>>158155430
literally who are you quoting
>>
>>158155976
literally randoms from RSI or youtube
>>
>>158155792
it's all in the OP mega, however the 'good' one was the first preliminary design, and they all got shittier and shittier from that point.
>>
>>158156130
The good one is the design sofa referenced in the new deal (while referring to old deal)
>>
>>158156838
???
>>
>>158157627
Sorry for english

New deal referenced by s o t a for cutlass , of show no. Electric bow. First google j age result for star citizen sota crossbow
>>
>>158148096
Oh god, if the avenger is slow, I don't even want to think where the Aurora ended up
>>
File: 3012878-5616422057-30121.jpg (140KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]
3012878-5616422057-30121.jpg
140KB, 1920x1080px
>hear a new update for ED is coming out

"oh maybe this will be cool"

>some graphics updates, a handful of QoL changes, new cargo delivery missions, oh and now you can put a smaller crappier ship inside your huge engineered death machine for some reason
>game is still a mess, no updates or fixes to boring-ass core gameplay loops, still nothing to do that feels even remotely like it matters, still no satisfaction to be had from gameplay outside of grinding for a bigger credit balance
>tfw I got my hopes up for ED again
>>
>>158162042
someone should make a better space game

ED potentially could be really great if braben didn't have autism
>>
>>158162716
To be fair, how much blame can we put on Braben for the ship transfer stuff - maybe just for allowing the vote in the first place?
>>
>>158162716
From what I've been reading and some anons have said, it doesn't seem like Braben is the reason behind the game being shit. It's all the people he hired and the incompetent designers doing the work for him.
>>
>>158162716
They need to focus on improving the multiplayer aspects and giving players something to do that feels like it's having a real effect on the game world, like what Powerplay was supposed to be until it turned out to be boring, grindy, convoluted garbage.

They keep listening to their literally insane forum userbase, who constantly votes to keep the game as mediocre and unfun as possible. It's like they don't want the game to be successful, like they know the game isn't good, so they're just doubling down on shittiness.
>>
>>158162874
>still sperging out about ship transfers

fuck off dad
>>
>>158162949
have you played even 5 minutes of frontier? it's totally him, just look how the current update touts accurate magnetic fields as a feature

realistic space stuff is cool, but it's getting in the way of gameplay at some point
>>
>>158162874
Ship transfers being completely worthless is all thanks to Sandro and the faggot dads. Because for some reason to them tedious gameplay and spending 150 hours traveling through black nothing is the best gameplay there is.
>>
>>158163205
It's crazy. I had no idea there were so many 50+ autists who literally hate fun until I started playing ED.
>>
>>158163319
It's the strangest kind of mid life crisis. At least the 50+ people that buy cars get something useful out of their crisis. These people just spend their paycheck's/retirement money on a ship skins and ugly DIY cockpit setups. I saw one asshole that went as far as to make a fucking bathtub setup for ED.
>>
>>158163205
you don't need to travel all the way across the bubble every day you know

fuck off dad, you're the person they talk about when they say the grind is all in your head
>>
File: dafuk.jpg (24KB, 467x506px) Image search: [Google]
dafuk.jpg
24KB, 467x506px
>>158163775
>quotes "the grind is all in your head" argument while calling other people dads
>>
>>158164351
the game has problems, not catering to your self destructive behaviour is not one of them

every fucking time it's ship transfer this, ship transfer that, like it's the only fucking thing you can do in the game is transfer ships 24/7, like it's gonna make trading or mining or whatever more fun, or make pvp better

it's completely fucking irrelevant and the only reason you care is because you're a dad who spends all your time in the game running 200 ly grind routes
>>
>>158161147
is good video, yes?
i am to be of the search of youtube for this
>>
>people think the gladius should be good

It's the fucking tutorial ship for sq42. It was never meant to compete with anything. It even took over the avenger's place in the lore as the old navy fighter that the hornet was purchased to replace.

It was never going to be good and you're retarded if you bought one.
>>
>>158164539
I don't play anymore, m8, I just check in to see if it's still shit every now and then.

But yeah, changing a new QoL feature to make it shittier is stupid, no idea how you can even pretend to argue the other side of that issue with a straight face.
>>
>>158164715
Stop responding to the false flagger calling us dads.
>>
How 2 exit Hornet in space?

"Reduce Velocity to stabilize " while im at 0 velocity and no movement
>>
>>158166584
If you're on legacy controls, CTRL F and you hold it. If you're on new controls, hold F should work.
>>
>>158167146
You're right but it was bugged, had to commit suicide
>>
>>158161152
The aurora hasn't gotten a second pass yet, so it's still at 95 for the MR and 90 for the LN like what the early leak said. I have no idea if that number will go up next pass or not. The connie and freelancer just got boosted to where they're now faster in SCM mode than some of the small fighters, while none of the small ships got a SCM increase. It seems like they clearly want the ships to have a much narrower combat speed range than before, but so far I haven't seen any examples of how they plan on making that the least bit balanced though .
>>
File: Cutlass Black.jpg (225KB, 1024x768px) Image search: [Google]
Cutlass Black.jpg
225KB, 1024x768px
What weapons should I put on this bad boy?
>>
File: ScreenShot0857.jpg (403KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]
ScreenShot0857.jpg
403KB, 1920x1080px
>>158168370
panthers for energy, broadswords for ballistic
>>
>>158168370
fixed s3s / broadswords if you like shooting things at rediculous angles without line of sight and denying your turret gunner clean stable shots

otherwise gimballed tarantulas / badgers / APARs. then again I valuesustained DPS over eventually landing a more lethal shot on something. not sure how these fixed gun only memers manage to enjoy the game or kill things efficiently

broadswords or panthers for turret no question
>>
>>158162949

Holy shit, sounds exactly like Star Citizen.
>>
@158170913
Holy shit, sounds exactly like bait.
>>
>>158171049
>@

is this some kind of new (you) denial weapon or are people genuinely bringing twitter and reddit jargon here
>>
>>158171520
(you) denial. People are starting to catch on to shitposters finally.
>>
File: Hornet_F7C_M_Super_Hornet-1.jpg (1MB, 3300x1800px) Image search: [Google]
Hornet_F7C_M_Super_Hornet-1.jpg
1MB, 3300x1800px
What should I kit my SH with? I've been flying around with 5 gimbaled Badgers but it just doesn't seem to so much.

I don't want to go ballistics really. I tried all longswords and it just wasnt my thing. Is there other decent energy based weapons that i can gimbal other than Badgers?

TLDR; What loadouts do people use for SH?
>>
>>158110767
That's not a guy...
>>
>>158172095
any combination of APARs and badgers is outstanding

badgers for literal infinite spam fire, APARs for 1 shotting bits of ships or 1 shotting them entirely with the right shot placement with no downside other than 60 max ammo and low ROF

see
>>158151067
>>
File: vks.jpg (1MB, 6702x3531px) Image search: [Google]
vks.jpg
1MB, 6702x3531px
shipfu
>>
>>158164601

dumbest post I've seen tonight

just kill yourself
>>
File: 1rTCuZS.jpg (3MB, 3910x2714px) Image search: [Google]
1rTCuZS.jpg
3MB, 3910x2714px
>>158172880
Sorry I'm fairly new to changing loadouts what are "APARs"? Apoc arms?
>>
>>158173467

https://robertsspaceindustries.com/electronic-access/Weapon-Roms/Strife-Mass-Driver
>>
>>158173183
There is some logic behind him. They probably would want the sq42 gladius to be a bit shit so when you finally qualify to fly a hornet, it seems like a massive upgrade instead of just a sidegrade.
>>
>>158170650
>not sure how these fixed gun only memers manage to enjoy the game or kill things efficiently

by flyin gud
>>
>>158174474

ok

the military hornet is just a bit different than some civvie shit with a hornet skin

also saying THIS SHIP WAS ALWAYS MEANT TO BE SHIT is dumb as fuck and something i'd expect to see on the rsi forums
>>
>>158172880
Sounds like the Glaive but not shit
>>
>>158174474
>>158175115

also its entirely possible to have different combat balance in the pu than a sp game where you're the big bad rookie hero
>>
>>158173183
>>158175115
>Mustang should beat Buccaneer

lelelel
>>
>>158175389
didn't seem to stop them from clearly designing the retaliator for single player payload escort missions instead of PU play.
>>
TWO
POINT
SIX
WHEN
>>
>>158175871

not really comparable

the gladius can be fixed with number adjustments

the current tali design is an engineering clusterfuck on the interior and turret placement
>>
>>158176143
evocati are running thru iterations of like 1/5th of 2.6's content currently, so like 2 weeks before main PTU gets it and we can get some videos at least

mid-late nov
>>
>>158175115
Aurora.
>>
>>158178621
True, but they also added variants that were intended to be non-shit versions of it for people who really liked the Aurora... but then hornet niggers got it nerfed
>>
How do you go faster in the ship? The hornet seems to cap out at 610 Velocity unless I'm doing something wrong which I hope so because I don't even see me reaching the missions at this rate.
>>
>>158180045
You paint the ship red.
>>
File: 1472901363526.jpg (37KB, 379x503px) Image search: [Google]
1472901363526.jpg
37KB, 379x503px
>>158180045
>>
>>158180045
fucking press B
>>
>GAME
THERE IS NO GAME JUST A CRYENGINE MODEL VIEWER BEHHH P2W DEREK SMART >VED >KONG >IMPLYING NOT VAPORWARE MY FRIENDS ON V TOLD ME TH
>>
@158181456

heh, didn't think i'd get to test out this new weapon so soon. you're finished, goon.
>>
>>158181456
I'd just like to interject for a moment. What you’re referring to as Cryengine, is in fact, a heavily modified version of Cryengine, or as I’ve recently taken to calling it, Starengine.
>>
File: 1458061937175.jpg (23KB, 400x524px) Image search: [Google]
1458061937175.jpg
23KB, 400x524px
>>158180045
>>
>>158168370
So I think I got my Cutlass bugged maybe, cause I the longswords dont come with ammo anymore.
>>
>>158181771
this is a pretty big issue for any given limited ammo gun atm - if it's the stock ones that came with the turret idk what to tell you

i do know that i've got 6 size 3 gimballs that won't work with any ammo weapon, and i have to go back and forth between arena commander to figure which fucking ones dont work

never take gimballs off of free fly ships or subscriber perk ships, they go to the top of your stack of loose gimballs and youre fucked on using gimballs unless you want to test guns in AC 30 times til you find the one you actually own/rented, i've got a stack of 6 right now i took off this fucking starfarer that effectively made me stop caring about playing til november
>>
>>158182086
Well my longswords are the stock one that I had stock with my Cutlass, I moved them from my turret down onto my wing mounts. If anything i'll just rent Panthers and stick them everywhere or mount Mass Drivers.
>>
>>158182427
yeah, just keep everything where it started i guess. if gimballs arent involved i'm not sure what it is. one of the issues thats making 2.5 unplayable for me
>>
my Gimbal is the primary mount frontal mount on the Cutlass
>>
what space-ship is tha best™
>>
>>158183991
Currently the Aegis Vanguard
>>
>>158183991
The Javelin is the most expensive ship
>>
>>158183991
Remeemer
>>
File: 1452205126512.jpg (319KB, 1500x844px) Image search: [Google]
1452205126512.jpg
319KB, 1500x844px
>>158186359
>>
>>158176185
All this is headcanon shit, it doesn't matter if that size torpedo are balanced to be as vital for taking on cap ships as CIG have made it clear they are supposed to be.
>>
File: Javelin_REV3_WIP_Hobbins.png (976KB, 2400x1360px) Image search: [Google]
Javelin_REV3_WIP_Hobbins.png
976KB, 2400x1360px
Discussion : Do you think the Javelin destroyer should have a hangar/rover ramp ?

I'm asking that because some people are surprised enough the Polaris ended up as a mini-frigate.
Me I'm not surprised for Capital ship to have a way to carry personnel/cargo (the argo make a lot of sense here), but limiting them to nubs fighter would have been good enough.

So I think CIG wanted to let players have at least one Qjump capable fighter with them.
>>
>>158189197

>rover ramp

it can't land in atmo
>>
>>158189197
for reference :
https://robertsspaceindustries.com/comm-link/transmission/14335-Introducing-The-Javelin-Destroyer
>>
File: JavelinDestroyer_ROUGH_C.png (3MB, 2952x1503px) Image search: [Google]
JavelinDestroyer_ROUGH_C.png
3MB, 2952x1503px
>>158189252
The original concept sure did and you can still see the engine hinge.
It's probably the biggest one that can
>>
>>158189476
>pre-pre-concept art

that pic shows the javelin being polaris sized. sure as hell isnt anything close to the official concept we've had for 2 years or what was in the last demo
>>
>>158172095
>I have the best single fighter ship and it is not enough, where should I pump more USD?!
>>
>>158189476
well now we know how the reclaimer design came to be
>>
>>158190551
That's not even remotely what I'm implying. Plus you don't need to spend real money on weapons if you are half awake in AC.
>>
File: 3D size chart.jpg (128KB, 1459x943px) Image search: [Google]
3D size chart.jpg
128KB, 1459x943px
>>158190350
The Javelin still have rotating engines, what do you think this is for ?
It is not even that much bigger than the Idris

https://robertsspaceindustries.com/comm-link/transmission/14335-Introducing-The-Javelin-Destroyer
>>
>>158192145
I know Im just salty because my toaster computer is stopping me from joining the forever Alpha madness

>beeing poorfag
;_;
>>
>>158192549
>spending more money than minimum on a $100 million game
>>
>>158192854
what are you trying to say?
>>
>>158192854
Anon, this anon is talking about not being able to afford a powerful PC that can run it, not more ships.
>>
>>158192549
Why did you spend money on an incomplete game if you don't have the rig to run it properly?
>>
>>158193694
>americans
>>
>>158193694
by the time it is complete a rig that can run it properly will be cheap
>>
Hey fellas, does the FALL2016 have the same content as the one you'd get by buying the game?

And what do you guys do in-game most of the time?
>>
What's a good credits value to switch over to the Python for long range hauling missions? I assume I need twice the ship price, similar to everything else?
>>
File: 1477179060084.jpg (75KB, 1059x352px) Image search: [Google]
1477179060084.jpg
75KB, 1059x352px
>>158192549
>stopping me from joining the forever Alpha madness
Watch wtfosaurus on Twitch. He spawns on Olisar, gets in a ship, travels to Kareah, ejects, lands, goes inside and either gets killed or kills someone else. He'll literally play the same thing over and over again for 3-4 hours.

Even imagining doing that for 3-4 hours is boring enough.

You aren't missing much, stop worrying about it. Until they fix the shitty netcode there's hardly anything fun to experience. You'll get face to face with someone and your FPS will drop to single digits.

The only thing you'll probably want to play is Arena Commander, for getting used to the controls, but just wait while they work on the netcode.
>>
>>158196279
>is the freeflight same as the actual game
Yes
>What do you guys do most of the time?
Fucking about in Crusader, shopping in ArcCorp, and playing a fuckton of Vanduul Swarm
>>
>>158196279
>And what do you guys do in-game most of the time?

Either racing in a poorly-designed course, exploring a mini system in the PU, or Vanduul swarm or the mini PVP arena.
>>
>>158196279
>And what do you guys do in-game most of the time?

alt tab to scg and shitpost about best ship
>>
>>158196625
This, we hardly ever discuss the Reclaimer, though.
>>
>>158196625
Spectrum will make your life easier.
>>
File: 1477166390371.jpg (24KB, 564x460px) Image search: [Google]
1477166390371.jpg
24KB, 564x460px
>>158196625
So what are the best exploration ships? Also, how much would I have to grind to get one if I just wanna pay real monies once, just to get my starter package?
>>
File: Drake_Herald_Transmit.jpg (2MB, 3812x2127px) Image search: [Google]
Drake_Herald_Transmit.jpg
2MB, 3812x2127px
>>158196774

All priced from lowest to highest cost.
Mustang Beta
315p
Freelancer Dur
Terrapin
Constellation Aquila
Carrack

Honorable mentions (convertable to exploration):
Herald
Hornet Tracker
Gladiator
Constellation Taurus
Constellation Andromeda
Reclaimer (treasure hunter in old-lore but are subpar to the Carrack in the role. )
>>
>>158196941
all of these seem nice and now I got a better idea of how I would like to progress through the game, thanks pal
>>
I may as well do the other ship progression lines too.

Bombers/Missile boats:
Mustang Delta (Light Fighter, 36-50(?) S0/Micro Rockets)
Herald (16x S2(S3?) Missiles, intented for dataspike missiles but can mount any type)
Freelancer MIS Missile Boat (Fighter Screen, 10x s2, 46x S3 (default 26, expandable internal missile rack)
Gladiator Bomber (Bomber, 4x s3, 4x S5("Torpedo")
Constellation Andromeda (28x S1 Missiles, 20x S2 Missiles)
Polaris Corvette (24x S10 Torpedos, 32x S3 Missiles)
>>
>>158198508
>24 S10 torps
>32 S3 missiles
>tons of turrets with S4s
>can carry a fighter

what kind of fuckery
>>
>>158198586
Only 30 million credits, goy. $750 cash...
>>
File: 1450438574353.jpg (81KB, 1010x562px) Image search: [Google]
1450438574353.jpg
81KB, 1010x562px
>>158198712
>30 million credits
t. event manager
>>
>>158198508
#RehabilitateTheRetaliator
>>
>>158198712
If those stats stay true, there doesn't seem to be a point in owning an Idris when it comes to a combat role. You're potentially able to kill one, are more maneuverable and clearly less expensive to run or outright buy. 2 Polarii (Polarises?) and a sizeable group of fighters, like 12 or so, will be unstoppable.

Can't wait for it to be flight ready in 2018 to not be even close to what they say it is now.
>>
File: Merchantman-Bestship.jpg (554KB, 4000x2162px) Image search: [Google]
Merchantman-Bestship.jpg
554KB, 4000x2162px
>>158198508
>>158196941

Cargo:
Aurora ES/LN/MR/LX (25 SCU)
Reliant (30 SCU)
Aurora CL (45 SCU)
Hull-A (48)
Freelancer (51 SCU)
Freelancer MAX (123 SCU)
Hull-B (750 SCU)
Constellation Taurus (236 SCU)
Caterpillar (512 SCU)
Starfarer (4043 SCU)
Banu Merchantman (5017 SCU)
Hull-C (4608 SCU)
Hull-D (20736 SCU)
Hull-E (98304 SCU)

Honorable mentions:
Avenger ( SCU)
Aegis Retaliator (128 SCU, cargo configuration)
Anvil Carrack (1057 SCU)
Reclaimer (6266 ((unsorted in a pile in the back, not for valuable transport)) SCU)
>>
>>158199061
I'm

Light Fighters:
P-52
P-72
Mustang
Aurora LN
Reliant Tana
Avenger
325A
Mustang Delta
Gladius
M50
350R
Khartu-AL
Sabre

Medium Fighters:
Buccaneer
Hornet F7 series
Gladiator
Sabre
Scythe

Heavy Fighters:
Cutlass-Series (I wouldn't consider it a Medium or Light fighter, this seems the best classifcation. Smaller/Budge "Heavy" Fighter)
Freelancer MIS
Vanguard
Redeemer
Stinger

Honorable mentions:
300i/315p
Freelancer
Terrapin
Constellation Andromeda
>>
File: PolarisAttack.jpg (935KB, 5362x2825px) Image search: [Google]
PolarisAttack.jpg
935KB, 5362x2825px
>>158199563
Ships designed, (or can be utilized) for Command and Control of individual fighter squads or fleet movement.


C&C:
Hornet F7C-R
Hornet F7C-M
Terrapin
Constellation Andromeda
Constellation Aquila
Constellation Pheonix
890 Jump
Polaris Corvette
Idris Frigate
Javelin Destroyer
Enoch Cruiser
Ares Battlecruiser
Bengal Carrier
>>
File: Baseless prediction.jpg (53KB, 755x582px) Image search: [Google]
Baseless prediction.jpg
53KB, 755x582px
>>
>>158199815
Multi-Role noncommittal ships:
Aurora Series(++)
Reliant Series(+)
Avenger Titan(++)
Freelancer Series (+++)
Constellation Series(+++)
Redeemer(++++)
Retaliator(++++)
Caterpillar (++++)
Starfarer(+)
Hull-Series(++++)
Polaris Corvette (+)
Idris-P(++)

What I'd quallify as "Versatile" would be any ships that can fight and carry cargo, or be moddified to other roles
>>
>>158200220
I agree with this. I'd love the addition of more robust EMP weapons, and maybe even a Starfarer-Caterpillar sized Police/Pirate/Militia/Bounty-Hunting ship with a large fixed EMP weapon to fry shields and systems.

https://youtu.be/5BkOVSFb2Zw?t=153
>>
>>158200534
I think that's the plan but I feel like the energy system isn't fleshed out yet
>>
File: 1476123349306.png (561KB, 1366x768px) Image search: [Google]
1476123349306.png
561KB, 1366x768px
> Polaris
> Ships designed, (or can be utilized) for Command and Control of individual fighter squads or fleet movement.

This statement make me think that if we don't get some sort of homesteading, defending their "flagship" will represent the bulk of what do Organization even beyond securing a place.

Star Citizen will not be anywhere as big and persistent as MMO like Eve Online, so even if Org will obviously try to conquer and defend a place, the "only" 100 systems plus the instancing mean that the only thing really persistent would be the spaceship themselves.

What do you think ?
Day one, everybody grief that insufferable whale's Idris
>>
>>158201362
>Day one, everybody grief that insufferable whale's Idris

>Day everyday. Still griefing whale's Idris'
>>
>>158201362
>Star Citizen will not be anywhere as big and persistent as MMO like Eve Online

I feel like this statement is only half true, as the scale in both games is much different. I'd imagine you can pretty safely hide a single fighter in SC on a planet "controlled" by a Organization. If they do let the unclaimed systems be fought over by players, I can imagine a lot of the larger Orgs will actively be patroling their systems and planets which will make smuggling items to those systems pretty interesting, especially if smugglers make little trade depots in the badlands to exchange items illegal in that system.
>>
File: 1456264934930.jpg (168KB, 1000x1000px) Image search: [Google]
1456264934930.jpg
168KB, 1000x1000px
>>158200249
>Hull series
>multirole
>>
File: HullLanding.jpg (458KB, 3840x2160px) Image search: [Google]
HullLanding.jpg
458KB, 3840x2160px
>>158202118
You better believe it.

>Their potential load (and modularity) is unparalleled, however: no other ship allows as much room to store goods or to modify towards another role!

>Owing to the ubiquity of the cargo pallet system, many manufacturers have created third party addons capable of taking advantage of the Hull superstructure. These range from additional ship upgrades (shield generators, sensor suites and the like) to ‘stealth’ cargo pods to gimbaled turrets and other weapons which can take the place of some cargo pallets on larger ships (with a corresponding reduction in cargo capacity.) As a result of these “expansion ports,” the Hull series is one of the most modular starships available; many view it as a platform upon which to build as much as the bulk hauler it was designed as.

>With extensive after-market options, the Hull E have been adopted as everything from colonial supply trains to survey equipment platforms to orbital defensive platforms. With space for the largest possible set of container types, the properly equipped Hull E can carry everything from iron ore to passengers to fully functional spacecraft!
>>
>>158201530
I look forward to it. Unfortunately I have a feeling that people that bought Idrises are going to be leaving them docked for a while out of fear of roving bands of pirates immediately grabbing it from them.
>>
>>158202234
I'll believe it when I see it working in the game. The concept sale posts and Q&As are about as trustworthy as Ben.
>>
>>158202347
who do you think writes them?
>>
>>158201362
Well I do hope we get a homestead feature. Or at least some planet surface stations.
Are all Idris sold so far LTI ?
Would be fun to sneak up with a Tali on someone with a not insured Idris flapping his e-peen around
>>
File: hullattackship.jpg (858KB, 1909x1255px) Image search: [Google]
hullattackship.jpg
858KB, 1909x1255px
>>158202118
>replace all cargo boxes with carriages with port holes
>load up a bunch of marines in them
>become a ball of death
>>
>>158201879
Eve Online has thousand of system and gate connecting each of them so an Org can claim a few system and be totally ignored.
But in Star Citizen even with 50 unclaimed systems there will only be a few gate to them (plus the gate's size). If players are anywhere as greedy and competitive as they already are, they'll never be able to settle there for long, even on particular spot of a planet.

And then there's the Instancing that make it possible (out of necessity) to have players at the same place but not in the same instance. If 2 Org can be at the same jump point without seeing each others, I would say that the only reason/mean they'll want to see each other is to blowup the others' Flagship (regardless of the place)

just speculating

>>158202234
I look forward space-fighter hiding in cargo pallet.
>>
File: 1 for the chairman.jpg (69KB, 456x320px) Image search: [Google]
1 for the chairman.jpg
69KB, 456x320px
ded
>>
where are all the shitposters?
>>
>>158205676
It's not worth shitposting anymore.
>>
>>158205798
>gamescon was lame
>citizencon was shit

SC dead
>>
>Runs smooth on hangar and the space command wave mode thing.
>Go to the "universe"
>main port, dipping high 20s average.
>Go to a scavange place with 2 other people in the area with pirates spawning
>10 fps

Wew lad.
>>
>>158206345
Look up how to force the universe into offline mode. You'll get 60 fps. Or just hope for an empty server
>>
File: Avenger_EMP_01.jpg (2MB, 3840x2157px) Image search: [Google]
Avenger_EMP_01.jpg
2MB, 3840x2157px
Do any sane people own this ship or is it just for fucking around with no real purpose?
>>
hi fellow /edg/elords

so now that sothis/ceos is ded, what are some good ways to make the shekels?
>>
>>158206907
there is a video of an Avenger EMP(probably) who almost btfo a Gemini fully crewed

shit was funny how they got panic and started running away
>>
File: 1416510219113.jpg (3MB, 3514x2827px) Image search: [Google]
1416510219113.jpg
3MB, 3514x2827px
>>158206907
>star citizen
>sane people
>>
>>158207048
Do you remember the video?
>>
>>158201362

I think it's hard to measure how big the game is versus EVE. Sure the volume of planets and star systems is going to be smaller than EVE. But keep in mind that Star Citizen is also shooting for greater density as far as things to see and do. The scope of the two games, when put side by side, are very different.

The difference in scope is evident even for the ships themselves. The ships of EVE, everything from a Frigate to a Titan are a player's avatar and the crews thereof basically do not exist in any tangible way due to the nature of the game. The ships of Star Citizen are tangible locations and your crew are characters to be interacted with.

So, sure, if you're talking raw numbers then EVE with its 8,000 or so star systems could be called bigger than Star Citizen with its 100+ systems. That said it's important to take into account what's in those star systems.

7.5 billion kilometers of places to go, things to do, and characters to interact with can be "bigger" than 7.5 trillion kilometers of mostly empty space.
>>
File: 20161023120037_1.jpg (505KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]
20161023120037_1.jpg
505KB, 1920x1080px
that's a nice ship you have there CMDR be a shame if I just slammed into the planet.
>>
>>158208742
how many G's?
>>
star citizen or elite dangerous?
elite looks better for now but there's no out of ship gameplay but isn't it supposed to be added in future?
>>
>>158210435
>Supposed to be added

Supposed to be. But with the rate Frontier has been going at, EVA is going to be added by the time Star Citizen 4.0 is out.
>>
>>158210435
elite if you want to play now, SC if you want to sit here shitposting all day for 6 months while riding the hype train
>>
>>158210435
Star Citizen will be better in the long run.

T. /edg/uy who jumped ship to SC after being fucked over by FTroop
>>
>>158210694
>>158210815
well I was thinking about buying Elite if they put it on 50% sale, but it feels like Star Citizen would be much more complex and iteresting, if it doesn't crash with no survivors of course
>>
>>158211275
$15 elite sales happen now and then, that's a good time to buy
>>
So is the Caterpillar just a normal "Cargo Ship?"
>>
>>158211913

If by "cargo ship" you mean pirate boarding craft.
>>
>>158211913
It's a ruggedized cargo ship.
Better armed, better armored and modular enough to be specialized into a niche role.
Think of it like the treatment freighters get in wartime. It wont stand up to a real warship but It will be able to swat away patrol boats and pirates, and depending on who is driving be able to pursue and overpower other cargo ships itself. And because it's at cargo ship at a heart you actually have space to carry away the plunder yourself.

Most pirate ships during the age of sail were little more than armed merchants with mutinous crews. the goal of a pirate i'snt to blast its targets to bits its to disable them and steal their shit intact, ideally cargo and ship both.
>>
>>158212381
That sounds fun, hopefully they add a voice com in there and communicate with the game. Act like a Friendly cargo vessel then open up on them and disable their ships. Watch as they can only look on in horror as "Techs" climb aboard their ship and loot everything saying they're fixing it.
>>
Is it just me, or is the Gladius underpowered, or at least it's weapon selection?

I'm flying it with three laser repeaters, and I just flew against some hornets and some sabres.

I was hitting every single shot, circling around them and I overheat before I get to do any damage. What gives?
>>
>>158213986
>I was hitting every single shot
>I overheat before I get to do any damage
Contradictory statements. Get a better ship or stop crying about the Gladius.
>>
File: Is that a grinder.jpg (561KB, 3500x1968px) Image search: [Google]
Is that a grinder.jpg
561KB, 3500x1968px
>>158210435
I originally planned to buy both. Then I heard about Elite Dangerous splitting its feature into 2 games at different price, ever since I'm afraid of buying it and discovering I need a new DLC to have more feature.

>>158212164
As far as I know it's a poor man's corvette from what I heard about customizing it by adding whatever module you want including turret

...if of course the Polaris didn't redefine corvette (it's a fregate to me)
>>
>>158211913
If the freelancer is 50% cargo and 50% fighting and the Hull C is 100% cargo, than the catapillar would be 25% fighting 75% cargo.
>>
>>158214589
>Contradictory statements.
Yeah, only if you're a retarded pedant.

Point is, before I get a kill I'm overheating and need to stop firing.

Example non-retarded conclusions:
"Use a better gun/loadout"

Tips?
>>
They're not supposed to sync everyone up to 30 fps like they do now in the final game, right?
>>
>>158214670
>splitting its feature into 2 games at different price
you mean the horizons dlc? or arena?
yeah that's the reason I wait for 50% sale, I ain't paying double the price to have basic features
that's why I'm also looking forward to star citizen, it looks so much more complex with all controling your character rather than spaceship, first person gameplay, being able to enter stations and go around your ship
but I'm afraid it will fail and end like no man's sky, all these millions from crowdfunding wasted
on the other hand elite is supposed to have all this added, but it might end up like horizons as dlc
>>
>>158216594
He's talking about Horizons. What he fails to mention is the strong possibility that the game will keep splitting and fragmenting. How is Frontier going to do this? There are going to be people with Base game only playing people that only have base game and Horizons playing with people that have base game, plus horizons plus the third "expansion pack", playing with people that have base game plus horizons plus third, and fourth.

What a clusterfuck.
>>
File: ss+(2016-10-23+at+02.09.24).jpg (9KB, 156x112px) Image search: [Google]
ss+(2016-10-23+at+02.09.24).jpg
9KB, 156x112px
>>158210191
1.97g you can see it in the screenshot.
>>
Do you recommend the constellation? If so, which variant?

I want one with LTI.
>>
>>158216912
Nah man, Frontier said they're going to stop supporting versions before Horizons when the next xpac comes out
>>
>>158216912
yeah, that's why I'm reluctant to buying it outside of big sale, because there will be another DLC for 20 euros, then another and another, all adding stuff that should be there from day one
let's hope star citizen will be complete at release date, I think they said that there won't be any paid dlcs
>>
File: 1476046611609.jpg (1MB, 3840x2160px) Image search: [Google]
1476046611609.jpg
1MB, 3840x2160px
>>158217225
As long as you're aware that it's a freighter and not some "space superiority platform" like some people on RSI believe it's pretty good. Ridiculous frontal firepower (4 gimbaled S4, 28 S1 and 72 S2 missiles) plus having the Merlin to harass or just dick around in is kinda neat.
I'd recommend the Aquila since it comes with the Rover (but less S1 missiles and -1 turret). In the final game you could just rip the scanners out and put weapons back in if you wanted to.
>>
>>158217260
Wait, what?

>>158217263
I remember someone trying to convince me to buy Horizons.

>You'll just be behind on everything you know, if you wait to buy it.

I'm glad I didn't listen to them.
>>
>>158217668
Neat. But is the Aquila even out yet?
>>
>>158217260
so buy horizons or fuck off?
>>
>>158217828
It's in 3.0.
>>
why is entering my 325 so difficult, finding where exactly to stand is a pain in the ass
>>
>>158217885
>>158217668
What's the difference between CCU'd Andromeda's and others?
>>
>>158218465
None.
>>
>>158218465
Insurance? CCUs only have the insurance of the original ship the CCU is applied to
>>
>>158220408
LTI doesn't follow the ship?
>>
Is there a way to change throttle mode in star citizen so it doesn't "hold" the throttle automatically, and only thrusts forwards when I press W?
>>
>>158220618
Nope. If a ship currently has LTI and you get a CCU and apply it to a (for example) six month insurance ship, it'll only have six months. You need to melt the ship and use the store credit for the new LTI ship if you want LTI. CCU only changes the ship, not insurance.
>>
>>158217668
But annon, the constellations sole role is to be better than other ships. Thats why it is a space superiority plataform. It is suppoed to outperform everything else.
>>
>>158215352
>Tips?
Get a better ship or a refund.

>enter a F1 race in a ford escort
>complain that your top speed isnt good enough to beat F1 cars

>enter arena commander in your light fighter
>complain that your firepower isnt good enough to beat heavy fighters
>>
>>158207502
DanGheesling has a recent ish one where they swarm a gemini with warlocks

all it does is cut shields and engines for a few seconds, but if you've got a larger ship waiting there to blow them to hell this is invaluable. or if shields ever have anything to do with boarding

warning: hes an autistic canadian who can't type, speak english, or play this game for his life, and makes hundreds of videos of basically him being a cameraman for his org
>>
>>158211913
poor man's endeavor, poor man's destroyer, or if youre a very boring person, it can haul a solid amount of cargo while maintaining some other utility in alot of other things

4 cargo modules which should be able to be repurposed, and a 5th nose room which may or may not be a hangar/salvage grinder. they avoided that room in the most recent video but it had large bulkhead doors.
>>
>>158215352
Ignore that autist. Put Bulldogs/badgers/Panthers on all your guns and you'll be able to shoot for days and do significant damage while you're at it. Component system will let us use REC and Alpha UEC to get better coolers as well.
>>
>>158215352
Also Gladius requires a precise oppertunist attack style, consider the Buccaneer/Cutlass/Hornet if you want to rely more on firepower than being nimble
>>
>>158223298
>Ignore that autist
This is funny because he already said he was using energy repeaters and claimed he was landing 100% of his shots and doing no damage and overheating.

You call me an autist? LOL :^)
>>
>>158223464
>This is funny because he already said he was using energy repeaters and claimed he was landing 100% of his shots and doing no damage and overheating.

I don't understand how that changes the fact I believe you have impaired social interaction, verbal and non-verbal communication, and restricted and repetitive behavior.
>>
>>158224090
Well you ignored what he said and insulted someone who gave better, more concise advice. It seems like you're the one with impaired communication but are projecting your insecurities on to me. I find it funny, it's ironic.

Thanks for keeping the thread bumped, CMDR o7
>>
>>158224394
>it was that other anon
Nice samefag, bro
>>
>>158213986
>overheating with bulldogs/badgers/panthers

you're doing something very wrong or you're missing ship components

also gladius against hornet is a poor decision for you. it's a better ship. sabre is a MUCH better ship, obviously, since it's the canon f22 to the f18 that is the gladius
>>
File: About Paying politic.jpg (663KB, 1596x1836px) Image search: [Google]
About Paying politic.jpg
663KB, 1596x1836px
>>158216594 >>158216912
As said I meant the Horizon "dlc".
I wonder how I "fail to mention that" btw, I just said the risk of the game splitting (again) is the reason I'm not buying it.

For all the shit SC get because it sell jpeg, at least the project maker is asking us to believe a throughout promise of why there will not be any new hidden cost.
The only black spot we are waiting to smear him with is how "grindy" the game would be that he would sell "limited" amount of EUC for (under the pretext of balancing Whales versus Korean-grinder and lessening account-blackmarket).

>>158217260
So basically if you don't upgrade you are left with half a game ? Unless they offered freely the upgrade out of goodwill (fat chance) I'm definitely staying away from it.
>>
>>158224394
>three laser repeaters that overheat
>assume he's talking about default bulldogs when he's clearled mounted three repeaters that overheart
>clearly M3As

You're definitely a retarded
>>
>>158224901
>You're definitely a retarded
Well since you're calling the M3A a laser repeater, we'll agree to disagree.

Thanks for the bump.
>>
>>158224705
The thing is, you can confidently engage either a Sabre or a Hornet 1v1 since you're just that more agile and hard to hit.

But taking them down with the limited weaponry of a Gladius is difficult. Their shields are simply too strong.
>>
So, capital ships with tons of fixed weapons on each side aka broadsides, do you guys think CIG will ever make something like that?
>>
>>158228706
http://store.steampowered.com/app/363680/

has anyone played battlefleet gothic armada?

Looks interesting
>>
>>158228706
Closest you'll get is a Caterpillar filled with men armed with Infantry railguns, or a future Caterpillar Broadside module
>>
File: PolarisAmbush.webm (3MB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]
PolarisAmbush.webm
3MB, 1280x720px
>>158228706
>>
>>158229684
Oops, was responding to this guy >>158228906
>>
ded gem ded thread
>>
File: 1451675645504.jpg (2MB, 2069x1344px) Image search: [Google]
1451675645504.jpg
2MB, 2069x1344px
don't mind me just shaking the coffin
>>
>>158228706
No, fixed broadside guns were obsolete a hundred years ago in a two dimension battlespace, IE surface fleet combat. They will be even less effective/limiting in a 3 dimensional battlespace. Theres a similar argument to made that even turrets are of questionable use, why not simply treat the entire ship as a turret and aim it, presenting your entire armament, best armor and slimmest profile on a single axis towards the enemy.

Hence the "gigantic railgun with engines and a command deck" style dreadnoughts you always see in scifi.

Fighting broadside or in an orbital path around you target has advantages, a drum Ive beaten before is the being able to shoot in one direction and move in a different direction is an absolute necessity, turreted guns alo you to do that in a way that fixed, gimballed and broadside guns simply do not, broadside being the worst offenders in that they dictate your path in order to keep engaging a target while also presenting what is usually one of your largest cross sectional profiles. Of course were only talking about larger slower, not terrible maneuverable craft here, if your starship can pitch yaw and strafe rapidly them it make absolute sense to have a single axis of fire and just aim the entire ship.

Warhammer 40k is many things but even vaguely realistic isn't one of them.
>>
File: Command_module_01a_Gurmukh.png (562KB, 1200x675px) Image search: [Google]
Command_module_01a_Gurmukh.png
562KB, 1200x675px
>>158234818
What do you think would be SC equivalent to that ship ?

I would love to say Merchantman because it scream blockade-runner but the Caterpillar probably fit better visually
>>
i want to control a big fucking turret but we haven't had a ship that releases my desires yet
>>
File: f7c-m.png (1MB, 1152x768px) Image search: [Google]
f7c-m.png
1MB, 1152x768px
>>158237525
>big fucking turret
Look no further, my son.
>>
What are some good hornet loadouts?
>>
File: cutlassdakka.webm (3MB, 852x476px) Image search: [Google]
cutlassdakka.webm
3MB, 852x476px
>>158238395
you call THAT a turret?
>>
>>158238841
wew, what guns are those? I never kept up with this shit and now all the generic gun names have me lost.
>>
>>158238798

5x fixed broadswords, panthers

gimballed s2 tarantulas, bulldogs, or mass drivers
>>
>>158238917
I think it's the turret off the Vanguard.
It's not possible, this was just someone messing around with xml files.
>>
>>158238841
>>158238395

fug. I hope we get more unmanned turrets
>>
>>158239134
is the vanguard using some unique non-swappable guns? I just want dat dakka
>>
>>158238395
I really fucking wish the Gladiator had the same turret. It looks retarded with its current turret
>>
>>158238395
not big enough, i want a cannon that fire shells the size of cars
>>
>>158238917
For awhile after they made the starfarer hanger ready, you could take the side turrets off of it and put it in place of the Cutlass' manned turret giving it a pair of pilot controlled S4 guns.

They quickly fixed it because fuck the cutlass having nice things
>>
>"Cyber bullying is criminal. Griefing is a subset of cyber bullying."

>"To be a griefer one must be at least temporarily mentally ill and anti-social. Such a person may not be criminally insane all the time, but at the moment of the act he is."

>t.DaphneJones
I never wanted punch someone face more than those faggot
>>
>>158240140
>I never wanted punch someone face more than those faggot
That's because you're an anti-social bully.
>>
>>158240140
When can we just kill feminists
>>
>>158240412
>wants interaction with someone else
>anti social

what
>>
>>158240602
Bullying people is hardly social interaction. Try not being a bellend m8.
>>
File: spacerobert.jpg (6KB, 298x169px) Image search: [Google]
spacerobert.jpg
6KB, 298x169px
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UspNecO19tk
>>
File: 1473633600514.jpg (366KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]
1473633600514.jpg
366KB, 1920x1080px
>>158240140
I've weathered the poor community design votes, CGBots fuck ups, the phallic jokes, the massive delay for flight ready before the redesign, the weapon size nerfs, and the shitty view in the cockpit.

Yet whenever I see this bitches Second-Life avatar and the retarded shit she spews in the defense of carebears, I seriously consider melting my original backer Freelancer package just to avoid its association with this dumb cow.
>>
File: New Gladius Cockpit.jpg (54KB, 1024x467px) Image search: [Google]
New Gladius Cockpit.jpg
54KB, 1024x467px
that's a nice cockpit
>>
Stuck in the middle of space with no warp fuel
What do I do now?
>>
>>158200249
No cutlass?
>>
File: 1477020202245.gif (2MB, 270x138px) Image search: [Google]
1477020202245.gif
2MB, 270x138px
So since they're slowing literally everything to a crawl next patch, does that mean that if you're not using a Super Hornet you're 100% worthless in combat?

Because that's what it looks like it's shaping up to be.
>>
>>158242150
suicide
>>
>>158242150
right alt backspace
>>
>>158240140
>Criminal

Just say some stupid shit like it's illegal to make a medical diagnosis without being a doctor.
>>
>>158241549
no shield or gun status mfds in view
>>
>>158242980

shields are on the left side though

and if I remember correctly they're adding a weapon overheat bar to the HUD, which is pretty much all you actually need to see in combat
>>
File: steel-battalion.jpg (56KB, 640x480px) Image search: [Google]
steel-battalion.jpg
56KB, 640x480px
here's your controller, bro
>>
>>158242298
Probably the SH and the Sabre, but yes. Although they haven't actually gotten to the gun re-balance yet. And since fixed targeting is super easy now at the new speeds, maybe they'll narrow the damage difference between weapon sizes again.

At least the Avenger, Freelancer and Connie will be able to run away really well.
>>
>>158243201
>shields are on the left side though
Nope that's the hull condition panel. CIG split hull and shield to different panels for some stupid fucking reason
>>
>wahhhh my roleplay firefly cargo ship sucks in combat
You guys are almost as bad as RSI. Just buy all the ships with UEC when the game comes out.
>>
File: scottkelly3_14931439_8col.jpg (61KB, 622x498px) Image search: [Google]
scottkelly3_14931439_8col.jpg
61KB, 622x498px
>>158243935
who are you quoting and what ship are you talking about?

Freelancer?
>>
>>158239662
Is there a non-meme reason they would "fix" things like this? It seems to fit their design plans for turrets, I'm sure they said this exact kind of thing was intended.
>>
>>158244189
Yes

>>158243430
>At least the Avenger, Freelancer and Connie will be able to run away really well

And why are you going to stick around to 1v1 military fighters? I don't understand you people. Freelancer is a cargo ship, Connie is an exploration missile boat.
>>
>>158243345
Would build a pit for
>>
File: Natural born loser.png (3MB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]
Natural born loser.png
3MB, 1920x1080px
>>158112228
He'll come around, Anon
>>
>>158244351
But the freelancer is a genuine murderboat, it punches well above it's role as a U-haul truck
>>
>>158244351
I am legit excited that I can run away in my connie.
>>
File: s-l500.jpg (28KB, 417x500px) Image search: [Google]
s-l500.jpg
28KB, 417x500px
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KfwteoZCvoY

>>158244530
You got any recommendations for a stick in Star Citizen?

I don't want to spend a lot on some Warthog / X52 or whatever. I was looking around for some nice cheap USB stick. Funny thing is, the retro looking ones look much better to me.

This one looks cool, but I don't know if it's got enough buttons on the throttle.
>>
>>158107383
I'm not sure what your issue is. A capital ship should be worth several million. If you think you have to grind to get what you want you don't understand how the game's economy, or life in general, works. Multiple people from an org should be expected to pool money together.
>>
>>158244891
If I knew a damn thing about sticks I probably wouldn't want a steel battalion console
>>
>>158244891
CH Pro Throttle and Thrustmaster stick. Or if you want, wait until that new Thrustmaster combo releases.
>>
>>158245284
>>158245460
Thanks, dudes.

I'll wait on the RSI stick too, if it's any good I might pick up the cheap version.
>>
File: 1452030099945.gif (154KB, 500x500px) Image search: [Google]
1452030099945.gif
154KB, 500x500px
>>158245596
Dont go throttle.

Dual stick is what you want for a space sim.

Throttle is only for flight games where you have to keep a certain minimum speed not to fall to the ground.

Star Citizen is best with a dual stick setup.

Go dual T-16000M's or at least one as a throttle and a TM Warthog/VKB Fat Mamba for the right stick.
>>
File: spaceshipcontrols.png (897KB, 2156x488px) Image search: [Google]
spaceshipcontrols.png
897KB, 2156x488px
>>158245807
>dual stick meme
>>
>>158245807
I really hate that cig are trying to kill throttle management
>>
File: YPPYHmz.gif (3MB, 360x270px) Image search: [Google]
YPPYHmz.gif
3MB, 360x270px
>>158245908
Either you go M/KB or Dual Stick.

I recomend pedals with both of the setups.

HOTAS is the worst you can do for space sims.

HOTAS is for flight sims.
>>
File: t16000mfcshotas-4.png (127KB, 513x378px) Image search: [Google]
t16000mfcshotas-4.png
127KB, 513x378px
>>158245807
>T-16000M

>>158245460
>new Thrustmaster combo
Is this it? Source please.
>>
>>158246401
https://www.amazon.com/Thrustmaster-T-16000M-FCS-HOTAS-Controller/dp/B01KCHPRXA
>>
>>158244674
I don't know, there's some people with a serious hateboner against the Freelancer. Don't know why exactly, it's the perfect Yin (I haul cargo and can fight) to the Cutlass' Yang (I fight and can haul cargo).

If he's going to the RSI forums then yes, it's full of retards with unrealistic expectations for their chosen ships. As it stands now, the Freelancer is decently balanced in that a competent pilot can fight off of flee the common shitter that harasses it and will still lose to an ambush or an equally skilled fighter pilot.
>>
File: 1463771310021.jpg (1MB, 1649x2575px) Image search: [Google]
1463771310021.jpg
1MB, 1649x2575px
>>158246401
The T-16000M stick is really good.

Just rememeber to do the spring mod if you plan to use it as your aim stick.

Forget the throttle.
>>
>>158246176
I am going for the bait.

The only disadvantage of my X52 set up is that the y and z translation are on hat switch and don't have analog input. While that could be significant to some its not hard to pulse your input if you need to. Think about the default ED hotas bindings, nothing really missing, forward backward translation is a little awkward but that is not hard to fix.
>>
>>158246176
>HOTAS is the worst you can do for space sims.
Better tell saitek and cig that since theyre making a branded one
>>
File: Untitled.png (225KB, 1331x464px) Image search: [Google]
Untitled.png
225KB, 1331x464px
>>
>>158246659
>Forget the throttle.
Well I guess I could. I like the idea of push/pull for speed control, as well as having the buttons at my fingertips, instead of using the keyboard. I think I'd rather use mouse and keyboard instead of stick and keyboard.
>>
>>158247934
You kinda need the 2-axis control that a stick gives than what a throttle gives.

Unless you wanna gimp yourself or make it feel like flying some shitty ship in warthunder.
>>
>>158247934
I'm pretty sure you are getting memed
>>
File: 1454089309556.jpg (39KB, 517x645px) Image search: [Google]
1454089309556.jpg
39KB, 517x645px
>>158248228

How can you call this meme'ing, when its obviously the best way to control your ship by having control over all axis easily by two joysticks.

The only throttle that comes close to being half-way useful for Star Citizen is the CH Pro Throttle because of the analog thumb joystick on the side to make you able to strafe with at least some comfort.

It's a reason why everybody is going for dual joystick.

Anyway, no matter what you want to use, M/KB, HOTAS or Dual stick. PEDALS is what you want no matter what you do.

Get MFG Crosswinds because most other pedals require a lot of force to make it move out of the center position.
>>
>>158249089

>PEDALS is what you want no matter what you do.

This is actually true.
>>
>>158249089
you need pedals and two sticks to get all axis control

www.youtube.com/watch?v=jzHVsUzSH0k

if you're shelling out stupid amounts of money a 3d mouse might work too

trackball with scroll wheel might be an adequate budget THC, but I don't know how good it would be
>>
>>158244891
Wait for Star Citizen Saitek/Logitech HOTAS to come out.
>>
>>158249089
>>158249259

what would you use pedals for out of curiousity?

I've been mulling over a joystick but it's not something I think I'd probably use simply because it takes up desk space, but pedals don't have that issue
>>
>>158249378
The funny thing is that it will just be a normal budget HOTAS that is still the most shitty way to play the game if you look away from racing wheels and guitar hero equipment.

ED is fine with HOTAS, but not SC.
>>
>>158249619
People map it differently.

I do Pitch and roll on right stick.
Accelerate, decelerate and right/left strafe on left stick.
Turning in pedals slider and strafe up/down on pedals push.
>>
File: 31Ll0DcOlLL[1].jpg (14KB, 500x375px) Image search: [Google]
31Ll0DcOlLL[1].jpg
14KB, 500x375px
is this piece of shit worth it? for the very budget friendly price I mean?
>>
>>158249732
The reason it's taken so long it's because they're trying to make the HOTAS viable for all 6 degrees of freedom. If they wanted a normal budget HOTAS, they'd just slap a SC theme on an X52/X55 and call it a day. I've heard of talks of adding a trackball to the throttle, but it remains be seen how the HOTAS will turn out now that Logitech has acquired Saitek.
>>
>>158250338
It looks like it has an extreme lack of buttons. Can you step up to a Logitech Extreme 3D Pro?
>>
>>158250715
next step up looks like it's flight stick X

I'm mostly attracted to the modest base that isn't going to be some kind of monstrosity on my desk
>>
File: madcatz_starcitizen.jpg (131KB, 620x459px) Image search: [Google]
madcatz_starcitizen.jpg
131KB, 620x459px
>>158247283
lol
>>
>>158252009
delete this
>>
>>158252009
pretty sure that was scrapped because it turned out to be rebranded crap
>>
>>158252009
how the fuck am I even meant to arrange this on a desk
>>
>>158246603
The only I hate I have for it is the damn view slit, and even that I could probably live with if they'd just put some fucking MFDs on that giant waste of space ceiling so that it at least kind of feels like it has a purpose.
>>
>>158246659
I must be the only person who thinks a stiff stick is better for aiming.

...I fucking hate taking about flight sticks, it get sounds so gay.
>>
>>158254527
http://www.aimbooster.com/

Go nuts
>>
So whats a good effect for beam lasers. Mind you i lack friends so heal beams arent going to do anything.

Also why do beams only go upto rank 2?
>>
>>158257117
Heat
>>
>>158215713
no. 3.0 is replacing the current netcode. theyre running on literally stock cryengine netcode meant for at the most, 12v12 deathmatch on small maps with FPS characters and basic vehicles (note how star marine is currently maxed at 12v12 TDM, PU is 24 man servers)

i'm honestly amazed the PU functions at all
>>
File: 1474640296989.jpg (43KB, 410x206px) Image search: [Google]
1474640296989.jpg
43KB, 410x206px
>>158107383
Dropping this fucking game
>>
>>158107383
are you implying that you should be able to acquire an advanced military corvette and bomber inside a week or 2 of casual mission running?

is this your first MMO?
>>
>>158252009
>Mad Catz

Every single time my brother went out to buy an extra controller for the Ps2 or Gamecube he would bring home some Mad catz crap.

Four out of five times they failed to actually work, the one time he got one that did the turbo function was hilarious but the thing was innately inferior.

I berated him every single time.
>>
>>158261856
Most likely he is. At that I don't understand the appeal of having the biggest, baddest ship. Who wants to be heavily constrained to managing a crew and ship expenses when you could pick up a cutlass or freelancer and travel the stars in freedom?
>>
>>158262628
i understand the appeal, and i can imagine how fun it would be to have it fully crewed, and operating in a highly organized fleet of other large ships and countless fighters

but i also know that this isnt a fucking war movie where the protagonist (polaris owner) has full control of the situation, money isnt a factor, and his crew is working tirelessly toward whatever goal the captain has without question or deviance

what do they even think theyre gonna be doing? unless "fly into vanduul space and face their swarm" is the endgame theyre gonna just end up being entitled space police
>>
>>158107383
so this means 1 USD == 26.7k UEC?

~5.2 million for 200 USD ships?
>>
>>158264238
Last thread has some ballpark values, it isn't a straight line like that and some ships are more of a deal than others
>>
>>158263234
Combined with simply ordering your crew on what to do and having to focus mostly on the logistics. I shouldn't say I don't see the appeal, I just don't like it myself. Teaming up with a fleet is different but I wouldn't want the position of leading one. In Elite Dangerous I use the Federal Assault Ship even though I could run an Anaconda or Federal Corvette since the mid sized ships are more fun and exciting than being a tank of a ship.
>>
>>158264238

It also depends on earnings ingame. Some missions may give out hundreds of thousand of UEC.
>>
>>158265805
Actually speaking of mid sized ships, what are the predictions for what will be the largest ship a single person can viably control? Personally going for bounty and planet exploration (combat focused) so the Cutlass and Freelancer are looking good.
>>
>>158265991
retaliator should work with a fully AI crew long as pilot can control torpedo fire, and AI turrets have an on/off switch
>>
>>158266451
Nice profit lol
>>
>>158264352
>>158265974
right now 1k UEC = $1
I doubt you will be making $20 an hour in sc.
They will most likely just readjust the UEC pricing for ships
>>
>>158266451
How many turrets do you could be made to fire forward? Just the front two or all but the bottom aft turret.
>>
>>158267520
tali isnt for firing forward, so long as the AI is hitting things defensively, and you can fire the torps as pilot it should work solo. as opposed to a non-AI person being needed to do something with torpedos in the rear

largest ship i can think of where all roles can be fulfilled from pilot seat, not trying to say the retaliator isnt bad
>>
>>158265991
They've stated that the constellation will be the largest... Though it really depends how useful having a person on shield and power systems will turn out to be.
>>
File: trousers.jpg (6KB, 346x101px) Image search: [Google]
trousers.jpg
6KB, 346x101px
>>158214670
>>158216912
>>158224894

They'll probably just roll Horizons into the base game once the next expansion is out. The incentive to buy Horizons will be gone with 3.0 out and ftroop knows they'll never be able to maintain so many editions of the game. Even the version numbers hint at it. eg: 1.5 = 2.0, 1.6 = 2.1, 1.7 = 2.2. Their game plan was an update quarterly, so you reach 1.9 = 2.4, then 3.0 comes out and then what?
>>
File: 1476360376923.jpg (2MB, 6064x6072px) Image search: [Google]
1476360376923.jpg
2MB, 6064x6072px
>>158107265
Aww, all the little space game sheeple made their own board. How come No Man's Sky isint included in your little group as well?

Ohh....my bad....too soon?
>>
>>158267943

>implying anyone on 4chan didnt expect the game to flop hard
>>
File: Space_Nazi.webm (725KB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]
Space_Nazi.webm
725KB, 1280x720px
>>158267943
>isint

Heh I see you made a typo tough luck pal
>>
>>158267943

After 20 years of gaming I have become annealed against marketing efforts. I don't pre-order, kikestart, season pass, or crowdfund nobodies. Hello Games and Sean Murry were the "literal who?" of games development. Release day is where you get to see the real game and get to see real reviews.


Of course there is a little bit of hypocrisy in this post since I did help fund Star Citizen.
>>
>>158268406
where's this from?
>>
File: legs2.jpg (739KB, 2448x3264px) Image search: [Google]
legs2.jpg
739KB, 2448x3264px
>>158267943
FUCK YOU FUCKIGN BULLLLLYYYY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
>>
File: 1474847198434.webm (3MB, 1066x602px) Image search: [Google]
1474847198434.webm
3MB, 1066x602px
>>158268950
Some AtV video I guess
>>
File: 1470660263096.jpg (155KB, 466x379px) Image search: [Google]
1470660263096.jpg
155KB, 466x379px
>>158267943
>>
>>158268759
At least some amount of the funds Roberts collected were warranted by confidence in his previous titles. I could not say how much of the ~130 million is deserved by that confidence but I am pretty sure that our reality has broken off the rails and entered the twilight zone at some point between 2012 and now. Everything going on in the world including star citizen is too surreal to provoke anything but bewilderment.
>>
>>158268759
CIG is a little too far along to be considered literal whos

either it's a great game and is recognized for that, or it's a total flop and is recognized as the greatest scam since bernie madoff
>>
File: 1432501375471.jpg (269KB, 640x640px) Image search: [Google]
1432501375471.jpg
269KB, 640x640px
>>158269989

There is a saying: "Success breads success". At some point in the crowd funding campaign the fact that the game had garnered so much funding and attention was getting the project even more exposure which builds backer confidence which causes more people to join in which bring more money to the table which bring more exposure which builds backer confidence an so on.

At some point SC got the honor of "too big to fail" associated with it and that built confidence in the project even more. So far, who ever has been in charge of marketing the game has made very shrewd moves in regards to the public image of CIG and those working there. It's a sign of pure genius on whomever that person, or persons, is in charge of marketing. I gotta give credit where credit is due; you don't make 130 million from a hundred thousand nerds just Chris Robert's charisma.

>>158270121
>CIG is a little too far along to be considered literal whos

Some of these people are getting great exposure. Which is going to be good for their resumes. For example, Sean Tracy is practically a house hold name to me now.
>>
>>158189197
What's with the ribs on the Javelin?
>>
>>158270803
>So far, who ever has been in charge of marketing the game has made very shrewd moves in regards to the public image of CIG and those working there.

The appeal to the "PC master race" with a proven dev not tethered to both profit driven publishers and console limitations is a great foundation.
The hiring of Illfonic, responding to jealous Derek with a multi page rant, and trying to weasel refunders into staying instead of boosting confidence by not making it an issue were terrible moves.

It's the kind of rollercoaster any realist would expect.
>>
>>158199061
>Endeavor's hangar bay holds 5000scu + a Cutlass
>>
>>158271207
theyre just struts for the turrets basically.

those were "filled in" and replaced with more turrets on alternating "Steps" as you can see in the v2 demo
>>
>>158271867
Yes but like the Reclaimer the running costs will make that kind of venture unwise
>>
>>158271565
>The hiring of Illfonic

Usual bullshit that companies do. Outsource to a third party and something happens and the result sucks ass. Just like what happened to Aliens Colonial Marines.

> trying to weasel refunders into staying

Ever tried to cancel a credit card? Companies do this shit to. They want to keep your business so its difficult to cancel services.

>responding to jealous Derek with a multi page rant,

I loved this! This actually made me respect Chris even more since he wasn't afraid of that troll. But, you make some good points, Anon. I can't excuse all the faults of CIG as "other companies do the same". When I backed, I assumed all that money was gone, never see it again. Its way to late for a backer like me, 2013, to expect his money back. I see the progress CIG makes with every new version pushed to live and I can't help but be excited and confident on the direction that this project is taking. The one responsible thing I can do is keep my wallet closed to CIG until more impressive milestones are met.
>>
>>158270803
what does breaded success taste like
>>
File: success-bread2.jpg (191KB, 1000x1333px) Image search: [Google]
success-bread2.jpg
191KB, 1000x1333px
>>158272282
>>
>>158272253
>They want to keep your business so its difficult to cancel services.

This isn't my experience. I just sent them an email asking for a refund for one of my ships and got it no questions asked
>>
>>158272398
>canadian
>success
>>
File: Devin_Townsend.jpg (32KB, 500x500px) Image search: [Google]
Devin_Townsend.jpg
32KB, 500x500px
>>158272515
>Update
>>
Flying around in the Persistent Universe, keep forgetting that every time I join a server I am the Public Enemy. Spawn my Cutlass, suddenly Aegis Sabre on my ass. Warp out of their and get called a coward afterwards. Says i'm a bad pilot for doing that. Called him out on an OP ship.
>>
File: 4236526.gif (453KB, 480x294px) Image search: [Google]
4236526.gif
453KB, 480x294px
>>158274932
>>
>>158261856
>are you implying that you should be able to acquire an advanced military corvette and bomber inside a week or 2 of casual mission running?
Yes. Someone post the quote about grinding by Chris Roberts.
>>
>>158275378
so you want gameplay to be optional, money to have no value in terms of value of services between players?

because lack of progression is how you make an MMO really dead really fast
>>
>>158275638
>so you want gameplay to be optional
No, I want Chris to deliver his promise about no grind. And for LTI to just cover the cost of the hull insurance over the 10 year lifetime of the game and for there not to be stupid high prices and items which take years to grind.

Is that OK with you?

>lack of progression
They have said numerous times that they are going for emergent gameplay from a sandbox environment. This isn't WoW, we don't want a treadmill.
>>
>>158275732
>we don't want a treadmill
on behalf of who are you speaking?

or is that just your self proclaimed pronoun? should we call you them?
>>
>>158275732
>no grind
then you should probably stick to squadron 42
mmos are all about dat grind
>>
>>158275732
>his promise about no grind.
A completely subjective meme promise that only ever meant gameplay should be fun. I swear you fanboys do this to yourselves.
>>
>>158275872
>on behalf of who are you speaking?
People who backed a sci-fi sandbox universe on the premise of no grind or pay2win.

I'm not speaking for the 1 person in this thread who wants a WoW clone.

>>158275927
>mmos are all about dat grind
No they aren't. Just the shit ones.
>>
>>158276061
>No they aren't. Just the shit ones.
Examples of non-shit ones?
>>
>>158275732
is it really grind if they actually pull through with all the money making possibilities theyve noted? you could probably afford whatever you want doing something different every day

but removing grind entirely? just give everyone their maxed out military fleet on day 1 since they've got nothing to work forward to for very long anyway. really just fuck missions and jobs entirely since the game will devolve into a massive omnidirectional space battle full of solo pilot polaris' and idris' who didnt need to actually play the game
>>
>>158276103
>Examples of non-shit ones?
I don't know any. MMOs are shit because they all follow the same retards who came up with the grind mentality.

There are probably some good early MMOs, maybe Ultima Online, I never played it. I'm talking about MMOs being able roleplaying and interaction more than having to run for increasing gear and elitist wankery.
>>
>>158276160
>is it really grind if they actually pull through with all the money making possibilities theyve noted?
They can charge 100billion UEC for all I care, as long as they make it easy to make money.

Are you actual goons trolling or what?

This isn't supposed to be some 2nd online job that you have to shit in a bucket for, LTI was sold on the premise that it wasn't a big deal and that insurance wouldn't be a lot. So if insurance isn't a lot, why such a stupidly high price for a ship?

3.8 years to solo a ship? It's obnoxious already and it's not even in beta.
>>
>>158276186
If you want interaction and not working at all for earning a nice ship then you should probably ERP with the owner of a fleet
>>
>>158276186
>No they aren't. Just the shit ones.
Examples
>I don't know any.
so u are just pulling shit out of your ass?

>>158276321
>make it easy to make money
may as well be free if you dont want there to be any kind of challenge or progression
>>
>>158276383
>not working at all
That's not what I said.

>>158276457
>so u are just pulling shit out of your ass?
Better than spewing it out of my mouth like you.

WAHHHHH WHY DONT THEY FORCE ME TO SHIT IN A BUCKET FOR 6 MONTHS SO I CAN BUY THIS ITEM AND SATISFY MY ELITISM

REAL LIFE? NO I DONT WANT REAL LIFE ACHIEVMENTS, I WANT PEOPLE TO KNOW I WAS ABLE TO WORK FOR A SHIP THAT OTHER PEOPLE BOUGHT WITH CASH BECAUSE NOT MANY PEOPLE CAN DO THAT

Stop posting. You have shit arguments and strawman garbage. Nobody is saying there shouldn't be a cost to ships. Learn to argue better or stop posting, I don't have time for you.

Only retards love grind. You love grind.
>>
Getting the hull should be (relatively) painless.

It's getting super high end components that should be the actual grind, especially if they still want to do the whole overclocking of thrusters and weaponry like they want to, and even requiring you to shop around on different planets.

At least, that's how I'd do it.
>>
>>158276321
youre telling me you really want this game to be dead inside 1 year, i don't understand

this may be the most elaborate goon tactic i've encountered

that or youre just hopelessly casual and really dont have any footing on the subject

if all you want to do is fly your favorite ships ASAP you can go buy them with your money, but please don't support ruining the game for the rest of us
>>
>>158276825
>you really this game to be dead inside 1 year
Yeah, I must have backed this game to fill a 12 month gap until the next space game comes along.

After all, what kind of idiot doesn't want tedious grind and elitist wankery in their games?
>>
>>158276601
>WAHHHHH WHY DONT THEY FORCE ME TO SHIT IN A BUCKET FOR 6 MONTHS SO I CAN BUY THIS ITEM AND SATISFY MY ELITISM

REAL LIFE? NO I DONT WANT REAL LIFE ACHIEVMENTS, I WANT PEOPLE TO KNOW I WAS ABLE TO WORK FOR A SHIP THAT OTHER PEOPLE BOUGHT WITH CASH BECAUSE NOT MANY PEOPLE CAN DO THAT

you sound like a literal retard

>Nobody is saying there shouldn't be a cost to ships.
You want it to be so easy that it may as well be free. You want no grind. You want easy money. How long is the satisfaction going to last when you and every other normie is able to afford a javelin with no effort?

are you some kind of noncompetitive nu male?
>>
>>158276924
>you sound like a literal retard
Says the guy who wants this game to be fucking WoW. OK, kid.

>40 man raids WHEN!?? REEEEEEEEE
>tfw only 4500 gear score and can't run vanduul raids
>not having the Idris+6 vs Xi'an cloak of tanking
>>
>>158276321
>as long as they make it easy to make money.

More like fun to make money, if there's enough interesting stuff to do that lets you earn money the grind just feels like normal progression instead of tedious suffering
>>
>>158277017
Lol. Wow must be doing something right if it is still up after all these years.
Get over it bro, you will not be able to buy your endgame ship without putting a significant amount of time or money in the game.
>>
>>158277070
>stuff to do that lets you earn money the grind just feels like normal progression instead
But as fun as killing a pirate for 100UEC is... getting to 30million from doing it IS tedious.

Hull E and Orion owners shouldn't be the only people to get money, and shouldn't have an unfair advantage.

If they are getting 20,000 UEC per run, a bounty hunter should get 20,000 per run too.
>>
>>158276901
again, come november anniversary sale you go can go to https://robertsspaceindustries.com/pledge/ships and purchase whatever your heart desires to create your gameplay-less star citizen experience

Squadron 42 will be the single player experience and you can likely do as much idling in the ships as you want as you bask in your grind-free safe space. nobody can hurt you there.

CIG offers several, albeit not free, ways to get the specific experience youre looking for.
>>
>if you don't want this game to be WoW you are a carebear who should stick to SQ42.

Fuck this thread and the cancer in it. You're literally worse than RSI at this point.
>>
>>158277192
> and shouldn't have an unfair advantage
>i want my aurora to make the same money as a $350 ship
>>
>>158277326
Why can't you make the same money? Aren't you able to get missions which pay the same?
>>
>>158277275
if you dont want to grind and you want easy money then you dont want an mmo

the stuff you are describing sounds exactly like a single player experience
>>
>>158277192
>But as fun as killing a pirate for 100UEC is
If killing that pirate is part of a mission where you have to take over an outpost on a planet guarded by another fuckton of pirates, where you have to coordinate with your buddies/org AND the reward is significantly more than just 100UEC it won't feel as repetitive.

They just need to get that emergent gameplay and group missions right, if they do then earning money could be fun as fuck.
>>
>>158277378
>the stuff you are describing sounds exactly like a single player experience
No you're a shitposter.
>>
>>158275378
wew this was quite the rant

His statement was based around grind being an unfun phase players "grind" through to reach the endgame.
The intent is for the game to be fun from starter ship to endgame.

Whether they can pull that off over a long time frame is another matter.
>>
>>158277449
it definitely doesnt sound like an mmo

we literally asked you to provide an example of an mmo with the characteristics you wanted and you were unable to come up with one

i think you are confused, friend
>>
>>158277375
you can likely pick up most missions at any point

that doesnt mean your pilot skill in an aurora LN is going to help you survive on a higher tier mission designed for actual fighters or mutliple ships

this is the definition of progression. work in, money out, get better capability, put more work in faster, get more money out faster
>>
>>158277375
no. you will not be able to use your aurora and make the same kind of money a hull e or orion will in the same time frame
>>
>>158277539
well shit, i can't even think of any remotely large online sandbox games that don't involve grind.

minecraft has grind even

pretty much just single player games where you can get what you want without much work
>>
>>158278573
I think club penguin is safe from the grind demons
>>
>>158278802
really just go watch a movie instead, using a keyboard can be dangerous if youre not trying to IRL grind too much
>>
>>158278883
>grinding through an entire intro sequence and character establishment before the plot starts

fuck off
>>
>>158278883
But I don't want to learn about the characters and stuff I'm too lazy. Can I get a free resume??????
>>
>no economic in alpha now
>no auec prices in PU now

>i-it's grind guys, i swear!
>>
>>158279146
https://youtu.be/QcQhyZ7U6nc
>>
File: 1475269739095.jpg (3MB, 3300x1900px) Image search: [Google]
1475269739095.jpg
3MB, 3300x1900px
> Grinding
> Everybody answer to a sperg who pretend to not understand balance

It's really not worth continuing that shitstorm, the difference between grindy and not grindy is entirely based on whether or not you are having fun (gathering money)

Normal player will be having fun gathering the money and playing with their new ship, choosing new objective.
Asperger will be muted and rage-quit because they had mental problem anyway.
>>
File: 1451505809901.jpg (28KB, 609x454px) Image search: [Google]
1451505809901.jpg
28KB, 609x454px
When Chris said no grind he had a very specific meaning in mind, which is that all gameplay should be fun, not that everything should be super easy and fast to get. If you misunderstood this point then you're a literal manchild with the reading comprehension of a chihuahua.
>>
File: 1457316193222.jpg (44KB, 720x694px) Image search: [Google]
1457316193222.jpg
44KB, 720x694px
if i buy a bullet and blow my brains out to skip the grind that is life, did I P2W?
>>
nice rsi forums tier circlejerk you got going in here familiars
>>
>>158279701
Some kid is just confusing mmos with single player games. Im sure he has learned the difference by now.
>>
File: 1474584444661.webm (2MB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]
1474584444661.webm
2MB, 1920x1080px
>>158279701
Indeed, we need to get more goony in here
>>
File: husband_and_wife.webm (3MB, 1200x675px) Image search: [Google]
husband_and_wife.webm
3MB, 1200x675px
>>158280078
>when the marriage wasn't worth the money
>>
>>158279470
>grinding enough to buy a bullet

Just smash your head against the wall and get it over with
>>
File: D_Martial.png (96KB, 1719x455px) Image search: [Google]
D_Martial.png
96KB, 1719x455px
>>158280193
>>
File: FrankieGoes.png (92KB, 1706x623px) Image search: [Google]
FrankieGoes.png
92KB, 1706x623px
>>158280547
Get a refund
>>
>>158281045
>missing out on the best game of the century
>>
File: 1476816074742.gif (245KB, 552x168px) Image search: [Google]
1476816074742.gif
245KB, 552x168px
>>158281578
>>
File: 1476631125392.jpg (293KB, 1024x2368px) Image search: [Google]
1476631125392.jpg
293KB, 1024x2368px
>>
>>158280193
So after seeing this posted so often I must ask:
what is it supposed to imply? That their marriage is a faaake?
>>
File: 564745433.jpg (27KB, 770x250px) Image search: [Google]
564745433.jpg
27KB, 770x250px
>>158282364
Why does dude look like he has Down Syndrome?
>>
File: Denver_Bar_Citizens.png (3MB, 1883x1055px) Image search: [Google]
Denver_Bar_Citizens.png
3MB, 1883x1055px
>>158282412
That and her obvious disdain for this whole space video game shit

Can't blame her with the "citizens" she probably meets though
>>
File: 1475948676518.png (1MB, 1783x2312px) Image search: [Google]
1475948676518.png
1MB, 1783x2312px
>>158282364
Jealous Derek ? You don't make as much money scamming people 100$ with a game inferior to Star Citizen alpha
>>
>>158282364
disturbing
>>
File: 1474931803897.jpg (156KB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]
1474931803897.jpg
156KB, 1280x720px
>>158282545
>LoD is bad
>This has any bearing on SC

Sad
>>
File: 1473699399255.jpg (167KB, 1320x1169px) Image search: [Google]
1473699399255.jpg
167KB, 1320x1169px
>>
dead
>>
>>158282520
Why the fuck does Chris keep putting her on stage/in front of the camera then all the time?
So that whales see boobies? But then they don't the 'marriage' part, except if that is to appeal to dads...

God why can't this game not be surrounded by odd things/people. Is a normal, non-eyebrow-raising production too much to ask?
>>
>>158285621
>Current year
>expecting cons and webshows to be anything but cringey and autistic.

I will admit that when the least cringey part of the presentations is the part where the engineers are talking there's probably an issue.
>>
File: EliteCitizenDangerousStar.jpg (3MB, 8000x8400px) Image search: [Google]
EliteCitizenDangerousStar.jpg
3MB, 8000x8400px
Posting size comparison, good morning threadfriends
>>
>>158286165
The Endeavor looks so tiny now, and the Hull-E is basically idris sized when retracted jesus fuck what a beast
>>
File: 1467814461889.jpg (104KB, 712x812px) Image search: [Google]
1467814461889.jpg
104KB, 712x812px
>SC has some free demo until the end of the month
>sure I'll try it
>20 fps no matter what settings I change or lower the resolution on a pretty decent rig
>had 100+ fps in E:D on highest settings
>o-okay let's try the game
>immediately start bugging the fuck out
>most awkward controls and movement I have ever seen

I expected bad and unfinished but this makes E:D look like a masterpiece. How is this game so fucking shit after years of development by "industry veterans"?

>b-but muh scripted video with a worm!
>>
>>158286473
Stop posting shit pictures on the internet and maybe I'll answer your questions.
>>
>>158286165
wow i had no idea my carrack was that big
>>
>>158286473
It has been said several times before but

>fps
its server bound, new net code coming, hopefully it helps

>bugs
shit happen and this is not marketed as a finished game right now, all and all its remarkable stable for the moment

>controls
that is true, but it can be improved if you have a few hours to throw at rebinding stuff or you can find a xml somewhere that you like

>movement
also pretty janky but it has been steadily improving and it looks like the new camera stabilization will fix quite a bit of it

>it should be most polished with how much time is behind the project so far
They probably could be a little further along with some better management from the beginning and they are defiantly years behind their original schedule but looking at the scope of the game and its dev time relative to other ambitious titles they are a long way off from entering development hell.
>>
>>158286780
Carrack is such a qt, I'm looking forward to seeing it's fuckery
>>
>>158267879
>Roll it into the base game

Wew, I know so many people gonna be fucking pissed. Frontier dug themselves a deep hole.
>>
>>158289797
Holyshit that's going to cause a shitshow, dads on suicide watch

Actually it'll be more like
>you don't see the vision
>games need to be funded to survive
>i for one am okay with subscription being added!
>it'll get rid of the milenials who don't appreciate the art
>>
>>158290796
If ed was an mmo with a sub upfront i could take it or leave it but this hidden tricky sub is bullshit.
>>
>>158291647
E:D is dead to me and FTroop fired the gun
>>
>>158282412
She did Not like the Money grind in reallife so payed with her bagina to win.
>>
>>158289797
>>158290796

Why doesn't Fdev just go F2P then?
>>
>>158294409
Not 100% sure of all their reasons, but I know for certain one reason is the dads. There are a subset of them that will suck Frontier's dick even if they shoot their dogs, but there's another subset that refuses to have the game change from what it currently is.
>>
>>158294409
Because FTroop are a casestudy in how to shit the bed
>>
Does anyone share my pleb opinion that fightes shouldn't be able to use the quantum drive?

Only haulers and carriers.
>>
>>158297597
That's a terrible opinion. But you're welcome to it.

Quantum drives area component, and thus have weight and are removable, so you can remove them for a vey small weight reduction and thus speed increase speed if you really desire.
>>
>>158292441
So it took almost 4 minutes to drop your shields and then another 2 too explode your hull while they circle strafed you?
>>
>>158294665
Star citizen just uses korean grindfest to test bed ideas. Whatever is fun gets put in sc and ed gets the opposite.
>>
>>158298782
It took 40 minutes to drop my shield then they told me I'll need to pay the price of the full game again just to add part of the game that sounds like a free concept update
>>
>>158297597
Are you sure don't mean jump drive? Because quantum is basically required to do anything besides fly around the space station you spawned at.
>>
>>158298390
He's probably just borrowing Sandi's shoes for the day.
>>
>>158299073

Fucking kek
>>
>>158298908
This is pretty much why I jumped ship to Star Citizen. Not because Star Citizen has more funding, but because Star Citizen has so many people willing to help test shit they get it better
>>
>>158299176
That is a nice way of looking at it
>>
File: Vanguard_flight_2.jpg (2MB, 3840x2160px) Image search: [Google]
Vanguard_flight_2.jpg
2MB, 3840x2160px
>>158297597
Don't confuse Quantum Drive and... current stat view call it "Jump Engine/Jump Drive".

Snub fighter don't have Quantum drive, they can't move between planet.
Fighter don't have Jump Engine (and limited quantum drive)
It only start appearing with heavy-fighter (and even then the Vanguard don't) or as add-on like with the Aurora or the Mustang "exploration"

So in practice it seem it's already planned like that.
>>
>>158300897
Anon, that's wrong. Every ship except for Snub Fighters come with both a Q-Drive and J-Drive. CR said it himself that it would be silly if you're stuck in one system with your ship.
>>
>>158301218
Every ship except snubs CAN EQUIP a jump drive.
Most of the smaller ships do not in fact come with one. Like of the 300 series only the 315p comes with a stock jump drive. This is important because this determines whether when your ship is destroyed and replaced, the replacement will be jump capable.
>>
>>158300897
>Fighter don't have Jump Engine

Nice bullshit, every non-stub fighters can mount Jump drives and the majority of them come with one by default now. Sabre and F7CM both come with one and aren't "heavy fighters"
>>
>tfw star citizen is my last hope for space sim Elite Dangerous was okay.. but i didn't like it..
>>
File: 08 - L9L4hv0.jpg (476KB, 3840x2160px) Image search: [Google]
08 - L9L4hv0.jpg
476KB, 3840x2160px
>>158302107
What do you plan to do in Star Citizen, anon?
>>
File: Herald-2.jpg (3MB, 5100x3221px) Image search: [Google]
Herald-2.jpg
3MB, 5100x3221px
Quick search about Q-Drive versus J-Drive
http://www.scqa.info/?keywords=Jump_drive

I think the stats of the ship page can be considered completely bogus as far as subsystem are concerned (you don't see "jump drive" installed on the Carrack but you see it on the Aurora LX)
The Herald for example is said to have a small one (and pretty much need it for its job)

Only a few fighter will have the ability to Jump between system
All fighter will have the ability to move within system
Only snub-fighter can't Q-drive at all
>>
>>158302107

You're right at home, mate. Everyone here is in the same club.
>>
>>158302243

Shut the fuck up, that's my business and no one else's. Fuck you, you piece of shit. I just said it's my last hope. You don't have to be a raging faggot and get in my business.
>>
>>158302464
>oh look it's a falsefag
>>
>>158302650

You're damn right. I just want to start shit cause I'm so goddamn bored of waiting for 2.6.

Sorry Anon. I really am, just really fucking bored. Have 3 days off of work, and no Star Marine
>>
>>158288302
me too, anon. Me too.
>>
>>158302796
Yea, the shittery surrounding release dates and delays and the lack of tangible progress is starting to grate on me too. Like I dont care so much about delays, but fucks sake, be honest and direct about it instead of continually teasing unrealistic shit, and puit shit out as its actually usable instead of trying to package shit into marketable hypeable releases
I already fucking bought it, stop trying to dress shit up to sell it again. Chris needs to fucking replace sandi and anyone else in the marketing department. They are going to strangle the project with their bullshit and when they do its gonna be his head people come for.
>>
>>158303312

>Chris needs to fucking replace sandi

Of all things that would cause a great reform for the better, this is probably the top 3 on my list.

She doesn't seem to do shit except post crap on her Facebook, and I cannot convince myself that she adds any value to the company. Secondly, she can be as shit as she wants at her job because she's Chris' wife. It's like being a professor/teacher and having tenure at a university/school -- you pretty much have to kill someone to get fired. It's a stupid amount of job security, and it makes the person highly incompetent if there's no threat of losing their job.

And yeah, I'm tired of CIG dressing 2.6 and 3.0 as something that is "just around the corner", when it's very clear that they have a fuckload of work to do. I think CIG does that to sell ships, but I also feel that if they were more transparent, that their sales wouldn't diminish (and in some cases, it might even increase if CIG communicated to us the problems they are having and such).
>>
>>158301643 >>158301609
You are confusing Jump drive with Quantum drive. small Exploration ship are exception, not the rules.
If we were to believe the (bogus) stat chart, the SABRE don't seem to have the slot to install one.
But assuming it can I think it's obvious it won't be installed by default and might be limited to like one or two jump.

That actually sound like a promising game-design. It goes against the stupid do-it-all combat ship, it allow cargo-ship to flee through jump gate, it make carrier-ship extremely useful, same for tanker-ship.

>>158301218
> CR said it himself that it would be silly if you're stuck in one system with your ship.

I would like to see the context where he said that, because if he took it as a law player couldn't pilot snub ship (if case their constellation get destroyed) and all ship would be able to go everywhere
>>
>>158281045
>pile of poo poo

mom wont let him cuss?
>>
File: LOLD.png (293KB, 1024x841px) Image search: [Google]
LOLD.png
293KB, 1024x841px
>goons convince themselves that this is the best game of all time

If derek was such a great dev and had done all the shit SC is doing back before computers were even invented, then why does nobody play any of his games?

And if he has so much dirt on croberts, why wont he spill it and vindicate himself?

top kek m8s top kek
>>
File: 1472754335123.gif (2MB, 360x270px) Image search: [Google]
1472754335123.gif
2MB, 360x270px
>>158304372
>peak of 2 players in a month
>>
File: 1458782012423.jpg (42KB, 495x636px) Image search: [Google]
1458782012423.jpg
42KB, 495x636px
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Tx1kMbC8ZxE
>derek will never license his "Physics Done Right™" to CIG so we can have PROPER flight models in atmosphere.

why even live
>>
>>158304613

>Goes in reverse
>Main thrusters still fire the same way

I don't get it. Why even start this project at all? Looks like some shit from 1999/2000.
>>
>>158305045
Don't insult 1999/2000 like that m8
Tribes 2 came out in 2001 and it has much better flight models than that on its vehicles.
>>
>>158304372
kill yourself no one gives a fuck about derek shart or his """""""""""""""""""""""game"""""""""""""""""""""""""
>>
>>158304094
You're an idiot. Do some research, try googling "Does the sabre come with a jump drive".
>>
>>158305173
Free Space 2 and also Wing Commander are 99
>>
>>158305638

This is the only information I found on Google about the Sabre being able to jump.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jv3Li98MyF8
>>
>>158305045 >>158305173
That's right, that's insulting for Tribes 2
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XifQdKoPkT0
>>
File: 1456661384026.jpg (691KB, 3300x2550px) Image search: [Google]
1456661384026.jpg
691KB, 3300x2550px
>>158305638
You are delusional, the only topic about it say it don't come with one and that only maybe it can fit one.
I wonder how mad you would be if your precious pledge ship can barely jump once and it's how the game stay balanced.
>>
>>158304094
No, I am not confusing QD and Jump Drive. I have been soaking up every tidbit of information that has come out about this game for four years. You are the one who has either incorrect of incomplete information.

Every ship larger than a snub fight will be able to equip a Jump engine to pass through jump points from system to system. Some ships come with jump drives stock, Like the Freelancer or 315p or Constellations. Some do not, but they will all, with the exception of things labeled as snub fighters or utility craft like the argo, be able to equip an aftermarket jump engine.

I do not know where you are getting your information or basing your statements, but it is incorrect. English is clearly not your first language, so I suspect you may have misread or misunderstood something. It has been stated over and over that ALL full scale ships, from the Mustang Alpha and Aurora ES to the UEEN Retribution will be able to traverse jump points without any kind of external assistance. No carriers, Ferrys, Warpgates or other secondary mechanics required. The only thing limiting a ships capability to jump will be the size/class of the Jump point and the ability of a given craft to reach it in deep space, some ships will have difficulty getting far into space without refueling.
>>
>>158307124
>>158305879
>Does it come with a jump drive?

>Yes, the Sabre comes with a jump drive standard.
>>
>>158302243
Sorry had a doctors appointment, I plan on Becoming a massive Trader/Space Terrorist with me friends that or just see where the road take me.
>>158302315
Thanks m8
>>
>>158252009
I'm so fucking glad Logitech bought Saitek.
>>
>>158311056
Why?
>>
>>158268950
https://vimeo.com/154339150
>>
>>158309230
I'm basing my information from a 2015 Q&A and I think I have a better understanding of nuance than unimaginative fanboy defending their pledge ship
http://www.scqa.info/?keywords=Jump_drive

> The M50 is pretty small, so it's likely not necessarily to have a jump drive. But we're gonna also have-… you know, that's kinda the idea of why you'd have bigger ships
Another Q&A
> And then you've got the next level of a ship that would maybe have Quantum drive, but maybe doesn't have a jump drive

The way they phrased it you have two choice :
a) suppose that <fighter of your choice> will be the lucky one that can be fitted with a (limited?) Jump-drive
b) claim they'll "never" intend any fighter to not have a Jump drive, despite it being a perfectly feasible gameplay supported by many carrier-ship.

At best it's a technicality, you can add a jump-drive but with a range so limited they might as well not be able to.

> They can jump between systems, and you have different levels of that, cause you've got ships that could jump to another system, but they couldn't head off into open space and jump system after system, they just don't have fuel or life-support reserves,

Some ship have bed (to save and quit anywhere) some don't. Quid of what happen if a fighter "jumped" into a system but lacked the fuel to reach a base or a place to refuel (if there's one). We are talking of non-standard game over here.
Maybe it's just me but when you get Crucible and Starfarer I expect them to have an use, and they can't if any fighter can travel at least 2 jumps away.

You should rejoice if it turn out fighter can't go far, it would mean you are expected to have your own mobile base, not just "hangar" here and there
>>
>>158297763
>>158299006
>>158300897
Hm, yes I may have meant the jump drive.

I just find it weird that a small ship can warp around and cover these huge distances. Space feels small.
>>
>>158311347
Even Logitech is better than fucking madcatz. The next saitek stick might still be a cheap piece of shit, but it'll at least work for a few months out of the box now.
>>
File: BennysShirt1.jpg (4MB, 3000x2000px) Image search: [Google]
BennysShirt1.jpg
4MB, 3000x2000px
>>158311425
>Omar Aweidah
Most handsome CIG employee or what
>>
>>158312045
Wow, I always thought that Saitek owned Madcatz, but it was the other way around. So yeah, you're right.
>>
>>158311972
Yeah, it would make more sense that fighters and small civilian ships couldn't jump, but then CIG would have to make pocket carriers and big ass space ferry ships which they have a hate on for.
>>
>>158300897
The Mustang Delta comes with a Jump engine.
>>
File: ShipStatus2_6thru4_0.gif (1MB, 2560x1161px) Image search: [Google]
ShipStatus2_6thru4_0.gif
1MB, 2560x1161px
>>
>>158304372
>criticizes goons
>but uses goonslang "croberts"
Is this a new goon ctr infiltration strat?
>>
What will be the first big combat ship we will be able to fly? As in big I mean as the starfarer or bigger
>>
File: file.png (220KB, 783x451px) Image search: [Google]
file.png
220KB, 783x451px
What are the 600 and the Eclipse going to be?
>>
What will /scg/edg/ do for edition 100?

multiplayer party?
>>
>>158315363
Origin 600i, Constellation competitor.
Aegis Eclipse, Constellation-sized "Stealth" recon ship
>>
>>158311972 >>158312592
In term of gameplay they could easily prevent fighter from being jump capable. But they probably fear the fanbase not recognize its merit (by believing that if a game don't let you jump between system it mean it a small game)

Plus there's already reasons to have a ferry mechanic in game : any mission where you would have to operate from an Idris could just teleport you in for the service (and it wouldn't be visible for other players thanks to instancing)
>>
>>158311871
You are making up head canon out of information you do not understand.

"Doesn't have a jump drive" means "doesn't have a jump drive installed"

Of course ships have limited fuel and if you just wander off into deep space in fighter you will run out before you get anywhere. The point is that a jump drive, while related to the Q drive, is not the same, and is not ,limited by fuel consumption the way the Q drive is, the thing that limits how many jumps a ship can make is not the jumps themselves, but the empty space in between. Most fighters will lack the fuel reserves to move from one jump point to another within a system, much less cross multiple systems, but that limitation has nothing to do with the jumps themselves, It has to do with not having enough Q-Drive fuel to make the journey across the systems in question from on Jump to the next, as long as you can can plan your route to hit fuel stations along the way, you can jump as many times as you like, again in any fighter. That M50 can equip a jump drive, it just has a very small Q-drive fuel tank, so It cannot realistically cross more than one system on its own.

As I said before, English is clearly not your first language, half of your post makes literally no sense. I don't know what you speak, but you are mashing together grammatical rules from different languages and coming up with an incorrect understanding of the travel mechanics as a result.

I have been following the project from day 1, I have watched every video, read every tech and design post, asked my fair share of questions and gotten answers. And with regards to Jump drives the answer has always been: Some ships will have them by default, some ships will have to purchase one as an aftermarket part, the jump drive is a Q-drive modification, so in order to have a jump drive a ship must also have a Q-drive, and any ship that has a Q-drive and an upgrade slot will be able to fit a jump drive.
>>
>>158314949
Caterpillar.
>>
>>158315979
Caterpillar best ship
>>
>>158315979
Its even less of a combat ship than the Gemini is. The catapillar is basically a slightly more offensive Hull C at this point.
>>
File: best ship.jpg (143KB, 1366x768px) Image search: [Google]
best ship.jpg
143KB, 1366x768px
>best

it is known
>>
>>158317127
>Caterpillar is worse than combat than the Gemini

Wrong. Caterpillar will eat Gemini, I hope you aren't suprised by this.
>>
File: 1473559492867.jpg (1MB, 3840x2400px) Image search: [Google]
1473559492867.jpg
1MB, 3840x2400px
>>158317557
at first I hated all those landing legs
and then, after much thought, being the retard that I am, I put it together that it's a caterpillar
>>
New Jump Point where?
>>
>>158318029
no problem, you were lost, no direction, no god.

But now you know who is your lord, its Drake and the Caterpillar is our missionary
>>
>>158317720
I'll believe it when they release the turret modules it's suppose to have
>>
>>158317127
What the fuck did you just fucking say about me, you little freelancer? I’ll have you know I graduated top of my class in Squadron 42, and I’ve transported numerous secret cargoes for the syndicates, and I have over 300 confirmed trades. I am trained in gorilla trucking and I have the best ship in the entire Drake fleet. You are nothing to me but just another aurora CL. I will wipe you the fuck out with precision the likes of which has never been seen before in this Empire, mark my fucking words. You think you can get away with saying that shit to me over the Internet? Think again, fucker. As we speak I am contacting my secret network of xi'an across the galaxy and your IP is being traced right now so you better prepare for the storm, maggot. The storm that wipes out the pathetic little thing you call your Hull C. You’re fucking dead, kid. I can be anywhere, anytime, and I can kill you in over seven hundred ways, and that’s just with my M3As. Not only am I extensively trained in dragonfly combat, but I have access to the entire arsenal of Drake Interplanetary and I will use it to its full extent to wipe your miserable ass off the face of the universe, you little shit. If only you could have known what unholy retribution your little “clever” comment was about to bring down upon you, maybe you would have held your fucking tongue. But you couldn’t, you didn’t, and now you’re paying the price, you goddamn goon. I will shit fury all over you and you will drown in it. You’re fucking dead, kiddo.
>>
>listening through my X3 soundtrack
>get to this: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=81vwaYzH_3Q
>imagine a Drake Dragonfly commercial aimed at teenagers with beach parties and stunts and bitches and shit
>>
File: 2.png (2MB, 1394x701px) Image search: [Google]
2.png
2MB, 1394x701px
pic related is me and chris roberto
>>
File: Cargo bombing.webm (2MB, 960x540px) Image search: [Google]
Cargo bombing.webm
2MB, 960x540px
>>158316838
>>158315979
BEST FUCKING SHIP

>>158317127
>offensive cargo hauler
>not best
>>
>>158320552
>not swapping out all 4 moduels for massive server rooms and a decryption lab and running the grey market intel game with your herald
>>
>>158320215
get a hair cut and drink some whole milk
>>
Ballistic Sub when?
>>
>>158320894
because of my arm?
>>
>>158320794
how would a gray market for intel even work? or a black market for that matter? selling state secrets to/from the xi'an empire?
>>
>>158321128
iirc 'black market' almost exclusively refers to the positions of jump points which can be sold to corporations for money so they can take routes to avoid piracy.

I remember reading something about the position of asteroids for mining companies as well.
>>
>>158321081
I assumed it was a deformity.
I was talking more about your neck and shoulders
you look pretty skinny
>>
Cutlass with what Ballistics weapons on it?
>>
>>158321313
how the hell is that black market? are you legally obligated to sell JP data to the UEE now? There's numerous examples of corporations and even individuals sitting on JPs and basically exploiting entire systems to the best of their ability before the word got out/they went bankrupt etc and the system became public domain, though most examples were hundreds of years prior.
>>
>>158320215
That's me on the left
>>
>>158315960
Oh please, you are the only one making stuff up trying to be right. It's seem that I read english much better than you do, so have a lesson :

> "Doesn't have a jump drive" means "doesn't have a jump drive installed"
You are the one trying to force that interpretation, the first meaning is clearly supported by
> And then you've got the next level of a ship that would maybe have Quantum drive, but maybe doesn't have a jump drive. Or maybe doesn't have a jump drive installed
> maybe doesn't have a jump drive. Or maybe doesn't have a jump drive installed
Two distinct possibility.
Are you going to argue next that the Q-drive hack don't count as something you "install" so it doesn't count ?

If you want to argue that they'll certainly leave every fighter capable of jumping that's your headcanon, not what the developers just said. Read the link http://www.scqa.info/?keywords=Jump_drive it acknowledge the idea that some fighter-class ship MIGHT not be capable of installing/hacking any Jump-drive despite retaining Q-drive capability.
I already knew about the Q-drive hack into Jump-drive, It is absolutely not against what I said, if they need a Jump-less ship they will

If you've been following the project you should know that the game changed and morphed features in ways that are unrecognizable to either the way they were first phrased or the way they have been understood. There's so many example you are the one who need to prove that whatever you last heard have cemented in the exact way you believe they have.
Ex : a developer had to confirm "Jumping use fuel", some fans were swearing the Jump itself didn't use fuel.

So just put your ego away and accept that you can't defend that as a fact.
...even if I totally agree that they are likely to give it up just to avoid the inevitable fanboy raging if they don't feel their pledge ship empowered enough. (unlike combat stats the ability to jump with anything will be seen as just QoL improvement even nerfed)

End
>>
File: CUTLASS-03-Black-Martin.jpg.jpg (250KB, 1400x1079px) Image search: [Google]
CUTLASS-03-Black-Martin.jpg.jpg
250KB, 1400x1079px
Gatling or Repeaters for this bad boy. Sad day when I cant mount the flash fire turret
>>
>>158317127
What the fuck did you just fucking say about me, you little bitch? I’ll have you know I graduated top of my class in the United Empire of Earth, and I’ve been involved in numerous secret raids on Tevarin, and I have over 300 confirmed ship kills. I am trained in gorilla warfare and I’m the top pilot in the entire UEE Navy. You are nothing to me but just another dad. I will wipe you the fuck out with precision the likes of which has never been seen before in this space, mark my fucking words. You think you can get away with saying that shit to me over the Spectrum? Think again, fucker. As we speak I am contacting my secret network of spies across the Universe and your IP is being traced right now so you better prepare for the storm, furry. The storm that wipes out the pathetic little thing you call your life. You’re fucking dead, shitizen. I can be anywhere, anytime, and I can kill you in over seven hundred ways, and that’s just with my bare hands. Not only am I extensively trained in unarmed combat, but I have access to the entire arsenal of the Squadron 42 and I will use it to its full extent to wipe your miserable ass off the face of the Verse, you little shit. If only you could have known what unholy retribution your little “clever” comment was about to bring down upon you, maybe you would have held your fucking tongue. But you couldn’t, you didn’t, and now you’re paying the price, you goddamn idiot. I will shit fury all over you and you will drown in it. You’re fucking dead, derek.
>>
>>158322186
where do you buy and modify ships weapons?

I want to replace the repeaters on my avenger with gatling guns like the front one.
>>
>>158322324
Go to your hangar, and change it there without the fear of getting shot at, but in order to earn money without having to spend dollars for in game sheckles, Do arena commander and rent them before you decided to buy with irl money.
>>
>>158322324
Electronic Access
https://robertsspaceindustries.com/electronic-access
>>
>>158322456
can't I just grind icc missions instead of buying them with real £? and do you buy them in the hangar or just edit them there?
>>
/vg/, how do I remove mouse aiming? I have a ship with no gimbals and the mouse pointer is distracting me. Any ideas?
>>
>>158322651
the AUEC is still in the alpha stages. If they removed the Alpha part it'd be easier, but renters UEC is the only way unless you have ships that have a gatling on it.
>>
>>158315979
It's called Carrack*
>>
>>158322651
https://robertsspaceindustries.com/electronic-access Isn't real money, just grind AC and you can use rent the weapons and use them in the PU with the REC
>>
>>158322768
Wait so to get different guns on a ship, I have to buy them with REC, I can only use them in electronic access, and it's only for rent rather than forever?

Sorry if I seem retarded but it's a bit complicated.
>>
File: PolarisBroch11.png (1MB, 1179x845px) Image search: [Google]
PolarisBroch11.png
1MB, 1179x845px
>>158322770
Best ship POLARIS coming through
All other ships can't deny the polaris is SEXY AS FUCK

>>158322975
You can use REC rented weapons in the Universe but not ships
>>
>>158321128
well when i say grey market i mean super jew everyone equally while keeping motives neutral

other than that, corporate espionage and stealing research from either NPCs or from little jimmy in his endeavor who just spent 50 hours doing sciency stuff

but if they fuck up how intel and info running works, it'll just be a slightly safer, more specialized version of cargo
>>
>>158322975
You can buy them forever if you want to spend your UEC, but if you dont want to pay the 5, 10, or 20 dollars to get them you kinda get screwed until they make it so that AUEC turns into UEC then you can buy upgrades with the in game money that you earn.
>>
>>158322715
"Lalt+m" unless they changed it recently
>>
File: ScreenShot0841.jpg (412KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]
ScreenShot0841.jpg
412KB, 1920x1080px
>>158321413
broadswords if fixed, S2 tarantulas if gimbal
>>
3.0 when?
>>
>>158323925
Dec 20th
>>
>>158323925
February 4th
>>
>>158323925
April 1st
>>
>>158323925
A couple months at the very least.
>>
>>158325285
oh well, is it worth wasting 30 gigs or whatever they're on now just to try the super hornet free fly thing? has anything at all changed?
>>
they're waking up

https://www.reddit.com/r/starcitizen/comments/592llu/if_cig_thinks_2016_isnt_likely_for_30_anymore/
>>
>>158325397
When did you last play?
Grimhex is neat
>>
>>158323925
Two weeks.
>>
>>158325397
About 25GB. Changed from what? IF you have played 2.0, the only big thing you added was a pirate spawn base. Ship flight models have changed, keybindings have changed, the game is a lot smoother (though still buggy and crashes because it's an alpha).
>>
>>158325609
that was added*
>>
>>158325443
i thought 3.0 not coming until next year was common knowledge
>>
>>158325443
>implying you fuckers are any better than plebbit
>>
File: 1396499014963.png (136KB, 400x400px) Image search: [Google]
1396499014963.png
136KB, 400x400px
>>158327717
just kidding ily 4ching :')
>>
>>158328748
ill find you some day anime poster
>>
>>158327717
Not sure what you mean by "better", but generally in /scg/ we've held much more realistic, or rather, cynical expectations of CIG. I suppose I can't truly speak for everyone, since we do have shills, but that's how it's been.
>>
>>158325841
Not every forum has people leaking information about how slow testing is going.
>>
>>158329959
I've never really seen any shills here. it's just realists and straight up Derekposters shitting on any ounce of cautious optimism from said realists.
>>
File: 1476644745685.jpg (70KB, 810x780px) Image search: [Google]
1476644745685.jpg
70KB, 810x780px
>>158329686
>>
>>158329686
Get off 4chan then if you don't want to see it. No matter what board you go on, a lot of people like Japanese culture/anime/manga/etc
>>
>>158331273
its not a lot of people its just the same anon always posting the same images
>>
>>158332471
How can you be so sure? I haven't used that many anime pictures here, but I frequent other boards (especially /v/ /a/) where I use them more often. Just because this is a different board, that doesn't necessarily mean it's a different userbase.
>>
File: 1476403518150.jpg (789KB, 1036x1218px) Image search: [Google]
1476403518150.jpg
789KB, 1036x1218px
>>158331146

there's a decent CIGDF in /scg/
>>
>>158320038

This is good. I like it. Much better than the original pasta.
>>
File: IWishICouldHugTheRoberts.png (225KB, 345x380px) Image search: [Google]
IWishICouldHugTheRoberts.png
225KB, 345x380px
>>158320215
>>
>>158333089
no, you're just a shithead. nobody but goons or people who should really sign up to be goons use the term CIGDF, every single time I see it the person using it is full retard just calling the game a scam and saying people are retards for not expecting it to implode any second. your welcome for the pic btw
>>
File: 1452037719115.jpg (452KB, 2048x2478px) Image search: [Google]
1452037719115.jpg
452KB, 2048x2478px
>>158333783

settle down, david
>>
CIGDF exhibit A:
>>158333783
>>
>>158333089
Shouldn't you be playing Line of Defense, the best game ever by your lord and savior derek smart, the self proclaimed internet warlord and oldschool game dev?
>>
CIGDF exhibit B: >>158334050
>>
>>158334119
Or maybe you ARE Derek?
Well in that case, shouldn't you be polishing that turd from 1990?
>>
>>158333974
I never noticed the poorly photographed logos before now.
>>
>>158334186
why are you so rattled?
you need to thicken that skin, fellow citizen
>>
>>158334560
Am I rattled? I certainly couldn't tell.
It feels like you're the one rattled 2bh
>>
File: 1452114272836.jpg (175KB, 1294x2391px) Image search: [Google]
1452114272836.jpg
175KB, 1294x2391px
>>158334653
>make statement about people blindly defending star citizen
>instantly get blown up
>no, you're just a shithead. nobody but goons or people who should really sign up to be goons use the term CIGDF
>Shouldn't you be playing Line of Defense
>Or maybe you ARE Derek?

I don't know, anon. did you type and of those words?
>>
>>158334853
r u okay?
I look forward to your next paragraph, I expect it on my desk in 5 minutes.
>>
Not this shit again. May as well be orgposting.
>>
>>158334853
>akimbo airsoft Deagles
>beret

you think this is some kind of cartoon m8?
>>
>>158321413
gimballed Strife MDs or fixed broadswords
>>
>>158322324
you won't be able to swap out the wing guns for what you have on the nose mount unfortunately

plenty of other size 2 options but good luck finding one that lines up with the nose gun's pip
>>
File: 15504328828_dfa549da9e_b.jpg (245KB, 1024x575px) Image search: [Google]
15504328828_dfa549da9e_b.jpg
245KB, 1024x575px
>>158335152
you tell me
>>
>>158325397
content wise 2.5 is technically the biggest. meaning they added the grimhex spawn point for criminals. same missions and locations as 2.4

they did end up breaking alot of small things though which can make the game alot less playable than 2.4 was.

if youre interested in trying the game before 3.0 this is probably your only chance. you should be able to spend a few hours on it without any issues, and theres guaranteed someone who has bigger ships who'd let you crew for them if you ask. 2.6 will likely add more issues at the cost of new content so i really doubt there will be freefly til 3.0.
>>
>>158335987
>content wise 2.5 is technically the biggest. meaning they added the grimhex spawn point for criminals

This makes it sound laughable.
>>
>>158336098
2.5 is a pretty laughable patch, but if they put much more effort into fixing things or adding content to the PU as it is now, they'd just have to rework it all again for 3.0 anyway
>>
>>158333974
>>158334560
>>158334853

Can someone post the family pic with the text?
>>
File: 1473621990420.jpg (374KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]
1473621990420.jpg
374KB, 1920x1080px
>>158336613
I just have the non text one

gotta love the stock trigger
>>
>>158337353
Damn, the little girl looks like she'll be a badass motherfucker when she grows up.
Or a ham planet.

One or the other.
>>
>>158337353
having a foregrip but not holding it triggers me
>>
>>158333974
>"ANAM"

'mo like "OMNOM"
>>
>>158338178

But booger hook on the boom switch doesn't?
>>
File: Image.jpg (2MB, 2592x1936px) Image search: [Google]
Image.jpg
2MB, 2592x1936px
>>158337353
it's never too early to get the family into Star Citizen
>>
>>158335987
I have an aurora because I'm not a space whale, flying a better ship would be nice, but if there's nothing else it's probably not worth it
>>
File: Access_Granted_Welcome_to_RSI.jpg (575KB, 1900x717px) Image search: [Google]
Access_Granted_Welcome_to_RSI.jpg
575KB, 1900x717px
Low quality attempt for low quality bait.
>>
>>158340751
There's no in between. It's either a 300 plus hours of literal work to get the most expensive ships (ED/Frontier) or I want everything in a few hours (this guy). And even if this guy is baiting, there are people that legitimately think like him, like the PVP sliders faggot.
>>
File: 1476395878662.jpg (61KB, 756x715px) Image search: [Google]
1476395878662.jpg
61KB, 756x715px
>>158304372
>croberts

hmm
>>
>>158320206
>>158320206
s,mads,mads,m
>>
>>158340487
nothing new to do regardless what ship youre in. current netcode is still very good at ensuring that any multicrew or pvp is as unenjoyable as possible. even youtubers and streamers are having real issues figuring out what the fuck to do in their 2.5 streams.

2.6 has nothing to do with PU aside from flight speeds across the board. star marine will likely be a shitshow for a while but if that's clean and runs well it'll tide me over til 3.0.

just forget about the game til 3.0 unless you want to suffer like myself who's stuck in an viscious cycle of looking for juicy leaks and new info, while constantly being reminded that I'm super done with any gameplay possible currently
>>
File: asofOCT2016.jpg (314KB, 741x2256px) Image search: [Google]
asofOCT2016.jpg
314KB, 741x2256px
I have too many ships.
Which should I melt and what should I make them into?

I'm probably going to ignore you, but gimme your thoughts. I'm a solo/small group player who will probably sign on to a larger org and trade the use of my corvette for the benefits of having comrades/minions.
>>
>>158343051
polaris and prospecter are the only 2 acceptable ships in your fleet. everything else is shit

get:
endeavor
orion
hull e
banu mm
sabre
reclaimer
vanguard and buks
sabre
>>
File: 1440262063104.jpg (2MB, 3399x1906px) Image search: [Google]
1440262063104.jpg
2MB, 3399x1906px
>>158342894
>super done with any gameplay possible currently
This :(
I did everything there is to do within a week of 2.5 coming out and have basically just logged on, flown around doing nothing and then logged off since. Star marine would keep me amused for a while, but AC has devolved into "getting my assed kicked by superhornets and sabres because I fly a gladiator and missiles are buggy and broken and my buccanner doesn't exist yet"

Fucking missile selection UI and actually functioning tracking when? Right now 90% of my missiles miss without the target even doing anything, they just keep flying around and the missiles cant make the intercept. Bonus points for there's no point in mixing missile loadout because you cant select and fire a particular one.
>>
File: 4CAW8A6.jpg (175KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]
4CAW8A6.jpg
175KB, 1920x1080px
>>158343286
>Sabre
No I don't meme and the mutton chop cannons ruin the aesthetic for me. I want to like it but I just can't I tried, hard.
>MM
I actually had one, but I'm not jewish sold I melted it.
>Orion
I considered buying one but I'm not jewish so I didn't.
>Vanguard
The biggest meme fighter to ever fight memes.
>Endeavor
I wanted one when they first sold em with the modules but Couldn't swing it without melting literally everything else I had at the time. If they sell em with modules again in November I might.
>Reclaimer
See previous comments about my lack of semitic ancestry or belief system. M<y only jewship will be the Which may or may not survive November, I cant melt it, cus its my OB package, but it may get upgraded again.

What wrong with the freelancer?
Do you think a boomslang would fit in the Polaris' hangar?

Also that 315 is both my second character slot and personal runabout, cus it has an LTI jumpdrive on a fast single seater.
>>
>>158344094

>boomslang

pointless question because it's never going to happen
>>
>>158344094
you are right freelancer is good
gotta overlook your race supremacy and get some of them delicious jew ships
>>
>>158344712
Way to puncture my dreams, dick.
What about a Brutus instead?Plz?
Fucking why the redeemer, WHY, ITS SO FUCKING GAY LOOKING
>>
File: bakyu.jpg (137KB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]
bakyu.jpg
137KB, 1280x720px
>>158343051
You can send me that Freelancer senpai
>>
File: tC8x8XX.jpg (379KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]
tC8x8XX.jpg
379KB, 1920x1080px
>>158344094
>>158344712
>>158344968

This is the best gunship
>>
File: spesstrucks.jpg (1MB, 1920x2232px) Image search: [Google]
spesstrucks.jpg
1MB, 1920x2232px
>>158344959
I just mean I'm not really into the straight up Shekelharvesters. I'm more the trader/smuggler/merchant/pirate type with a side of mining and fuel collecting.
>>
>>158345041
no gifts for anime posters
>>
File: sad_keanu.jpg (33KB, 307x409px) Image search: [Google]
sad_keanu.jpg
33KB, 307x409px
>>158345181
>>
File: 162346.gif (925KB, 425x318px) Image search: [Google]
162346.gif
925KB, 425x318px
>>158345158

also never happening

redeemer, the actual winner, is low priority right now and has had zero news related, so the chance of ever seeing these is basically 0%
>>
File: Starfarer-Blueprint-1.jpg (227KB, 1128x888px) Image search: [Google]
Starfarer-Blueprint-1.jpg
227KB, 1128x888px
>>158345041
I cant actually cus I bought that one with credits.

The only things on that list which are still tradeable are the Gladiator, the Reliant Kore Starter pack and the Polaris.

Also that lancer is probably my daily driver.
Starfarer cargo racks when?
>>
>>158345429
ofc

Also I think you mean deemer
>>
File: gHBqTq6.gif (582KB, 512x288px) Image search: [Google]
gHBqTq6.gif
582KB, 512x288px
>>158345181
no gifts, only gifs
>>
>>158345512

I mean redeemer, which is the name and not some made up 4chan name
>>
File: u1QOL0L.webm (2MB, 1278x644px) Image search: [Google]
u1QOL0L.webm
2MB, 1278x644px
>>158345454
Sheeit. That Starfarer design bothers me. The back looks like it's too squashed together. Is this webm of a different version because this one looks a lot better
>>
>>158345842
The question is "could the cargo bay loading/access ramp deploy" the answer is probably no, and there is no other way onto the ship when its landed. The docking collar under the nose needs a ladder, ramps are for wheelchairs.
>>
>>158346045
ramp looks accessible you'd just have to walk between all the cargo containers
you can kind of see the door in the top image
>>
anyone here actually tried using the turrets on a ship while someone else pilots it successfully in combat?
>>
I really hope they don't drop the ball on interior customization. The Concept art of interiors got me terribly hyped, but the delivery thus far has just been kinda bland and underwhelming. The retaliator of course being the number one offender.
>>
>>158345512
how's it going to redeem so many peoples' pledges if it's the deemer

one cannot deem if it's designed to redeem
>>
File: ItUpLLE.jpg (282KB, 1920x912px) Image search: [Google]
ItUpLLE.jpg
282KB, 1920x912px
>>158315895
shiet. is there anymore information on the eclipse?

Might have to melt all my shit.
>>
>>158346396
It's the deemer because both CIG and the players have now deemed it to be shit
>>
File: 366.png (85KB, 289x122px) Image search: [Google]
366.png
85KB, 289x122px
>Slowing every ship down to the point that they're barely faster than a Hornet
>Without buffing health, agility, or firepower

What did CIG mean by this?
>>
>>158346686

t. tales from my ass
>>
File: ScreenShot0065.jpg (710KB, 2560x1440px) Image search: [Google]
ScreenShot0065.jpg
710KB, 2560x1440px
>>158346291
You're underestimating how huge that ramp is and how far back it extends when deploying. The tanks are bother higher off the ground and have a wider central gap than those boxes.

You could easily park a starfighter on the fucker if it wasn't for all the superstructure surrounding it.
>>
>>158346714
Well you see the Hornet is the X wing
>>
>>158346367
I'm sure interior design is pretty low on the list of things to do for them at the moment.
>>
File: ScreenShot0034.jpg (411KB, 2560x1440px) Image search: [Google]
ScreenShot0034.jpg
411KB, 2560x1440px
>>158346714
For starters they probably mean that certain ships were so fast on burner they could flatly outrun incoming fire and all you had to do to dodge a missile in anything but like an aurora was strafe sideways and press shift.
>>
>>158346854
I just doubt they're going to make a cargo ship that blocks itself from filling up
>>
File: ScreenShot0028.jpg (391KB, 2560x1440px) Image search: [Google]
ScreenShot0028.jpg
391KB, 2560x1440px
>>158347097
And yet is stuff like interior design that will make or break the "immersion" and "muh fidelity" that the game is sold on. The thing that will bridge the game between "sci fi video game" and "first person universe" is stuff like customizable ship interiors and accumulating wear, tear and mess.
>>
>>158347104

they're gonna have to nerf gun damage and velocities with these speed nerfs because otherwise it's going to be over in seconds every engagement unless you're a SH
>>
File: khartu-al.webm (3MB, 900x563px) Image search: [Google]
khartu-al.webm
3MB, 900x563px
>>158347104
rip strafe god
>>
>>158347104
just buff missiles then
>>
File: 1450175498436.jpg (236KB, 800x800px) Image search: [Google]
1450175498436.jpg
236KB, 800x800px
>>158347268
I hope I can turn off the wear, tear, and mess rp

I don't want to vacuum my spaceship.
>>
File: 1A7pNu9.jpg (349KB, 2898x1525px) Image search: [Google]
1A7pNu9.jpg
349KB, 2898x1525px
>>158347159
I don't expect them too either, though I would not put it past them. They did make a multirole ship with no real cargo space and a "luxury" ship with a shitty bed and useless interior in the 300 series. Much as I love its look, that ship design is completely botched inside. I just hop it doesn't get forgotten about. so far the Starfarer is the only sorta standard form human freighter. I don't want to pull all my shinies on a spindly rack system and I want to be able to land on some barely inhabited shithole to trade stuff without having to offload at an orbital dock first.
>>
>>158347442
I bet it's just random metal scratches
and cum stains
>>
File: ALPxVhV.jpg (215KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]
ALPxVhV.jpg
215KB, 1920x1080px
boy glad wee got a half assed bar 3 microwaves and a sink instead.
>>
File: 36457.jpg (29KB, 450x450px) Image search: [Google]
36457.jpg
29KB, 450x450px
>>158348019

>pointless roleplaying garbage
>>
>>158346714
I think it means they dont have a clue what they're doing. The increased the freelancer back up to 120 and the connie up to 115 m/s I'm hoping that means the rest of the ships will be getting simlar scm boosts in the next few passes.
>>
>>158348019
>wasting real-estate on anything but the bare essentials
>>
>>158347330
>Ship that can dart from side to side near instantly
>Alien in hell as design

Such a good concept
>>
>>158348542
Shame it's going to be useless and expensive

t. Khartu owner
>>
>>158348203

yeah, hopefully the gladius gets a speed bump so it isn't just a sabre -1
>>
thread
>>
File: say_cheese_hind_by_siregar[1].jpg (124KB, 1280x725px) Image search: [Google]
say_cheese_hind_by_siregar[1].jpg
124KB, 1280x725px
>>158345158
>tfw no space hind
it hurts
>>
bout to copy paste everything from the OP and make a really shitty new thread if someone doesnt step it up
>>
>>158349005
They should have just done a global 25% speed reduction in the first place. It would have accomplished what they wanted, while still being fast enough that most ships would feel fun.

I wonder if the rumors about hidden watermarks in screenshots are true or not.
>>
File: 63278298.jpg (111KB, 400x400px) Image search: [Google]
63278298.jpg
111KB, 400x400px
>>158350413
No.
Thread posts: 757
Thread images: 165


[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / bant / biz / c / can / cgl / ck / cm / co / cock / d / diy / e / fa / fap / fit / fitlit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mlpol / mo / mtv / mu / n / news / o / out / outsoc / p / po / pol / qa / qst / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / spa / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vint / vip / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y] [Search | Top | Home]

I'm aware that Imgur.com will stop allowing adult images since 15th of May. I'm taking actions to backup as much data as possible.
Read more on this topic here - https://archived.moe/talk/thread/1694/


If you need a post removed click on it's [Report] button and follow the instruction.
DMCA Content Takedown via dmca.com
All images are hosted on imgur.com.
If you like this website please support us by donating with Bitcoins at 16mKtbZiwW52BLkibtCr8jUg2KVUMTxVQ5
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties.
Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.
This is a 4chan archive - all of the content originated from that site.
This means that RandomArchive shows their content, archived.
If you need information for a Poster - contact them.