Should developers be able to counter-claim refund requests or

>>389844965
make longer games?
that would stop it no?

Their protection is making games that are enjoyable for more than 2 hours

>>389844965
>Playing any SHMUP only once
I don't seen an issue, the fag that refunded clearly has no interest in that game

>>389844965
Should /v/ be protected from endlessly recurring threads?

>>389844965
Valve will take away your refund privilege if you behave in such a way. Is that not protection enough?

>>389844965
No.

If they know the refund conditions, they should've made their game in accordance to it such that events like these doesn't show up.
If it was released before the refund update, the fault is all on consumers.

>>389844965
No, instead Steam should start showing something similar to howlongtobeat so people not interested in vignette game faggotry don't get scammed in the first place.

>>389844965
>be able to counter-claim refund requests
They already can do it by not making shit game or the one only last for 2 hours. Even 3~4 hours game would suffice and it's still considered short as fuck.
If it's straight repeal, it could be abused due to how many manchildren dev out there nowadays.

If your game is so shit you can just complete it before 2 hours, it deserves to get refunded.

>some kind of extra protection from them
Some already do that by making intros for the games super fucking long. A Night in the Woods or whatever that not-game is a good example.

>>389845859
Game being short doesn't mean it's shit though

>>389845859
So metal gear rising deserve to be refunded?

>>389846191
If you can beat it under 2 hours? Hell yeah.

JUUUUUUST