You may chose. Play one 10/10 game that is 100 hours long.

File: 1500231337440s.jpg (5KB, 250x250px) Image search: [Google]

5KB, 250x250px

Three games please

>>389646495
Three games

File: derp horse.jpg (79KB, 926x960px) Image search: [Google]

79KB, 926x960px

>>389646495

option 2

variety is the spice of life

Second option, of course.

>>389646495
Three, not even close. Variety is worth ten hours, particularly since my team isn't infinite.

File: 1497524721297.png (4KB, 256x444px) Image search: [Google]

4KB, 256x444px

What if the 3 games ware 9/10.

Id probably still pick them over the one 10/10

>>389646495
Why do I not have time for both? Am I dying OP? I'd rather spend my last 100 hours with my family/friends then.

>>389646495
>You dont have time for both.
but there are three?

File: 14709975977861.jpg (45KB, 640x640px) Image search: [Google]

45KB, 640x640px

>>389647306
>that one faggot in the thread

>>389646495
I'm a jobless NEET, I absolutely have time for both

>>389646495
where does the ten hours in second option go?

>>389647791
But what if you did not.

>>389646495
>Play three 10/10 games that are each 30 hours long.
This

>>389647791
Same. I take 3 x 100 hours.

>>389646495
False equivalence. Some people rate a game more highly if it's shorter/longer than others.

Personally, I like long-winded deep games as I'm to intelligent for anything else.

>>389648038
Funny how the same is true for children and autists.

honestly I don't even think of any games as a 10/10

>>389646495

Option 2

>>389646495
>Play a 7.5/10 metacritic rated game
>Play a game rated 9/10 by /v/
Which one do you choose bros?

>>389647306
/thread

>>389651165
9/10 from /v/

Last time I didn't listen to /v/ I grabbed Bioshock Infinite, last time I'll get burnt.

>>389646495
If it's truely a 10/10 it would have near infinite replayability. But option 2 for the variety

With very few exceptions, there aren't many games I've put more than 30 hours into, so definitely the second option.

>>389651165
If the 7.5 game is in a niche genre that I enjoy (e.g. dungeon crawlers), then it's probably pretty good.

File: 712312.png (123KB, 260x362px) Image search: [Google]

123KB, 260x362px

>>389646495
>You dont have time for both.
you don't have the authority to tell me what i do and don't have the time for

3 10/10 games, they could be less than 30. Short sweet and to the point often works out better. I love Dragon Age Origins Awakening, Breath of the Wild, and Vanilla-Wrath WoW but for all the 10/10 moments there's a lot of not 10/10 moments. A game with a more reasonable length can keep it consistently 9-10/10 the entire way through.

Alternatively one or two 10/10 multiplayer games I'll get at least a thousand hours out of with my friends over the years. Kirby Air Ride, Smash Bros 64, Melee and 4, etc

>>389651165
/v/ has a terrible habit of writing off good games for asinine reasons and propping up games for equally asinine reasons. You'll end up stuck with a shitty game like Neptunia or Senran Kagura
Metacritic isn't going to be any better though, you're fucked either way.

>>389646495

Option 2. Most likely the first one should really be a 30-hour game too, but there's 70 hours of reused content and cheap gimmicks to extend the play time

>>389651165
They're often the same thing
Some niche game that's great but the majority of the western audience just don't really get

>>389651165
The 7.5/10 game.
nu-/v/ doesn't know shit about video games