This would be a better fit for Switch than LA Noire. I have no

>>389572889
It's been stated before that Red Dead is literally too complicated to port over to anything.
It's not going to happen.

>>389573016
But how, it ran on 360.

>>389572889
>it flopped before, why wouldn't it flop again
LA Noire didn't flop though you retard

Switch couldn't run RDR.

File: Digital Foundry Red Dead Redemption 360 vs. PS3.png (2MB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1920x1080px

Rockstar don't want to go through the heavy burden of fixing the game's code to port it, apparently. It's a shame because unless a 360 emulator happens we'll never get the proper version of the game on archived on PC.

>>389573069
Its code was a chaotic mess, they had to last minute get their best project manager on it to just get it working on time.

>>389574142


why does the ps3 version look like shit?

They can't port it to PC because of messy code so it ain't coming to Switch either.

>>389574671
Because the PS3 is shit.

>>389574758
that's not the reason. ps3 is supposed to be more powerful than 360

>>389574142
bro I had both systems and the 360 and PS3 versions were identical graphically for Red Dead. This picture is objectively wrong

Your only difference was finding matches online, PS3 was cooked for that (for this game only)

>>389574847
Well the actual reason is that PS4 only had a more powerful CPU, but that CPU was difficult for third parties to work with, which is why most multiplats looked better on 360.

If the rumors are correct, they lost the source code of the game

>>389572889
I don't give a shit about the Switch but I would've preferred RDR on PS4 instead of LA Noire, especially with the sequel coming out.

>>389573016
That's just the excuse PCbros use

>>389574867
you should get glasses, bud.

I never played la noire so I will think about it, but if it's $60 no fucking way. I am tired of all this overpriced shit.

>la noire flopped
Yeah, just like GTA V was a massive failure since /v/ said it was.