[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / bant / biz / c / can / cgl / ck / cm / co / cock / d / diy / e / fa / fap / fit / fitlit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mlpol / mo / mtv / mu / n / news / o / out / outsoc / p / po / pol / qa / qst / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / spa / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vint / vip / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y ] [Search | Free Show | Home]

I thought the Switch would get third party titles? I don't

This is a blue board which means that it's for everybody (Safe For Work content only). If you see any adult content, please report it.

Thread replies: 139
Thread images: 23

File: aasss.png (55KB, 915x480px) Image search: [Google]
aasss.png
55KB, 915x480px
I thought the Switch would get third party titles?
I don't get why it can't run a downgraded port on a game designed to be a PS3 game.
>>
>>389399795
Just port the mobile one;^)
>>
Switch will get third part su--
>>
>>389399795
The game just was way too weak and shitty to run the switch ;)
>>
>>389399795
The PS4 can barely run Luminous
>>
>>389399795
that's what happens when you try to port a 50 GB game to a 32 GB console.
>>
>>389400086
Why would sonybros be salty here?
>>
Lmao at all the people who paid for a 4 year old Nvidia tablet reskinned with a Nintendo logo. Nintendo is making a mint on the hardware. In total it maybe cost $75 to slap together likely using existing Nvidia Shield parts.
>>
File: 1498611999315.jpg (26KB, 324x291px) Image search: [Google]
1498611999315.jpg
26KB, 324x291px
>>389400086
This poster
>>
>>389399795
it'll be about 2-3 years old by the time they have it ready for the console
it would be a dumb decision since it's a shit game now and it'll be a shit game with zero interest in it by the time it's out, since you already have the option to play it on PS4, Xbox, mobile (to an extent) or PC
Square should fuck off and make a better Final Fantasy game
I don't care if it comes to the Switch
just that the next game is actually good
>>
>>389399795
Not even a well optimized Switch port would make me want to play that turd again.
>>
>>389400086
Click the wrong image there fuckboy?
>>
File: 1487547741324.jpg (56KB, 583x435px) Image search: [Google]
1487547741324.jpg
56KB, 583x435px
>>389399795
The other consoles can barely run FFXV as is, so that much was a given.
>>
File: 1497406256951.jpg (43KB, 470x521px) Image search: [Google]
1497406256951.jpg
43KB, 470x521px
>>389399795
Oh for the fucks sake, how about squeenix try to stop shilling this fucking game?

I don't give two shits if is coming to switch or not, its time to move on.
>>
>>389400459
THat's a pretty large overstatement. The game wasn't 60 FPS sure, but it never performed awful throughout the game. At its worst was the first demo which ran terribly, the full release was fine.

I'm confused why people keep claiming it was by any means unplayable on the Xbox One or PS4. It performs even better than BOTW which drops frames during combat and DOF lockon.
>>
File: 10315-drake.jpg (330KB, 880x897px) Image search: [Google]
10315-drake.jpg
330KB, 880x897px
>>389399795
Dumb console warrior.

That piece of shit will remain a piece of shit no matter what system it's on unless they drastically overhaul the story, combat, magic system, and pricing scheme.
>>
>>389399795
There are several factors to this. One is that the engine could be badly optimized (like Yakuza 6's Dragon Engine) and the reason PS4 and One can run it is because they have extra horse power to make up for the engines unoptimized short comings. OR the Switch is just simply too weak and can't handle it too well. Could be other factors as well of course.
>>
>>389399795
I thought XV engine is garbage to began with?
What did they expect running it on weaker hardware? Just port the mobile version and be done with it.
>>
>>389400949
Could be both.
>>
>>389399795
>ps4 and xbone can barely handle the horrible mess luminous engine is
>didn't make any sort of changes or optimizations to make it run better in switch

This is some shit b8 thread.
>>
>>389401115
Switch is not that weak, sure isn't going run shit at 4k but is really far from be a ps360 tier crap.

And more importantly, Devkits this time work fine and dandy unlike the mess that was WiiU.
>>
>>389400949
The article states that squenix made no effort to make a switch build. They just ported the build they already had and got terrible results. Obviously the switch is underpowered but they didn't even bother to optimize the game to run it properly.
>>
>>389401402
>barely handle the horrible mess luminous engine
???
>>389401495
Don't devs have to compensate for handheld mode? If so, its severely underclocked and barely a passable Wii U.
>>
>>389401557
>they didn't even bother to optimize the game to run it properly.
If a big ass company like Square isn't willing, who will exactly? It's just going to be indie ports later in life then.
>>
>>389401642
A bunch of indies ported shit in matter of weeks to switch, even some incompetent ass devs like NIS said that they had no problem porting stuff.

I feel that squeenix just want attention, also reminds me from some faggots saying that they had project cars running on WiiU despite never having any kind of build on it.
>>
>>389401862
Maybe because indie shit is alot less complex technically, and alot less intensive. Disgaea isn't exactly fucking hard to run, they're on the Vita too.
>>
>>389402092
The engine is a mess, but proper optimization can do wonders.

But well, I really think that they are just trying to push FFXV subject, they are awfully silent about DQ.
>>
>>389399795
>I thought the Switch would get third party titles?
You thought wrong.
>>
File: 1502187382886.gif (2MB, 230x199px) Image search: [Google]
1502187382886.gif
2MB, 230x199px
People should just wake up to the fact that the Switch will have poor 3rd party support.
>>
File: 1491679958574.jpg (121KB, 667x1000px) Image search: [Google]
1491679958574.jpg
121KB, 667x1000px
>Problem 1
Companies have to exert extra manpower and time to optimize games that otherwise were not made to perform on the Switch's hardware.

>Problem 2
They wouldn't sell even if optimized, because third party games sell notoriously poor on Nintendo consoles.
>>
Reminder that Switch only has 4 GB of unified ram
>>
File: 2532256.png (331KB, 600x605px) Image search: [Google]
2532256.png
331KB, 600x605px
>>389399795
> Wanting a port of a shit game
>>
File: Confuzinnied.png (38KB, 253x185px) Image search: [Google]
Confuzinnied.png
38KB, 253x185px
I honestly don't care about "major" third party games that Nintendo usually misses. I buy Nintendo consoles for Nintendo games.
>>
>>389402891
>third party games sell notoriously poor on Nintendo consoles.

Ah yeah, lemme port a even worse version of some old game that somehow runs worse than any other console, also we make sure that is full priced and have no marketing.
>>
>>389404058
This image makes no sense. When did ironic vore Wojaks start becoming the norm?
>>
>>389400057
This
>>
>m-muh optimization
>d-devs are just l-lazy!
>they just dont want to make a switch game!
>the switch is too powerfull for this old game haha

holy shit this thread is sad as fuck.
>>
>>389400687
I have a ps4 pro, it ran bad.
>>
Im playing FFXV right now.

You Nintoddles dont want it
i honestly dont even remotely remember what the story was about

I just started the Assassin's Creed dlc.
no idea what's going and honestly I still dont care.
>>
>>389399795
XV was already too ambitious for the PS4/Xbone. Why would anyone think it would run well enough on Switch?
>>
File: 1504458544443.webm (3MB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]
1504458544443.webm
3MB, 1280x720px
switch is slightly stronger than ps3/360
and devs have to make the game run docked and undocked Switch is shit
>>
It must be exhausting being a Switch fan having to beg for every game to be released on it.
>>
>>389404850
It was to avenge your father... whom you only saw in a handful of cutscenes, most of which were in demos and supplementary material.

It was to obtain the Armiger... only half of which are required to complete the game and one of which can only be found in a dungeon after the story is cleared.

It was to find Luna... who, again, was only fleshed out in supplementary material.

It was to defeat the empire... which had already been hollowed out from the inside from the emperor on down by a memelord and practically self-destructed without any agency on the part of the players.

...Jesus Christ, that game's story was pointless.
>>
>>389406190
and you know what really bothered me the most, no town or all 2 cities treated Noctis like royalty. nor did I feel like it.
>>
Anyone who knows shit about video games already knew that "3rd party support" on the Shitch is bullshit. It's always the retarded Nintendogs who still believe that anyone gives a fuck about their underpowered piece of dogshit handheld. But I know, you don't "care anyway" because all these games are "shit" and you only bought the Shitch for the gazillionth bling bling wahoo jumpy dumpy colorful kiddyshit rehash Mario game.
>>
>game announced
>switch port when
>game not coming to switch
>we didn't want a port, it's a shit game anyways
>>
>>389402817
We already have. I'll say the same thing I say every time I see this thread, because it's made at least 3 times a day:
No one ever thought these fucking games were coming to the Switch, so why do game journos feel the need to constantly write articles about games that aren't going to be on the Switch. Why is there an article about P5 not being on the Switch? Why is there an article about Hearthstone not being on the Switch? Why are there similar articles about RDR and Destiny 2? Who the fuck is writing these and why? What's the purpose? It's almost as if there's some kind of coordinated attack on Nintendo, but why?
>>
>>389407102
literally no one thought this was ever going to be on the Switch, the article is clickbait
>>
>>389406965
Hello Neogaf.
>>
>>389406965
SEETHING

how autistic are you kid.
>>
>>389407312

Because the Switch is Nintendo's current gen console you fucking retard.
>>
ITT: Sonytard Circlejerk
>>
File: 1503424425364.jpg (482KB, 1600x564px) Image search: [Google]
1503424425364.jpg
482KB, 1600x564px
>>389399795
?

modern engine can scale down ?
>>
>>389407485
*handheld
>>
>>389407375
Dark souls
>>
>>389407593
*Hybrid
>>
File: 1476283578873.jpg (51KB, 669x688px) Image search: [Google]
1476283578873.jpg
51KB, 669x688px
>>389407485
>the switch is a current gen console
>>
Hopefully the make the right choice and use UE4 for the Switch game and all future FF projects.
I mean they dropped the engine for FF7 and KH3
>>
>>389406721
Vyv treated you like his bitch

I enjoyed it he's a good sugar daddy for twink crew
>>
>>389407485
The only current gen console is the Xbox One X
>>
>>389407485
you're missing the point, fuckwit

Persona has always been a sony exclusive series, Hearthstone isn't on ANY console, and literally no one ever has even had a slight idea about Destiny 2 being on ANY Nintendo platform

these articles are the same thing as if someone wrote an article about how BotW isn't coming to the PS4 or Smash Brothers won't be getting a Steam release

the articles are fucking bottom tier clickbait
>>
>>389407867

Nice reddit spacing, kiddo.
>>
>>389407735
generations are defined by release date, not system specs, you fucking retarded sony nigger
>>
>Console fags legit want to laugh at Nintendo fans
>the game barely runs in the PS4
The fact that it's coming to PC actually made me interested in giving it another go around, since the games visuals along with mod potential actually make it seem like it could be worth playing.
>>
>>389407812
Revisions are not part of another gen
>>389407961
wrong
>>
>>389408012
Then what makes a system part of the new gen?
All systems are just revisions of the last.
>>
>>389407898
>le reddit spacing maymay
go back
>>
>>389408012
actually that's completely correct, you fucking shitposting consolewarring idiot
>>
>>389403185
>no marketing
>it literally had a TV ad
Stop trying to change history.
>>
>>389405459
>Switch is stronger than last gen
>Can barely run botw at 30 fps
>Botw looks like fucking crayons
>>
File: 1498876265510.jpg (49KB, 460x276px) Image search: [Google]
1498876265510.jpg
49KB, 460x276px
>trying to put FF15 on switch
>not World of final fantasy or 12 HD
>>
Luminous was made with high end consoles in mind and STILL ran like shit. It would be a disaster on the Switch. If they really want to make a FF game set in the XV universe to the Switch, make a game tailor made for the system running on UE4 or something.

Anyway, I'd rather them work on something new for the Switch instead like a new Tactics game or Crystal Chronicles.
>>
>>389407867
>Third party is the same as first party
What is Monster Hunter World?
>>
>>389408236
slightly in some ways but it's gimped because games have to run docked and undocked
>>
>>389408236
>I know literally nothing about alpha effects, particle physics, and draw distance
also, it runs at a solid 30fps after the patch months ago, shitposter
>>
>>389408367
its a monster hunter game you will never ever play
>>
>>389408367
good job, you cherry picked the one instance where Switch isn't getting a third party title that people thought it would

that still doesn't explain why there needs to be articles about why games like P5 and Destiny 2 won't be on the Switch
>>
>>389407898

>I have no counterpoint, the post
>>
>>389408326
aren't there other engines? that aren't unity?
>>
>>389408265
Best movie and best mainline Final Fantasy in one post? I didn't think it was possible on /v/.
>>
File: 1501503081332.jpg (773KB, 1855x2275px) Image search: [Google]
1501503081332.jpg
773KB, 1855x2275px
>>389408506
Because pic related
>>
>>389408012

So if someone were to release a new 8 bit console, it would be classified as a new first generation console?

You do realize the very definition of generation is a collection of people (or devices) that exist during the same timeframe, right?
>>
>>389399795
If you read the rest of the article, they actually just ran the engine without optimization.

But of course when it's Nintendo
>>
>>389402891
Problem 2 is more likely since the existence of PC ports mean there are varying performance options that allows it to run on the lowest possible setting. That and it's easier to believe developers are lazy people that puts profit ahead of anything else.
>>
>>389408762
>t-the switch is powerfull!
>>
>>389408630
>B-but PS4
>Then it got released to PS4 too

God, these cucks are delusional
>>
File: Screenshot (267).png (117KB, 273x262px) Image search: [Google]
Screenshot (267).png
117KB, 273x262px
>>389408996
>implying I meant that the Switch can run a game at 8K60fps
Of fucking course it'll run like shit on a Nintendo console, this should be easy to remember now that it's been done ever since the Wii. Still, it should be noted that no optimization was made when tested since they wanted to see the limits of the Switch.

plus it would be better to take that downgraded port over an even worse mobile port
>>
File: 1504400578081.png (177KB, 270x278px) Image search: [Google]
1504400578081.png
177KB, 270x278px
>>389399795
>Switch would get third party titles
>>
>>389399795
>>389409628

The Switch is getting a brand new RPG from Square, Octopath Traveler. Why would they want Playstation's sloppy seconds?
>>
>>389399795
He didn't run so good.
>>
>people fell for the WiiU a second time
Face it, Nintendo should have died years ago, the only reason they didn't was because 3DS acted as life support, WiiU was a total flop and Switch is following the exact same path to failure - no 3rd party support, lackluster launch year lineup, it's like watching a rerun. It's another trainwreck happening in slow motion and people still fell for it.

They can't do consoles right anymore. They should go 3rd party and forget about consoles, just like Sega did. Their time in the sun is over, they need to step aside for basically just Sony at this point since Microsoft is a noncontender and always has been.
>>
File: project-octopath-traveler.jpg (32KB, 700x394px) Image search: [Google]
project-octopath-traveler.jpg
32KB, 700x394px
>>389410070
Ironically this game looks 10x better than FF15, but only to nostalgiafags like me
>>
>>389400065
>muh uncompressed audio
>>
>>389410240
Considering how we got absolutely no other information about the game, I'm getting the feeling Square is either fucking up as usual or trying to weasel out of making the game for the Switch.
>>
File: 1357594742495.jpg (240KB, 500x500px) Image search: [Google]
1357594742495.jpg
240KB, 500x500px
>>389400687
> It performs even better than BOTW

HA, opinion discarded. This shit doesn;t even perform better than Xenoblade X, the game sonyfanboys would not stop bringing up in final fantasy 15 threads
>>
>>389410469
Square isn't making it, the guys behind Bravely Default are making it.
>>
>>389408630
I bet these are the same people saying P5 will get a Switch port, kek
>>
>>389410240
yeah i'm excited to emulate this too.
>>
>>389399795
>PS4 can't even run that thing well, needs Pro and several patches
>fuck if I know about Xbox
>trying to milk 4K for the PC crowd
No shit it wouldn't work with a straight port Tabata, you autist.
>>
>>389410581
Which is great since Silicon Studio has actually made some good shit in the past few years.
>>
>>389410240
this looks so retarded,it's almost like those fanmade stuff glorifying some old shit,i cant even put it into words exactly
>>
>>389410581
Which is even more worrying. There hasn't been any new info whatsoever. I'm thinking something has fucked up in development somehow.
>>
>>389410556
Choppy in most areas
20 fps in some areas
looks like a 360 game
dlc announced in the first 2 months
>>
>>389410915
They said it was gonna be at TGS
>>
File: stop1.png (37KB, 256x256px) Image search: [Google]
stop1.png
37KB, 256x256px
LOL, be for real
Who is asking for this shit game to be ported to the Nintendo Switch, let alone is upset enough to make a stand alone article about it and link it here?
>>
Battery wouldn't even last 2 hours.

Heck, the battery won't even last 2 hours for skyrim, for how demanding that game is, especially without optimization mods.
>>
>>389410905
They put heavy bloom lighting on every sprite in a night scene. I'm not feeling confident about their intelligence.
>>
File: ffcc_original.jpg (51KB, 330x370px) Image search: [Google]
ffcc_original.jpg
51KB, 330x370px
>>389399795
>we will never see a port of pic related remastered with online play for Switch.

I would rather have this than an mmo.
>>
>>389399795
>well enough
But it worked.
>>
>>389408012
>wrong
For your sake I hope this is bait.
>>
>>389410937
Iam glad you know how poorly FF15 ran and what unessary features come with the game, but that has nothing to do to contradict my statement.
>>
>>389410937
Were we talking about Zelda or Final Fantasy again?
>>
File: _______.png (166KB, 413x350px) Image search: [Google]
_______.png
166KB, 413x350px
>Constant posts online about asking maybe they should port the Crystal Chronicles series, one of the good final fantasy games

>we tried porting FF15 but it doesn't work

>...

Man, why is this even news, nobody asked for this awful shit. What the fuck is SquareEnix doing?
>>
>>389411253
botw looks like a ps2 game so obviously ff
>>
>>389411253
botw before it got patched
>>
>>389400057
There's nothing wrong with 20 fps.
>>
Doesn't surprise me.
The game doesn't exactly run well on the platforms it's already on.

>>389400687
I'm like 90% sure Duscae ran better than XV
>>
I wouldn't play a XV port in the first place.
>>
>>389410989
this guy gets it
>>
So /v/ likes XV now?
>>
>>389413438
only the people who haven't played it :^)
>>
>>389399795

>BREAKING NEWS!!!
>Crystal Tools didn't work

You don't say?
>>
>>389400446
>It's the version before they unfuck chapter 13
I'd rather eat a bullet desu
>>
>Bring out the most of the engine

What the fuck does that even mean? Also click bait title.
>>
File: 1400510071106.png (13KB, 528x424px) Image search: [Google]
1400510071106.png
13KB, 528x424px
Expected!
>>
>Trying to port FFXV instead of Kingdom Hearts which makes 10x more sense

To this day I still wonder why its coming to Xbone, might as well just cancel it.
>>
>>389414000
They can't flat out say the Switch is a turd of a hardware, because they're trying to keep business relations nice
>>
>>389399795
It has third party support.

Sonic Mania, Puyo Tetris, shovel knight, stardew, project octopath traveler, super meat boy forever, mario + rabbids, minecraft, jackbox, etc. tons of great games.

If "third party support" just means assassins creed 12 and call of duty 25, then you were stupid for ever thinking Switch would get those. Sorry man.
>>
>>389416040
Indie support isn't the same as 3rd party support. Neither are ports of last gen games. You will never be able to play relevant 3rd party games on the Switch because it's not powerful enough, and people were the ones called stupid for pointing this out
>>
I feel like it wouldn't have mattered if the Switch was up to par with PS4/XONE in terms of hardware. 3rd party titles just don't sell that well on Nintendo consoles.
>>
>>389415641
They basically said they don't want fans to get upset because it'd look like they're adding even more work and potential delays to KH3 so they're going to release it on the announced platforms then consider release on other platforms later

same deal with the HD collection, they want fans to know that they're focusing completely on releasing KH3 next year and not dicking around making ports
>>
Newflash to the high school freshmen in this thread... In 3 years you'll take Econ and learn that regardless of the system's power if there's demand companies will develop for it, and the demand shows zero signs of slowing down.

>>389400291
Costs over 200 to manufacture actually and the technology to create a more powerful handheld doesn't exist unless you want it to cost twice as much
>>
>>389410639
It wouldn't be a hardware issue. It would be a sony paid for exclusive rights issue.
>>
>>389399795
Isn't FFXV rated above E? No point porting a game that won't sell on a Nintendo system.
>>
>>389416704
>3rd party titles just don't sell that well on Nintendo consoles
That's probably more of a deterrent than the now customarily weak Nintendo hardware. Why risk wasting time and money downgrading games only for Switch owners to ignore them?
>>
Nintendo lost.
>>
>>389419087
At least in this case it's academic. Final Fantasy XV is and will be a mess of a game unless it undergoes such a dramatic start-from-scratch overhaul, no matter what system it is on.
>>
>>389413438
/v/ is weird. Talked shit before the game was released, then sorta loved it for the first few days because of muh travelogue, and then it hated it, and now it's luke warm toward it. /v/ roller coasters a lot.
>>
>>389419326
And Sony always wins.

Never forget this /v/.
Thread posts: 139
Thread images: 23


[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / bant / biz / c / can / cgl / ck / cm / co / cock / d / diy / e / fa / fap / fit / fitlit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mlpol / mo / mtv / mu / n / news / o / out / outsoc / p / po / pol / qa / qst / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / spa / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vint / vip / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y] [Search | Top | Home]

I'm aware that Imgur.com will stop allowing adult images since 15th of May. I'm taking actions to backup as much data as possible.
Read more on this topic here - https://archived.moe/talk/thread/1694/


If you need a post removed click on it's [Report] button and follow the instruction.
DMCA Content Takedown via dmca.com
All images are hosted on imgur.com.
If you like this website please support us by donating with Bitcoins at 16mKtbZiwW52BLkibtCr8jUg2KVUMTxVQ5
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties.
Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.
This is a 4chan archive - all of the content originated from that site.
This means that RandomArchive shows their content, archived.
If you need information for a Poster - contact them.