Why do movies and TV shows look smooth and normal when they're

The Hobbit looked terrible. Clearly 24 FPS should be the standard.

>>389369497
>Why do movies and TV shows look smooth and normal when they're filmed at 24 fps
nah
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1La4QzGeaaQ

movies dont look smooth at 24fps. you are a blind retard. movies arent interactive and dont have as much camera movement as a game, so it's less noticeable

>>389369854
>Try to play video in 4k
>Video stutters like crazy and my computer shits itself and crashes
Looking forward to 8k!

>>389370503
I played it in 1080 and it was silky smooth

>>389369497
>but video games look jerky and are unplayable at 30 fps
Calm yourself, you massive sperg

>>389369497
i can't see the difference between 30 or 60. why do PCfags make such a huge deal about it?

>>389369497
>Why do movies and TV shows look smooth and normal when they're filmed at 24 fps

Motion blur.

>>389370936
Because they desperately scramble for something to feel superior about.

>>389369497
Motion blur.

>>389370936
Maybe your eyes are broken, I'm not kidding. Get that checked if your insurance covers it.

File: FPS Comparison.webm (566KB, 960x540px) Image search: [Google]

566KB, 960x540px

>>389369497
superior webm version
>>389369497
>Why do movies and TV shows look smooth and normal when they're filmed at 24 fps
But they don't, a lot of tv is at 60 fps already as are sports and with movies they use considerable blur to transition between frames, static shots, third person and avoid using fast panning shots to not give the viewer motion sickness.
24fps is actually pretty shit but there are ways to hide it, as for videogames the smoother the better since it requires feedback but you are exaggerating how bad 30fps is.

>>389370936
It's not so much about visuals as it is control responsiveness.
In other mediums it doesn't matter.

>>389371796
No it's about visuals. Even at 55 it's noticeably jarring compared to a perfect 60 fps.