So Lego Worlds is coming out for the Switch tomorrow. I'm

physical or digital only?

its not optimized that well on PC, i cant imagine it being very good on Switch. could be wrong though.

Its a fun game, but i miss the endless open world of the beta version.

how it works now isnt as fun, but its still alright

File: 1465348752136.jpg (35KB, 498x498px) Image search: [Google]

35KB, 498x498px

>>389311954

I'm getting the physical one. It's ten bucks more, but comes with all the DLC and doesn't take up as much space.

>>389312271
>comes with all the DLC
might have to look into this then. it seems like a neat game to have on the switch if it runs well

>>389312053
i torrented the beta and played it a bit till i got bored. How does it work differently now?

>>389310985
The pc version is pretty shitty. Bad combat, bad building controls, the worst FPS mode I've ever seen, your character auto climbs far too easily, nothing really to do once you unlock most of the interesting premade stuff.
I got it for $10 early on and I still feel I wasted my money. And I usually like the lego stuff as a guilty pleasure.

>>389310985
But do you get to play as the Pizza Delivery dude

File: 7171.jpg (173KB, 800x569px) Image search: [Google]

173KB, 800x569px

Post that one Lego set you always wanted as a kid, but never got.

Why do Lego sets from the 90s/early 2000's look so much better than the ones they release today?

>>389312053
>>389312271
>>389312589
The fact that the game runs like such shit on the PS4 I highly doubt that the Switch version would be even half as good

>>389314897
>Why do Lego sets from the 90s/early 2000's look so much better than the ones they release today?

The simplicity. They leave just enough to the imagination, while the newer sets get overdesigned.

>>389314897
They were blockier and tended to leave the studs on top instead of covering them with tiles