Thread replies: 10
Thread images: 5
Thread images: 5
File: shulk face.png (505KB, 600x600px) Image search:
[Google]
505KB, 600x600px
>people complain about Xenoblade 2's artstyle
>call it ugly
>this is the main characters face texture in Xenoblade 1
>probably some of the worst facial textures/models in any AAA game
>"b-buh, that's the Wii! The Wii U had XCX!!!!"
Yeah, and it was just as ugly but this time it was HIGH DEFINITION UGLY.
>>
File: Germs near me.png (189KB, 529x529px) Image search:
[Google]
189KB, 529x529px
>>389162573
>AAA game
Uhmmmmm
>>
>>389162573
>any AAA game
the problem is it was a pretty low budget game.
and XBX looked awful too
>>
Sorry but i don't recall seeing Xenoblade advertised in my TV in NY or saw it in public, that's what you have to do if you are an AAA game
>>
File: what hideous faces.webm (575KB, 960x540px) Image search:
[Google]
575KB, 960x540px
>>389162573
>he prefers HD face textures
>>
File: Xenoblade.full.845453[1].jpg (111KB, 700x1300px) Image search:
[Google]
![Xenoblade.full.845453[1].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/ZUxYxH1.jpg "Xenoblade.full.845453[1]")
111KB, 700x1300px
>>389162573
That doesn't even look that bad. for a Wii title. And it's artstyle is still better than XC2's
>>
>>389163538
They don't look so bad.
>>
>>389162573
I've always hated the character designs in XBC, but I hate the ones in XBC2 even more.
>Those fucking MC pants.
>>
![6[1].png](https://i.imgur.com/aQaPiaT.png "6[1]")
>>389163809
Jesus Christ, what happened?
>>
>>389162573
Xenoblade was a tech marvel. Lets see you make an open world game that will run on a console with only 88MB RAM.
Thread posts: 10
Thread images: 5
Thread images: 5