If Fallout New Vegas is so good, how come there's no

>>389117671
true

Cant argue with that

>>389117671
>if Michaelangelo's David is so good, how come there's no David 2? Huh?

>>389117671
>if immortality is good how come there's no immortality?
Stupid fallout 3 babby

>>389117671
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BfrjGf0iHEQ

>>389117671
https://pastebin.com/Gp1rfk0Q

project brazil coming soon which is a full-on total conversion mod

File: 1488507367864.gif (2MB, 324x390px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 324x390px

>>389117671
If pong was so good, how come there's no Pong 2?

File: metaheaderimg530pxheadre.jpg (44KB, 530x257px) Image search: [Google]

44KB, 530x257px

>>389117671
1 point is why.

If Half-Life 2 is so good, how come there's no Half-Life 3? Hmm?

>>389119283

Why did you post this? There's no answer given in it. There's only conjecture and factual inaccuracies.

I absolutely hate everybody who likes this game or even thinks it's story is decent.

Generic "All sides are bad LMAO" morality, character "development" is shoehorned in, especially with companions where you spend a certain amount of time with them and they dump their oh-so-tragic life story on you.

Look, I don't care if you're a lesbian and your bull-dyke partner got lost in a casino, I don't care if you murdered your wife.

Don't make me mention the DLC.

Old World Blues drops you inside a mountain because reasons, some scientists want you to kill another scientist who is doing no harm. Once again, no reasons.

Honest Hearts was flat out boring. Go back and forth, grab some people, kill some people, leave or have the tribe stay.

Lonesome Road is a pseudo-intellectual non-game with a fedora protag and a backstory presented by buzzwords.

Dead Money had characters act unrealistically and the moral of the story was too simple, "Don't be greedy."

Overall, It's an objectively bad game.

>>389119094
That genuinely made me laugh, thanks.

>>389119283
Someone sent me this same video earlier. It took him six minutes to say nothing at all.

At least he didn't do that 10:01 ad revenue shit.

>>389119916
>Look, I don't care if you're a lesbian and your bull-dyke partner got lost in a casino, I don't care if you murdered your wife.
Sounds like a personal problem.
>Don't make me mention the DLC.
>mentions it anyway
You're trying too hard, only Honest Hearts is the meh one and even that has its high points.

File: woahnigga.png (139KB, 500x522px) Image search: [Google]

139KB, 500x522px

>>389119916

>>389119916
>Generic "All sides are bad LMAO" morality
how is that even generic, this kind of thing isn't even that common
>character "development" is shoehorned in, especially with companions where you spend a certain amount of time with them and they dump their oh-so-tragic life story on you.
companion quests trigger only if you do certain things and talk to certain NPCs, they don't just happen by staying with you a long time
>some scientists want you to kill another scientist who is doing no harm. Once again, no reasons.
The scientists are all batshit insane who can't stop making experiments that turn wrong in the name of progress. Two examples of those experiments are Cazadores and Nightstalkers. Mobius wanted them contained so they wouldn't do any more harm. Try paying attention to your surrounding instead of just shooting stuff.
>Honest Hearts was flat out boring. Go back and forth, grab some people, kill some people, leave or have the tribe stay.
>he didn't collect the survivalist quest
>Dead Money had characters act unrealistically and the moral of the story was too simple, "Don't be greedy."
No the moral of the story is letting go which is also a core theme to the game as a whole (factions being based on pre-war societies, Courier tracking down Benny)
>Lonesome Road is a pseudo-intellectual non-game with a fedora protag and a backstory presented by buzzwords.
You can just call out on Ulyssees' shit

>Overall, It's an objectively bad game.
nice opnions there, bud