http://www.sharp-world.com/corporat e/news/170831.html THAN

>>388870339
yawn

MOOOOORE
I NEED MOOOOOOORE

>>388870339
For what purpose? Your eyes can't even see past 720p anyways

>>388870339
>>>/g/

File: 1494711814442.jpg (46KB, 258x586px) Image search: [Google]

46KB, 258x586px

>>388870339
>http://www.sharp-world.com/corporate/news/170831.html
4k is a meme.

8k IS WHERE ITS AT

I really doubt we'll ever get to the point where 8k makes sense for desktops
Even for 32" monitors 4K is not only more than enough in terms of sharpness but you even have to adjust the DPI to at least 125% to make it readable.
As far as TVs are concerned 8K only makes sense for extremely large TVs.

who the fuck would want 8k? that would waste so much performance

128K soon

>>388871032
http://www.dell.com/en-us/shop/dell-ultrasharp-32-8k-monitor-up3218k/apd/210-alez/monitors-monitor-accessories

You were saying?

i dont get it, there is nothing that supports this format.
unless you want to play Minecraft in 8k, cause your average AAA game probably needs a 10k PC to run at 8k

>>388872420
Wrong, HDMI 2.1 fully supports 8K 60Hz

http://www.hdmi.org/manufacturer/hdmi_2_1/index.aspx

>>388872708
He probably means content.

>>388872708
i probably mean content.

>>388870339
>8k
>Still stuck on 480p

>>388871032
8k isn't that important for clarity but it'd make a huge difference for image quality in games (e.g. less jaggies, more CGI-like appearance)

>>388870339
>>62188933

>>388870339
Yawn, wake me up when people realize 144hz is more important

>>388871162
>He doesn't have 8 1080TIs to render 8K at 30fps

>>388873060
at what point does AA just not matter anymore, hell, even on a damn 4k 27" display, I can hardly see any jaggies with no AA

>>388873292

agreed. I wish devs would stick to 1080p for now and try to reach 144hz on all games. then once they get there they can start improving the resolution.

>>388873427
consoles don't even output at over 60hz, they keep trying to go for higher resolutions and lower frame rates instead with muh 4k* 24fps movie games
*checkerboard

8k tvs have been showcased since 2012, they even have a 12k tv and by now im sure theres a 16k display.

>>388873292
my negro

>>388873360

i've read that 16k is pretty much the point where IQ becomes 100% pristine with no visible artifacting/aliasing at any screen size, that's what Pixar films are rendered at.

4k will be a good enough compromise for at least the next decade though.

>>388870339

Might as well wait for 65355k

Let me guess, they are going to use this on tiny fucking smartphones.

File: gsdx_20170831183440.jpg (4MB, 7680x4320px) Image search: [Google]

4MB, 7680x4320px

Oh boy I can't wait to play my PS2 games natively in 8k on a screen that can actually display it.

Why is 3840 x 2160 called 4K when 1920 x 1080 is called... well, 1080p?
I guess calling it 2K just didn't seem like enough of a upgrade for marketing people?

File: 1476627536654.jpg (112KB, 540x720px) Image search: [Google]

112KB, 540x720px

>mfw 1280x960 @85hz CRT
>mfw it's smoother than 144hz LCD
>mfw actual contrast and colors

>>388874460
what the fuck anon

File: gsdx_20170831184546.jpg (3MB, 7680x4320px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 7680x4320px

>>388875272
You don't play your PS2 games in 8k?

>>388874882
When 1080p debuted as a mainstream standard it was referred to as "HD," but then greedy marketing assholes decided to start calling 720p "HD" so they could get away with selling cheaper displays to retarded consumers at insane markups. Eventually the 720p market collapsed and manufacturers realized they fucked up because they couldn't convince normies to buy their 1080p displays after already buying the 720p displays because they already had "HD" so they started calling it "True HD." Ultimately they discovered that normies can't tell the difference between 720p and 1080p anyway so they just dropped all the bullshit and started calling it 1080p because it's no longer possible for 99% of consumers to go to the store and get a TV that is anything less than 1080p.

>>388875394
I just want you to know that you're my hero.

>>388875416
It makes me happy inside knowing all the utter fucking morons who bought overpriced curved / 4K TV's when all they do on them is play CoD and Sportsball games on Xbone at 900p and watch TV at 720p and rent DVD's from redbox at 480p.

File: Untitled-1.png (338KB, 662x630px) Image search: [Google]

338KB, 662x630px

>>388875394

>>388876160
But anon I watch plenty of 4K movies on Netflix, they work great over my 10Mbit Comcast XFINITY cable internet service.

>>388871032
>For Desktops
8k is for artists.

Fuck yes, 8k @ 144hz when

File: gsdx_20170831185913.jpg (4MB, 7680x5760px) Image search: [Google]

4MB, 7680x5760px

>>388875995

File: optimal-viewing-distance-television-graph-size.png (49KB, 547x461px) Image search: [Google]

49KB, 547x461px

How do we stop the resolution cancer?

File: 1488762226526.jpg (20KB, 439x290px) Image search: [Google]

20KB, 439x290px

>>388874882
two words: JUDEN PIGS

>>388876338
>4k streaming
might as well download Yiffy br rips you dingus.

>>388876338
Just what we need. Inflated resolution with fucking netflix bitrate. Delete memek.

>>388876338
Well then I guess I'm not talking about you then. But on a side note I'd even say that 4K movies and shows are a complete meme. Video games are the only thing that inherently benefit from higher resolutions. A movie at 720p with a high bitrate and 1080p with a high bitrate look almost identical because the source of the raw film is at such a high quality and being downsampled to 720/1080 still looks good. The only reason someone should own a 4K TV is if they play PC games on it in 4K.

Remember when 1080p came out everyone said "standard" definition was fine?

What retards they were.

>>388876487
in 10 years

File: YSiA7[1].gif (722KB, 316x240px) Image search: [Google]

722KB, 316x240px

>he bought a 4k TV/Monitor

>>388876363
This.

>>388870339
>not waiting for 65536K to be released so the price of 32768K drops
You retards never learn.

>>388877343
Standard was "fine" but no one would argue that they couldn't tell the difference. With 4k however chances are you literally can't. And even if you do, what content are you going to watch? Netflix 4k looks just as bad as normal netflix because of the low bitrate. Most TV is still 720p. Games are as we know.

>>388871032
5D Mk IV is 30 MP and it's a p. average camera

>>388870339
>8k
>nips cant even make games that run on 1080p 60 fps stable
lmao

>>388871032
This backwards thinking is why it has taken so long for 4k to be adapted. 720p was brought in with open fucking arms and now faggots are way too content

File: rec2020-vs-rec709-001.png (442KB, 1168x1400px) Image search: [Google]

442KB, 1168x1400px

>>388877553
HDR is the biggest improvement in a while

Too bad manufacturers lie about it

>>388877995
HD CRT > HDR

Oy yey games are already became 100gb shit holes whats next 1TB per game?

File: hdr for retards.jpg (56KB, 1536x864px) Image search: [Google]

56KB, 1536x864px

>>388878441
>only 0-255
>tfw no SED/FED TVs due to patents

File: egg01-bd-dvd.jpg (401KB, 1019x1148px) Image search: [Google]

401KB, 1019x1148px

>>388877553
>but no one would argue that they couldn't tell the difference
No there were definitely retards who argued you couldn't see the difference between upscaled DVD and Blu-Ray.

>>388878621
Luckily all it takes is to post a picture like that to prove them wrong. You simply can't do the same thing with 1080 vs 4k without cropping and zooming because the difference is so minute.

>>388870339

Are their TVs mid-tier at best units being sold at a high-end price? They were trash when I worked for them 5 years ago.

>>388876338
subtle

File: dehr-eye-logo.jpg (43KB, 540x286px) Image search: [Google]

43KB, 540x286px

>>388876670
>Not getting eye augmentations just to appreciate the benefits of >8k resolutions
Heh, plebs.

File: 10-megabytes-hard-disk.jpg (92KB, 600x831px) Image search: [Google]

92KB, 600x831px

>>388878463
>oy vey programs already became 100kb shit holes whats next 1mb per game?

full Super Hi-Vision is 7680×4320px, 120fps, 12bit

>>388878621
There's no way that wasn't touched up, there are plenty of lines in the hair that don't match up or simply aren't even there in the bottom example.

>>388876160
>Sportsball games
jesus is this the cringe thread

File: 1504154717569.jpg (117KB, 400x600px) Image search: [Google]

117KB, 400x600px

>>388876160
>Buy a 1080p TV to replace my cute 720p TV
>Picture looks garbage unless i sit far away

Fucking Comcast. Their signal is so compressed it makes me wonder why i bothered buying a 1080p for watching TV. Games and web videos look gorgeous on it, though.

I don't think you're paying attention if you think there's no noticeable difference in quality between 1080 and 4K.

http://screenshotcomparison.com/comparison/116238

>>388880665
>both images are 1080p

gg

>>388880919
I down scaled the 4K picture because it would've looked wonky on the site otherwise. This is what it would have looked like if I didn't downscale.

http://screenshotcomparison.com/comparison/116239