>$20,758 per month >BotW is still unplayable Why people

By 'unplayable', do you mean "playable from beginning to end, in 8k resolution, at 60 FPS"? Because that describes the current state of BotW on CEMU. And it's getting better soon.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VC07BL85dwA

File: zelda_0004_layer_10_by_aloooo81-db4d7d.jpg (587KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

587KB, 1920x1080px

>>388868302
If BoTW is unplayable on Cemu, then it's a crime against humanity on Switch.

Because they failed the Stanford marshmallow experiment.
Thanks to their stupidity emulation made a huge progress so it's a win-win.
Move on with your life.

>800 bucks in disability checks a month
>still haven't invested in a computer that can play BotW
It's my fault. CEMU works great on faster PCs.

>>388868302
he probably meant playable with crashes and more getting the game to work on an emulator than actually playing the game

>>388868603
Why do you have a disability check

>>388868430
That's one person with a crazy oc'd cpu, and the 2xhack glitches the game.
In real life the game is stuck at 20fps in towns and when it rains it drops to 15-20, not mentionning the cpu cache leak

>>388868673
Autism. Applied for bux and successfully got it.

So you can play it from start to finish with bugs, bad textures, crashes and other issues, right? Should I even bother or just wait until I get a wii u?

>>388868784
>get a wii u
get a switch at this point
?¿?¿

>>388868768
Good luck when you get audited

>>388868694
It's just a normally OC'd CPU, 90% of 7700Ks can do 5.1ghz

>In real life the game is stuck at 20fps in towns and when it rains it drops to 15-20

Nigger it hasn't been stuck at 15-20 since a week after release. Look at the date on this video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z56S7yhld5Q

>>388868694
I've got constant 30 with a 3.4 ghz i5, BOTW is way the fuck more playable and stable than it was a month ago.

>>388868784
to be honest I'd rather deal with low frame rate on wii u than crashes, bugs, texture problems AND low frame rate on PC

>>388868857
But I rather play the wii u games than the switch with no games?

How is Citra coming along?

>>388868430
>8k resolution
Is this what people are calling 4x MSAA today?

File: 1492464627149.png (123KB, 512x512px) Image search: [Google]

123KB, 512x512px

>>388868302
It's playable to me. Have over 50 hrs in BOTW. I'm tired of downloading a new version of cemu anyway.

>>388868784
It sounds like you already have a Switch, though.

File: xZLGXrK.jpg (42KB, 846x960px) Image search: [Google]

42KB, 846x960px

>>388868784
You just described all 3 versions, though.

>>388869138
No, the game's renderer is set to output at 8K. There is no anti aliasing involved.

File: LvSxuKQ.png (298KB, 600x512px) Image search: [Google]

298KB, 600x512px

>playing a handheld game on a stationary pc

>>388868302
It it were perfected then people would have no reason to keep donating. They'll drag their feet as long as they possibly can until donations start dropping substantially.

>>388869402
>less than 3 hour battery life
>handheld game

>>388868430
Way to obliterate the OP.

>>388869279
Uh that's exactly what antialiasing is.

File: 1212641615809.jpg (65KB, 332x520px) Image search: [Google]

65KB, 332x520px

once the game runs perfectly, i hope people start modding it
every item having 2x durability would be great.
some npcs that sell arrows could sell bows too. same for other npcs that realistically would have been selling equipment like swords/shields.

>>388868887
>>388868902
Nigger I have a good single core perf cpu (i5 4670k at 3.8ghz) and I'm stuck at 18 fps when it rains stop lying please

File: 1504215160787.jpg (8KB, 256x256px) Image search: [Google]

8KB, 256x256px

>unironically playing any game at 30 fps
literal consolecucks

File: 1502838360694.jpg (12KB, 250x250px) Image search: [Google]

12KB, 250x250px

>>388869562
... No it isn't.
Rendering at a high resolution eliminates aliasing, but that's not the primary purpose.

>>388869550
ironic shitposting is still shitposting anon

>>388869667
Then what is the primary purpose?

File: hqdefault (4).jpg (14KB, 480x360px) Image search: [Google]

14KB, 480x360px

>>388868430
Too many frames.

>>388868302
BotW is a trash game anyways, just play Xenoblade X & Sm4sh.

>>388869279
Rendering at a higher resolution is technically SSAA

>>388869731
Because if you display a low resolution image on a high resolution monitor it looks bad.

File: 1487205135890.png (279KB, 1046x1288px) Image search: [Google]

279KB, 1046x1288px

>>388869609
>Not being an idort

>>388869837
SSAA works by rendering at a high resolution, but doing that isn't called SSAA

I played BOTW on CEMU and did everything except find all 900 seed guys.

Only issues I had were the motion control dungeons (managed to gimp them by using weird ways) and taking some photos with the camera.

I love it when Nintendo and PC users start to infight.

I love Cemu threads.

>>388869581
I think that durability mods are definitely due in master-mode. cracking 2 weapons to kill a black-moblin is a joke. For that matter, your durability would be better if it regenerated at the same rate that enemy health does (or at all).

>>388869609
>unironically playing boring games at 144 fps

>>388868902
I don't believe that, i got a 6600k at 4.5 and still only get 20 fps outdoors. also links speed seems to be related to the fps, which is pretty odd

I just started playing a bit again with 1.9.1, last tried it around 1.7.3. Finished the great plateau and it seems to work really good now, pretty solid 30fps, no graphical glitches at all and no crashes yet either.

>>388868302
So mk8 is still unplayable on polaris gpu?

>>388868302
>Why people pay for this again?

People already finished zelda, which is a good question.... Why do people still pay for it?

I Mean everything else works on CEMU, so why continue to pay for it when there are no more games to play

>>388869837
No... SSAA is what you do if your machine can't handle rendering at a much higher resolution but you still want to get rid of the jaggies. AA is essentially a prediction method where your GPU tries to predict what pixels to put in place instead of letting the engine draw them in via higher resolution. It has a far lesser impact on performance than actually fully rendering a higher resolution.

You may be confused as it is commonly said if you're using a 1440p, 2160p etc display and playing your games at those native resolutions, you can often disable AA in many titles as there are no visible jaggies at such a resolution anyways.

>>388869931
>>388870305
Good thing this exists then >>388868430. You can think about how my first BOTW experience will be the superior high resolution and 60 fps version while you chew on my taint, you fucking consolecucks.

>>388870272
There is a trainer that you can use to set and modify durability, as well as give ANYTHING regeneration

>>388868430
They had to keep the video to 2:50 cuz it crashed :(

>>388870691
Do you even know what idort even means
Having all consoles and the pc?

>>388868430
I have an i7 6700k, AMD Radeon 390 with 8GB VRAM, and 16GB RAM. Mine peaks at 25 FPS. So no, that video is not the current state of BotW.

I have a binned 7700k that comfortably reaches 5.2ghz, it's 30FPS everywhere and even handles the 60FPS hack in places with simpler terrain

I'm still gonna wait a couple months to play it, 60fps everywhere is going to be wonderful.

>>388870691
How is it superior if it isn't even portable?

File: specs2017.png (22KB, 488x414px) Image search: [Google]

22KB, 488x414px

>>388868302
this is my rig
it can emulate BOTW in 1080p at its native 30fps and could probably go to 60fps with CheatEngine

>>388870871
>AMD Radeon 390

Sorry, this is the reason for your bad performance. AMD has absolutely horrific OpenGL drivers. Buy a $50 gtx 660 off ebay and swap it in.

>>388868430
And all you need is a $8000 pc

Kek. The absolute state of mustard pc only cuckks

>>388868430
>8k
>he has to play in fucking windowed mode

rofl nice try

>>388869594
>good single core perf
>3.8ghz
fug

>>388871087
Actually, you need only a ~$500 PC to run CEMU BotW at 60fps.

An i5 7600K is the best processor for CEMU, it costs about $200. Add $30 for a Hyper 212 Evo cooler for overclocking it. Add in the cheapest NVIDIA GPU you can find, plus a mobo, PSU, and 8gb of RAM. You're good at that point.

>>388869859
not him...but uh, that's because of all the aliasing no?

>>388871123
He wants to show the technical info of the machine in other windows. The game still renders at the high res, it just gets downsized to match that window. It has the same performance impact.

>People could have bought a wii-u with BOTW, beat it, then sold it for what most of these autists are paying to play the game at 20 FPS

lol. this is why 3rd worlders are the only people commenting on the patreon pages

>>388871382
No, the blurriness. Have you ever resized an image in Photoshop and noticed it gets blurry as it gets larger? Well, putting a low-resolution game output on a high resolution monitor will give the same effect since it must be resized to fit.

I feel this is pretty much elementary school stuff and I probably shouldn't need to explain it to you.

>>388871087
>And all you need is a $8000 pc
>Kek. The absolute state of mustard pc only cuckks
will you idiot console faggots stop assuming PC's are crazy expensive?
seriously for the price of one of your sub-par consoles you can get a PC that outperforms it
maybe if you stop looking at shitty pre-built machines and actually looked at individual parts to build a PC you would actually see

>>388868302
>>388871419
who's paying for cemu? apart from supporting it on patreon or something I havent heard of needing to pay for it

>>388868302
To be honest? I'm hoping it destroys Nintendo. So far I've payed $200 ($50x4) and I would pay more if I could.

You may not understand it. That's fine. If there was a Patreon that allowed you to undoubtedly hurt, say, Electronic Arts, would you donate? Same thing.

>388871310
>Mobo, pc case, HDD/SSD, network card/WiFi card, GPU, PSU, 8gb ram, keyboard, mouse, OS for $250?

>>388871310
cemu uses 10 gb ram at 1080p

>>388871542
>Well, putting a low-resolution game output on a high resolution monitor
you mean like the switch outputting to a 4k tv?

>>388871419
Why do people assume that we spend money on our pcs specifically to play BoTW? I already had the computer, I use it for many things. I paid nothing for BoTW.

They're paypigs.

>>388871604
>If there was a Patreon that allowed you to undoubtedly hurt, say, Electronic Arts, would you donate
no because that's some top tier jewish trickery

>>388871180
The guy I was replying to had a 3.4ghz i5 :)

File: 1488407173893.jpg (94KB, 1024x1019px) Image search: [Google]

94KB, 1024x1019px

>>388870779
>>388870998
You're a corporate whore who pays for inferior versions of games on shitty hardware. You sure showed me. Please eat out a stranger's ass for an snes mini.

>>388868302
But it already plays as well, if not better then it does on the switch or Wii u.

>>388871827
Inferior how?

>>388871827
t. Pcbro who waited 2 weeks to play sonic with DRM

i5 3570k
16gb ram
gtx970
750gb SSD

it's unplayable, 18fps and drops often to 10-12fps even with the hack. Done all the fixes, sometimes it's ok but the mini stutters are unbearable, and I am using great cache shader files.

It's just not ready unless you have a ridiculous pc

File: speccy5.png (200KB, 1061x981px) Image search: [Google]

200KB, 1061x981px

>>388871690
The video linked in this thread is a system running it at 8k native 60fps and only using 7.6GB of RAM, nice try though!

>>388871419
No one bought a PC to play BOTW, we all already owned them. Are you new to /v/?

Anyhow, I tried Cemu with BOTW a couple months back and was able to get 4k/60fps most of the time with some tweaking on pic related. It had some glitches still, experienced no crashes after a good 10 hours or so I put into the game. The experience was definitely better than on my Wii U but I still think I'll wait another month or two as it looks like the game is finally getting to a solid 60 fps on Cemu. I've got plenty of things to play already anyways.

>>388871604
a goy and his money, soon parted

>>388872028
It's all in the processor. 3570k is not good for BoTW

>>388869562
You're actually right. Supersampling takes a high-res image and averages the extra pixels together. MSAA does basically same thing, but only on the edges.

>>388871827
At least I can play BoTW without having to pay $2000

>>388871827
Holy shit PCbros are mad as fuck
Why don't you guys just play your mobas and survival simulators instead of whinging about """"inferior"""" console games

>>388872207
>doesn't already have a 2k shitposting machine
why though?

>>388868302
>Paying for Piracy

Really rattles the raisins.

>>388872207
We paid nothing for BoTW. We already had the computer. Do you include your electricity bill when talking about how much you paid to play BoTW?

File: toothpastes-place-in-history.jpg (142KB, 1200x800px) Image search: [Google]

142KB, 1200x800px

Here's a $60 Pentium using toothpaste as thermal agent running BotW at 4k/30fps

oh, and it was months ago, before optimizations were made

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C1fk2Mlf2JM

I have an i3 6100 and can play at 25-30 fps
The only problem is the ram usage

>>388872151
I have a little disposable income for a little while, what's a decent i7 cpu for around $500 to spend solely on the processor

>>388872239
Refer to second post. Who is mad?

>>388872271
Because he's a retarded consolecuck who doesn't know what a PC is.

>>388868302
Not only is the game fully playable it runs great.
And you get all the amibo content for free.

>>388872207
Again, it costs $500 to run CEMU at the highest speed possible. See:
>>388871310
>>388872358

File: 1501145204746.jpg (6KB, 151x233px) Image search: [Google]

6KB, 151x233px

>paying for emulators

Hyrule warriors and TMS fuckin when

>>388872239
Consoles are an illusion. The only advantage they have over PCs is a consistent set of hardware for developers to optimize on. Other than that, there's no difference.

>>388872386
If you've got $500 definitely get the 7700k and a good fan to OC it even further

>>388871827
MAD AS HELL

>>388872562
Thanks dude

>>388872386
For your motherboard? 3770k is the best you can get and should suffice.

>>388872491
>It's free
You do realize people pay them by choice, they give out the emulator for free.

>>388872761
For $500 he can buy a whole new mobo, some DDR4 and a 7700K and still be in the green.

>>388872724
>>388872562
>>388872761
Yeah I forgot to mention that, going up that many generations means you'll need a new motherboard and possibly even new RAM for a big upgrade like that. So that's a little harder to determine what you can get for $500

>>388868430
>9 (You)s
>9 fucking (You)s
i didn't think /v/ would respond this quick to a bait reply yet here we are

>>388872761
>>388872926
Yep I figured as much so I've been meaning to upgrade for a while anyway, going to get a new gpu as well next month.
I appreciate the info though, thank you anons.

>>388872358
So, a ridiculously buggy emulation, that crash twice in 9 minutes by simply visiting cities (no rain, no combat, no fire, nothing) is your example.

Impressive

>>388871827
I don't understand shit like this. Video games as a whole are one of the cheapest cost to time hobbies out there.

>$1000 for a PC to cover console games up to PS2 era, as well as still handle most modern games
>$270 for a PS4 with 1 game
https://smile.amazon.com/PlayStation-Slim-500GB-Console-Uncharted-Bundle/dp/B01LRLJV28/ref=sr_1_1?s=videogames&ie=UTF8&qid=1504217438&sr=1-1&keywords=Playstation+4
>$300~350 for a Nintendo Switch
>$100~150 for a Nintendo 2/3DS, easily hacked so all games are free
So for ~$1770 you can own three consoles, and if you round it out to $3.000 you can purchase 20.5 games at $60. That's less than I spend on my other hobbies, and I get a far greater value per hour.

>>388873061
Coolio, happy to help. Enjoy your new rig

>>388872980
It gets quite the (You)s on The Reddit as well, good sir.

>>388873107
from five months ago, on a $60 CPU, yes

on the other hand it did run the game at 4K and 30FPS

Does CEMU scale better witht the CPU or GPU?

File: Cemu 2017-08-05 07-45-58-57.png (1010KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

1010KB, 1920x1080px

>>388868302
Friendly reminder that you should ignore all the lairs that says that BotW is unplayable on CEMU.

>>388872343
>we

>>388873247
/v/ is populated by spider people pretending to be humans

>>388873186
So, absolute trash is good, because it was 5 months ago.


Jesus, do you nigger actually read what you type?

>>388873339
obviously the emulator has undergone some developments in those five months
you don't crash anymore

>>388873129
Please post all the buyer's remorse money and shill-links that help you and your retarded wasteful spending sleep at night

>>388873229
CPU. The GPU load is very low provided you're not using Intel integrated graphics or something. I have a 980 and can easily run the game at 4K.

>>388873549
Yeah I doubt it's gonna work then.
>tfw i5-3570K

>>388873129
Pretty much this.

I have 2 gaming desktops both with i7s and 1080 Tis, one in my living room with 4 gamepads for co-op and couch gaming, the other at a desk setup for whatever else.

Have a Ps4, Ps4 Pro, Xbone, Wii U and pretty much every console of every gen prior. No Switch cause it has no games yet. All of this? Doesn't even hurt the bank account in any meaningful way.

Gaming is a cheap as shit hobby, in the past 5 years I've spent MAYBE and average of $1500 a year? That's just not a lot of money to most people, even the lower class which I am, I only make 45k / yr and can afford this while living in a 3000sq ft house with 2 room mates and have virtually zero debt to my name at 28

You have no excuse for not owning every platform you'd like to game on if you're over the age of 18.

>>388868430
nigger are we even watching the same video, thats not even close to constant 60 with all that stuttering lmao

>>388868302
I have an fx 6300 overclocked to 4.5ghz and a r9 280 with 8 gigs of ram and it runs like shit no matter what, it actually seems like the framerate and accompanying spikes get worse with each update.

>>388873979
>bulldozer
>expecting anything but shit performance

File: mspaint_2017-08-31_17-29-24.png (220KB, 868x447px) Image search: [Google]

220KB, 868x447px

choose one and ONLY one

>>388874072
WiiU was garbage

>>388873979
AMD has never been good for emulation, their CPUs are just not worth buying for gaming. Ryzen has the same problem.

>>388873658
It'll work, just probably not 30FPS in towns

File: nintendo switch hands on main.jpg (21KB, 633x356px) Image search: [Google]

21KB, 633x356px

>>388868430
Yeah? But can you take your PC outside without looking like an autist?

>>388874072
I can play more than 5 games on the PC.
And i can play BOTW on it as a bonus.

>>388874071
It runs bitcher 3 at ultra nigger, if it can't run it most won't be able too. It's also possible the dev just likes fucking over amd users.

>>388868694
>cpu cache leak
Nothing to do with CEMU, that's Nvidia's doing

>>388874247
Yeah I'm getting a switch anyway so I think I'll wait.

File: lel AMD.png (269KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

269KB, 1920x1080px

>>388873979
>fx 6300

You poor thing. You fell for Bulldozer.

File: 1468689687177.jpg (58KB, 667x800px) Image search: [Google]

58KB, 667x800px

>>388874257
People who use laptops in public are perceived as intellectual or businessmen by normies.

>>388874072
Jokes on you, I already bought a PC for other purposes.

>>388874072
Can I get the left without the gay, embarrassing leds everywhere

>>388874291
Yeah no, Witcher 3 relies more on the GPU than the CPU. CEMU relies almost entirely on the CPU and Bulldozer is ass.

File: epic laughing animu.gif (521KB, 500x280px) Image search: [Google]

521KB, 500x280px

>>388874335
>Farcry 4

File: 1458508118680.png (177KB, 500x500px) Image search: [Google]

177KB, 500x500px

>>388868302
Because who else would work on it, it's closed source.

>>388874493
When is Far Cry: Kill Whitey coming out anyway?

>>388874528
The same people who say this are also the same people who said that it would be YEARS before BoTW was even playable.

>>388874493
>I...IT DOESN'T COUNT
Nice buyer's remorse

>>388868302
>$20,758 a month for a glorified Zelda PC port
let me know when Wonderful 101 is playable

>>388874413
I own those parts, I know how good it is, never ran into a problem with it until cemu all the other emulators are fine and most modern games, why exactly would I listen to some cheeto stained neckbear on the internet blathering about info he's getting second hand from google? Maybe think about killing yourself before replying again kidd.

>>388874662
If you weren't a retard, you'd know benchmarks mean shit anyway.

>>388870871
>AMD
There's your problem

>>388874257
Can you play any video game in any platform outside without looking like an autist?
I'll answer myself: you cant

>>388874879
Anon, how many times do I have to tell you? Normal vidya will almost exclusively use the GPU. CEMU doesn't. You're CPU is shit, there's no way around that. You don't need to upgrade because it still functions fine for vidya because you probably don't need 144hz which is fine, neither do I.

>>388874652
What does that have to do with my post, you retard?

emulation is by definition an inferior way to play a game, why are pcfags so proud of it? or why do they act like is a victory over nintendo or people that pay for their games? hell with what face do people here sanctimoniously shit on companies for kike behaviour after pirating video games left and right?

File: yuor dead kiddo.gif (2MB, 400x209px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 400x209px

>>388875279

>>388874279
>i'm too lazy to boot up my console for playing one game
ok

>>388871020
Hey dumbass you could easily play it at 2K with MSAA X8

File: 1502484679293.jpg (28KB, 600x454px) Image search: [Google]

28KB, 600x454px

>>388875694
Do you read what you type?

>>388875332
The meme that CEMU is being nefariousness because they're keeping it closed source makes no sense, but it so happens that the same people who held that position also held the position that BoTW wouldn't be playable for years.

It goes like this: First people said it wouldn't be playable -- It then becomes playable -- In response they then created the "closed source means they did something nefarious" meme to explain why they were wrong.

At no point did it occur to them that the small CEMU team may simply be very good engineers.

>>388875576
>>388875071
Hey you tech illiterate /a/ poster quite being mad that your processor sucks ass my I7 2600 which is older has 4 REAL cores and it runs BOTW at 20-30fps everywhere. Keep being mad you didnt go for intel when they were king.

>>388876249
Everybody already knows CEMU is being built off a stolen devkit. Also whatever the Switch has more games now anyway

>>388876249
>really good engineers
They had access to stolen source code. That's why they're so ahead of every other project. Also is why it's unethical to be giving them 20 grand a month.

>>388876575
My Switch is portable :)

>>388876598
>Everybody already knows CEMU is being built off a stolen devkit.
No they don't. That was made up out of thin air, and nobody has any reason to believe that.

The Switch is very similar to previous Nintendo consoles, which already had emulators and lots of hardware documentation. It's the simplest and most straightforward explanation for the development speed of CEMU.

>>388876694
So is a laptop and a number of them can do 30fps solid at 4+k depending on the gpu

>>388876684
>They had access to stolen source code.
I'm willing to believe this is you can give me a reason to do so. I'm trying not to be partisan about this, but there's simply no evidence for any of this.

>>388876990
A laptop is not as portable as a switch and one that will run BOTW as well as it will be at *least* double the price, don't be and idiot, moron

>>388877236
Okay you just move goal post I mean whatvthe fuck did the switch have to do with my first post fuck off back to redd1t mr.leepictroll

File: 1504207850685-v.jpg (80KB, 781x657px) Image search: [Google]

80KB, 781x657px

>>388871020
>"Rig"

>>388869594
Are you even using cemuhook

>>388877989
He's not even using CEMU, it's a fucking Nintendo apologist false flag.

>>388869731
Rendering more details

>>388877989
Yes :) Had to uninstall everything cause it was unbearable, last version I was playing is 1.9.0c.
Could you guys please stop baiting people into downloading that shit, thanks

>>388871415
okay, show me the vid running in fullscreen then with no dips since I have yet to see a single video even on youtube that has this, even the fags that claim it's running at 30-60fps

>>388876990
>laptop
>running cemu
anon we need to get PCs running Cemu before we can joke about that

File: 3126276237.gif (192KB, 768x576px) Image search: [Google]

192KB, 768x576px

>>388879845
An advantage to rendering at higher resolutions that nobody talks about is texture quality. Rendering at higher resolutions causes mip-maps to tolerate farther distances before they switch to lower resolution versions of themselves, so you are literally rendering higher-resolution textures at farther distances.

This effect is amplified when super-sampling at 4K or 8K.

>>388880437
Yeah that's what I was thinking about, like rendering things in the distance, not actually improving the game's looks.

>>388880437
You could just set a negative lod bias and do the same thing

>>388868302
PC drones are really thirsty for games. Just look at pugb. Early access crap is all they have.

>>388868302
I beat it on my PC months ago

File: 2376437484.png (1MB, 1599x899px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1599x899px

>>388880964
I'd have to look into it, but I think the reason mip-maps are used is to prevent aliasing. If the bias is pushed back too far, textures will become noisy or show moire patterns and stuff. This noise effect would disappear with super-sampling, though.

>>388870871
I have the same specs as you and I get at least 30fps in 4k or 5k. Something else is wrong.

>>388868430
>windowed mode
>using a mod you have to buy
>$5000 pc
Sure seems reasonable.

>>388881732
That CPU costs $200, and is the only important part to achieving 60fps.

>>388881732
CEMU is free by the way, backers just get a one-week preview of upcoming builds

>>388868887
>90% of 7700Ks can do 5.1ghz
lmao
on liquid nitrogen

>>388881926
>for a 30Hz game

>>388882060
If you delid they'll do it on the stock cooler. Nevermind a $30 Hyper 212 Evo.

>>388881926
>OC to 5.1ghz
Yeah no.

>>388868694
sounds like perfect nintendo hardware emulation to me

>>388882007
No the 60fps thing is a paid mod. I have a desktop that isnt a super computer and a switch. When botw is feasible on consumer hardware for less than $5000 Ill swap to pc for playing it. Until then Im not going to pay $3000 to upgrade my desktop for 1 game.

File: 1445062538392.jpg (10KB, 225x225px) Image search: [Google]

10KB, 225x225px

>>388882131
>on the stock cooler
Nigger fucking please.
That nigger in the vide is running a dual 120mm fans at max.
Sure he can play on cemu that uses a single core with that hurricane but it ain't keeping in anything intensive.

>>388871059
Taht is not the reason at all disinfo spreading faggot.
AMD is accurate in emulators while nvidia is inaccurate. Literally less work on nvidia is the reason it performs so much better in this emulator.
How about you actually read what cemu devs say instead of spreading your retarded opinions

>>388876575
You just proved my point retard the processor is fine and 6 cores is factually more future proof, cemu is literally the only problem stop being a flaming fanboy. How many sheks you getting for being a good goy?

>>388880012
He doesn't understand what 8k on cemu graphic pack is.
He thinks it's the same as changing ingame resolution.

>>388872151
Yes it is.
This is a single core emulator you retard.
You can oc 3570k to 4,5Ghz easily and that is all cemu needs.

>>388874412
If LED's are "embarrassing" I think you have bigger problems to worry about

>>388881349
Do you know what it could possibly be, then? I have my i7 OC'd to 5 GHz for fucks sake, it should run well.

>>388868302
PC MASTER RACE
BASED 25K INVESTMENT, AT LEAST I DON'T HAVE TO BUY A WII U!

>>388871310
>200 more for 30fps
Do you retards hear yourselves? Not to mention I know for a fact it would cost you more, just like the $500 "xbox one x killers"

>>388871604
No, I wouldn't, because I'm not a fucking autist

File: 1478388191457.jpg (50KB, 433x469px) Image search: [Google]

50KB, 433x469px

>>388868302
>paying for a fucking emulator

Why don't you just buy the goddamn game at that point

>>388883301
You have a radeon.
The devs did not change the code of this emulator much, maybe they can't (there are some rumors tat this emu is stolen or built on stolen assets).
In the words the devs put it on cemu leddit, amd is accurate when emulating, meaning you can see all the visuals out of the box, but that means you have to work on the emulator to make it posible to run all that stuff.
Nvidia is not accurate, meaning stuff is missing in games(can be effects, reflections or particles, anything really) so it runs better at the cost of visuals. Then there is the case of most people having nvidia so the dfevs are not that hard pressed to make it work on amd yadda yadda.
I wish they used vulcan for crazy performance gains but fomr reading their posts it seems they are borderline incompetent.

>>388874662
>>388875071
you're both fucking retarded. of course the 6300 is fucking shit, it's 5 years old.
t. 6300 owner and still happy with my purchase, going to upgrade to a ryzen and maybe a vega in a few months.

How bad will it run with an i5 6500
I want to try the game before I buy

>>388868603
$800? I get $600. Wtf is this bullshit

>>388883805
I have a 390x and cemu works fine for me

>>388868302
>Paying for piracy
Shit just buy a switch.

>>388885693
CEMU is a CPU bottlenecked emulator, if your GPU isn't toaster tier it's not going to be a problem.

>>388885787
Or don't pay for piracy and play BotW anyway. It's an 8/10 game, not worth buying a platform for.

>>388885997
If you just download cemu and use it, sure. You do you. I'm sure most folks have zsnes and such. I just don't understand the concept of paying for piracy tools.

>>388885693
I believe you.

>>388885065
he's $200 more disabled than you

Because PC mustards are pathetic. There is literally no one more pathetic than the average mustard, they have nothing to play and the future of PC gaming is MMOs and shit like PUBG so they're desperate for any console scrap while trying to still play the superiority card.

Its not even laughable, just sad.

>>388882260
>No the 60fps thing is a paid mod

Are you fucking serious? Link to more info? Has nobody cracked and uploaded it?

>>388886973
He's memeing you bro. BotW's gameplay is locked to framerate anyway, if you play at 60 everything is in fast forward.

>>388887587
pretty sure there's actually a hack to avoid that, or one that interpolates the frames

>>388887675
I just capped the framerate at 30 and it was fine.

>>388887675
No.
botw is not tied to the framerate, you just use cheatengine to speedhack

>>388873247
WUZ

>>388868302
>play BoTW from start to finish
>crashes every great now and again, sometimes not at all
>don't need cheat engine for it to play at a playable framerate
I haven't actually quite finished it yet but I've done all 4 divine beasts and 100 shrines, working on getting the last 20 and then I'm gonna go fight Ganon. I have a i5 2500k and a 770 and everything is fine.

>>388871604
>cemu is having any noticeable effect at all on nintendo
nice b8

>>388884682
Other fx 6300 you are right it is shit, after upgrading to the newest cemu I get playable framerate, appears I fucked up the config somehow, I take back my shamefur comments.

>>388872343
reminder: LOADIINE EXISTS.
(You)

>>388879975
I mean running the game with a shitty 1st Gen i3 isn't gonna do you any good.