It's on sale on Xbox right now for $6, and it looks like

I'd say yes just to mess about and play through what content there is, but don't bother buying dlc. They never added ai for it and the online is dead, so you'll never get to actually play it.

If you don't have spare $6 to spend on stuff you find interesting, then maybe finding a job is a more immediate concern for you right now.

>>388583313

>no single player content
>playing shooter on console

eh

I paid $20 for the Ultimate edition twice.

It's worth it if you like the game.

>on console
Eh no, unless you have a xim4 and stomping on children for the next two months sounds worth it to you for $6
>>388585680
>It's worth the money if you're a retard
That's always true though

the only game I regret buying this gen

>>388583313
For 6$ it's probably worth it honestly. There's not really any depth to it so you'll get burned out of it pretty fast. Good for a few hours.

>>388583313
Its on Origins for $5 and I got it, its not that bad for that price but all the starting guns almost universally suck besides the basic Rebel rifle and Imperial E-11. You don't get a real decent gun until the EE-3.

>>388583313
there is probably like 700-1k players left spread across dlc having players and non

>>388590941
>Using anything but the E-11
For allegedly being a piece of shit that thing is a work horse.

>>388583313
Almost any game is worth $6, but if you're excited for BF2 you might just want to put the money towards that and not burn yourself out before that's released.

>>388591989
I didn't say the E-11 was a bad gun. I said the starting Imp gun, which is the E-11, and the Rebel rifle, are both decent but most of the early unlock blasters for either side suck till you get to the EE-3 which is hands down arguably one of the best guns in the game.