What exactly is the point of going from GTA to RDR? >No gigantic

less is more

You'll get to kill racist slave owners as a black man.

RDR's gunplay was a lot more interesting than GTA's. Also the time period is a lot less explored in media so it has a lot of novelty.

>He missed the subtleties

File: This is not HOOO HO HO HO HO.jpg (31KB, 640x360px) Image search: [Google]

31KB, 640x360px

>>388553090
>GTA
>detail
Literally every 'pro driving video' from GTAO is some faggot doing 1080s off mountainsides while driving at a 45 degree angle offroad because all the tires are apparently magnetic.

>>388553090
The point is going from RDR to RDR2. Of course, Mustards wouldn't know about that, nor they will.

>>388553090
Some people prefer the countryside to the city. I always found the streets of gta a bit mundane personally. Very pretty when it rains but essentially a series of corridors with minor variations. Id rather play in a paddock than a haĺlway

>>388553090
Fun.

>>388553090
So you didn't play RDR? It and GTAIV were both masterpieces of fine detail in design AND gameplay. GTAV is shit. RDR2 will be shit.

>>388553667
>hasn't played the game
opinion discarded

>>388554159
There is a fleeting chance that if Rockstar San Diego is primarily in charge then it will be good, RDR is their baby.
Conversely, if they let those bongs over at Rockstar North anywhere near it we'll get GTAV horses edition.

File: 1503093142862.png (304KB, 584x560px) Image search: [Google]

304KB, 584x560px

>>388553090
GTA V had all of that yet it was still shit, soooo....

>>388554381
I put in 100+ hours on GTAO back on 360 you fuck, everyone just drove on mountains because the LS was in Purge mode 24/7.

>>388554580
sure buddy, thats why you talked about youtube videos instead of first hand experience

>>388554408
Since it's a direct sequel or prequel, I worry for the worst. I think it's thoroughly uninspired to begin with.

Worst case scenario is that I won't feel obliged to buy a retarded console for this game.

>>388554689
I'm not a pro, I'm just saying there's not a damn bit of detail in GTAV, Crazy fucking Taxi had more realistic driving physics, meanwhile GTAV is more laughable than a modern FnF movie.

File: crymore.jpg (7KB, 246x105px) Image search: [Google]

7KB, 246x105px

>>388555239
cool opinion but you haven't played the game so your word means nothing

>>388553090
t. someone who never played Red Dead Redemption

>>388555373
Jesus christ

>>388553090
Wow it's almost like they'll have more of a budget to make the game fun.

>>388555373
Hey brah i have the amount of hours my only complaint is no singleplayer dlc and th fact Online is a cash grab. Crazy we have the same hours though

>>388556090
well I got an extra 800 or so when I played on deadgen. Online is great if you've got the cash, some modder dropped 300 mil on me once and I've never needed to grind since. Totally changed the game from a chore to an enjoyable experience

I agree that no single player dlc is unacceptable, considering they teased it early on

>>388553090
Everything you mentioned was just cosmetics is GTAV.

In fact, once you strip away all that nothing, you get the true GTAV, a drive around and look at stuff simulator.

90% of the map is useless, and has zero interaction or meaning in the game.

>>388553447
This

Coupled with a better story and missions

>>388555373
Ah, so you're just retarded. My apologies, I try not to argue the differently abled.
But yeah man, get that checked out, they have programs for this kinda thing.