Anyone see this game before? I actually had fun playing

Not posting the name of the game will help the discussion

>>388554432
War of Rights

>>388553074
>>388555412
So an American civil war game? The screenshot says alpha so I assume it's some early access drivel too.

>>388555412

>War of Rights

Can't wait for the devs to be outed as Lost causers.

It looks good and i love the civil war period but i doubt it'll get popular enough for the giant battles it envisions

>The orders will move down the chain of command, to the Colonels, Majors, down to the Captains in charge of the individual regiments, all of whom have the option to follow the orders of their trusted commander, or rebel against his wishes and fight as you see fit.

It'll be a mess and impossible to organise outside clans

I played the original M&B mod they made and it was pretty fun, but I don't really have confidence the devs can pull off actually releasing this game in a state that does their aspirations justice,

>>388555821
That sounds cool as hell but there's no way that'll work well at all. Anyone know any good civil war era strategy games at least?

>>388555957

I enjoyed ultimate general: civil war. Its got simple RTS like controls with a basic campaign layer that involves building your army between battles and buying guns stuff. The AI manages to put up a good fight but the Union always seems to be timid when they're attacking (that might be intentional im not sure)

>>388555821
There's a couple of big companies / regiments already. I stumbled into a company doing a random drill while I was learning the game.

Really friendly community.

Daily reminder that 1stTX is best WoR regiment

>>388555821
>It'll be a mess and impossible to organise outside clans
Then join one. I used to play a lot of Mount & Musket and Napoleonic Wars in a line regiment, and it's actually a lot of fun.

>>388555957
Sid Meiers Gettysburg and Antietam, Civil War Generals 2. Those three can be downloaded for free as freeware. Ultimate General: Civil War is a new one that's supposed to be good.

>>388556225
Thanks, I'll look into that. And the Union thing does make sense considering they only went all out after Gettysburg.

>>388556671
Biggest complaint I've read is that the battle outcome doesn't really matter in the end.

File: mpc-hc64_2017-08-24_20-23-30.png (279KB, 499x416px) Image search: [Google]

279KB, 499x416px

Is this game still active?

>>388557663
Yeah, pretty active. There's huge battles every Saturday, and sporadic battles (mostly with randoms and people not in companies) throughout the week.

>>388557868
How do I buy into it without paying 300$ and why ain't it on steam yet.

>>388557928
It's on Steam. You can spend 50 - 60 of your valued currency to get access to the Skirmishes (alpha with 64-man battles). 30 gets you into the beta, and like 15 gets you the game when it eventually releases.

>>388556992

Yeah the game has the set-up of a multiple path campaign, but it doesn't.

However, what does matter is do too poorly and your army will be understrength and poorly equiped. So you can't lose too much for your own sake. Or get too costly wins.

>>388558147
When's it releasing?

So it's like a shitty Napoleonic Wars?