I have a GTX 1080 / Ryzen 1600X / 32gb's of RAM and this

1. it's a beta
2. it will be fixed
3. that's all there is to it

File: laughinggirlsomega.jpg (469KB, 1459x820px) Image search: [Google]

469KB, 1459x820px

>ryzen

>Unreal Engine

>>388487134
>ryzen
what about an ssd anon?

>>388487134
>Early Access
Not even once

>>388487134

Sorry anon, it's shit

I feel your pain

ryzen. i have a 1070gtx i7 7700k /16GB ram and it runs fine on ultra

File: 1447100075727.jpg (188KB, 1462x1462px) Image search: [Google]

188KB, 1462x1462px

>>388487134
>ryzen

kex

Found a video of you OP

https://youtu.be/O2-zmsLnC30

>>388487134
You need a fast CPU.

>>388489426
>running around in public when there's still 75 people up.

Oh god what is wrong with them.

File: 3234234.jpg (86KB, 900x900px) Image search: [Google]

86KB, 900x900px

>>388487134
>gtx 1080
oh,cool

>Ryzen

are you fucking retarded OP? mixing AMD cpu with nvidia gpu?

I have an RX 480 and a 6600k and 16GB RAM and a SSD and it runs flawlessly

>>388489647
that jump though

asian players are the fucking worst, they can't shoot for shit as well.

https://youtu.be/jqU_U4QmzSg

>>388489752
My only shooting problem is forgetting to hit the firing mode button twice on the ump. So I think it's on full and I'm just gonna unload but I just pop off the 3 shot and then I'm like OH FUCK but im dead.

File: 1492134312875.gif (627KB, 477x348px) Image search: [Google]

627KB, 477x348px

>>388489648
The ryzen r5 cpus are the best processors at their price point and every AMD GPU is sold out or hiked up do too miners

>>388487134
I have a really shitty PC and still manage to run it on potato settings

>/v/ thinking they know tech

>>388487134
its a shit optimized game focused on making money more than performance, hence why they're focusing on skins and console ports instead

also Ryzen probably isn't as optimized but idk how cpu intensive it is

File: wefwef.jpg (60KB, 635x477px) Image search: [Google]

60KB, 635x477px

>>388489648
...

1080Ti / i7 6700k @ 4.6GHz /16GB DDR4 RAM here, the game goes in to the 40's/50's when I'm inside the bigger ''cities''. I'm only playing on high setting as well.

>>388489426
does asia still not have first person yet

>>388490571
It's real obvious when they say ryzen sucks when the ryzen 5 beats out almost every single mainstream processor at a good price.

>>388490714

>marketing

>>388487134
E S P O R T R E A D Y

>>388490714
kek

nvidia taking the piss at amd

>>388488679
try staying in pochinki for 2 circles

>>388487193
/thread

File: 1503216345416.gif (2MB, 300x168px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 300x168px

>>388487134
1080Ti
16gb ram
i7 6700K at stock 4.0ghz
all on a 5400 rpm WD Blue


120+ fps

File: specs.png (244KB, 722x558px) Image search: [Google]

244KB, 722x558px

I run it fine.

>>388487193
>It's only called a beta
>It won't be fixed
>Stop buying early access shit

>>388493242
it's fun and runs on my pc fine>>388492743

why do you even give a fuck?

File: this happens sometimes.jpg (212KB, 1800x1578px) Image search: [Google]

212KB, 1800x1578px

>>388493242

>>388492697

>5400 rpm

that's laptop tier anon

did you get the HDD on special or what? It stands out from the rest of your components

>>388492697
120gb ssd are less than 50 bucks. why is your OS and the game not on that?

>>388487193
>it's a beta
Oh you sweet summer child.

File: 269262.jpg (139KB, 1022x681px) Image search: [Google]

139KB, 1022x681px

>>388493570
It's more of my "don't care about loading times and majority storage" drive. I'd love to get some larger ssds, maybe swap my OS ssd for a M.2 and keep the ssd for the few multiplayer games I play, but hey, money.

>>388493631
My OS is, but the game is on the disc drive. I'm soooo happy I made that switch, but I want to upgrade some of that stuff.

>>388493485
Post-purchase rationalization is real

Poorly optimized garbage. That's what you get for buying Early Acess shit

>>388494237
Sadly you need an SSD to play battlegrounds or you're gonna have the buildings load slowly

File: 1490444743829.gif (2MB, 200x151px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 200x151px

>>388489426
>please watch my funny video that is totally unrelated to the problem. remember to like & subscribe

>>388493242
This is the only good reply in this thread.

Reminder that people who say "it runs fine for me" have shit standards

I've had way too many people say this and then they've got crazy screen tearing, lowered graphics or resolutions, sub 60 fps but they are too retarded to notice.

The game isn't optimized and doesn't run well. Just because you've got dual 1080ti and i7 10000 series to get 60fps doesn't mean it's fine you fucking idiots

File: Capture.png (50KB, 680x542px) Image search: [Google]

50KB, 680x542px

>>388487134
>>388490739

Uhm, what the fuck is wrong with your rig

Specs included. I only drop below 60 FPS when I'm looking at the red zone explosions as well as smoke nades and molotovs. The effects are unoptimized as fuck but everything else is fine.

Following settings:
2560x1440
AA Medium
Post Processing high
Shadows high
Texture ultra
Effects high
Foliage Ultra
View Distance Ultra.

There is something seriously wrong with your rigs. I fucking pull this shit off at scaling 105 @ 1440p so get your fucking shit checked.

>>388494794
I've got plenty of room on the SSD so I'll switch it over to see how it performs, but so far it has been pretty solid. I've really had no issue with the game whatsoever, but I think it's funny how the game runs so well despite the gimp leg 5400rpm disc drive.

>>388494349
nah anon. i made 60 bucks back selling digital clothes and boxes. we gravy nigga. currently have 150 hours logged on steam. u jelly?

heck, golly, gee wizz, you're prolly some console owner who will pay 60 for this once you can. lol

shit is free for me.

>>388490353
>ryzen r5 cpus are the best processors at their price point
Nice meme but no, 7700 is literally better for the same price because you can get cheapest mobo and ram.

File: 1480259012754.jpg (102KB, 771x900px) Image search: [Google]

102KB, 771x900px

>>388487210
>>388487346
>>388488679
>>388489426
>>388489648
>>388495707
you people are proving how stupid you really are.
PUBG has been proven to run WORSE on Intel because it overloads a single core but doesn't on AMD.
PUBG is one of the few games that Ryzen runs better, if only because it is terrible optimized on Intel by chance.
The 7700k in particular runs it particularly bad.

>>388495865
They recently added optimization for 6+ cores. I have an old FX8350 and all the cores are equally used, maxing out at like 70% use. Problem is that the game runs considerably worse on amd GPU's compared to the nvidia equivalent card.

>>388496065
well that's an entirely different conversation.
A lot of people use AMD+Nvidia, in some games AMD+Nvidia beats out AMD+AMD as ironic as that is.

I'm just saying it's ironic that these people are greentexting "ryzen" when it's literally Intel processors that had a huge problem with optimization in this one specific game.

>>388487134
Because the game is designed in such a way that certain elements of the game systems are needlessly tied to the frame output which causes the GPU to wait several milliseconds longer which causes it to sometimes miss it's frame time window which causes dropped frames and latency.
These are the kinds of things usually tweaked or improved during a late-stage optimization pass which this game is quite a ways away from reaching.
Which hardware you run is essentially insignificant past a certain point until these issues get addressed.
Don't expect anything more from an early access ¯\_(ツ)_/¯