If someone paid you to say a game was good, would you say

File: 1495412917994.png (61KB, 177x200px) Image search: [Google]

61KB, 177x200px

>>388435869
you pay me to say anything and i'll probably say it
i'm not exactly known as a credible source

How much am I being paid? Is the game actually good? Do I get to be anonymous?

Not enough information to make a decision.

>>388435869
Sure why not.

>>388435869
Depend on money they paid me.

>>388435869
Depends. If it paid off a mortgage sure. Otherwise nah

I already do it on /v/ for Nier and Horizon.

Sure, why not?

Nah

>>388435869
depends on the game and how much

>>388435869
Depends on how much I'm getting paid and how good or bad the game actually is.

>>388435869
i would do anything for money if it's easy

>>388435869
obviously. its a fuckin video game. Only autists would care

>>388436528
so you'd rape a 5 year old?

>>388435869
If you're asking in relation to youtubers and streamers, it's already been proven almost all of them will.

Bethesda paid almost all of them to say nice things about Prey, not that is helped sell copies.

>>388435869
If I was paid, I would say it is good, and then say it's bad if it is actually bad. I'm not being paid to stay silent.

>>388436715
no
i'm not a pedo

>>388436813
you just said if it was easy

Of course I would, I would lie my ass off as long as:
a. It doesn't get me into legal trouble
and
b. Don't lie hard enough that my fanbase would get wise and leave me leading to less money than if I didn't shill

I will do basically anything that isn't illegal as long as the price is right, and fuck you if you wouldn't do the same.

>>388436875
sucking dick ain't illegal my son

File: Screenshot_20170827-154104.png (201KB, 720x1280px) Image search: [Google]

201KB, 720x1280px

>>388435869
Sure

>>388435968
/thread
Who would be dumb enough to refuse free money?

It only depends on what can I say. If I can focus on talking on the good parts about it but I can still say I didnt liked it overal (or compared to X) I will. Otherwise definitively not.

>>388437020
Is that a 4.7/100?
Holy shit has CoD sunk low

File: toods.png (131KB, 241x245px) Image search: [Google]

131KB, 241x245px

Very good thread. We should definitely discuss this more.

>>388435869
sure

easy way to get paid

>>388436949
Yeah, exactly. I ain't gay so it's hard to stomach, but if you gave me 500 bucks and no cum lands on or in me then you've got a deal. $1,000 if it does. You could get that way cheaper with way more attractive people (some of them might actually be WOMEN), but the point is that there is a price limit.

>>388437604
i'm gay and you couldn't pay me enough to stick my ding dong in a womans mouth or vagina

>>388437604
i'll give you 20 if you swallow

>>388435869
How much?

>>388435869
of course, since I was paid.
Depending on how bad it actually it is there would be omissions, or degrees of sincerity, but yeah.

>>388437212
>Trusting user reviews
>Literally ever

I don't care if you don't like Call of Duty, but literally none of the games are 0 or 1/10; they're all competently made FPS with action movie campaigns and skinner box multiplayer with a Zombies portion. 0s and 1s should be reserved for totally unplayable broken messes. Protip: the people who play Call of Duty and the people who actually think anybody gives a fuck about their Metacritic User Review are completely different people

>>388436864
Don't they bite?

>>388438085
they've got milk teeth still probably easy to pull out with pliers so still pretty easy

>>388437863
That's not worth it to me so I won't do it. If you paid me 20 dollars to shill the new Call of Duty I wouldn't do that either, but if you make it worth my while then I'll do it.

>>388436808
pretty sure maintaining the statement is implicit, and since you are someone whose opinion can be bought, you would probably face consequences for changing yours so readily that it would be obvious to you that it would be better not to do so, like never being paid again, since voices like yours are bought en gros.

>>388438191
500 is way too much

>>388438309
For me personally? No that's about right. I'm not a sex worker and I'm not going to make it a regular thing, and you probably wouldn't enjoy it as much. The actual number isn't the point, the point is that you could, in theory, pay me and I will basically do ANYTHING that isn't illegal.

>>388438219
Fair point. Guess I'm being too honest for my own good.

File: 1503261319580.png (200KB, 314x296px) Image search: [Google]

200KB, 314x296px

So many soulless sellouts itt

If I get paid before hand, I'd probably say it's shit.

>>388435869
it depends how much I'm being paid to give an honest review.

>>388435869
Yes

It's not like I'm a reviewer or something, I don't have a reason to give credible reviews.

>>388438039
>literally none of the games are 0
what about the vita game?

>>388435869
If I had a family and this kept them from starving and becoming homeless, I certainly would.
Otherwise I'm not too keen on whoring myself out.

>>388438176
I dunno, that sounds like a lot of effort.

>>388436071
youre a pussy.

>>388437604
Anon, people like you are the reason I am chronically depressed.

>>388440406
Explain you depressed faggot why does that other fag make you depressed faggot

>>388435869
Only if I felt the game was actually good. Otherwise no

If someone paid you to gargle a dogshit smoothie, would you?

I already do :)

>>388441664
No.

>>388441817
If someone paid you to gargle a catshit smoothie, would you?

>>388436864
raping the 5 year old may be easy but evading law enforcement is not.

>>388435869

Yeah. Gaming industry and standards are fucked beyond repair anyway, mightaswell reap the spoils.