>Ryzen is a failure >VEGA is a failure >AMD CEO goes

>Ryzen is a failure
That's wrong.

>>387785792
>Ryzen is a failure
>typed the Intel shill while quaking

>>387785948

1700x vs 2016's i3 = i3 won

Its clearly a failure.

>>387786021
You have no idea what you are talking about.

>>387786270

See Ryzen reviews

Go away pootel shill, and take your stutterfires with you.

The shit is only for vega 64 unless there's "new news" I haven't seen this past weekend but the "shit" is so bad though. Way worse than intel/nvidia bad as these are mostly to fuck competition which indirectly affects consumers, what AMD did is directly affect consumers but not everyone else.

File: 1503167780332.png (247KB, 760x572px) Image search: [Google]

247KB, 760x572px

>>387785948
>>387786014
>>387786270
>>387786380

>>387786360
I don't need to look at reviews to know how wrong you are.
A 7600k shits the bed against a 1600(non-x) in games like BF1, Watch Dogs 2, GTA V, Witcher 3, Crysis 3, etc etc
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bBKHsMar1Jo
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X6Ovmxfejvo
https://youtu.be/JypkqwpOtNI?t=8m
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4RMbYe4X2LI
Yeah, maybe a 7350k might get 5 - 6 more fps in some minecraft or other light games but even an overclocked 7600k would lose against an R5 the very moment the game is intensive on the CPU, aka the very moment CPU matters.

>check /g/
>literally no threads about the vega 64 shit
One reason why no one should go to that AMD shillhole.

File: 1497565895125.jpg (112KB, 691x771px) Image search: [Google]

112KB, 691x771px

>>387786552
GOY PLEASE DELETE

>>387786021
In what? Gaming? Some people actually do shit on their PCs.
>>>/v/

>>387785792
>Shits on AMD
>On the day of the Intel 8th gen announcement

We'll just have to wait and see if Intel can hold their "up to 40% performance increase" promise. Spoiler alert: it's only 4% with a 40% price increase.

>>387786949
What, there were threads about it, even /g/ called out Vega 64 for the shitshow it is. /g/ doesn't tend to dwell on subjects for too long though.

>>387787635
>/g/ doesn't tend to dwell on subjects for too long though.
>amd shill threads everyday, linux shill threads everyday, some other shit everyday, intel shitposting everyday
right

>>387787716
Yeah, but actual news stuff tends to fall off the board after a while. That stuff is/has always been around.

File: 1461114544978.jpg (567KB, 1920x824px) Image search: [Google]

567KB, 1920x824px

>Implying Ryzen failed
>Implying all of their line up didn't become best sellers
>Implying it didn't forced Intel to rush coffee lake early after skylake x failed to deliver

File: 1496098972845.png (316KB, 882x758px) Image search: [Google]

316KB, 882x758px

Can't wait for AMD to go bankrupt.

>>387785792
>Ryzen is a failure
>literally the best performance per watt high performance CPUs money can buy
I don't understand.

>>387788724
For what reason? You want 4 core processors for $800 for the next 20 years?