>this game sucks because of these >you just have shit

Dogs are shit tier animals and pets

>>387696020
not an argument

It's the "argument" of forever

File: 1412450251974.png (6KB, 377x330px) Image search: [Google]

6KB, 377x330px

>lose an arguement
>go make a new thread in a desperate attempt to get some validation

File: 1410105911134.jpg (10KB, 251x242px) Image search: [Google]

10KB, 251x242px

>game is popular so game is bad

>>387696020
People insulting you don't prove you're wrong, but their existence per se doesn't prove you right either.

>>387696020
What was the argument, OP? Who hurt you?

>>387696020
>shit taste the "not an argument" of 2017
>implying anons haven't called each other's taste shit since the dawn of day

>>387696020
That's how online opinions work. People will criticize you no matter how right or wrong you are. Things become scary when you agree more with people offline than you do online.

>>387696097
All pets are shit-tier, if you didn't get them when they were newborns.

>>387696020
Imagine being so mad about someone calling out your shit taste that you go make a thread about it

File: 1502487913521.jpg (106KB, 560x510px) Image search: [Google]

106KB, 560x510px

>>387696020
That's annoying, but it isn't half as bad as being accused of having not played the game, even when the complaints you bring up show that you have.

>waves opinions around like they are facts

File: 1440747739537.jpg (326KB, 713x1008px) Image search: [Google]

326KB, 713x1008px

>discuss such heavily taste-dependant matter as games
>use "arguments"
Most of your "arguments" is someone else's opinions from Metacritic and that's not even the worst one.
Deal with the fucking fact that there are no objective truths when it comes to enjoyment.

>>387696620
>game is popular so game is good

File: 63455bacd1c69fbc235fe081136517a0583f7039_hq.jpg (22KB, 502x512px) Image search: [Google]

22KB, 502x512px

>>387696620
>Game is good and popular so /v/ hates it