Why does EA have to make good trailers? Am I wrong to be exc

>>387627582

>Why does EA have to make good trailers?
Because that's how games sell. Your game can be total crap but if the trailer looks like an expensive movie, idiots will buy it. Especially Star Wars fans.

If you're a Star Wars fan you're already a mindless fanboy drone, so does it really matter?

>>387627943
I think I'm going to get suckered into it because of (seemingly) free maps and fighter combat. How much can I get stung by this game? I enjoyed the Battlefield 1 singleplayer well enough and I do like Star Wars.

>>387628238

>How much can I get stung by this game?
It's EA so sky's the limit.

File: 1460085731036.jpg (13KB, 318x345px) Image search: [Google]

13KB, 318x345px

>>387627582
>"For the Republic!"
>It's not a clone's voice
>and then there's a female voice
I'm going to pretend EA isn't retarded and that's Anakin and Ahsoka

>>387628238
Pay2Win for starters

>>387629640
This type of game isn't usually made pay2win. Are they going to have the ability to land on a ship and assault on foot?

>>387627582
>Maul and Yoda in Kamino
Couldn't they just place Obi Wan and Jango already? Or is it too much job for them?

>>387627582
>this is supposed to look good
You don't even get to see half the shit going on, just a bunch of lasers and then suddenly it shifts to another scene. Not even the things that make StarWars interesting.

>>387629864
That's a good point. Everything is going so fast you can't really figure out what's going on.

>>387629482
The voice actors don't sound alike. EA has been good at getting the voice actors from the show so far, with the exclusion of Vader's voice.

File: BF2 Space battles.jpg (282KB, 512x512px) Image search: [Google]

282KB, 512x512px

>>387629790
>This type of game isn't usually made pay2win.
You would be surprised. It was already confirmed that there are boost cards you aquire by playing that if you preorder you already have by minute 1. And iirc shit gets even worse.

>Are they going to have the ability to land on a ship and assault on foot?
Most likely not.

>>387629864
>>387629981
>You don't even get to see half the shit going on
That's actually the problem with most fighting/battle scenes since pretty much the beginning of the decade if not earlier.

>>387630112
>It was already confirmed that there are boost cards you aquire by playing that if you preorder you already have by minute 1
Another game down the trash.

>>387630343
I think I agree with you. I've been watching Star Trek recently, and because of that I've noticed that suspense really takes a back seat to "what the heck is going on" action, especially in video games.

>>387630343
Yeah pretty much, obfuscate the whole screen in flashing lights and cool sound effects and you've got an audience by the balls apparently.
>>387630717
Yeah I actually enjoyed the remakes but there's so many scenes that are just swamped in pointless visual noise and activity