>Game has shit graphics. >Suddenly every gullable retard

File: 1494129140599.jpg (126KB, 945x1043px) Image search: [Google]

126KB, 945x1043px

Kikoken!

>>387499245
The graphics aren't bad its the art style/direction.
Better lighting would be a big improvement.

It also helps people got really burned with SFV
Most people would rather put up with multiple re-releases rather than release a partial game and force the consumer to finish it by buying DLC

>>387500643
The state SFV shipped in was inexuseable, but who the fuck wants re-releases upon re-releases over base game+updates in 2017?

it's not that the graphics are bad

it's that the graphics and style are WORSE than its DIRECT PREDECESSOR released SIX YEARS AGO

>>387501508
Base game+updates is fine. It's the logical future of fighting games.

The amount of content that V shipped with at launch, for $60, was inexcusable. It was horrible value. It was like they made a free-to-play game but charged AAA price for it.

>make game that is below consumer standards
>be surprised when even gullible retards call you out on it

>>387501508
Not the anon you're replying to, but id much rather have "Super Street fighter" style updates with big balance changes and a dozen new characters once a year than a season pass with new characters every month and the devs constantly toying with the balance of a game. I might be in the minority though.

>>387501508
>but who the fuck wants re-releases upon re-releases over base game+updates in 2017?
Quite a bunch, going by all the people who bought every single SF4, MvC3, GG, BB, and other games that use that model.

>>387501549
This. I don't comment much but this game is just disrespectful to the fans and an obvious cash grab. I don't understand how people are defending this game at all.