>buy $60 game >it includes micro-transactions Stop

>DLC
What a mistake that was huh

Also, shameless self bump

File: 1443165927491.jpg (71KB, 501x576px) Image search: [Google]

71KB, 501x576px

>>387393220
Don't be silly go- fellow gamer, slippery slope is just a logical fallacy remember? Dumb goyim can't even remember indoctri- I mean school. Now buy your loot boxes and have fun!

File: 1486328243568.jpg (8KB, 269x211px) Image search: [Google]

8KB, 269x211px

>buy $60 game
>it becomes free2play later
>developers don't compensate you and basically tell you to fuck off

The higher the graphical fidelity the costlier the resources are to make. As modern gamers demand modern graphics the price is gonna go up. If it's an up front increase it might hurt sales, hence microtransactions.

I'd honestly be fine with PS2 era and below graphics, it'd keep costs lower and allow developers to allocate more resources to gameplay and let the game run better, I hate when HD remakes trade 60FPS for higher graphical fidelity. It'd be better in any game not focused on a conematic experience. But kids need their next-gen graphics.

>>387393253
What's the joke?

>>387395374
formerly Chuck Chanchez

File: 20880079-112c-4d7b-833c-85806c6d9c13.jpg (45KB, 302x431px) Image search: [Google]

45KB, 302x431px

Is it wrong to think that full price game microtransactions are okay as long as they go entirely to making sure the DLC is free?

File: 1501534012405.png (437KB, 498x492px) Image search: [Google]

437KB, 498x492px

>buy 250€ handheld
>it gets a 20% price cut two months later
>an upgraded model is announced 4 months later
>receive a bunch of old ROMs and an emblem reminding you how big of an idiot you were for trusting in them

>>387395471
The thing is, this doesn't happen. unless by 'DLC' you mean a couple shitty MP maps a couple devs threw together in an afternoon.

>>387395561
>buying a launch console ever for any reason
lmfaoooooooooooooooooooooooooooo

>>387394367
serves you right for buying WoWclones