So why is Star WarsBattlefront able to run at 60fps on weak ass

File: C-ET6j-U0AElKd4.jpg (25KB, 539x258px) Image search: [Google]

25KB, 539x258px

>>387133875
Laziness.

>>387134019
Well, Obi Wan has the high ground, they shouldn't try it. So obviously he wins.

>>387133875
competence

>>387133875
Photogrammetry is where most of the good graphics come from, and they don't take any more gpu power than other graphics

>>387133875
720p on Xbox One / 900p on PS4, very little world interactivity

>>387133875
If DICE can make a game that looks good , sounds good, and runs relatively well. They're not bad devs they're just controlled by EA. Battlefront is almost cgi detailed. It's a really nice looking game bf1 as well.

>>387133875
DICE are good devs under cruel management.

>>387133875

Game dev here.

It's basically laziness. Other teams know they can get away with 30fps, so why put all that effort in to optimise?

It would cost another $20 million and normies don't even give a shit, so there's very little incentive.

Also, DICE are making a AAA competitive FPS, so they are basically making a game in the only genre where players actually care about framerate.

Because DICE are really good at optimizing their shit

>>387133875
Optimization, it's the same reason why Halo 5 runs really well on Xbox compared to other AAA titles, they only had one platform to focus on and were able to spend much more time optimizing it.

>>387133875
theyre fucking wizards. also they actually put time into research and development before the game which let them use huge realistic textures with small sizes or something to that extent. There is a nice Dev talk in youtube somewhere, really technical but really interesting.

>>387133875
No content.
Easier on the system.

>>387133875
DICE are great technical developers even if their social and design principles are outright malicious. I wont buy their games on principle but praise where it is due.