>he spent 500 dollars in a 144hz meme monitor >it's

>>387015803
doesn't happen on mine desu

All monitors and TVs flicker.

That's just part of the technology.

Lights also flicker.

The higher the refresh rate, the hertz, the less flicker is noticeable.

>>387015803
>spend $250 on a 144hz monitor
>everything looks incredibly smooth now
>didn't fall for the "the human eye can't see above 30fps" meme
It's that simple.

File: 1493186901648.png (109KB, 550x550px) Image search: [Google]

109KB, 550x550px

>have had a Asus 144hz monitor for four years and the only issue I ever had was a tinny sounding speakers that went away after a couple weeks
Guess Im lucky

>>387016003
>>387015803
>>387015882
>>387015998
>tfw would want 144hz
>but also want 4k
>know you cant possibly get this smooth of a performance without quad SLI
>stick to 1080p 60hz instead

File: 1487198407614.gif (596KB, 618x648px) Image search: [Google]

596KB, 618x648px

>>387015803
>recording your 144hz monitor with a camera
>not understanding the camera has a lower scan rate

>>387016072
>Without quad SLI
Even if you could do that on newer cards, the amount of games that would support SLI and 144Hz properly are few and far between

>>387016072
The 144hz difference is noticeable and nice even on the desktop, and really affects more games than you realize, even without dropping four grand on GPUs.

When did 60Hz stop being good enough?

Jesus christ in a year or two monitor makers will start selling 256Hz monitors as the next big thing and everyone will act like 144Hz is utter crap.

>buy mechanical keyboard, 144 Hz monitor, etc.
>sell it all to give up gaming for a year
>worried I'll never be able to go back
>back to 60 Hz, cheap Microsoft keyboards, etc. and perfectly okay with it
Good feels, desu. I want a mechanical keyboard just to get a tenkeyless one to save space, though.

OP is retarded, you need a special camera to record things that have odd frequencies

https://youtu.be/uzP8FFKpwQ0

>>387016072
I have a 1440p monitor, 144hz
It's actually really good and gives you that "better than HD" look without straining your wallet too much.

I'm sure 4k looks even better, but it's just not worth it yet.

Get a 1440p, keep that for the next 5 years or so, hopefully by then both 4k and cards that can run games on them will be cheaper.

File: 1502078196166.jpg (60KB, 607x608px) Image search: [Google]

60KB, 607x608px

>>387016314
>When did 60Hz stop being good enough?
It's not that 60Hz is shit, it's that 144Hz is better. 60Hz is absolutely fine if that's all you can afford/run, but if nothing's keeping you from going higher, why wouldn't you?
I guess it's hard to buy into the hype without actually spending time in front of a good monitor though, so one day you'll just have to take a risk and see for yourself.

File: thingken of $7.gif (1MB, 290x353px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 290x353px

>>387016336
>buy a $600 144Hz monitor
>also have to buy a fancy new special camera just to properly film it

oh my lord pcbros at it again

>>387016440
>>387016072
Quad SLI, lmao, I have a 1080ti with a 4.4ghz oc'd cpu and I play every game at ultra on a 1440p monitor no problem 100+ fps. If I had 2 1080ti I could do the same thing with 4k. Quad SLI my ass, no game is optimized for such a bullshit config.

>>387016314
>When did 60Hz stop being good enough?
Nothing wrong with 60Hz really, only that it's a shame that if your card has the ability to run something at a higher frequency, you don't have a monitor that supports it.

>>387016440
what kind of gpu do you need for 1440p 144hz

File: helicopter.webm (3MB, 320x240px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 320x240px

>>387015803
>He doesn't know how cameras work

>>387016605
HOW IS IT FLYING???

>>387016498
3.57401/10, made me reply

>>387015803

The differnece between 60Hz and 120/144Hz is really not that noticeable, and anyone intelligent rather people at a rock steady 60fps/2k on a good IPS panel than have a game fluctuatiing between 100-144 on a shitty TN like all high-Hz monitors are.

I "downgraded" from a 120Hz monitor not long ago because Frames Per Second is the ultimate diminishing returns meme.

>tfw don't even know what 4K at 144 fps even looks like, never mind owning such a rig

>>387016550
>Every game is the same

>>387016565
Not sure to be honest. I upgraded my monitor with my last system upgrade, so I have a 980 ti in there at the moment.

>>387016765
>TN shit
They make 165Hz IPS now my man.

>>387015998
>>387016098
>he doesn't own a monitor made by LG or Benq with anti-flicker technology that eliminates 99% of flickering

The only thing that keeps me from getting a new GPU is that I dont have a new monitor yet.

If you put the price of the two adding up you get like 1500$ increase

Flickering has nothing to do with frequency
144hz monitors usually have more flickering due to high frequency
ASUS/ACER/SAMSUNG buy 3rd class IPS/TN panels and don't implement any anti-flickering solution

>>387016314
Rendering more frames than you can display actually fucks with gsync. Framerate caps can become important depending on the game and your set up.

Alright but should i get the Sony or Toshiba?

>>387016880
I play every game AAA, ultra settings 100+ fps at 1440 p. quad sli is a meme, dual sli is a meme. You just get the strongest card out there and get one of them and upgrade your cpu. If you need quad SLI to run games at 4k comfortably, your cpu is trash.

>>387017043
yeah works great for hallway shooters but i like to play creative games or simulation games and for those you need a really strong system

>>387017043
>>387017112
>PC gamers spending 1000 dollars to play CS GO and Dota 2

File: wut.gif (2MB, 236x224px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 236x224px

>>387016991
>Flickering has nothing to do with frequency
>144hz monitors usually have more flickering due to high frequency

>>387017112
And I can play those as well. ARMA 3? No problem. Escape from Tarkov at 1440p ultra? No problem. As long as you have a good cpu at a good OC with strong cooling and a strong GPU you can run these games no problem.

>>387017150
I don't play either honestly. I just like playing games like ARMA 3 or other high intensity games.

>>387017159
i meant it has nothing to do with the frequency the camera is set
it doesn't matter if 1/44 or whatever speed(frequency cut)

>>387016643
the gooberment wants you to believe that they rotate to lift when it's really a really complicated set of pulleys

>>387016643
i can't tell if meme.

but the rotor is synced to the cameras rate of capture so it appears like it's not moving while it is.

File: speccorum.png (41KB, 797x605px) Image search: [Google]

41KB, 797x605px

Doesn't happen to mine (^:

>>387015803
I got a 60hz acer monitor, works great!

File: Sonic.png (439KB, 1024x719px) Image search: [Google]

439KB, 1024x719px

>LCD is still flickering shit that can't display black and has input lag
Should have never left CRT.

File: 1458175971291.jpg (74KB, 498x497px) Image search: [Google]

74KB, 498x497px

>>387016072
>not going for the 1440p meme

This is the wave to ride until 2020

>>387017316
>playing your games on prehistoric screens with no definition
Why

>>387015803
>4GB OF RAM

If you guys have an ASUS 144hz-165hz monitor just make sure you isolate the PSU and cable away from static and metal or you'll get black screen flickers.

ASUS have very shitty QC and went cheap on insulating their cables and PSU.

A fix would be to buy a laptop power brick since they have better quality this worked for the PG278Q(144hz) but the PG279Q (144hz-165hz) requires a bit more power to turn on.

>>387017470
CRT has many advantages over LCD.
>No input lag
>Can reproduce a perfect black
>No native resolution, in comparison to LCD static pixel grid, running content that is less than the maximum resolution looks much clearer
On top of this if you compare the days when LCD was starting to replace LCD, CRT was also capable of higher refresh rate.
>No definition
There are CRT monitors from 10 years ago that support over 1440p resolution.
The reason for CRT getting pushed aside by the industry was one of cost, LCD is dirt cheap to product. Everyone nowadays can afford a 60" LCD, that wasn't the case in the CRT era.

>>387017819
True 10 years ago, now LCDs have left CRTs in the dust. Are good LCDs expensive? Sure but so was an FW900 Trinitron, quality is always expensive.

Have had 1080p 120hz for 6 years, it's great

Planning to move to Freesync 1440 144 with zen2 and navi

File: 1461191830352.jpg (13KB, 480x360px) Image search: [Google]

13KB, 480x360px

>>387017470
>not having a 300 pound 1080p crt from 1995

>>387017819
>No input lag
Unless you exclusively play fighting games this is a non-issue

>>387018080
>LCDs have left CRTs in the dust
What do you expect when CRT hasn't been developed in 15 years because it got abandoned in favor of LCD? LCD is still garbage today, the good technologies since the demise of CRT are Plasma and OLED.

>bought a 1440p 144hz Freesync IPS on sale
>works great and I do better in my shootys now

Remember when poo in loos used to say SSDs were a meme? That's what OP is doing with 144hz

>tfw been using cheap ACER monitor for past 4 years
Why the fuck are you people paying that much for a monitor

>>387015803
Are you fucking serious?

Just buy a Dell ultrasharp ultrawide

>>387015803
>he's a RAMlet

>>387016765
>anyone intelligent
lamo
Tip my fedora m9

File: 1465692707434.png (132KB, 350x418px) Image search: [Google]

132KB, 350x418px

>>387015803
>1.6GHz dual core celeron CPU
>4GB of RAM

>>387016565
I use a 1070 myself and it's perfect for everything. Have yet to find a game I cant get at least 60 on high with, if not ultra.

>>387015803
It's flickering due to the refresh rate clashing against the camera's settings.

I'd expect no less from someone with a tripod right next to their system to showcase 4 GB of ram and a dual core to completely not care about changing their shutter speed to work with the refresh rate of their screen.

>>387016891
retards think response time is the same as input lag though.

>>387016909
this
this
this

File: 1501735648299.png (1B, 486x500px)

1B, 486x500px

>only a handful of monitors have strobing as a feature
>strobing died off with the 3D meme
>GPUs don't have a black frame insertion as a feature
>only a certain number of games and emulators let you do it

File: 1495840784705.png (597KB, 621x740px) Image search: [Google]

597KB, 621x740px

>>387015803
>not joining the LG or Dell monitor master race
Absolute plebs.

>>387017043
Your cpu matters very little at 4K as compared to 1440p. Performance is all gpu-bound, at most you'd find a difference of 1 or 2 fps on different cpus.

144hz is a meme when consoles can't even go above 30 most of the times, and console ports (99% of PC "gaming") are locked at 60fps most of the time. Don't even start this hz =\= fps crap, you know pretty god damn well what I mean, you fucking faggots.

Now prove me wrong, memers.

>>387015803
It's extremely smooth and didn't cost nearly that much
never heard of flickering happening on them, dunno where you got that one from

>>387022786
>e
Console ports? Locked PC fps? I don't think anyone understands what you're talking about.

>>387022786
Do you own a PC?

Honestly all I really want is a good IPS with 75 hz. I don't even care about the tearing id see in comparison to 144hz. Because at least it's an IPS. Although that's why I got the 1440p IPS with 144hz for a higher price

>>387015803
>spend $20 on second hand monitor being sold by lady who doesn't know better
The differences between my monitor and the $300 brand new ones at my local electronics store are so minuscule it makes me feel sorry for people who actually fall for the new monitor meme. Spend that extra money on components. Heck, spend the money on sex toys and doritos, just don't waste it on a fucking screen.

That flickering is only visible when you take a video of a monitor you dumbass. It's because the refresh rate of the monitor doesn't evenly divide the "refresh rate" of the camera.

Fun fact: if you've ever noticed the wheels of cars spinning backwards in movies, this phenomenon has basically the exact same explanation.

>>387017000
>nvidia
Good goy

>>387015803
>it's full of flickering
Literally what? Just take it back and get a working one anon, mine is fine.

File: 1353156797216.gif (695KB, 640x360px) Image search: [Google]

695KB, 640x360px

>OLED monitors cost 3000$
The dream with replaying the silent hill games with one is still dead.

>>387024786
You could get a LG OLED tv for around $1500. You'll probably be waiting a long time for affordable OLED monitors

>>387022786
Most "console ports" (I assume you meant to say multi-plats) aren't locked at 60 dum dum

>>387023856
If you only play on a 1080p60hz tn monitor you aren't a real gamer.

>>387025119
>le "master race only plays on overpriced tat" maymay
Not an argument

>people wanting oled monitors
enjoy your task bar burn in

>>387015803
>spent 110 euros on a 1080p 144hz acer monitor
>spent 340 euros on the cheapest 1070 there was last christmas
>everything works flawlessly

Feels good to not be a retard.

>>387025396
Is there any alternative though if you want true blacks?

>>387017218
This guy knows his shit. Fuck you for giving this dud shit

File: 54322.jpg (46KB, 720x713px) Image search: [Google]

46KB, 720x713px

Poorfag here
Are there any decent 144hz 1080p monitors for $200 or less?

>>387025401
>>spent 110 euros on a 1080p 144hz acer monitor
Did you buy it from your romanian friend or something

>>387025396
>he doesn't auto-hide the taskbar

>>387025689
okay enjoy your game ui burn in

>>387025645
German ebay. The same monitor was 130 euros on baguette ebay. Got it almost a year ago.

>>387025727
Modern OLED has no burn besides extreme cases.

I run my monitor at 120hz because it's the least common multiple of 24, 30, and 60 FPS

>>387025551
BenQ ZOWIE XL2411 if you don't mind the extra 50 bucks, AOC G2460PF otherwise.
www.productchart.com/monitors/

>>387015803
You should try using the correct cables to plug it in.

File: 64526346745.jpg (68KB, 600x737px) Image search: [Google]

68KB, 600x737px

>10bit or higher
>1440p or higher
>120Hz or higher
>AMVA+
>tfw no monitor has all 4

Fuck.

>>387025859
Whenever I check out ebay it's full of shops selling at retail prices and 2 week auctions ending up at retail prices

>>387016314
I think we're going to reach a point where people only spend money on the highest framerate they can notice. I have a 144hz monitor but I begin to stop seeing a frame increase around 80 or so. 256hz probably won't become commonplace until after we reach the highest resolution worth achieving.

Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) stopped being used years ago in high end monitors as better solutions came to be. Only retards that buy that shitty $200 ASUS 144hz monitor from 2012 have to deal with it because they did zero research. There isn't a single high end monitor that uses PWM on the market. Only old ones and Korean B-tier panel displays.

>>387026918
Youre pretty stupid. Its very clear to notice the difference. My old eizo crt could go above 190hz refresh rate at a moderate res and it was very obvious. Its so smooth that 120hz on the same monitor feels stuttery. Such high refresh rate with a high mouse update rate gives a physical feel, like looking at an illuminated mirror, you mistake it for moving a physical newspaper in front of you. And it was even smoother at 250hz but it was a retardedly low unusable resolution at that point

>>387021519

LG dosent have G sync desu and what about Dell is trash

>>387026350

acer will bring out a 4k 144hz monitor desu

>>387028052
>Youre pretty stupid.
No, my eyes just fucking suck. I'm not alone in that either.

Congrats, you have top-tier vision. Don't tell people they're stupid for having lesser eyesight.

>>387028658
No you're just stupid, everyone's eyes below a certain age and lacking of a serious disease work the same way

>>387028658
Buy a pair of glasses

>got a dell 1440p 144hz gsync monitor for 300
>its amazing

I have a 1080p 60hz next to it and the difference is pretty substantial. I don't think I can go back to 60hz as my primary monitor.

>>387017150
Please tell me when consoles get an actual combat flight sim.

>>387015803
i have a 144hz and have no flickering.
stop buying the cheapest version of things you poor piece of shit.

>>387015803
>Buy a TN
>get bad colors, bad viewing angles and weird artifacting on screen while using 144hz

>Buy an IPS
>get awful IPS glow which ruins dark scenes in games

>buy a VA
>get poor pixel response time which causes blurring and other motion artifacting


Monitors in general are a huge meme.

>>387016072
4k is a meme, just get 1080p 144hz

>TN 24" 144HZ screen 1080 as main

>60hz 27" IPS as secondary for watching anime and playing controller games.

master race

File: john-cleese.jpg (117KB, 720x1080px) Image search: [Google]

117KB, 720x1080px

>>387016061
>tfw same monitor
>tfw mine makes a nice woody sound

>>387017819
>>Can reproduce a perfect black
Hardly. Much better than an LCD backlight but still a lot of scattering light lifting the black level.

>>387025506
Not really. Possibly QLED but that's still some years away. (The QLEDs Samsung are pushing right now are just souped up LEDs and still use backlights.)

File: 1487192205885.jpg (53KB, 595x398px) Image search: [Google]

53KB, 595x398px

>>387016061
>>387031889
>monitor "speakers"

>>387016605
NANI?! KONO POWAA!

>>387016314
240Hz Freesync monitors are already relatively cheap ($500). I'm getting one in a couple months.

File: 1.png (98KB, 350x425px) Image search: [Google]

98KB, 350x425px

>>387032391
>he buys separate """gaming""" speakers

>>387018118
There are early 2000s CRTs that weight like 15kg and I bet are way cheaper and better looking than that pos

>>387017464
>not 3440x1440 100Hz
fucking poorfags I swear

File: 956435498332.jpg (19KB, 351x351px) Image search: [Google]

19KB, 351x351px

>>387032391
>>387033209
>speakers at all
>not headphones

File: IMG_1297.jpg (119KB, 500x500px) Image search: [Google]

119KB, 500x500px

>>387033209
>he doesn't have studio monitors

>>387033209
no one said that.

Just don't use the monitor speakers you fucking pleb retard. Pretty much anything is better, even earbuds

File: 1480179992438.jpg (749KB, 1280x1060px) Image search: [Google]

749KB, 1280x1060px

>>387033764
I bet you think using headphones as a mic is better than a $100 mic

>>387015803
>celeron
What the fuck are you doing

File: 1482201699563.png (19KB, 119x205px) Image search: [Google]

19KB, 119x205px

>>387033689
>he doesn't have audio monitors
is what I read at first. Thanks for the headache, friend Anon.

>>387016314
Back in the 2000 a cheap CRT monitor could have 85 Hz. We actually downgraded quality as we started using flat screens.

File: appcantopem.jpg (168KB, 650x365px) Image search: [Google]

168KB, 650x365px

>>387034947
>not having an audio monitor

Is G-sync/FreeSync worth it or is it a meme?

>>387016003
>Have to buy a 1080Ti and overclock your Intel furnace to avoid tearing.
>Fear at every new game's optimization, because there's just nothing more you can throw at it.
>tfw, this will only get worse as time passes.
>Play on low with your NASA computer.

>>387016605
>>387016643
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Nyf79SI0U9Q

>>387035208
Well it's worth it @ 4K.
I can get framerates in the mid 40s and not notice any tearing.
I guess it's worth it on 144Hz monitors too, as noone can actually run 144fps in real games.

File: morphine administered.jpg (132KB, 604x454px) Image search: [Google]

132KB, 604x454px

>spent $800 on three asus VG248 monitors
>enable lightboost and nvidia surround
>obliterate forumdads in eravate in motion blur-free silky smooth 120fps@5760x1080
I pity the consolefriends who will never know such immeasurable joy

>>387016072
1440p144 is the dream for me, but it's retardedly expensive in brazil and i don't have a place of my own yet and im not risking having a gaming rig on my room when roomates could come and steal it and flee to colombia or something
im definitely not paranoid and i def dont have trust issues

>>387034960
Both in refresh rate and resolution. Still not sure the tradeoff in lighter, thinner displays was really worth it. Late-model CRTs could do WQHD, meaning 2560x1440 resolution. Going back to 1024x768 on a brand new flatscreen was pretty painful

File: ips vs tn lmao plebs.jpg (944KB, 1440x824px) Image search: [Google]

944KB, 1440x824px

>>387015803
I know OP is just memeing or hes a delusional console pleb but.

The ASUS ROG SWIFT PG279Q 27" 2560x1440 IPS 165Hz is the best monitor ive ever owned or purchased ever.

No black light bleed, no dead pixels, excellent colors and lighting.

No flickering, no flaws whatsoever.

Best monitor ive ever owned.

Meanwhile, OP is on a 720p TN panel that has a max 30 hz refresh rate that he uses to only play Dota and Lol.

what a fucking pleb lmao.

>>387016314
>When did 60Hz stop being good enough?

I saw the benefits of +60Hz over a decade ago with CTR monitors, and I was pissed I had to wait for so bloody long for highly responsive LCDs to become popular. The "60 is the best it can get" thing was always a fib.

>>387035626
Tá tudo bem irmão.
Eu entendo a situação aí no Brasil.
Um primo meu reclamou que um amigo de longa data roubou o carro dele, 300 reais da meia e a PS2 do filho dele.

>>387026278
Oh fuck these are TN

File: 1500252298989.jpg (61KB, 500x499px) Image search: [Google]

61KB, 500x499px

>>387015803
>not going with a BenQ XL2411Z with anti-flicker technology

>>387035707
>that overpriced ANUS monitor
>r*ddit spacing

>>>/r/pcmasterrace

>>387035707
what does this picture look like in motion on your monitor?
https://www.testufo.com/#test=photo

>>387022470
This is fucking false kek. It's a myth perpetuated by people who want to put their head in the sand and continue believing that cpu's aren't an integral part to graphics processing. Ever play a game and shadows tank your fps even though you have a good gpu? That's your cpu bottlenecking. Your cpu has to be above the quality of your gpu in order to get the maximum performance from it. The cpu allows the gpu to do the work.

Look at rivatuner and people every day that bottleneck their 800 dollar gpus with their shitty i5s.

>>387026918
After a certain point nobody is going to buy that shit except people who are doing it to dickwave on youtube

>tfw still plays on 900p 30hz
>not sure whether to upgrade my 960 to a 1060 or get a monitor instead

>>387016072
Enjoy your microstutter

The Samsung KS8000 is the best television man.

>>387024786
OLED somehow eliminating most burn in and actually being affordable is the dream and I will gladly woo the day of LCD's demise.

File: 1411026355088.jpg (8KB, 229x250px) Image search: [Google]

8KB, 229x250px

AMVA+ or IPS?

I'm thinking about making the move from 1080p to 1440p but I want a monitor which I can use for both pc and console gaming. Question is, how does PS4 look on a 1440p monitor? Really bad?

>>387035829
Well of course. What do you expect paying less than $200?

>Got the 24 inch 1440p/144hz Agon monitor a few months ago
>No flicker whatsoever

Stop being retarded with technology.

Can someone give a quick rundown on monitor types? Like what are IPSes or TNs

>>387036086
Get a monitor instead. 960 will last you well enough until next gen Nvidia.

>>387036209
The ps4 pro would probably look great. I play it at 4k though. My 1440p is for my PC.

>>387036294
IPS is better for watching videos, making photoshop shit, and using as a work station.
It ALWAYS has a slight input delay from my experience. No matter how small it is, it's unacceptable for games.

TN is better for gaming. That's it.

>>387036294
if you care about color quality and viewing your monitor from arbitrary angles, go for IPS. otherwise, pick TN.

>tfw just color calibrates my monitors
>tfw watching the looney tunes restored BDs

at first I didn't like it but man it's good seeing reds that are indeed red

>>387035821
caralho, aí é foda. porran

>>387018391
which one

>>387036409
is IPS input delay unacceptable if I only play single player games?

>>387036345
But it's the 2GB one. I don't have enough juice to play some heavy stuff like Arkham Knight without having stutters.
But I have seen how games look noticeably different on 1080p so I might get that first though, any recommendations?

>>387036294

You trade tn's bad viewing angles for ips glow. People believe this to be a worthy trade off for some unknown reason.

>>387036173
slight motion blur > darkness ruining glow

>144Hz
>Flickering
Literally impossible.The light imprint duration in our eyes dictate we see light as a continuous stream above 50Hz.
If you see flicker, it's not 144Hz.

>>387037094
Eh I would say so. Any delay that causes the game to do something I didn't want it to because it was out of my hand thanks to input delay, pisses me off. It makes games not worth playing.

I GUESS you could still enjoy slow/turn based games like Hearthstone? But I would never play any multiplayer game, any shooter, any racing game, any platformer etc on an IPS again.

>>387037109
You don't need better. Arkham Knight is a fucking mess on PC, didn't you know? It's also shit.

>>387037109
>recommendations
Oh. Well, >>387035978 is what I use. I've never owned a better monitor.

>>387035626
jajaja uma delicia 1440p

>>387037109
http://www.144hzmonitors.com/best-gaming-monitor/ Or something here if you can't find that exact BenQ anymore. Not sure if it's still in production.

>>387033465
>not 16K
fucking plebs man
https://youtu.be/Toft6fMvByA?t=8m42s

File: 1394639552524.gif (993KB, 250x250px) Image search: [Google]

993KB, 250x250px

>>387017251
>when it's really a really complicated set of pulleys

>>387016765

enjoy your tearing

>>387026350

where the fuck are you even gonna get a 10bpc source to display?

File: Ykiq9VV.jpg (1MB, 2557x1561px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 2557x1561px

If you can live with SOME tearing, read: it's there, but you actually have to focus for more than a second to take serious notice of it, every pro monitor with primo IPS panels that I've tested at work are excellent for this, beyond the fact that in terms of picture quality, contrast, and colors, meme "gamer" monitors absolutely can't compare. 16:10 is also the most perfect single monitor AR

I have a U2410, and started keeping it off when Doom came out, and I don't think I'll ever go back. Vsync has traditionally stayed ON ever since the shitpile that was my Samsung T220 convinced me LCD's are tearfests, especially since the monitor before that was a based 120Hz Trinitron from my Dad's old office Vaio

Dell UltraSharp's are pretty accessible pro panels if you don't wan't to enter $1000+ NEC territory, and rumors of horrible input lag are exactly that, since most input lag specs are based on if you're using sRGB/hyper-accurate color modes, and all of them come with standard/game modes

>>387016765
Anon, 60 is noticably worse than even 100, let alone 144.
IPS is objectively shit for gaming, because there is none without removed input delay. You WILL always notice it unless you're a fucking scrub at games.

>>387037546
U M A
D E L I C I A

>>387015803
Why the hell is 144Hz even a thing? We've had perfect 120Hz monitors, a number divisible by 24, 30 and 60

>>387015803
>he fell for the LCD meme
My CRT monitor doesn't flicker at all.

>>387039190
It ends in 0 which means its divisible by 0, which can cause programs to crash. 144MHz is much more stable since it ends in 4.

File: a1ejGnY_700b.jpg (35KB, 700x393px) Image search: [Google]

35KB, 700x393px

>>387036006
pcmasterrace is one of the shittiest places ive ever been. you can think consoles are shit with out being a pc master race fag.

yes i'd buy this monitor again in a heart beat.

also unironcally saying reddit spacing lmao

>underage highschooler

anyway, what monitor do you own kiddo?

i bet its worse than mine in every aspect.

>>387036026

165hz of buttery smoothness with IPS beautiful lighting and coloring, why ask questions with obvious answers?

File: DERP_sonic.jpg (14KB, 320x240px) Image search: [Google]

14KB, 320x240px

>>387015803
>flickering
Backlight strobing results in clearer image motion no matter if the refresh rate is 60hz or 144hz. LCD is shit tier anyway. We desperately need a new display tech.

>Tfw had to choose between 144hz or ultrawide ips with freesync
>Went with ultrawide cause I barely play games that would benefit from high refresh rate
>Ultrawide is the single best upgrade I've done in my life when it comes to vidya

It's a fucking pain in the ass to get some games to work, and some don't at all, but oh boy when they do... And support keeps getting better

>>387039638
Why do you do that spacing, actually? It's unappealing, makes it difficult to read, and is just the wrong way to type texts.

>>387036070
What you're saying is certainly true for lower resolutions, but did you miss the 'at 4k'? Currently it doesn't matter jack shit if you have a 7900X or a 'shitty i5' if you're playing at 4K.

>>387038095
keep telling yourself that

File: 2758972-ciri.jpg (4MB, 3830x2152px) Image search: [Google]

4MB, 3830x2152px

>>387040186
Because its easier for me to read kiddo.

I don't care what you think about it, cry reddit all you want, i don't care.

I will reddit space for the rest of my days.

It also makes my post bigger and draws more attention to my post therefore i get more replies and more people get salty about 'le reddit' spacing.

Obligatory picture of an attractive video game character to get even more replies.

>>387033594
not wanting to play games with realistic sound stage and imaging that doesn't sound like mush.

File: webmme.webm (2MB, 640x360px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 640x360px

>>387015803
Reminder to check if nvidia cucked ur monitor for all of its colors

Open up nvidia panel
Look under display click on change resolution
scroll down and make sure the output dynamic range is set on full

>>387042557
I don't even half those 4 options, just the colour depth.

>>387042557
FUCKING NVIDIA
It's been on limited for YEARS

>>387035554
Just ramming those fools or giving the plasma death?

>>387043294
That means you dont have to worry about that shit, i went with the limited option for 3 months. The difference is night and day

File: CAT-03-JE0214-01P.jpg (65KB, 511x510px) Image search: [Google]

65KB, 511x510px

>>387042557
Thank you

>>387042557
Woah, thanks bro.

>>387043927
Apparently it's a HDMI only thing. I use a DVI cable, so it isn't a problem.