>900p docked >720p portable >30fps LOL We can stop praising

>>386595161
I stopped at >rabbids

>>386595161
You have no excuse for caring about the framerate to a turn based game.

>>386595161
The fact that Nintendo is doing a Ubisoft collab shows that the big N is down to its last years.

>>386595161
>complaining about FPS cap in a game that isn't real-time

>>386596651
The main issue is 900p.

>>386596709

Yes and?

Last gen your meme was 720p

>>386596776
I want my meme to be 1080p

>>386595161

>720p portable

I don't give a shit about this game and wasn't interested but can you guys stop using this as a negative?

Handheld mode having 720p is better than both 3DS and PS Vita

>>386595161
>720p portable
haha wow, it's only doing native resolution?

>>386595161
Why are there 2 Marios?

>>386595161
Got a source for that claim OP?

File: 1499917932642.jpg (25KB, 450x338px) Image search: [Google]

25KB, 450x338px

>>386595161
PCKeks and ACKeks literally needs to stop hating on this game just because it has Rabbids in it.

Why don't you shit go and play your fake difficulty XCOM and XCOM2 instead of shitposting? Oh right, it must not be fun to keep missing those 99% shot 5 times in a row.

>>386597320
but worse than my 3 year old phone

>>386598569
Oh yeah, I'm sure 1080p sure is worthwhile on that tiny fucking screen

>>386598569
Your phone doesn't play new AAA games though

>>386595161
>3rd party dev
>not being able to pull the same tricks Nintendo does
STOP THE FUCKING PRESS!!, ANON IS ONTO SOMETHING

File: 1478996220167.jpg (23KB, 250x250px) Image search: [Google]

23KB, 250x250px

>caring about framerate in a turn based strategy game

>>386595161
i was wondering why this game music felt so rareware, turns out that fucking Grant Kirkhope himself is doing the music.

File: 1498240959264.png (106KB, 306x423px) Image search: [Google]

106KB, 306x423px

>>386595161
The vast majority of normal people don't give a rats ass about framerate.
And this game looks great despite how bad /v/ and those leaks made it look a while ago.
And if this can be allowed to happen there is no reason Mario and Rayman can happen since his games keep selling well.

>>386595161
>le 60fps meme
Why do you need 60fps on a strategy game?

>>386599976
The leaks helped the game, they got everyone used to the idea before the actual reveal.

>>386595161
>console does console things
woah

>>386595161
>Stable 30 FPS
Fucking rights, Xcom 2 still jumps around 45-27 on my computer with a GTX 1080. Before an expansion they really need to fix the performance of their game.

File: 1502137797352.jpg (109KB, 890x528px) Image search: [Google]

109KB, 890x528px

>>386600126
Did they?
I felt everyone (especially here) was a bit upset with stuff like pic related

>>386600274
Yes, everyone got their dose of laughs, bitching and shitposting with the leaks, so wheb the actual reveal came out eveypne was burned out for more shitposting and actually saw what the gane had to offer.

>>386600274
To be fair, those leaks were internal documents that the public wasn't supposed to see, ergo the overtop names and stuff like your pic.

>>386595161

>Graphically one of the best looking Switch games so far
>Prioritizing 60 fps in a turn-based tactical game

>>386596198

>Sony is butt buddies with Ubi for years, lets them shit all over their player base with Crotch_Dogs and Ass Creed 56
SONY ALWAYS WINS!

>Nintendo collars with Ubi for a Rabbids game, looks to be a decent X-Com clone
NINTENDOOMED!

>>386595161
The 900p is one thing, but really, do you need 60fps in a turn-based game?

>>386598678
And WAHHOO does?

>>386598569
>over 720p
>on a fucking phone
This meme needs to stop.
There's literally no fucking difference between 720p or 1080p on fucking 5'' screens

File: Wat.jpg (31KB, 599x626px) Image search: [Google]

31KB, 599x626px

>>386595161
Were there actually people praising this garbage heap or are you just speaking out of your fucking ass and spouting diarrhea because you feel like starting something OP for trolls?

File: x2.jpg (257KB, 1366x768px) Image search: [Google]

257KB, 1366x768px

>>386598529
You can always try getting good, cunt

This game existence is too bizarre, i mean, look at this.
>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QeQBRjGFx90

>>386595161
Everyone will still play it even if it had the graphics of the 64

File: 1500186240123.jpg (18KB, 300x300px) Image search: [Google]

18KB, 300x300px

>>386601286
Im getting great mighty poo feeling from this song
>It's-a-me, let's-a-go!', the only words you know!
Heh.

>>386595161
>caring about performance

Sad!

>>386601528
That would make sense considering the same composer of all rareware n64 classics is working on this game, heard the music in this
>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xKY0f7MJasE&index=1&list=PLpwyzkZha0Z70UsyyQEsfCv14sguv-2I-
It gives me flashbacks to DK64

Nintendo doesn't allow devs to make games higher than 720p in portable mode no matter what.
Fast RMX devs wanted to super sample by running it at 900p portable but they weren't allowed.

>>386595161
>just like Zelda BOTW
ok

>>386595161
>i need muh 60 fps
Jesus, I like good performance too, but this is a turn-based strategy game. Why would need 60fps for a game like this?

>>386601286

I would have preferred something besides the Rabbids, but bizarre is good. It reminds me of the good old gamecube days when they put Star Fox in an adventure game with dinosaurs, or gave Mario a water jetpack. But better because it's a spinoff rather than a mainline game, so it won't divide the fanbase.

>>386601286
Well talk about cringe.

>>386601938
hey, the water jetpack was cool.

>>386601642

>Nintendo doesn't allow devs to make games higher than 720p in portable mode no matter what.


It's a 720p screen, no developer is going to make the game run above 720p when the screen can't display a higher resolution. It's not about being allowed to.

>>386602187
Super Sampling.

I don't give a shit.

>game actually looks pretty fun
>innovates on a lot of good xcom features
>mobility is apparently a large focus in combat
>but I won't play it because it has Rabbids in it
Why couldn't it be something like Star Fox?

>>386595161
>30fps

You gotta be pulling my leg. HAHAHA

>>386598569

What games do you play in 1080p on your 3 year old phone?

>>386602224
On a WAHOO? No way fag.

>>386602459
>Star Fox XCOM game
I would play that
It'd be a nice way to make 64fags shut the fuck up

>>386602576
Something like Fast RMX doesn't really push the system so they wanted to go for it.

>>386595448
It looks worse. Besides, if it's fucking turn-based it should be even simpler to get to maintain 60fps, due to there not being as much player control.

>Back then
>Nintendo is great. They always prioritise framerate!
>Now
>It's okay if the framerate is shit if it's Nintendo!

>>386600892
fuck off, sony couldn't succeed without ubisoft

>>386595161
>30fps
LOL keep dreaming toddler, even 20 is pushing it for the Shitch

>>386602685
>it should be even simpler to get to maintain 60fps, due to there not being as much player control.
Please don't ever try to use your brain again, you're embarassing yourself.

>>386602621
>starfox xcom game
>played as star fox marooned on a hostile andross federation controlled planet
>have to team up with star wolf and some AWOL andross forces, possibly even Dash, to escape alive
>call it Star Fox: Hunters

>>386602998
>Fixed camera angles
>Fixed area layout
>Fixed animations
If Mario Odyssey can run at 60fps, this should have no problems. It's not more graphically intense.

>>386595279
rabbids instantly put me off and kiled any interest i may have had in this game.

>>386602621
>>386603058
Fucking hell give us a good mainline game first THEN do whatever shitty spin-off you want, anything else turns you into Metroid or Pikmin fans.

>>386601286
Mario is too meta for its own good

>>386598529
>fake difficulty
Lmao

>>386600892
assshitters wasnt a sony exclusive.

>>386595161

>Rabbids are allies instead of the enemies

What a waste. Anyways is it linear? Dynamic campaign? Custom units? Equipment loadouts?

File: 4973043274.png (147KB, 307x307px) Image search: [Google]

147KB, 307x307px

I refuse to consider this game good simply because Ubisoft is connected to it. And you can't argue that they've ever made a good game, otherwise I will have to assume that you're a shill.

File: 1484330640854.jpg (17KB, 313x286px) Image search: [Google]

17KB, 313x286px

>>386601286
>3.9M views
>trailer was simply dropped out of the blue a week ago with no E3 or Nintendo Direct to piggy back viewers from

File: mMLQz.gif (437KB, 300x222px) Image search: [Google]

437KB, 300x222px

>>386598529
>fake difficulty

>>386598529
>missing those 99% shot 5 times in a row.
I don't think I've ever missed a 99% shot, I missed a 98% shot once and that's in over 3000 hours of XCOM gameplay

>>386602787
They actually still do though, see Splatoon 2. Switch's hardware is weak, yes, so they used adaptive resolution to keep a consistent 60fps when playing.

But ok

File: watch_dogs_game-HD[1].jpg (1MB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1920x1080px

>>386595161
Ubisoft making a poorly optimized piece of crap game coasting on marketing over substance?

I have literally never ever even considered that this could have been a possibility.

File: latest[1].jpg (129KB, 1024x768px) Image search: [Google]

129KB, 1024x768px

>>386601938
>It reminds me of the good old gamecube days when they put Star Fox in an adventure game with dinosaurs
Yeah... The good ol' days...

>>386601174
>soldiers wounded: 1
>good
lol maybe next time kid

>>386598529
>keep missing those 99% shot 5 times in a row.
This my friends is how you know anon has never played XCOM

>>386602810
.............................the game actually does run at 30(???)

I want a fucking Splatoon x-com damn it. It should have been inklings and not rabbids, but maybe next time.

>>386595161
Proof that nintenbros will literally praise ANY game with Mario in it.

So desperate.

Also
>X-COM clone

Please be kidding.

>>386601286
More playable characters than I thought. Looks fun too.

>>386603453
It's Xcom lite. That means barely any customization and a straight shot campaign. Also we are to believe there's only the 8 characters we've been shown and you need at least one Rabbid with you at all times.

Basically, it's a waste of everything. But you should buy it anyways because some game dev cried at E3.

>>386603808
I really don't like that " if he misses, bump up the chance to hit next time in secret" mechanic XCOM has.

If they miss, they miss.

File: fix.jpg (81KB, 836x720px) Image search: [Google]

81KB, 836x720px

>>386604092
who cried?

>>386604123
That's only on lower difficulties.

>>386604123
That only happens in the lower difficulties

>>386604005
...So I guess Link, Samus, Fox, Kirby, Yoshi, Pikachu, Lucina, Ness, Chibi-Robo, the-white-things-with-a-bow-tie-and-huge-mouth from Rhythm Heaven, and yourself as a villager don't exist as well

>>386603453
Rabbids are the allies and the enemies, fool.

>>386604123
Aim adjustments are disabled on the highest difficulty and there are mods that will disable it on all difficulties if you want

>>386604340
Only one of those has gotten a half decent game in recent years.

>>386604340
A more accurate statement should've been "Nintendo fans will praise anything from the big N". Which is true. You guys have sadly never hated a single product from them. You've praised every last one, from the CDI games to Metroid: other M and even Starfox Adventures.

>>386603149
You're a retard

>>386603548
That is a sign that this game will sell.

WOOOAHHHH DUDE ONLY 900P WTF WOW THIS GAME IS SO GARBAGE BECAUSE WE KNOW THAT THE ONLY THING THAT MATTERS AT ALL IN A VIDEO GAME IS THE AMOUNT OF PIXELS ON A SCREEN, NOT SOUND DESIGN, GAMEPLAY, ART STYLE, NARRATIVE OR ANYTHING ELSE.

NINTENDO BTFO!!! HAHAAHAHAHAHAHA

>>386603149
None of those matter on the rendering side, man. They'll have absolutely no effect on the framerate.

>>386604949
>THE ONLY THING THAT MATTERS AT ALL IN A VIDEO GAME IS THE AMOUNT OF PIXELS ON A SCREEN, NOT SOUND DESIGN, GAMEPLAY, ART STYLE, NARRATIVE OR ANYTHING ELSE.
Thank goodness we know that this game will have none of that, thanks to Ubisoft's brand of """""""quality""""""" stamped on it.

>>386604158
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z4tUL2rSYBg

You will never hear his name ever again.

>>386600892
When has ubisoft ever made a sony exclusive

>>386604092
Actually you can use Mario, Luigi, Yoshi, and Peach to get rid of the rabbids.

>>386605390
wow how exciting

the fucking original 1993 game had more variation

>>386605453
The original game had no stand out characters.

>>386605543
mostly because it was about your dudes and not played out 30 year old characters

>>386605716
Yeah, its no wonder the series never really took off.

>>386605775
yeah I bet firaxis is hurting all the way to the bank

>>386605390
You can't, you must always have mario and a rabbibt

>>386595161
>We can stop praising this garbage now.
Only shitposters were to begin with

>>386603149
Look. I might've been with you if this was a platformer or FPS.

It's Xcom style turn based. Wtf am I going to need 60fps for? Are people this desperate to knock on this game? If this is your best then at least think up your worst so I can at least laugh.

>>386603714
I think that game has quite a bit more substantial problems than simply "THEY LIED TO US. it doesn't look absolutely perfect like my PC games is are. Herp a derp derp. The graphics are just ok HIW DARE THEY TRICK US "

>>386595161
I wish this resolution frame rate shit would stop is /v infested with Nivida/4k monitor shills.

>>386595161
60 is preferred but this is more or less just a turn based strategy... Also it's Ubisoft

>>386606106
>Herp a derp derp
>>>/reddit/

>>386603547
>And you can't argue that they've ever made a good game, otherwise I will have to assume that you're a shill.
I can't tell if you've been on /v/ too long, or not long enough.

It's a turn-based game, the fact it's not running at 60 fps doesn't make it unplayable.
The fact they can't get a turnbased game to run at 60 fps is worth bringing up, because even if this game is good the switch is undoubtedly a shit console, and a sensible person would wait for this to get ported to the switch 2 or whatever the fuck

>>386598569
I highly doubt your phone when it came out was the same price as a switch.