>want an HDR-capable TV >the only TVs that support it are

>>386591242
>gaming on tvs

get a monitor and a pc u console pleb

>>386591242
HDR tvs have less birds. why would you want that?

>>386591242
because hdr is also a meme,games already have contrast modifier themselves

Just turn your saturation up.

>>386591382
I have a major fear of birds.

>>386591373
>u
Finish high school first bitch.

>>386591373
>get a monitor and a pc u console pleb
Because PC monitors are as far along on the HDR train as TV's right?
Fuck off peasant.
4k60fps HDR or bust bitch. PS4Pro more like PS4LIFE

>>386591543
what

are you implying tvs have higher fidelity than monitors

>>386591657
I am implying that HDR tech is better on TV's

>>386591815
>actually implying that

nice

File: 1501490111770.gif (1MB, 500x281px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 500x281px

>>386591543
>60fps

best tv for the money youre welcome

http://www.rtings.com/tv/reviews/tcl/p-series-2017-p607

>>386591242
You don't even know what HDR is if you would want it on anything lower than 4k.

Dumb faggot.

>>386591873
>Plays photorealistic Fifa18 at native 4k60fps with the best HDR on the planet.
U mad?

how poor are you that you cant get a 4k TV they aren't that much anymore

>>386591382
i fucking hate birds

>>386592482
hes implying you want 60fps when 120, 144, and beyond exist in 2017.

>>386591242
what is considered stupidly expensive?

>>386592745
It is a meme. I have a 120fps monitor on my gaming PC.

>>386591242
>55 in 4k HDR tvs are like 600 freedombux
are you homeless?

Buy a nice IPS monitor.
Great colours, fuck HDR

>>386592963
Have one. It is definetly a meme.
HDR is much better.

>>386591543
>Because PC monitors are as far along on the HDR train as TV's right?
yes. yes, they are.

File: 20160921_205954.jpg (1MB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1920x1080px

>>386591873
This, 1440p 144hz with two extra monitors is the only way to go. Televisions are for watching anime in bed, monitors are for vidya.

>>386591978
>11.0 ms response time

>>386592482
>4k
I actually am a little jealous, if the jump from 1080p to 1440p was pretty drastic, the jump from 1440p to 2160p must be even more so. I'm holding off until I can get a 4k monitor with at least 120hz, I can't handle gaming at low frame-rates anymore. I was actually thinking of picking up an ultra widescreen that's 3400 x 1440 100hz but it's got a 4ms response time so maybe not.

>>386592848
It really depends on what games you play, for first person shooters I really can't play at lower frame-rates, I just got done playing Titanfall 2 at 144fps and that was amazing, I tried to move on to Wolfenstein and I just couldn't do it until I engaged the edits which let it run at higher frame rates. Some games are alright at 60fps though, like Dark Souls and Dragon's Dogma were okay at 60.

>>386591543
>PS4LIFE
I'm not really with you on that, I don't find myself using my playstation all too much. All I've used it for this year is;
>Gravity Rush 2
>Nioh
>Persona 5
>Yakuza 0
>Wipeout

Whereas I'm constantly playing new shit on my PC, not only does it run better but there's more to play. Outside of exclusives, there's no reason to own a console. I'm struggling to think of any upcoming PS games I'm looking forward to, outside of the Jak and Daxter remasters, but that's just because I'm a trophy fag.

>>386591543
hahaha!!!! 4k master race brothaaaaa XD

File: fifa18-iconspage-nazarioscreenshot-lg.jpg (213KB, 1024x576px) Image search: [Google]

213KB, 1024x576px

>>386592482
>EA sports game
>photorealistic

pick one, the only yearly sports game with some effort put into the graphics and in general is NBA 2K