>all games need to be at a constant 60fps in order to be good

>older games on older tech don't run as well as games should in 20fucking17

File: 1466327602782.png (113KB, 509x493px) Image search: [Google]

113KB, 509x493px

>>386560408
>all games need to be at 1080p in order to be good
>praises NES games with plenty of 144p as well as N64 games that ran at 480p like OOT

>>386560481
Of course they won't. My point is a game, depending on the genre, can still be 30fps or even sub 30fps and be good, and to think otherwise is retardedly parroting your favorite e-celeb.

Would OOT be better at 60fps? Absolutely. Is it a shitty game because it's not at that framerate? No. The same applies to modern games.

>>386560481
not OP but why does 60fps need to be a standard now when it clearly wasn't back then despite 60hz TVs being the norm?

>>386560408
>all games need to be at a constant 60fps in order to be good
>things nobody said EVER

>>386560886
But people say that constantly

retards parrot Totalbiscuit and say it, Steamfriends say it a lot as well.

>>386560953
it should be easy to provide proof then

>>386560992
https://boards.fireden.net/v/search/text/30fps/
https://boards.fireden.net/v/search/text/silky%20smooth/

>>386560408
>that pic

>>386561151
so you give me some threads about people shitting on 30fps
where exactly do they say the game is shit just because of this single thing?

>>386560689
NES games ran at 240p and OoT was honestly probably the same resolution, though some N64 games could do 480p.

It's also funny how people shit on the N64 for being a blurry mess when PS2 games were generally 480i and looked like they were covered in Vaseline. Meanwhile plenty of GameCube games did 480p/60fps

>>386560886
Haven't you heard the shitting on Breath of the Wild for some minor FPS drops, too?

I mean, there were big ones, like with the Moblins, but "Oh, when there's some grass around the FPS drop just a little, what a shitty game"

It was everywhere, not just on /v/

>>386561802
You remember adamwestslapdog too?

>>386560408
>everyone on /v/ is the same person
>if you hear two possibly conflicting viewpoints you can be sure the exact same person said them

>>386562348
so a dozen angry Sonybros = everyone
k

File: image.jpg (875KB, 1200x1200px) Image search: [Google]

875KB, 1200x1200px

A better question would be, why are tvs 60hz if most mainstream content don't even come close to that mark?

>>386562479
How many years has it been since episode 13?

>>386560738
because now the technology to have 60 fps is cheap enough for the average consumer to have it, and being "okay" with sub-par tech at the same price as good tech is just unacceptable. That mentality is what lets Xbox and Playstation continue to sell underperforming hardware at 20-40% higher prices than it should be.

>>386562932
4 years since the last episode, 2 months since the last upload on his channel.

>>386560408
OOT wasn't that good, don't worry.

>>386562565
>> things nobody said EVER

I was not saying everyone ever. But surely a lot of people shit on it for minor FPS drops.

>>386563292
At least "chibi robo" was pretty good.

File: oh shit nigger.png (59KB, 366x380px) Image search: [Google]

59KB, 366x380px

>>386560692
>it's okay for new games to not adhere to the bare minimum standard of quality because old games can't either

oot is literally over 20 years ago
current games has no excuse to run at 30 fps

>>386564401
>November 21, 1998
It will be very soon

>implying people here don't shit on N64 games for having FPS problems

What bizarro /v/ are you from and what's it like there? Did Sony win in that timeline too?

>>386561961

You know, now that I think about it, that is funny. People are hypocrites. Back in the day these same people weren't graphicsfags, now they're obsessed with graphics (when we're not talking about PC that is).

>>386564294

>ああくそ黒人、何してるの

>>386560408
>why improve graphical fidelity when the N64 games were praised and good enough
>why make the jump to 3D when 2D is good enough
>why improve resolution when 480p is good enough
>why change or improve anything when it was good enough

>>386562348
That's because the framerate issues it had at launch were unacceptable. You faggots need to learn that criticism is a good thing, and to not just mindlessly defend every flaw. If people just rolled over and accepted every issue with no complaint, they would never get fixed and all you would get is trash.

>>386560408
Do you also drive a car without suspension, airbags or headrests? Cars in the past didn't have that, so why would you need it now?

>>386566407

Yes, I do. I was driving cars before you pussies were even shitting in your diapers. Before power steering, cup holders, seat belts, and all of that shit were invented. You millennial pansies wouldn't last a second in an older car without shitting in your diapies.

>>386567474
>mfw millenial shitters will never know the joys of whiplash and severe cranial trauma

>>386565891
I'm not saying "improvement isn't a good thing" or that said improvements wouldn't be beneficial. However, just because there isn't improvement in one particular vein doesn't mean the entire game is shit. BOTW runs at 30fps and it introduced a ton of new mechanics for the series, and it's GOTY. But no according to M-MUH 60FPS fags it's shit because it's not 60.

>>386567474
>ITT: Nostalgiafag desperately tries to defend circlejerking about old shit

>>386567687

Stop driving like a maniac. You don't need to be doing 90 mph while turning.

You know what would solve this? If game companies stopped trying so hard to push the tech they have to their limits from the start. Take more time to sleuth out how to get good performance. I had no problem with the wii u being underpowered for the time because it meant that a lot of the games on the system ran really really well which they ended up doing.

>>386560408
OOT actually had 60FPS input.