http://wccftech.com/killing-floor-2 -runs-1800p-xbox-one-x/

>>386023632
Oh no a shitty port

Native 1800p on Xbox one X which is pretty great for that considering it runs like shit even on PC.

Not native 1800p on PS4PRO so "Play best on Xbox one X" for consoles like every single game.

>everyone berates tripwire for being a shit company for years
>they make a bad port to nobody's surprise
>*inhales* AHAHAHHAHAAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHHAH.txt

sasuga /v/

File: E9Mp2wb.gif (4MB, 720x480px) Image search: [Google]

4MB, 720x480px

>1272p on PS4 Pro
>1800p on xbonex

Joggins the ol' Noggin

>>386023790
"Play best on Xbox one X for consoles"

File: 1499345257730.jpg (61KB, 394x534px) Image search: [Google]

61KB, 394x534px

>>386023819

>>386023790
How quickly people forget launch RO2.

What a shit show.

>Everyone blame tripwire
I guess you all forgot all the AAA games coming out with checkerboarding. 1st party Microsoft games and low demand indies are the only games that will run at 4K.

will it crash in lobbies like on PS4? Cause I'm sick of having to roll the dice on whether or not I have to hard-reboot my c onsole to play a match because tripwire can't fucking handle whatever it is making the game crash, since god damned launch.

File: 1500152719803.gif (2MB, 356x400px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 356x400px

>>386023819
>Lying
It's 3200x1800 then checkerboard rendered up to full 3840x2160.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fSvYJD-vGhI&t=195s

>not a single person in this thread knows it's the CPU that prevents devs from reaching 4k.

>>386023982
http://wccftech.com/killing-floor-2-on-playstation-4-pro-runs-at-1800p-with-checkerboard-rendering-ultra-textures/
>The game will run at 1800P (3200×1800) with checkerboard rendering, just like we surmised for many PlayStation 4 Pro games, and Ultra textures.

>>386023982
It checkerboards to 1800p from 1272p. Then it upscales to 4k. The native resolution is 1272p.

File: 1500669112220.gif?__cf_waf_tk__=1161970023CxDxgA7NS9evl9N2A0VlJyEH2U.gif (505KB, 1080x1080px) Image search: [Google]

505KB, 1080x1080px

>>386023879
>Ass Creed origins is Checker 4k on xbone
>Checker 1800 dropping to 1440cb on PS4 pro
>Suddenly After months of blowing Horizon Zero Dawn for being checker 4k/1527p checker is now bad

>>386023982
Wrong.

http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showpost.php?p=224775651&postcount=81

File: how could this happen to me.jpg (151KB, 710x842px) Image search: [Google]

151KB, 710x842px

>>386023632
BUT THEY PROMISED

File: 1484994979262.jpg (186KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

186KB, 1920x1080px

>>386023632
>>386023879
>>386024226

Anti shitpost here:

I don't think anyone that looked at the digital foundry reveal and e3 expected true 4k on the X at all times. Even pre digital foundry reveal MS dev papers stated the qualifications to achieving better performance on the X and there were different intensities including true 4k, upscaling(1800p), 1440p etc.


This machine works like any computer in the sense that just because a titan P can run doom(vulkan) at 4k ultra settings at 90fps does not mean that titan P can run every game at ultra settings 4k at 90 fps as is very clear.


>>386024007

The higher the resolution the less strain on the CPU, this is pure bullshit. It is only a relevant argument if we replace 4k with consistent above 30fps with the kind of cpu burdens modern games have.

>>386024226

https://boards.fireden.net/v/search/image/S3bTCtVUXbQN0ivZ7rkPNQ/

Hi Bangalore

The xbone pro whatever and the ps4 equivalent simply can not be powerful enough at their pricepoint to run run your average triple A game at 4k with an acceptable framerate. You might get some 4k for games that are not that graphically intense but you are pretty fucking delusional if you think you can have your "uncompromised 4k experience" at that pricepoint.

>>386024337
Post another Wojak with a wholly numbered filename, faggot

>>386023632
T R U E 4 K
only on indie pixel shit

>>386024347
Gears of War 4 will have 4k 60fps Support with the Xbox One X (probably checkerboarding)
It's all about optimization.

>>386024580
no
Campaign/Horde : 4k30fps
Multiplayer : 4k60fps

http://wccftech.com/gundam-versus-higher-graphics-ps4-pro/
>Gundam Versus To Get Higher Graphics Quality on PS4 Pro, But No 4K Support
>No 4K Support
LMAOOOOOOOOO

File: Sex Genies Final Fate.png (455KB, 1059x962px) Image search: [Google]

455KB, 1059x962px

>>386024518

>>386024580
Games like gears probably have the best chance of gaining native 4k with a good framerate since the maps are ultralinear and very small.

I don't have a 4k screen and I don't know a single person who does, I don't see the big deal because of that. 4K shit is way too expensive for your average consumer still, even after being cut in half or even 75% in some cases, years after it's release.

HDR is probably gonna be the big thing.

>>386024807
If I were to buy one of these pro consoles it would be for a more stable framerate.

>>386024762
>He bothered to change it

Impressive

If only you changed your crusty underwear as often

>>386023632
Do you think Microsoft should force developers to release games running at true 4K? Or allow them to have control over the resolution, framerate, quality of assets, etc.?

File: Sex Genies wet dream.png (34KB, 624x210px) Image search: [Google]

34KB, 624x210px

>>386024892

>>386024905
That should force devs to make games that run at a consistent 60fps

>>386024872
that'd be a waste then, I can't think of 3 games that went for stable/improved framerate instead of graphical fidelity. my PRO is basically worthless because of it. The downscaled "foooor kaaaaay" shit just looks like garbage on a 1080p screen.

>>386024905
Microsoft should force devs to give consumers access to graphical options on the PC so they could decide for themselves.

>>386025026
like on the PC fuck

>>386025026
>>386025087
That's too difficult for a console gamer to understand

>>386024930
>Saving the file without copying the filename

Rookie error, rscottyg

Most people don't even have 4k tv's and by the time they do (3-4 years) PS5 will be right around the corner

>>386025158
Graphical options are for the most part pretty fucking simple to understand though.

>Big number or small number
>some graphical setting like shadow presets between something arbitrary like low or ultra

Only stuff like anti-aliasing and V-Sync confuse people and many games actually give tooltips explaining what they do.

File: gears-of-war-4-4k-100686252-large.png (31KB, 580x872px) Image search: [Google]

31KB, 580x872px

>>386024769
Not sure

>>386024905
Consoles are not PC.

>Checkerboard 1800P garbage
>4K

What did they mean by this?

>>386025308
as Xbox Two: http://wccftech.com/next-xbox-console-designed-codename/

>>386025382
You're over estimating the willingness of console gamers to mess with anything like that. They just want to pop in the disk and play the game

File: Sex Genie.jpg (1012KB, 1888x1042px) Image search: [Google]

1012KB, 1888x1042px

>>386025208
>SexGenie knows all about numbered file names

>>386025382
The only reason you have those options on PC is because PCs aren't all exactly the same. Some can handle maximum settings, some can't.

With consoles, the framerate and performance are easily predictable. If the game isn't released in 4k you can bet it's because it doesn't run well at that resolution. Giving a player the option to select something that doesn't work would be pointless.

>>386024905
>Do you think Microsoft should force developers to release games running at true 4K?
They don't have to do any such thing. The developers themselves will want to push for as close to UHD as possible, as the alternative is leaving it at the mercy of every normalfags UHD tv upscaling a lower res image.
That won't look as good at all.

>>386025574
That is only partially correct. You can choose between different types of effects such as different types of anti-aliasing and you can choose between higher graphical settings or framerate. Also things like v-sync are highly debatable whether or not they are worthwhile. I could play something like battlefield 4 for example supersampled to some retardedly high resolution and maintain absolutely stable 30 fps or I could go for the same setting at 1440p with no SS and gain a stable 110-140 fps experience.

>>386023632
>console underperforming and/or developers optimizing as though every extra percentile of efficiency the game runs at earns them an HIV infected needle to the testicles/labia/landing gear

In other news, is water wet? More at 11.

>>386025509
Unless Xbox gets some good games it will be a repeat of the previous gen, Sony's heavy hitters haven't even released yet

>>386026137
>it will be a repeat of the previous gen,
I doubt
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5yC8FbgGnd0
or
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LrvE3B5Rz6A
will happen again.

>playing fps on a console

>>386024287
>I don't think anyone that looked at the digital foundry reveal and e3 expected true 4k on the X at all times.

you have to remember how tech illiterate people are

>>386026380
>plug in M&KB
>it works
???

>>386023632
I don't care if the resolution is somehow magically 8k. It's Xbox so it's DOA.

File: ms gaming.jpg (95KB, 651x612px) Image search: [Google]

95KB, 651x612px

>>386026756
Xbox is so DOA right now, amirite?

>>386024965
This. I wish this 4K meme would end and devs would focus on 60fps instead