I have never EVER played a Call of Duty game. What are the best games in this series?
1, it's expansion, and that's it
>>385809534
UO, CoD 2
CoD 2, CoD 3 The Big Red One, Cod4, CoD MW2
>>385809534
if you're talking about single player, definitely cod 4, for multiplayer mw3, but they're all full of modders now so ill assume you mean single player
>>385809781
>>385809781
Cod 4 has a terrible single player campaign. You just run forward through corridors and wait for scripted events to happen. There's even infinite enemy loops until you progress past a certain point. It's 5 hours of just running forward and that's it. Mw3 is the worst modern AAA multiplayer shooter ever made with completely broken spawns, no balance, garbage maps, horrible weapons etc. You have the worst taste of anybody I've ever seen
>>385809939
of the modern warfare series I think that's exactly how it goes, mw2 was also really fun but played mw3 more
>>385809781
>mw3
nooo noo noo not at all
>>385810119
All 3 are garbage from top to bottom
>>385809534
world at war
>>385809665
>>385809774
Cod 2 is 4 hours long, has regenerating health, and introduced the reduced/absent recoil the series has been infamous for ever since. It only holds up to scrutiny for having decent level design and good multiplayer
World at War, nothing else.
>>385810203
well he did ask which piece of garbage was best to get
>>385809647
>1, it's expansion, and that's it
/thread
You can check out CoD2 and CoD4 after that.
>>385809647
This guy knows what's what.
2 was when they got into the regenerating health super low TTK garbage and it all went downhill from there.
>>385809774
>BR1
Fuckig this
>>385810503
Why? It's just a worse version of cod 2 for old consoles
Is the modern warfare remaster worth it now that its standalone? I just want to play a cod thats not filled with fucking modders that doesn't have fairy boosting
>>385809534
Modern Warfare 2
>>385810585
Play cod uo then. Or cod 2.
>>385810612
I already have them and played them multiple times, but I want to play multiplayer and something more new, I just want something to hold me down while ww2 is coming out
>>385810779
Then play something that isn't garbage like modern warfare cod
>>385810245
Best CoD hands down
1, UO, 2, 4, WaW, MW2, BO, and BO2
The rest are quite mediocre
>>385810312
It's 6 - 7 hours minimum
>>385811125
I beat the campaign in 3.9 hours on hard difficulty my first playthrough. Give me a second to show you my steam time
CoD2 and MW2 for singleplayer, the two games in the series with the most open level designs. MW2 in particular is very well-paced, non-stop action and has an incredible amount of level variety, it also got rid of the annoying endless enemy respawns and grenade spam that plagued the earlier games in the series. CoD2 has more open level design though.
BO2 for multiplayer, the pick 10 system greatly enhanced class customization while the shift from killstreaks to the scorestreak system greatly encouraged teamwork.
CoD4 singleplayer is very linear and has little variety, don't listen to the idiots who recommend it. They're likely babbies whose first exposure to modern warfare FPS is CoD4 and/or are easily impressed by CoD4's pseudo-realism.
>>385809534
1 to 6, MW2 is the last good multiplayer CoD
The problem is, are the older games still alive at this point?
>>385809534
CoD: WaW
CoD 1 and its expansion pack, CoD 2, CoD 4, CoD MW2.
The only futuristic one I enjoyed was Black Ops 2, others are fucking trash.
>>385812157
>younger brother hooks up PS3 and plays MW2 online
>still able to find a match quick and play
Weird
>>385812951
sure packed with modders and can hardly find a good game
>>385809534
MW1 and 2 are GOAT.
Black Ops 1 and 2 are good.
MW3 and Ghosts are garbage.
I've not played the others.
1 through 6
Blackops 1 was the beginning of the downfall
>>385809534
MW1 and MW2 were the peak of the series
>>385813801
Switch Black Ops with Modern Warfare and it's good.
Just play the newest one, they're all the same
>>385810245
This. Great taste
CoD on its own was never good unless your a single player fag. CoD required a mod to be good and that mod was promod for CoD4. It's dead now so I wouldn't bother with any CoD.
>>385814009
>Blackops 1 was the beginning of me finally turning 8 years old
They were all a festering pile of shit.
Loved 4, it was first game like this I played and I was blown away by every second of it. It was also after I got new PC, so graphic change was really massive.
MW2 was ok, black ops got some nice parts, everything else was bad or not for me (not fan of IIWW or too futuristic shit).
>>385815074
<<The shark? You're real!>>
>>385809534
Play 1 so you don't have to play 2,3 or any 6th gen console games
Play WaW and BLOPS because they have actual plots
And play the newest one because you know it will have people playing
>>385816302
That means you're a 15 year old anon
You are not old enough to be here anon
i think advanced warfare had a pretty fun campaign, i also think that the movement was the best in any future COD and that it had the most fun Multiplayer.
everything before it was too slow, everything after it was a titanfall clan
>>385811197
>give me a second
>gone for 2 hours
I totally believe you've beaten the game in 30 minutes on veteran
>>385816883
A pleasure to speak directly with you, Anon.
>>385817228
GET ACROSS THE STREET MITCHELL
CoD1, CoD2, BO3
>>385822476
>bo3
No
It is really shit
>>385810245
This. World at War had the best campaign and introduced zombies to the series. Der Riese is still my favourite zombies map to this day.
Anyone that says anything other than Black Ops, World at War or COD 4 is lying to themselves.
>>385825607
CoD 1 and 2. What now?
Big Red One