[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / bant / biz / c / can / cgl / ck / cm / co / cock / d / diy / e / fa / fap / fit / fitlit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mlpol / mo / mtv / mu / n / news / o / out / outsoc / p / po / pol / qa / qst / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / spa / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vint / vip / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y ] [Search | Free Show | Home]

What is the most aggravating video game mechanic that was meant

This is a blue board which means that it's for everybody (Safe For Work content only). If you see any adult content, please report it.

Thread replies: 524
Thread images: 61

File: CCMP1New.jpg (76KB, 935x448px) Image search: [Google]
CCMP1New.jpg
76KB, 935x448px
What is the most aggravating video game mechanic that was meant to be fun?
I 'm thinking weapon durability or drop rates.
>>
>>385808694
QTEs
>>
>>385808694
Underwater and ice stages.
>>
>>385808778
This, still mad about shadow of mordor final boss
>>
>>385808910
But you can fight Sauron for real in the Bright Lord® DLC!
>>
I'm just here for the inevitable flame war
>>
>>385808694
Turret sections.
>>
File: snek quest.jpg (135KB, 600x800px) Image search: [Google]
snek quest.jpg
135KB, 600x800px
>>385809068
same
>>
>>385808694
I don't get it
>>
Why did the 7 get split up into 5 and 2?
>>
File: rghafd.png (87KB, 391x383px) Image search: [Google]
rghafd.png
87KB, 391x383px
>>385808694
>What is the most aggravating video game mechanic that was meant to be fun?

Extensive randomized loot

Also games trying to be too realistic to the point where it makes the games less fun to play.
>>
>>385809003
Already did, a lot better than the qte bullshit in the main game, but still underwhelming
>>
>>385808694

are brainlets still bothered by this? it's a stepping stone for doing all math in your head
>>
>>385809118
On order to make the addition "easier," the 37 was split up into 3 tens, a 5, and a 2.
This is basically all of common core. Their goal is to create learning that put all kids at the same level, but they effectively do this by crippling kids who are above average.
>>
>>385809368
Yeah but why not just add 7 straight to the 53 though? Why split up the 7? I'm pretty sure kids can keep 10 in their head, it doesn't need to be split down to 5 or less.
>>
>>385808694
>most aggravating video game mechanic that was meant to be fun
That's a tough one. For me it'd probably be Day and Night cycles. In practice it's basically an enforced time limit.
>>
File: 1475448960291.jpg (98KB, 990x660px) Image search: [Google]
1475448960291.jpg
98KB, 990x660px
>>385808694
You're thinking wrong, weapon durability is not meant for fun but for challenge and annoyance, drop rates are meant for grinding and increasing artificially game's lenght

>>385808778
QTE's are also not meant to be fun but a cinematic experience "4 teh players", in order to make something happen without creating a new game mechanic

On the top of my mind i can think of fishing. Somebody thought it's fun and adds variety, but most of the time it's just a boring way to abtain some shitty items.
>>
>>385809205
Arbitrary decision, the point is that children can only be trusted to know sums of less than 10.
>>
>>385809479

kids are often on very different levels when it comes to math so you're better off being too thorough than not enough
>>
>>385808694
Was taught to use ^ for exponents. Couldn't figure out why there were so many exponents in this damn thing.
>>
>>385809479
The coolest thing about common core is that the "old" way still works, you can still do it, it's just this method helps kids learn how to do mental math because most 20 year olds can't.
If a kid gets the question wrong for doing it the wrong way, then it's probably a case of a teacher following the planner, which is a problem with public teachers rather than the system of teaching.
>>
The new system is better. Left is for retards that needed a visual assistance to be able to do maths.

I was taught with left and developed right on my own because left is shit.
>>
>>385810014
t. brainlet
>>
>>385810054
>Brainlet for actually using my brain to do maths rather than sitting down and writing the numbers
Were you dropped on your head as a baby?
>>
>>385809887
>you can still do it
Just not in school, otherwise you are penalized for doing it the wrong way.
>>
>>385810123
>he can't do left without writing the numbers down
B R A I N L E T
>>
>>385810123
>Brainlet needs to write down common core
You can't make this shit up
>>
Math brainletest here, can someone explain the advantage of the new system?
>>
Glory Kills

At first you think
>man these animations are cool
>they have one for every direction
>I get health for doing this so I should do it whenever possible
>I can even get some emergency ammo from it
>it actually doesn't break the pacing
>I get more health when I glory kill at low health, risk and reward baby
>it keeps me in the game and rewards you for staying on the move and getting closer to enemies

And then when you actually get good at the game and play on Nightmare difficulty you think
>I wish I could move around while Glory Killing
>I keep getting fucking oneshotted by that Imp fireball coming from behind me whenever I exit the Glory Kill animation because I can't see or hear it coming
>I keep losing track of the enemies around me when I'm performing a Glory Kill because of the fixed first-person perspective
>this +5 HP bonus when I'm Glory Killing at full health isn't worth the hassle of losing situational awareness
>I get 20-40 HP when I kill an enemy normally while I'm on low health anyways, so what's the point of Glory Killing in this instance
>my auto-pickup radius for health bonuses isn't all that large, it's not like Glory Killing is the reason to stay close to enemies
>it's way too easy to pull these off really, unlike a Zandatsu or something
>why do I have to waste ammo on a staggered enemy who is as good as dead
>Glory Killing is just a crutch, it's not like the top players ever do it either
>>
>>385810123
>he actually needs to write down numbers to do fucking additions and subtractions
you can't make this shit up
>>
>>385810154
It's almost as if they're trying to teach you to do it that way.
Like I said, it's a problem with the individual teacher. They should be told to pull the student and parents aside to explain that he didn't get the answer wrong, it's just like order of operations in that you need to do it a certain way to show your work, because thats what they're grading, regardless if you got the right answer or not.
>>
>>385810123
Lol
>>
>>385809543
So... you mean a profitable game is designed to be a hassle... or maybe just nu-fun?
>>
>>385809474
>people constantly complain about these common core examples
>they are all math tricks I learned on my own and still use to this day
>>
>>385809368
>is a retard that can't do all the math in his with method 1
>calls anyone a brainlet

Kill yourself my dear friend with too many chromosomes.
>>
>>385810339
>it's just like order of operations
No, the order of operations is essential to math because breaking the order can fuck up your answer. There is no disadvantage or risk of error using traditional methods instead of the common core method.
>>
>>385810319
have fun doing 323556785466 + 2178995218 in your head anon. the "old" method is simple without adding unnecessary shit.
>>
>>385810483
The instructions at the top probably say to use estimation.
>>
>>385810230
It's early elementary school math showing the How behind simple addition. The problem before was that there wasn't a good way of showing the work for addition or subtraction, you'd just write the answer.

>>385810456
I said it's like it because, at least my teachers, didn't grade just the correct answer they made sure I was actually using OoO instead of just punching it into a calculator. This is the same principle, they're grading the work not just the answer.
>>
>>385810607
it's still stupid. you shouldn't punish someone for a more accurate answer.
>>
>>385810617
No, it's not the same principle. They grade the work when it comes to order of operations because failing to use the order of operations can lead to a wrong answer. The goal is to teach you that even if you get the right answer, doing it the wrong way will fuck you up down the line. Failing to use common core methods will never fuck you up because it's not a core component of how mathematics fucking works, grading the "work" in this case doesn't accomplish anything.
>>
>>385808694
The new method seems to be written mental math. It's not very quick on paper.
>>
File: commoncoremath-461x0-c-default.png (364KB, 461x620px) Image search: [Google]
commoncoremath-461x0-c-default.png
364KB, 461x620px
>>385810607
absolutely nowhere in the question did it use the word estimate. it asked if 75 was a reasonable answer, and he answered yes because 75 is the EXACT answer. you don't make up shit without specifically asking for it, that's not how math works. if it wants you to estimate, it will tell you literally to estimate.

fuck off commonfag.
>>
>>385810319
Do you know how to read? I don't write it down, I do maths in my head, for which the new system is better. It's not even a new system, anyone with more than 2 functioning brain cells was already using it.
>>
>>385810762
It accomplishes the kid learning how to use common core, just like grading OoO by the successful completion of each step teaches you to use OoO. They're just trying to teach kids how to do math in their head, it isn't a conspiracy to make kids think the right answer is the wrong answer.
>>
>>385810354
Profitable games are meant to be as braindead as possible. Those games have to appeal to a huge audience, and has to make feel the player as he is doing something, trough scripted events, QTE's, a shitload of optional content that is marked on a map instead of being left to discover.
A kid probably feels cooler doing a glory kill in nuDoom that he would feel for freezing the ground and making enemies fly down the cliff in Dark Messiah of M&M
>>
>>385810617
>there wasn't a good way of showing the work
In elementary school we used checkers pieces as visual aid, and several tricks to make additions/substractions on paper. The "old math" was then used once you knew every additions, substraction, multiplications and divisions up to 20. This "new math" method doesn't seem bad, it's just that similar ones were used 20+ years ago and worked, which is why I don't really see the need to impose it as the new one.
>>
File: hover.webm (3MB, 1274x720px) Image search: [Google]
hover.webm
3MB, 1274x720px
Why is weapon durability bad in genres like RPG and action-adventure games yet acceptable in more basic brawlers?
>>385808694
Teleporter dungeons. I'm ok with spin tiles, conveyer belts, dark zones, holes, moving enemies, trapped chests, damage tiles, etc.
But I fucking hate dungeons with the main gimmick of teleporters with a vengance.
>>
>>385810874
It's question 9, these types of tests have instructions at the top. The kids probably spent the past three fucking weeks learning estimation and the kid was an idiot for not following directions.
>>
>>385811026
Because it's easier to do arbitrary simple math than visualize a checkerboard or ticks. Maybe if you had paper, but at that point I'd just figure it out normally on paper.
>>
>>385808694
This makes me so glad I'm not an Amerifat.
>>
>>385808694
Inventory management
Adds absolutely nothing to the majority of the games it's in
>>
>>385810881
are you retarded, anon? you do realize when you do math in your head you group together like terms and perform the operation on them right? as in, exactly what the old method teaches? common core doesn't teach that, it just over-complicates what is simple arithmetic on smaller numbers.
>>
>>385811134
Okay then, as long as children understand math basics thanks to it I have no problem with it.
>>
>>385811167
It's a fun idea for horror games and some other games where some abilities or items are OP.
Like in horror you have to decide if you want more ammo or health or a key items like a better light or not, it really adds to the dire experience.
>>
>>385811058
>an idiot for actually being more correct and intelligent, using actual mathematics skills, and not just being a brain-dead retard that can't think for themselves
Really made me think.
>>
>>385809543
>drop rates are meant for grinding and increasing artificially game's lenght
It's still bullshit, you could get the item quickly or not get it at all. It's not fun, it's annoying. Killing the enemy x amount of time to get it would be fine but making that drop random is just annoying.
>>
>>385809368
How is that easier? Doing mental calculations in the first way is much easier. 7+3=10 so then I do 60+30=90.
>>
>>385808694
no you pretty much nailed it with drop rates

>kill an enemy and clearly see its fur sitting there attached to its corpse waiting for me to take it
>nope I have to go kill another enemy because it didnt "drop" it according to the rng
>>
>Summoning another phantom...
>>
>>385810014
But you do left in your head for 53+37
>3+7= 0, keep 1 in RAM
>5+3=8, add 1 from RAM
You get the answer within like a second
>>
>>385808694
the one on the right is just how my brain would do it anyways but it seems retarded to write it out
>>
>>385811408
You literally just described what common core teaches kids to do. Except that instead of automatically grouping the 30+60 they broke it down into 10s because the kids learning it are 9.
>>
>>385811428
if I need to five boar spines for my pauldrons, every boar I kill better have a spine.
>>
>>385811381
to be fair anon, if it actually did ask for estimations in the instructions then that's what you're supposed to do. problem is common core is fucking stupid so i doubt it did.
>>
>>385809205
5 is scientifically proven to be easier to handle for mental calculations
>>
>>385811534
But they split 7 into 2 and 5 which seems silly, there's only 10 digits to remember
>>
>>385811405
Law of large numbers
If an item has 1/5000 drop rate, it may mean you will get it after 5 tries, or after slaying 10000 mobs, but generally, a 1/5000 drop rates means that a huge number of players repeating the same process several times will always result in a number extremely close to 1/5000
That said, if a dev decides to set a drop rate to 1/5000 instead of 1/1000 it means that devs wants that item to be 5 times harder to obtain, and this is what is going to happen

If you want i can pull out my notes and demonstrate this mathematically
>>
>>385811606
They're kids, 5 and 2 are easier to work with for children. It's the same reason they did +10 three times instead of just +30. It's teaching the kids to break down bigger numbers, like you did.
>>
File: IMG_3993.gif (2MB, 500x280px) Image search: [Google]
IMG_3993.gif
2MB, 500x280px
Alright let's get this shit started.

>Math>>>>>>>>Maths

It's called "Mathematics" not "Mathsematics" you stupid eurofucks.
>>
>>385811534
kids of age 9 are more than capable of learning how to add the numbers 1 through 10. the "old" method shows you how the digits relate to each and how to perform basic arithmetic on them. number lines, fuckin feelings, or whatever dumb ass shit common core does does not actually show this.

that's why it's a terrible system.
>>
>>385811534
>>385811689
But I didn't. I used the old method. I used this method when I was 9 and had no problems. Are kids really this stupid these days?
>>
>>385811751
Nobody calls it "Maths" you nigger.
>>
>>385811751
kys burgertard
>>
>>385811606
It works best for doing multiplications in your head.

If you had to do 247 x 7, it teaches them that it's easier to do it as 247 x 5 + 257 x 2. Which at the same time would be easier to do as (247 x 10)/2 + 247 x 2.
>>
>>385811751
>Super Mario Bros.
>Bros.
Are they brosthers?
>>
>>385811824
>>385811798
The ENTIRE system is just mental math, but on paper. Yes, it is slower than normal math, but teaching literal children to do mental math is not a bad thing. Public schools need to cater to the stupidest kids so "nobody gets left behind". I, for one (especially after dealing with 20 year olds who cant do math without writing it down), am okay with more people knowing how to do mental math.
>>
>>385808694
Flinching when you get shot in multiplayer FPS games
>>
>>385811873
Huh, I just multiply 247 by 3 and substract that from 247 times 10. Isn't that how it's done?
>>
File: Skull Confused.jpg (129KB, 572x303px) Image search: [Google]
Skull Confused.jpg
129KB, 572x303px
>>385808694
>Do old math in my head
>1:add 2 numbers
>2:get answer
>Do new math in my head
>1:Break down numbers
>2:add 5 numbers
>3:get answer
>Do old math on paper
>1:write 2 numbers down
>2:Carry the one
>3:get answer
>Do new math on paper
>1:write 2 numbers down
>2:break numbers down into 5 numbers
>3: add 5 numbers to starting number
>4:Get answer

I don't see how this helps anyone. There are more steps and more numbers involved. It honestly seems like it would be MORE difficult to do math this way both on paper and mentally.
>>
>>385811751
Here in Australia we say "Maths" and "Sport"; only Americans seem to say "Math" and "Sports".
>>
>>385811996
but it absolutely is a bad thing, anon. the entirety of mathematics is based upon relations and concepts built on itself. if you cannot teach them how to learn the absolute basics, then how can you expect them to go further?
>>
>>385811996
Why aren't teachers teaching common core to the niggers/spic and the old method to everyone else?
>>
>>385808694
That's not new math, that's just a very convoluted way to use the distributive property of the addition.

It's easier to do 53 + 7 + 30
>>
>>385812143
But this is the literal basics, I don't understand. They move from 2+3=5 to this, it isn't something middle school kids or older are doing. This isn't something an adult is expected to write out, or even do because as you've said it's easier to do 53+7=60+30=90. It's a system to teach children how to handle big scary numbers.

>>385812219
Because white kids are stupid too.
>>
>>385810421
>being proud you were taught this way
>>
>>385810014
You could actually have a form of autism if left is too hard for you to do in your head
>>
>>385808694
Oh my God just 50+30 and 3+7 then add the resulting numbers. That's as simple as it should get you goddamn assholes.
>>
>>385812302
i'm a different anon, i never said it was easier to do it that way. the old method is succinct in what it does, and only has the highest value never exceed 10. hell, it's even easier to visualize in your head (that's still how i do it in my head) because you only need an operation for each digit. in the OP's case, that's 2 steps and you're done. 7+3 = (1)0, and 1+5+3=9.

and the pattern simply continues no matter how large the number is. doing something like 12345767 + 21379197 in your head with the common core method is much more difficult than simply lining them up and going digit by digit. which goes back to what i said about not being taught the absolute of basics of mathematics.
>>
>>385810339
>he didnt get it wrong
Except he gets a no points even thoufh he is right. Thats all that matters
>>
>>385809479
The point is that you can use the shit in OP for larger sums like when 5378 needs to get added to 7983. It's one method for all math - you teach the shortcuts later after you get the fundamentals down.
>>
>>385810607
You cant say the answer is wrong if its a perfect estimate
>>
>>385812124
>It honestly seems like it would be MORE difficult to do math this way both on paper and mentally.

it is

and it's retarded
>>
>>385811873
I just do 247 x 7 as 7 x 7 + 40 x 7 + 200 x 7. I don't see how your way is better.
>>
>>385810874
>questionmark by the teacher
Fuck I always hated these passive agressive remarks on test sheets
>>
>>385808694
only americans could come up with something this fucking retarded
>>
>>385812637
You keep failing to understand that the people using common core are no older than 10 years old. This isn't about an every day use, it's so the kids understand the basics of adding bigger numbers together so they don't get mommy and daddy to do it up until highschool. Literally, this is pre-grade 3, you wouldn't use this for fractions or numbers with more than 4 digits because, as you just said now, it's simpler to do it normally.

>>385812660
Because the lesson isn't finding the right answer but being able to. The kid could have used a calculator or got their parents to do it (which is why so many parents are against it, they can't do their kids homework for them anymore) and is the same reason you get graded for each step in Order of Operations, so you actually learn how to do it.
>>
>>385811942
Brothers is plural, Mathematics is singular. Your point doesn't work since they end in s for very different reasons. The plural would be Mathematica. There is no earthly reason to put an so on math other than you believe in your dialect's traditions without question or critical thinking.
>>
>>385808694
Common Core math is the epitome of idealistic thinking. They made a system that could probably work but forgot that teachers are even dumber than the kids they're teaching.
>>
>>385811269
Wait until they are required to use it in the workforce
>>
>>385811534
9 years olds should be onto times and division at least. Jesus christ
>>
>>385812828
or 24 x 7 = 168 add a zero 1680 + 49(7x7) =1729
>>
>>385812225
>That's not new math, that's just a very convoluted way to use the distributive property of the addition.


>>385812557
>That's as simple as it should get you goddamn assholes.

Holy shit you easily triggered and dumb fucking faggot. Shit are you just seeking anything to get recreationaly upset about or something? Or are you really that much of a stupid asshole that feel for and obviously and simple troll image?
>>
>>385813021
Kids are stupid, they're not being taught it alongside multiplication but the stupid ones will use it still instead of moving onto the normal way like everyone else.
>>
>>385809104
SCRUNGO
BEEPIS
Lizard Supreme.
>>
>>385808694
math is so fucking stupid sometimes...
>>
>>385812872
Kid can use a claculator for common core.
We also got graded on showing working for the old system too. Common core was never needed. The only kids who couldnt understand the old way were kids who werent even trying to.
t. Went to a shitty public school
>>
>>385808694
Grinding
>>
>>385813373
>Kids who werent even trying to
Guess who common core was made for
>>
>>385809205
Because a combination of retarded examples, and some really retarded decisions to overdoing it.

The example should be simplified to 50 + 30 + 10, not the gigantic shit soup of numbers it presents.
>>
>>385810607
>>385810483
Why the fuck isn't 75 a good estimate?

Hear me out. No matter which way this problem was built, 75 is the MIDDLE. You can estimate it down, or up, in increments of 10, or 5. 70 AND 80 would both be correct for estimation, but so would 75, and 75 is not only an increment of 5, but it's also literally the correct answer.

Shit like this pisses me off. Teachers shouldn't adhere to a curriculum and should give credit when their kids reach the correct answer and show their work, regardless of how they got to the answer.

Shit like this is why school isn't taken seriously.
>>
File: nGNvke0.png (23KB, 599x162px) Image search: [Google]
nGNvke0.png
23KB, 599x162px
The entire American education system is going down the shitter when it comes to math and history. English teachers at least seem to be keeping it steady, and most science teachers can't actually be told to change things.
But holy shit Math is being raped.
>>
>>385813560
Public school teachers have a planner, often don't know the material beforehand, and are lazy shits. The problem isn't the learning system but the teachers who are just as stupid as the kids.
>>
>>385811479
Or you just write the fucking digit over the equation to have it remembered, then sum three of them together. God, this Common Core bullshit makes me remind of how right now everyone is treated as idiots.
>>
>>385813491
As expected
>>
>>385808694
it scares me that a new generation of kids are currently being raised on this god awful system
>>
>>385812872
>people using common core are no older than 10 years old
Why teach bad habits to kids if they aren't usable for anything more complex?
>>
>>385808694
Damaged in car games
>>
>>385813695
The best part is that the teachers who do try typically are either elective teachers who make their own plans or have real life experience (which you typically don't see until high school) or the one who teach the upper echelon classes (rare as they are nowadays) and can't afford to fuck it up. All core classes are so heavily forced to use rigid structure that the teachers hardly care after the first few years, since they don't even get paid enough to.
>>
all this complaining about the common core makes me wonder how some people do common math, like X*11

do you guys right out the problem and actually do the work or do you do the common core method of X*10+X
>>
>>385813853
Because it teaches and solidifies a method of thinking that appeals to even the stupidest of kids. Common core and public schools in general are an attempt (keyword, attempt) to teach things in the simplest way for anyone to understand. Unless you're a brainlet you should understand what's going on on the right, especially if it's explained, regardless if it took longer or not.
>>
>>385812112
There's different ways of getting the answer, but that's how most people do it yes.
I multiplied 250 by 7 and then minus 3 x 7
>>
>>385808694
What's worse is that you can tell what they're trying to do- explain the math behind the math, but it all fails fundamentally cause what they're teaching is some basic shit. Honestly, I just learned things the old fashioned way and I kinda figured out the reasoning behind it, ie the new method, much later.
>>
>>385814031
I understand what's going on. It's just pointless.
Math is the most integral part of every science branch. If you are teaching kids math skills that are usable by no one but high school drop outs then there's something really wrong with the method.
>>
>>385814214
Nobody said the "nobody gets left behind" methodology was smart.
>>
>>385814309
not according to retards in this thread
>>
File: 1483223787709.png (40KB, 467x400px) Image search: [Google]
1483223787709.png
40KB, 467x400px
>>385810304
>Single Player Game
>Top Players
>>
>>385814214
Don't you mean really wrong with the administration who think that it's an okay method to teach.
Being angry at the method is retarded since it's a method. You should have a problem with the people reinforcing the method.
>>
>>385814352
Common core is a good system, but it's an appeal to a retarded system.
>>
File: flipflop.png (25KB, 168x158px) Image search: [Google]
flipflop.png
25KB, 168x158px
>>385808694
Inverted controls.
>>
>Tfw about to start 2nd year of college
>Tfw High School class issues are still fresh in my mind
>Tfw even as an 18 year old idiot I can see what's wrong with public education, if only becuase I got lucky enough to get good teachers
We're not completely fucked yet. Give it a couple more years.
>>
>>385812872
uh what? if it's not about everyday use then why is it only useful for smaller numbers? i also use the word useful very ironically.

>>385813560
because in estimations you round values up or down accordingly. the digit being rounded is arbitrary (usually the one before its designation like nearest thousand) so it's always ending in a 0. underestimates round down, and overestimates round up. 75 is a strange estimate because there's no decimal value being rounded.

75 is the exact answer, not an estimate. thing is the question is so poorly worded that the test/homework itself is the problem entirely.
>>
>>385811479
53+37=
50+3+30+7=
50+30+(3+7)=
50+30+(1*10)=
((5*10)+(3*10))+(1*10)=
((5+3)*10)+(1*10)=
(8*10)+(1*10)=
(8+1)*10=
9*10=
90
>>
File: 1500514658072.jpg (85KB, 365x720px) Image search: [Google]
1500514658072.jpg
85KB, 365x720px
>>385814764
>>
>>385814834
Math apparently
>>
>>385814687
Common core was designed so everyone, even the retards, would have to do the work and learn how to add, kids learn how to add with smaller amounts of digits and the method breaks down with larger numbers. It's a stepping stone that children are taught, they learn soon after that there's easier ways to do it, but common core provides a structure that even retarded kids can work with. Public schools are filled with retards, both kids and teachers. This is for them.
>>
>>385810874
Common core is just teaching kids how to solve simple math problems very quickly in their head. It's how those people who can add/subtract/multiply/divide very large numbers in their head actually do it. I guess the world just wasn't ready to be taught how to be super geniuses because everyone is too fucking retarded.
>>
>>385814951
>catering to retards
we might as well jump in the pig pen and play mud at this point since we need to lower ourselves to make sure that everyone is learning at the same pace
>>
>>385814031
I'm in 3rd semester of my masters in thermodynamics and fluid engineering I don't understand what the fuck is happening on the right. I haven't seen common core before and the way the right is presented has no logic whatsoever.

Did they split 7 into 5 and 2, while they're adding it to 3? What is the fucking logic of it.
>>
>>385815081
Did you go to a public school? That's essentially what you're doing. Telling your kid "good luck!" (Sometimes literally), and driving away hoping your tax dollars are enough to make Ms. Stacey care enough about your little shit in a sea of 1000 others.
>>
>>385810483
I seriously hope there's some kind of instructions about that at the top of the sheet
>>
>>385815167
They broke 37 into (10+10+10+2+5) and added it to 53 in small steps. It's a teaching method for children, mental math for the kids who don't figure it out themselves.
>>
File: 1399855034240.jpg (6KB, 250x250px) Image search: [Google]
1399855034240.jpg
6KB, 250x250px
>>385809251
>games trying to be too realistic to the point where it makes the games less fun to play.
This.
>level editor
>you can't upside down items
>>
>>385810874
I mean seriously, the answer to this problem isn't even that hard.

Dear Jack,
You were supposed to subtract 3 100s, 1 10, and 6 1s, but you subtracted 3 100s, and 7 10s for some dumb ass reason, probably because your mom was still taking shots of tequila with her sorority sisters while she was 6 months pregnant.

Sincerely,
Anon
>>
>>385815185
thankfully my parents were fortunate enough to send me to a private school, and I was lucky enough to actually have teachers that gave a shit, so no, I actually got proper education
>>
>>385814951
except it improves on nothing. when you add more steps to a process, there's more room for error. that's why this system is incredibly stupid at it's core. human beans work best with groups of values (usually less then 5 or so at most) which is why the old method is vastly superior.

>>385815071
i use the old method in my head, and did when i was a kid too. people always thought i was too fast, but you just get quicker at it the more you do it. everything is laid out nicely, and there's fewer steps involved. i don't need to add 50 + 30, then 7 + 3, and then finally adding those values. the larger the number, the more summations you have to remember. it's easy to lose track.
>>
>>385815335
You learn common core right after normal addition, it's a stepping stone for the kids who won't figure out mental math themselves.
>>
>>385808694
wtf is this new math shit
>>
>>385815437
OHHH i get it now
>>
>>385811534
I had to learn up to the 12 times table when I was 7, amerisharts are literally retarded
>>
File: test.jpg (29KB, 780x478px) Image search: [Google]
test.jpg
29KB, 780x478px
>>385815434
stepping stones aren't supposed to make things worse. it's like teaching someone the power rule without ever explaining how it was derived and why it works.
>>
>>385811408
ahahahahahahahah nigga that's common core you idiot
>>
The problem with common core is that writing it out defeats its purpose. It ends up looking silly and you have dozens of adults baffled.
>>
>>385815276
Yeah, but why did they break up the 7 into 2 and 5? And more importantly, why did they add the 5 to 53 first? I could see a point in adding the 2 first, to get 55, and then add 5, as 5 is a half-ten, making it easy to count with. That step was unnecessary and counter-productive, because I don't see a difference in thought process between adding a 2 to 58 or 7 to 53.
>>
>>385814951
Is that even true ? Old method is supposed to be retard-proof too, just line the numbers and do addition on each column, that's not rocket science. It's even easier using paper
>>
>>385815602
You severely overestimate the modern American child, and underestimate how bitchy their parents can be.
>>
>>385815602
old method is easier, it's just the retards that don't even try. not because they're stupid, but because they're lazy.
>>
>>385815334
off topic but...

Ive tutored some private school kids in math and they've all been ATROCIOUS. Of course, if you're looking for tutoring you're probably not the best to begin with but even with proper education you can only lead a horse to water.
>>
>>385815546
This literally is them teaching someone addition then explaining how it was derived and why it works.

>>385815590
Because children like 2s and 5s more than 7s and 3s, I don't know why they did 5 first either and chalk it up to the school being a public school.

>>385815602
I work with highschool graduates who legitimately don't know how to break down numbers or add without paper. I'd rather them know this than not know how to at all.
>>
>>385815567
No. It's the normal way of doing mental calculations.
>>
I suddenly had a very vivid memory of the day I learned long division, I think it was 3rd grade and I had no idea what I was doing
>>
>>385815683
But if the new method is more complicated and requires more work and writing down more shit, isn't that counter-productive?
>>
>>385815567
no, it's doing exactly what the old method does.
>>
>>385815590
Because op's image is exaggerating common core to make it look more ridiculous than it actually is
>>
>>385815816
kind of my point. it adds meaningless steps which only adds more room for mistakes. that's the exact opposite of what you want.
>>
these fucking captchas.
>>
>>385815816
It's easier to teach and is the same method of thinking as mental math. Some kids never figure out how to break down numbers in their head.
>>
File: 1501131159498.jpg (75KB, 600x891px) Image search: [Google]
1501131159498.jpg
75KB, 600x891px
>>385808694
That's a weird system.

I guess it's another initiative to teach students how to think, right down to the very fundamentals? I mean, I'm sure it's honest and all, but most of the worldwide criticism leveled at the American education system is the lack of autonomy, not the fundamental thinking processes.

At least, most of the ones I've read.
>>
>>385816027
nice thumbnail
>>
File: 1484732005543.jpg (10KB, 174x195px) Image search: [Google]
1484732005543.jpg
10KB, 174x195px
>this thread
Is this the common core thing Americans complain about? What the fuck It looks like it just makes it more complicated than it has to be
>>
>>385816061
thanks.
>>
>>
Common core is fucking retarded but I guess in the end it doesn't really matter. Retards who graduate to flipping burgers will use their phones to calculate things and people going in to STEM will use graphic calculators.
I just feel bad for the kids who are forced to learn this pointless shit.
>>
>>385816027
>>385816061
>>
>>385816192
some context would be nice
>>
>>385816108
>number bond
>hidden partners
Explain please.
>>
>>385816192
You'd think that QR codes would've taken off with how ingrained smartphones are into society. Takes 1.5 seconds to scan one and all the reader apps are free.
>>
>>385816296

L O N D O N
>>
>>385816029
>tfw know people who can't atleast aproximately divide by 2 digits in their head
>she teaches my little sister math in middle school

She also happens to be my mom's yoga instructor and the reason she's now vegetarian.
>>
>>385816108
What the fuck is happening here ?
>>
>>385816313
>>385816415
i haven't a fucking clue. didn't when i found the pic, and still don't.
>>
>>385816345
>Need to mention "lawyer"
>He doesn't think it's a yank
>>
>>385816285
>can't mentally do 7 + 268
why must things be made more complicated
>>
Whitey mad that common core is ending their privilege
>>
>>385816027
>>385816285
I didn't know American kids were mentally challenged like that, holy shit.
>>
>>385815846
If you wrote out how you solved 'the old method' in your head, step by step, you would be looking at something that looks almost exactly like common core. Unless you seriously imagine two numbers sitting on top of each other and subtracting them down a line. Then you might just be a retard.

Grouping numbers into 10s and 5s is how you can solve large addition/subtractions in your head without having to write anything down.
>>
>>385816326
I think it's just that people aren't going to bother looking up shit unless it's already in front of them, and making them get out their phone to do it is already two steps more than they were ever going to do. Just like people don't read articles, they only read the headline. It's why info-graphics are a great way to spread both information and disinformation.
>>
>>385816632
Explain. And show your work.

>>385816658
Beats the fuck outta me. Makes me glad I don't have kids, otherwise I'd have murdered a few teachers and administrators by now for being fuck retards.
>>
>>385815546
>that picture
I know that feel, when I was a kid a pretty damn good at math and could do basic addition multiplication in my head without my thought

Then teachers would get on my shit for "that's nice that you got everything right but show your work!"
>>
>>385816632
I find it extremely funny that americans are destroying their own future by raising their youths as literal retards
>>
File: 1501544381644m.jpg (70KB, 1024x304px) Image search: [Google]
1501544381644m.jpg
70KB, 1024x304px
There is absolute no need for mental math in the age of pocket calculators. Prove me wrong?
>>
File: I've been duped!.jpg (105KB, 650x854px) Image search: [Google]
I've been duped!.jpg
105KB, 650x854px
>>385808694
The way artifact weapons and their associated systems like AK / AP in WoW.

The way loot functions in WoW where RNG dictates sockets / iLvl and 100% RNG BiS items that change core class functionalities.

They wanted some goofy dynamic fun thing and what they delivered is Korean grinding with time gating.
>>
>>385815185
This is exactly why I'm happy I live in an ex-communist state.

Our lyceum was considered one of the bigger ones, we had roughly 400 students from 12 to 19 years old and roughly 30 teachers who knew every student on first name basis, and they taught/were classmates with half of the parents. Sick bants and pimpslaps were had and our teachers were drinking beer with us on school trips when we were 16-17.
>>
>>385816913
got any lower quality pics of this image? I can almost read it
>>
>>385816969
>tfw no qt gf to pet and feed
>>
>>385816913
Brain must be trained much like a muscle. If you don't use it frequently to perform simple tasks, you'll have a lot of trouble with harder stuff later on.

Of course you can never attempt to do anything hard with your brain and just leave it to rot, it's your choice.
>>
>>385816740
how am i retard if i can visually see two groups of numbers on top of each other? if you can visualize anything (literally anything), then you can visualize that. it's a basic fucking human skill anon. i'd be retarded if i couldn't do something so simple.
>>
File: hereyougo.png (9KB, 125x37px) Image search: [Google]
hereyougo.png
9KB, 125x37px
>>385817091
>>
>>385817207
thanks
>>
>>385816908
yep, I can't wait to see this generation of kids growing up
>>
>>385816740
>he can't do large scale division in his head
LOL
>>
File: GIANT SIZED XMEN 1.png (254B, 11x4px) Image search: [Google]
GIANT SIZED XMEN 1.png
254B, 11x4px
>>385817207
>>385817234
WE HAVE THE TECHNOLOGY
>>
>americans are too retarded to learn basic math
more news at 9
>>
File: SecondAmend.jpg (76KB, 876x493px) Image search: [Google]
SecondAmend.jpg
76KB, 876x493px
Common Core math is not the real problem, Common Core social studies is.
>>
>>385816027
>What was wrong with the old way?
8-3 is 5 so there's a 5
6-9 let's borrow a 10 from the next line over and you get 16 - 9 so that's a 7
then we have 5 - 2 but we borrowed 1 from this one already so that's 5 - 1 = 4 and 4 - 2 is 2 so that's 275

Now try doing that in your head

OR add 7 to 293 to get 300
add 268 to make it 568
268+7=270+5=275

Which method is easier in your head?
>>
I know see why
>american education
became a meme
>>
>>385816742
The world we live in.
>>
>>385817436
What the...?
>>
>>385816326
QR codes would've taken off a lot bigger if it was integrated into the default camera app most phones have
>>
>>385817374
>254B
Jesus christ anon
stop wasting all of the server bandwidth with your files
>>
>>385816192

As a history teacher in public schools I find this argument hilarious, because I spend fucking days teaching Christianity to these muppets and after days of teaching and days of review, these retardos still can't distinguish Peter from Paul.
>>
>>385810685
You should be punished for using improper methods though.
The test is meant to test a certain skill (which is also important to learn along with basic addition) and the student demonstrated that they don't know how to do it.
>>
File: rep-or-dem.jpg (61KB, 541x354px) Image search: [Google]
rep-or-dem.jpg
61KB, 541x354px
>>385817541
You've got to make sure kids believe the right things.
>>
I feel like the whole point of mental math is that it's something you figure out on your own after a strong understanding of the fundamentals. People think different, and develop different methods that work for them. Telling all children they have to do something only one way is taking that away from them, and ultimately does more damage than good. I feel like this is a pretty consistent downfall of utopian ideals. "If everyone just thought like I do, everything would be perfect!"
>>
Common Core Math isn't a horrendous idea in and of itself, but it has issues with breadth without depth (so many different number sense concepts that most of your class has no hope of learning them properly)

It also has strong issues with assessment because Different students find different methods easier or harder. It would be one thing to say "show 3 ways to do this multiplication problem out of 10", but what you see instead is "Use method 10 specifically, being able to get the correct answer with methods 1-9 doesn't count". Students are forced to use a single specific method on a per problem basis and are punished if they suck at that method but could easily do the problem another way.
>>
>>385817439
568-293. That is some BASIC math that, if you can't run in your head in less than a second, then you need to go back to 1st grade.
>>
>>385808694
durability is a minor inconvenience when it even matters, drop rates are just a way of extending game time.
so drop rates
>>
>>385817592
teach Christianity as in "here's a brief history of the religion" or "you better believe in god or you fools gonna get raped in hell"
>>
>>385816913

Actually, that's the only reason for this change.

In the era of pocket calculators, there's no need for written math. How many situations are you going to have where you have a paper and pencil and need to do math but don't have your phone on you?

Ultimately, they've realized that the only time you're going to do math is either a) when you have a calculator, or b) when you just need to do a quick computation in your head and can't be bothered to pull your phone out of your pocket.
>>
>>385817436
>in a state militia
NICE KEKING AMERILARDS
>>
>>385817759
>How many situations are you going to have where you have a paper and pencil and need to do math but don't have your phone on you?
Even then, the actual computation pales compared to just problem solving to get an applicable equation out of a situation. Computation was always the easy bit.
>>
>>385817750

As in "Christianity: Beliefs and Practices" similar to the "Islam: Beliefs and Practices" on that fucking worksheet.
>>
>>385817638
>R R R R R R R R R
>>
>>385817638
Aaaaand my good mood for the day is shot.
>>
>>385817726
Good job addressing the content of the post, anon. Maybe you should go back to first grade and learn how to read.

>basic math that then
wew and this lad is telling people to go back to school
>>
>>385817720
>not giving student a set of different tests tailored to each problem solving style and teaching them based on the best results

The biggest problem I see with common core is ironically this>>385817759

Basic math is pretty much useless for day to day activities, and I don't think common core is a good base for when people start learning things like algebra, geometry and calculus.
>>
>>385818000
Trips got it right.
>>
>>385817638
>charging companies that heavily pollute is an extra burden to them
thats the whole fucking point you jackasses
>>
>>385818000
Eh. The concept of breaking down numbers you can't automatically deal with is something everyone should know, and some people simply don't know how.
>>
>>385818000
You can do that for their individual success, sure, that's what good teachers used to do (and still do to some extent) via UDL. You teach a few methods to the class, you teach alternate methods to the students specifically struggling with those original methods and everyone sticks to their strengths come your assessments during the school year.

However, a modern teacher is bound to tie their curriculum to Common Core standards such that everyone is supposed to be able to use every method, and if you don't practice that and let your kids fail the fuck out of the state test then your head is on the chopping block.
>>
File: BX3RMMgCUAEyPuL.jpg (58KB, 599x799px) Image search: [Google]
BX3RMMgCUAEyPuL.jpg
58KB, 599x799px
>>385817939
Nothing wrong with it.
>>
>>385817974
You offered two stupid options for how to solve a math problem. I chose the third option: Actually performing basic subtraction. As for comma usage, I, don't, give, a, fuck,
>>
>>385811827
bongs do
>>
>I don't need to learn e;ementary school math, just use a calculator

#1 award in "best ways of spotting a brainlet"
>>
>>385818352
>e;ementary
>>
File: IMG_9046.png (457KB, 600x450px) Image search: [Google]
IMG_9046.png
457KB, 600x450px
>hey we're bad at maths
>lets implement a system to which there's no comparable counterpart in any of the counties that are better than us
>it works in theory (just like communism)!
>>
>>385816913
That's mostly true. Computation is the part of math that people don't really need to do. Even mathematicians have been using computers to do their proofs for decades.
A lot of us are a little old fashioned though.
>>
File: 1490300132930.jpg (177KB, 848x476px) Image search: [Google]
1490300132930.jpg
177KB, 848x476px
>>385816285
Wait a minute. I ALREADY do math in my head like this and I'm faster than 4/5 people or so. Going from right to left is only faster on paper, left to right is how I do it in my head.
>>
>>385818258
You people who seem to take offense to common core all seem to think its supposed to replace the "old" way. This is for the stupid kids in grade school who don't learn how to do 3 digit addition on the fly. They either learn to do it the "old" way because its easier or they stick to the common core way and at least can figure it out instead of simply not knowing how.
>>
>>385818352
>e;ementary
The easiest way to spot a 'brainlet' is that he hasn't even entered a password to delete his embarrassing post.
>>
>>
>>385818432
Common core is teaching kids to do mental math, parents are terrified.
>>
>>385818560
>>385818382
Brainlets have no answer, so they latch onto a typo.
>>
>>385818587
what's wrong, only brainlets get triggered by this
>>
>>385818432
And you've now identified the real problem with Common Core; It's a simple concept that most people do already but is just presented in a really stupid fucking way.
>>
File: 1500809529754.png (68KB, 448x334px) Image search: [Google]
1500809529754.png
68KB, 448x334px
>>385817436
>giving a shit about the constitution only when it comes to the 2nd Amendment¸
How typical.
>>
>>385818237
Reminds me of the movie They Live.
>>
File: consider the following (4).jpg (21KB, 452x299px) Image search: [Google]
consider the following (4).jpg
21KB, 452x299px
>>385811428
>>385811541
Maybe you killed the boar so hard you rekt the spine to the point of useless
>>
>>385808694
Time limits
>>
>>385818560
>I just realized the password field is missing from the reply box and delete post box.

Fuck I just never thought about it, how long has it been that way?
>>
>>385818587
It's impossible to tell which is the correct answer with that notation and without further information.
>>
>>385809697
>kids are often on very different levels
you mean blacks and spics are dumber than whites? ikr, schools should be segregated
>>
>>385818726
Holy shit i forgot what this thread was actually supposed to be about
>>
>>385816285
Huh, I get it.

If you think about the process of the 'old way' and try to articulate it you'll find it much more verbose.
The new way seems overly complicated but its verbally explaining the process of number siplification where in fluent practice you would find it very quick

Not a great example though, you could subtract 300 and add 7 as a shortcut but not all arithmetic has shortcuts
>>
File: hqdefault.jpg (17KB, 480x360px) Image search: [Google]
hqdefault.jpg
17KB, 480x360px
>>385818496
Those stupid kids don't need common core. They need a Sledge Hammer! to the back of their skull.
>>
>>385817638
D, R, R, split, split, R, R, D, What? Is'nt R the point?
>>
>>385810607
>>385810483
When it takes you more time to estimate than to get the correct answer, you shouldn't estimate. Anyone with half a brain can look at those two numbers and get 75 instantly.

Now, had they used larger numbers like 656 and 2832 (for example) then estimation could possibly come in handy.
>>
>>385814764
>being a retard

>53+37=
>50+3+30+7=
>50+30+(3+7)=
>50+30+10=
>90
>>
>>385818765
That's where you're wrong, dummy.
>>
>>385818765
What more information do you need?
4!=24
>>
>>385818432
Surprise, surprise, having to learn math the old way makes you come up with tricks to make the calculation easier on your own, AND it doesn't confuse the fuck out of you.
>>
>>385818931
It's probably more about recognizing splits, or at least recognizing what drives party beliefs rather than subscribing to loyalty.

Least that's what I hope.
>>
>>385808694
Crafting
>>
>>385819003
Except the beliefs they are ascribing are not true and very biased. If anything it's just further re-enforcing the Two Party system which is the worst fucking thing about American politics.
>>
>>385819001
That requires caring about coming up with ways to solve it on your own, instead of which corner store you're going to rob when you get out of class
>>
Common core seems like a great idea. It's teaching brainlets the aspects of thinking like those who score high on the IQ test. They learn pattern recognition, logic, grouping, relationships between numbers. It teaches them to think abstractly but also logically, which is also a trait of high iq peoples. This type of thinking of separating a number into separate groups would be similar to a highschool brainlet imagining a transition of a shape on a graph instead of using the formula. Breaking a value into parts instead of just relying on the formula. Of course, the only terrible part is that those who recognize the formula but are also able to think abstractly will be held back from their potential. But on the contrary, the ones who were always deemed smart or succesful either had the passion to learn or the passion of their parents, so it's not like the lazy geniuses would be affected in either way. Common core seems like it's teaching kids how to think outside the box instead of relying on formulas before it's too late when they reach high school and realize they don't understand how the formula got there in the first place. It's teaching kids critical thinking before they reach high school or middle school or whatever country you're from.

t. Perspective of brainlet
>>
>>385808694
Irrelevant minigames
https://youtu.be/W1ZKcZbi1rg
>>
>>385818963
youre wrong
proper notation (BRACKETS) defines the answer being sought otherwise it's solved exactly as shown from left to right
>>
>>385811751
Don't they call it maths because there's a lot of different kinds of it, but in America we only learn how to like algerba and call it quits?
>>
>>385818237
>The wants of the individual are less important than the well being of the nation

"Please reword the phrase 'Fuck the Constitution.'"
>>
I understand being bad at math, but how can you be so bad that you can't even add two small numbers together? How do you do your daily shopping? Just go YOLO, hope you have enough cash and trust the cashier with the change?
>>
>>385819163
P E M D A S
E
M
D
A
S
>>
File: 268085089_de7d9b6e9055.jpg (38KB, 479x640px) Image search: [Google]
268085089_de7d9b6e9055.jpg
38KB, 479x640px
53 + 37

(1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1) + (1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1) = 1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1 = 90


easy
>>
>>385819163
ah, fighting bait with bait, eh?
>>
>>385819245
>Cash
What year is it where you live
>>
>>385819293
this is the ONLY way to do math
>>
>>385819293
I mean that's how the universe does it.
>>
>>385819293
>there are brainlets that can't do this
lmao
>>
>>385819245
>Just go YOLO, hope you have enough cash and trust the cashier with the change?
yes?
>>
>>385819293
Woah, finally someone really brings math down to earth and demystifies it. Better send this to Vox so they can make another video that's more plea to the emotions than clear-headed arguments.
>>
>>385819341
Oh right, I forgot in USA they made you abandon real money to incentivize frivolous spendings via credit card.
>>
File: 1499588849465.png (137KB, 304x255px) Image search: [Google]
1499588849465.png
137KB, 304x255px
>>385819293
>mfw I'm sick and trying to sleep and my brain tries to deconstruct extremely large numbers by doing shit like this

Shit is fucking terrifying.
>>
>>385819527
Not him but I just use debit.
t. euro
>>
>>385819527
>Earning 2-3% cashback on everything you spend instead of the 0% back on cash is frivolous.

It's really easy to spot the people who are bad with their money. Protip: It's not the credit card users.
>>
>>385815745
I missed that day and nobody could tell me how it worked the next day
>>
>>385819527
Or you know, a bank card
>>
File: wtf reading korra.gif (1MB, 238x360px) Image search: [Google]
wtf reading korra.gif
1MB, 238x360px
>>385817638
>Abortion
Killing people should be illegal. I thought the general public already accepted that the fetus is still alive

>Gun control
Control is necessary. Always has been. Look at the countries where the government controls who can have a gun

>Healthcare
Healthcare is a privilege

>Taxes
Neither. Democrat sounds wonderful on paper but the reality is, there are people who are already abusing this one. It's still stupid to not pay taxes though

>Military
Basically yeah, prepare your troops for a war if there's a need for the country's self defence, but is the flying part seriously necessary?

>Death Penalty
Why is this bad?

>Prayer in school
>Democrat don't allow you to observe your religious freedom
Oh am i laffin

>Gay Marriage
Seriously, why is homosexuality a social issue than a mental issue?

>Pollution
What he said >>385818178
>>
>>385808694
Now I'm not saying everybody else is wrong, but ranked matchmaking algorithms being used for games that aren't 1v1 is far and away the biggest backfire in vidya history when it comes to trying make games more fun.
>>
File: wtf reading (6).jpg (8KB, 258x225px) Image search: [Google]
wtf reading (6).jpg
8KB, 258x225px
>>385818237
Isn't 2 and 4 grammatically incorrect? I was told that you can't put the "Apostrophe s" thing when it comes to objects.
>>
>>385819706
>Control is necessary. Always has been. Look at the countries where the government controls who can have a gun

Yes you just have random Muslims stabbing everyone and running people over with trucks.
>>
>>385819837
It's not the best form since you are personifying object but it isn't technically wrong.
>>
>>385819862
It's harder to kill people with trucks and knives than it is with guns. Also, the main purpose of the first two isn't to kill people. How can people not understand this?
>>
>>385819706
>Look at the countries where the government controls who can have a gun
I would post the Bataclan photo, but this is (technically) a SFW board, so I'm just gonna say you're retarded.
>>
>>385819968
what? it's stupid easy to kill people with knife and trucks
>>
>>
>>385819706
>but is the flying part seriously necessary?
Nigga, did you just ask if air superiority is necessary? Air superiority wins fucking wars, try being a guy with a regular gun on the ground while your enemies are 32,000 feet off the ground raining giant "fuck you" bombs on your sorry ass.

Also your opinions are shit
>>
>>385820087
Work harder
t. Rich people
>>
>>385808694
i dont get it
how does NEW MATH solve anything?

looks like math for autists
>>
>>385808694

Junction system FFVIII
>>
>>385819837
That's just silly. It's the car's bumper
>>
File: Dudewhat.png (57KB, 500x345px) Image search: [Google]
Dudewhat.png
57KB, 500x345px
>>385820091
Anon, I'm tired. I thought they meant fly the soldiers to whichever country they're sending them, when I thought they could still defend the country at their own country
>>
>>385820056
and I've been told it's even easier to do with a gun.

Well, a truck *might* work better on a crowd but they're not gonna ban trucks.
>>
>>385820087
>>385820189
I'm glad I live in a country where the gubberment actually pays me to go to university.
>>
>>385820212
It solves the problem of racial educational divide by dumbing everybody down to the lowest common denominigger.
>>
>>385820091
>drop more bombs on southeast asia than pretty much all other wars combined
>lose to malnourished peasants with surplus soviet rifles and homemade explosives
really airs my superiority
>>
>>385820431
d-delte t-this
>>
Drop rates can be handle well as long it is a bonus and not a fucking requirement. The luck stat on SMT games for example allow you to have unlimited healing items as you will never stop getting them.
>>
File: 1500727890986.jpg (81KB, 485x472px) Image search: [Google]
1500727890986.jpg
81KB, 485x472px
>>385820325
>"It's not enough that I should succeed, others should fail"
>>
File: laughing (2).png (176KB, 494x468px) Image search: [Google]
laughing (2).png
176KB, 494x468px
>>385820431
Thanks for the giggle, m8
>>
>>385820431
Bombing is really powerful when your enemy has structures to bomb. Especially supply lines. Vietnam had no such things, so the burgers' favorite strategy was of absolutely no use.
>>
>>385820431
One of my mother's cousins was in vietnam and he was a little dude so they'd send him into the tunnels all the time. He's pretty fucked up in the head now
>>
>>385813062
>Easily triggered
>Dumb faggot
Exactly how do you differ from him, Anon?
>>
File: Don't Mind Grandpa - The Pain.jpg (81KB, 367x500px) Image search: [Google]
Don't Mind Grandpa - The Pain.jpg
81KB, 367x500px
>>
>>385813659
>American education going down the shitter
How old are you/are you an American? It's been this shit for much fucking longer than common core.
>>
>>385808694
Survival mechanics i.e. hunger and sleep.
>>
>>385819710
I'm not saying I think you are wrong but I'd like to hear more about your reasoning behind this one.
>>
>>385819706
>Control is necessary. Always has been. Look at the countries where the government controls who can have a gun

I thought every country has gun-control, even US. No country that I know of can a person without a licence buy LEGALLY a gun, and in no country that I know of can you get a weapon licence if you have violent criminal record. Every weapon is registered and written to a specific owner. That is gun control.

The fact that there are thousands of un-registered firearms around isn't the result of normal people being allowed to own guns. Most of illegal weapons in US an EU came from South America, middle-east, Balkan and ex-soviet warehouses and from Africa.
>>
File: american schoolchildren.jpg (72KB, 620x330px) Image search: [Google]
american schoolchildren.jpg
72KB, 620x330px
>>
>>385808694
>drop rates
A bit vague to throw that around, the way it can work out in a game can literally range from being crack cocaine-addictive to snare players or make them pay microtransactions or whatnot, to being an efficient and innocuous way to randomize loot (or anything) a bit, without which it'd be mostly or entirely static.
>>
>>385818995
Do they even teach factorials in US high schools?
>>
Any type of third-person cover mechanics (particularly sticky cover and cover-to-cover-sonic'ing but really the whole thing in general) although I don't see how they were ever meant to be fun over just making games easier, duller and slower. But to each their own.
>>
>>385821270
As far as I know, there's no such thing as a gun license in the US. There's supposed to be a background check and a waiting period, but those differ on a state-by-state basis, just like what guns and gun accessories are legal to purchase and own.
>>
>>385808694
Inverted controls.
>>
>>385816027
>Using the old way or common core
>When 568 is 268 higher than 300
>Now add 7 you fucking retards
Stupid people might be ruining schools but y'all are entertaining at least.
>>
>>385817638
>republicans are for muslims praying in school
you learn something erryday
>>
>>385821504
Point me in the Constitution where it says there is supposed to be a background check and waiting period. Meanwhile I'll point out where it says my right to own firearms shall not be infringed.
>>
>>385821051
Name a single game that involves more than 2 players where the community was satisfied with the official matchmaking.
The system has nothing but a history of failure when applied to team games. All it does is make players angry and bitter.
>>
>>385821270
>I thought every country has gun-control, even US. No country that I know of can a person without a licence buy LEGALLY a gun, and in no country that I know of can you get a weapon licence if you have violent criminal record. Every weapon is registered and written to a specific owner. That is gun control.
This isn't how it works in the US. If you don't buy it in a store then legally none of these things apply to you.
>>
File: 1480128011829.png (650KB, 1200x1661px) Image search: [Google]
1480128011829.png
650KB, 1200x1661px
>>
>>385821625
Exactly, the only guns I have that the government knows about are the store bought ones. Sadly I lost those in a tragic boating accident so they know I don't have them anymore.
>>
>>385819995
nsfw is allowed if you spoiler
>>
>>385821640
Singapore is so rigging this.
>>
>>385818587
40 - 32/2 = 4!
40 - 16 = 24

What's the issue here?
>>
>>385821640
you just wait and see where that math ranking will be in 2018
>>
>>385821472
If they do it's probably in a very complicated and stupid way.
>>
>>385821785
There's none, just retarded bait
>>
>>385820981
>when you want to make a point about le PC gun 'rong but you accidentally out yourself as a redneck racist who thinks black people are animals
>>
>>385821640
>Viet Nam 8th place for Science students
I didn't know Viet Nam did anything, much less was good at something.
>>
>>385821785
the issue is you presenting the answer so we can't bait out the brainlets
>>
>>385821593
>there are no laws apart from the Constitution
>>
>>385821350
>niggers in the middle
Really makes me think
>>
>>385821472
We spent a day on it and there was one question on the final exam and that's about it.
>>
>>385820286
It's easier and safer to kill a an unarmed man with a knife than it's to shoot a man with a gun. You can kill tens of unarmed people with a knife, but guns are loud, and the stakes are much higher for the shooter. The fact that the UK IS in a terror emergency but the citizens aren't allowed to defend themselves is ridiculous.
>>
>>385821640
nice to see the bongs still ahead even just slightly, can't imagine it staying on top with the recent cultural enrichment though
>>
>>385821765
Yeah, we basically just study how to perform on tests in school. We don't actually do anything else.
>>
Control is necessary. Always has been. Look at the countries where the government controls who can have a gun
>>
File: 1500194700645.jpg (124KB, 392x438px) Image search: [Google]
1500194700645.jpg
124KB, 392x438px
>>385817638
>my face when democrats unironically believe that it's immoral to execute violent criminals but that it's perfectly fine to murder unborn children
>>
>>385821996
Of course there is, but the laws should not contradict or infringe on the Constitution.
>>
>>385818587
>4!
>fact(4)
>24
it's not wrong
>>
File: hqdefault.jpg (17KB, 480x360px) Image search: [Google]
hqdefault.jpg
17KB, 480x360px
>>385822132
>>
>>385822079
I feel it's an ingrained part of their society to not care even when hundreds of missiles are being fired in their general direction.
>>
File: 1481577787152.jpg (108KB, 392x418px) Image search: [Google]
1481577787152.jpg
108KB, 392x418px
>>385821990
>>
>>385819706
>Why is death penalty bad
Because we don't live in a perfect world. The death penalty kills innocent people and wastes huge amounts of taxes. If only guilty people got executed cheaply and quickly it would work but that's not how the real world is.
>>
>>385822218
Newsflash: There are already state laws that infringe on the Second Amendment (Jew York and Commiefornia come to mind).
>>
>>385822079
people always underestimate just how deadly a knife is, especially in an unarmed society where normal civilians don't think that they are in any danger at all
>>
>>385820687
>so they'd send him into the tunnels all the time

Man, that must have been terryfying. Just the tunnel levels in Vietcong on PC scared the shit out of me more than Silent Hill, and the tunnels there were much wider than they were in real life.
>>
>>385822431
Notice how you directly insult those states in making your point. I'm glad we agree.
>>
File: Catching up with Grandpa.png (113KB, 1024x510px) Image search: [Google]
Catching up with Grandpa.png
113KB, 1024x510px
>>
>>385821932
I don't think the artist was alluding to niggers, but niggers are, in fact, animals, yes.
>>
File: 1341720356454.png (364KB, 629x609px) Image search: [Google]
1341720356454.png
364KB, 629x609px
>>385822416
Wouldn't death penalty indirectly solve overpopulation, though?
>>
>>385812435
>wasn't taught this way
Doesn't it make sense to split stuff into blocks? I never listened in primary or secondary so I never had a clue how to do long addition, just done it in block in head like
>>385810304
Fun with the haste rune trial though
>>
>>385822617
>I don't think the artist was alluding to niggers
Can you get a clue?
>>
>>385822621
How many people do you think we execute in a year? To answer your question: No. More random black people are killed in one weekend in Chicago than are executed in prisons.
>>
>>385822431
What laws would those be?
>>
Honestly every time i hear about an american way of doing things it seems like the worst possible way for everyone involved. Politics, healthcare, education, taxation.

Also tipping in general in a trash tier concept. You're getting fucked by your employer and good service should be part of the job.
>>
>>385822621
If that's your concern abortion would be much more efficient.
>>
>>385822416
>wastes huge amounts of taxes
It's still way cheaper than keeping someone incarcerated for 20+ years, especially since a lot of people with lifetime sentences wind up dying in prison.
>>
>>385822416
>The death penalty kills innocent people and wastes huge amounts of taxes
how
the
bloody
fuck

what bizzarro world do you live in?
>>
>>385822807
>yurojew is too cheap to tip
Every time.
>>
>>385821640
>Taiwan in Math and reading
>Chinese Taipei in Science

???
>>
>>385822207
>immoral to execute violent criminals
No of course not and no one who is for abortion actually thinks this. The problem is that the U.S. government has a habit of lying to and cheating its people so a death penalty will get corrupted into a political silence tool.
>>
>>385822416
I'm not well educated on this subject, but how does killing a criminal straight up cost a huge amount of taxes, or is it the killing innocent part that's costing taxes
>>
>>385822890
The real world.
>>
>>385822857
>Death penalty
>95% chance of killing guilty people

>Abortion
>100% chance of killing innocent babby
oh wow
>>
>>385823010
But didn't you hear, goy? Babies are born racist!
>>
>>385822959
probably from a different source
also taipei is prc territory remove roc
>>
>>385822890
I live in America where people have been executed on death row and found to be innocent post-mortem. Where the death penalty entails keeping someone on death row while they appeal for years and waste my money.

Where do you live, friendo?
>>
>>385823010
>the unbaptized are innocent
lmaoing @ ur theology
>>
>>385822969
It's because they never just straight up kill someone. They drag it on for years.
>>
>>385822721
How would he be referring to niggers, brainlet? The point of the comic is political correctness gone wrong, but because it used the word "slavery", your dumbass just ignored every bit of context and assumed it was all about niggers. If he's alluding to the enslavement of niggers at all, it's only in the sense that people are still hung up about it and acting like it's relevant when it's been 150 years since it was abolished, and anyone who ever owned slaves would have died over a century ago.
>>
>>385822865
It actually winds up being more expensive as while the actual execution is cheaper the trial, appeals, and housing are much more expensive than a regular inmate.
>>
>>385823258
>How would he be referring to niggers, brainlet?
Because the whole point of the joke is that it reflects old people using the word "nigger" and glorifying slavery.

Jesus fuck, learn to read comedic subtext.
>>
>>385809474

hardly, this example is retarded since the question is simple enough to do in your head almost immediately.

A better example would be 23 x 15. Very difficult to do in your head, and even doing it the original way would require some paper. Using common core you can easily do it in your head, paper free

Just split up on of the sides, multiply them by the other, then add

23 x 10 = 230
23 x 5 = 115

230 + 115 = 345

Very simple once you try a few. If the 23 x 5 is too much, break that up to. So (20 x 5) + (3 x 5)
>>
>>385821623
Calm down lad. I was more hoping you'd explain if its that you don't like playing with trash players or against trash/strong players
>>
>>385822961
I never understood why are americans against abortion. Sure, you don't abort in 7th month, but even at 5 months that shit ain't sentient, it's not a human being any more than if you were to cut off a lump of flesh, put it in a bag and call it Anon Jr.
>>
>people defending common core
It is almost like you want to lower all educational standards AGAIN.
>>
>>385823010
At which point exactly does a mindless one-cell organism turn into a full fledged person with human rights?
>>
>>385823107
It's kind of a meme but still we are the murderers when we execute even one innocent person.
Also I'd rather be executed than live in a small concrete box for the rest of my life.
>>
>>385823107
>I live in America
oh, that explains it
can't you faggots do anything right?
>>
>>385823421
the moment it suits their narrative
>>
>>385822961
>no one who is for abortion actually thinks this
You're fucking delusional. Tons of people who are for abortion believe that executing violent criminals is immoral. Cognitive dissonance is pretty much a requirement to be a leftist, after all.
>The problem is that the U.S. government has a habit of lying to and cheating its people so a death penalty will get corrupted into a political silence tool.
Okay, I was being hyperbolic when I called you delusional before, but holy shit you seriously are delusional.
>>
>>385823386
>sure, you don't abort at the 7th month
Except people do, which is why it is an issue in the first place.
>>
>>385823386
I really don't care about abortion. I understand that some people think that it's a baby no matter what stage. But we kill so many things that can think (in their own way) and feel what we're doing to them. So if I don't give a shit about that why would I give a shit about a fetus?
>>
>>385822584
>he
>3rd person
>implying
>>
>>385823421
After about 18 years. Until then they're soulless and stupid abominations.
>>
File: juarez.gif (162KB, 620x349px) Image search: [Google]
juarez.gif
162KB, 620x349px
>>385819706
>Look at the countries where the government controls who can have a gun
Like Mexico?
>>
>>385823497
Lol nice backpedaling anon
>>
>>385808904
I can't even think of any modern game that has stages. Only games like the old Capcom, Sega and Nintendo platformers had stages. Thankfully these games are deader than dogshit today.
>>
>>385821640
oh wow, poor usa
>>
File: 1461378241270.gif (1MB, 300x159px) Image search: [Google]
1461378241270.gif
1MB, 300x159px
>>385823421
Immediately. The moment a zygote is formed, it's a fucking human being. I'm not sure why this is such a difficult concept for brainlets to understand. If we use your "logic", I should be able to murder your sub-100 IQ ass. Except it wouldn't be murder, because according to you, murder only applies to fully sapient and cognizant organisms.
>>
>>385823809
more like: nice i-can't-fucking-believe-they-have-the-audacity-to-call-themselves-a-first-world-country
>>
>>385823926
>an egg is a chicken
Okay
>>
>>385823546
Okay sure we can disagree on the abortion thing even if you're being weirdly confrontational about it. But to say that the government wouldn't abuse power that it has factually abused before is a bit crazy. And, to be clear, I'm talking about the U.S. Now, if you think I'm being delusional, by all means, do the research. You seem very naive.
>>
>>385823330
>glorifying slavery
Because there are fucking old people who were alive in the 1860s? Idiot.
>>
>>385823797
Mexico is at literal war. I don't see why US haven't stepped in, considering it's shitting up their borders aswell. Sweep every house, start 50 km away from the border and proceed towards the wall. Line up everyone they caught against it and fire.
>>
>>385824041
>you have to have been alive during slavery to glorify it
explain then why there are people doing it on /pol/ fuckface
>>
>>385824005
Uh ok, but we've been talking about America in this entire thread, so you'll forgive me when I say, stop backpedaling you faggot.
>>
>>385823926
Not sentient, though. Pro-choice people would compare it to pulling the plug on a vegetable.
>>
>>385824097
>taking anything on 4chins seriously
Are you retarded?
Lurk more you underage fag.
>>
Why in the world would you want to enslave black people again? Wouldn't you rather just throw them out of your country?
>>
>>385823330
>I'm not equating slavery to pet-owning, or implying that that slavery was as harmless as owning pets--or even, necessarily, that owning pets is harmless. All I'm pointing out in this cartoon is the somewhat random and unpredictable nature of moral trends. (Did I say moral trends? What am I, suggesting that morality is relative, rather than absolute--a matter of mere fashion? Well, no, no, not really. I mean sort of, I guess, yes. Yes.) And it's impossible to predict what the moral standards of the future are going to be and try to live up to those. Who knows what future generations will condemn us for? Owning pets? Eating meat? Driving cars? Having babies?

>I don't want to get into a while big thing here. Well, I guess I'm already into one. Shit. Look, I'm not saying that morality is relative, so whatever, man. I realize that there there are plenty of people today who are holding themselves up to what they imagine the moral standards of the future ought to be, fighting for good causes that now seem fringy and hopeless--animal rights, reparations for slavery, the abolition of corporations--just as there were plenty of people who opposed slavery for hundreds of yers before it was actually abolished. I'm trying to do this myself in my own paltry impotent little way. It just seems arrogant and hypocritical of us to assume that people of a hundred or two hundred years ago were somehow morally inferior to us. Because let's not forget that the Abolitionists were a vocal minority, a fringe group, considered a bunch of fanatics and wack-jobs by the majority of responsible people, who, like most of us, went about their business and didn't really care about politics and figured that the way things were was probably about as good as they could get and making a fuss wasn't going to change anything. Maybe they disapproved of slavery in the abstract but it didn't really affect them, and what could they do about it, anyway? So let's not get on our High Horse.
>>
>>385824005
>no argument intensifies
protip: tipping culture started because there use to be no waitress staff. It was a way to employ teenagers without putting unnecessary burden on the establishment in question.

Get rid of tipping, and you either get price increases across the board, or no waitresses. The restaurants won't just take the hit to their margins, else most will simply be unable to operate.
>euros in charge of business strategy
>>
>>385824218
>he actually thinks slavery defence ain't real
>he somehow thinks you have to have been alive during something to defend it
did you fall on the head?
>>
>>385823386
If the victim's capacity for thought and reason is what defines murder, then I should be able to kill you without facing any criminal charges, right? Especially so, since an unborn child has the potential to reach that capacity in the future, whereas you have fallen laughably short and won't develop any further no matter how much time you are afforded.
>>
>>385824196
More like pulling the plug on a regular, sleeping person who's on life support.
>>
>>385824328
wow
>>
literally nothing wrong with "new math". it's how most adults end up doing mental arithmetic anyway
>>
>>385824335
>newfags taking 4chan seriously
wew
>>
>>385824261
looks like he started realizing he made a boo-boo

Second part is complete self-contradicting damage control.
>I'm not saying morality is relative. But I'm saying we shouldn't judge people of the past who had a different one.
lol
>>
>>385820230
The car doesnt own the bumper. Its your bumper on your car. I agree with you, but that is the argument.
>>
>>385823421
The point in which it was on the path to becoming a full human, which is the single cell part. Be honest, what is the real "human" difference between a 9 month year old baby and a cell? Sure, the baby can do more things but they can't think past the level of a dog, have a concept of self, or have desires past shitting and eating. If that baby could never grow, it would be hard to consider it a "human being" like us. But the baby can grow and will be a human like us so we treat it like one because it will become one. Why do we not treat the single cell like that? Because its not cute and it's makes people feel less like the piles of shits they are for killing their own child to make their problems go away.
>>
>>385824442
>newchins taking 4fag seriouso
WAW
>>
>>385824196
You're comparing someone with a terminal illness, who has suffered irreparable brain damage, to a healthy, developing fetus.

I hope you're aware of how disingenuous that argument is.
>>
>>385824442
>le /pol/ is just le satire
back to plebbit with you
>>
>>385824354
Did that honestly sound like a good reply in your head? I'm getting second hand embarrassment here.
>>
>>385822079
So you'd rather have someone attack you with a gun than with a knife?
>>
>>385824036
A fertilized one, yeah. Are you stupid?
>>
>>385824602
>WWWWWWWEWWWWW intensifies
>>385824631
the irony
>>
>>385818768
/pol/ pls, children are children
>>
>>385811056

good catch spider-chan
>>
>>385824229
Mostly for farming cash crops, like cotton.
>>
>>385813560
It's a social experiment. Just like how we were taught to spell phonetically.
>>
>>385824771
some children are smarter than others. shouldnt pull them all down to the level of the dullest child
>>
>>385824038
Give me one example of the death penalty being used as a "political silence tool".

And if it were a fucking "political silence tool" you insufferable idiot, why is the legality of the death penalty determined at a state level? And why has it been done away with in a significant number of them?
>>
Is there a single game in which swimming is fun and something you look forward to doing? Mario, Crash, Ape Escape, swimming is a chore in all of them
>>
>>385824538
But that sounds weird too. At what point are you differentiating between something you own and describing an object?
>>
>>385812127
This
>>
>>385824354
Look at this retard. Just look at him and laugh. Way to miss the point, idiot.
>>
File: Sacvan[1].jpg (64KB, 600x438px) Image search: [Google]
Sacvan[1].jpg
64KB, 600x438px
>>385824963
>Give me one example of the death penalty being used as a "political silence tool".
geeze louize
>>
>>385824858
i agree, this is why most schools have "advanced" classes where they stick the smarter kids. nothing to do with race
>>
>>385824559
>why do we not treat <thing> just like we treat the <completely different thing>?
>there is no difference between them besides all the differences that i mentioned
do you hear yourself talk?
>>
>>385825098
You know I think they were actually guilty for the crime, even if they didn't have the evidence for it at the time.
>>
>>385824963
Why did you think acting like a prick would further this conversation? You can do your own research or not, I don't care.
>>
File: 1283473075103.jpg (46KB, 440x384px) Image search: [Google]
1283473075103.jpg
46KB, 440x384px
>>385824643
lmao are you sure that embarrassment is second hand? Seems to me that your embarrassment stems from you inability to defend your shitty argument.
>>
>>385823926
>A cluster of cells is a human
um
>>
>>385823926
>mystic brainlets think a human being is defined entirely by a fucking DNA code
wew
>>
>>385825146
>Not a retard like most small children
>Get placed in GATE (gifted and talented education) for just paying attention in class
>Turns out GATE was just an excuse for the school to have us make things they could sell at lunch
I mean I got to ditch class and fuck around so that was cool but that must have been illegal.
>>
>>385825146
>nothing to do with race
Until you go to one of these schools and realize the "advanced" courses aren't very advanced, and are full of whites and the smarter blacks.
The "normal" classes are essentially remedial, and are full of blacks and the dumber whites.

Might feel bad to say, but black communities aren't suited for the same education style as most white communities.
In contrast, there are black only schools in my area that focus on building a community atmosphere before even considering education, and those schools have very impressive literacy rates and overall turn out better kids.

It is almost like different groups of kids have different attributes, and they should be catered to on a communal basis as opposed to blanketing all kids as the same.
>>
>>385825303
Why did you ignore the second part of the post?
>>
>>385811641
Too many single player games are adopting MMO mechanics for their drop rates. Hell, they're going beyond MMO style drops rates just to turn their game into a 50 hour experience over a 20 hour experience. That's bullshit. Just look at a game like Patapon 3; that pile of shit has drop rates so extremely low that even with cheats to only find the rarest chests, 20 at a time, you shouldn't expect to pick up a "best" weapon even after 100 hours. That's fucking retarded. These items are content within the game, make them accessible.

I'm must more forgiving about weapon durability if the mechanic serves a purpose. Fire Emblem and Dragon's Crown use durability well; micromanaging your items is a integral to the game and strategic for obtaining the best results.

Then you have games like DS3, where weapon durability doesn't matter at all, despite that it's there. What's more is that DS3 doesn't need an extra mechanic around managing items to encourage players to swap items. So it's just pointless.

>>385811873
How is either of those methods faster than just doing the simple multiplication of 247*7? It's just silly shit. The alternate methods for multiplying larger numbers are already taught, because they are faster than the traditional "long form" multiplication.

Making simple equations more complex by using an inefficient method is retarded and will make children retarded.
>>
>>385811641
Yes but that doesn't mean jack shit to the player numbnuts. You think I give a shit when I'm at 0 drops after killing a 1/50 drop rate enemy 400 times that Johnny across the road got it in 3?
>>
>>385825557
>inb4 dats raciss
This same scenario would exist even if all of the kids in question were the same race. Environment is crucial to education, something that is outright denied by our current education system.
>>
>>385825557
Basically you're saying that segregation works for everyone.
>>
>>385820212
Instead of using shorthand tricks it's breaking down the problems. A big part of why math education is fucked everywhere is people jumping the gun and learning the tricks rather than really fully grasping why they work.
>>
>>385825317
>>385825419
WHAT THE FUCK IS THIS
>>
>>385825190
Why do we treat newborns with the dignity of being a human being when they don't currently posses the traits necessary to be a human being.
>>
>>385825317
>>385825419
why cover it in a flesh cage?

I dont want my androids to have skin I want them to make it well known that they're robutts and not people
>>
>>385825514
We've been over this brainlet. If intellectual capacity is the determinant of what constitutes "murder", then I should be able to kill you without consequence or reservation. I should be able to kill any mentally retarded or autistic individual.
>>
>>385825798
How is tailoring education programs to the community they are used in considered segregation?

Kids aren't just blank robots waiting to be programmed, you know.
>>
>>385822958
>burgerclap assumes I'm euro.

US geography education is a poor as mathematics apparently. Also we are paying more for our meals since the workers are getting payed more. How is that cheap?
>>
>>385825317
>>385825419
>run an electrical charge thought muscle tissue
>"ooh" and "ahh" over pulsating muscle tissue

Is this what we consider "amazing" now?
>>
>>385817374

WE MUST TO FURTHER!
>>
>>385825576
What? Read the post you replied to.
>>
File: rat brain cyborg.webm (3MB, 640x480px) Image search: [Google]
rat brain cyborg.webm
3MB, 640x480px
>>385825918
This better?
>>
>>385825920
The fact that you think autists don't have a brain at all is very much revelatory of your limited intellect.
>>
>>385815546
This one at least makes sense. Why does Bobby have more money? Because 4 dimes is 40 cents, and 30 pennies is 30 cents and 40>30.
>>
>>385825942
What does geography have to do with anything? Just couldn't wait to use that original murica insult, eh?
>>
>>385825098
Right, two literal who Italian immigrants were "silenced" by the government.

If they were falsely convicted, it was an issue of xenophobia on the jury's part, not the government trying to whack some nobodies.
>>
>>385808694
What the fuck is even going on in New Math? Where did that three 10s came from? Is this some of that common core whatever shit again?
>>
>>385826306
>Brainlet can't into math
Must be french
>>
>>385826034
Low-functioning autists are hardly self-aware, dumbass. They're less capable of communication and coherent thought than some retards.
>>
>>385810483
what in the name of fuckery is this bullshit?

It's like math, designed by some ungodly lovechild of Sheldon Cooper and the Riddler, designed so no matter what answer the student gives, the teacher can give a smug "wrong" and explain how fucking wise and wonderful they are.
>>
>>385825514
But it is, you retard.

Intelligence is hereditary. What's more amazing is that hereditary intelligence can be enhanced by a productive childhood of living in good conditions and training a young mind with information and complex concepts. Research seems to suggest that these environmental conditions make a tangible impact on the DNA, and therefore lead to even better offspring through hereditary intelligence. It's a double edged sword though; if you take a child with extremely intelligent parents and raise them in a shit hole of abuse and retardation, they'll end up as simpletons who breed simpletons. That's why it's important to promote the growth of intelligence through several generations within a species.

And now we know why africa is so fucked.
>>
>>385823414
You're forgetting that you are on here with literal children, anon. Whatever they know they are gonna stick by. But I guess that includes children of all ages.
>>
File: fields_percapita_572x432.png (7KB, 572x432px) Image search: [Google]
fields_percapita_572x432.png
7KB, 572x432px
>>385826404
sure
>>
>>385826419
And their brain, although malfunctioning, is still incredibly complex, and very much difference from a zygote.

>>385826489
>But it is, you retard.
Yes, all twins are the same person, ahurpadurp.
>>
File: 1493889710349.png (54KB, 500x534px) Image search: [Google]
1493889710349.png
54KB, 500x534px
>>385825993
>You called me a name, that means I get to conveniently ignore any points you made
>>
>>385820646
>, so the burgers' favorite strategy was of absolutely no use.

as i look back on WW2 and the wars leading to it, ya i guess we like bombing things

poor north korea
>>
>>385825317
>>385825419

What the fuck is this
>>
>>385826575
They have the same intellectual capacity. Obviously their personalities will differ. However, intelligence is the most important detail of any individual person.

You're doing this retarded thing where you conflate hereditary intelligence with personality. Under this idea, everyone with an IQ of 100 behave as clones of one another; and then everyone with an IQ of 110 behaves as a different set of clones of one another. That's now how it works. Intellectual capacity isn't personality.
>>
>>385819170
the word maff is both singular and plural
>>
This thread isn't video games. Go cry about math somewhere else.
>>
>>385826575
And unlike you, brainlet, a zygote will develop to have a complex, fully functioning brain. You still have yet to explain how you think it's morally justifiable to rob someone from being born. Even if you think a zygote doesn't qualify as a human being, by whatever retarded, non-existent, convenient definition of "human" you're using today, you haven't denied that it will become a qualified human being in the future. So how is that defensible?
>>
>>385826495
The are probably manchildren by now
>>
>>385819170
They call it "maths" because they're britbong ghetto trash who can't even speak their language more eloquently than the fucking burgers.
>>
>>385823926

Out of curiosity, are you against IVF?
>>
>>385821640

now show the scores when we exclude the US blacks
>>
>>385822079
Are you retarded? It's way easier to kill someone with a gun than a knife. It's harder to get away with it sure, but that isn't the issue here.
>>
>>385826993
Every egg has a chance to become a fully qualified human. Does that mean that girls having periods are committing murder?
>>
>>385826841
>You're doing this retarded thing where you conflate hereditary intelligence with personality
I'm not doing anything of the sort. I only pointed out the complexity of a human being goes far beyond the DNA code, and you've been drawing the conclusion that I'm talking about fucking IQ of all things.

But don't worry, it's very common among brainlets uneducated in biology to think DNA is a blueprint for a human.
If you ever study the topic a little bit, you'll come to understand DNA just serves as a protein library, and that you were reading too much into it.

>>385826993
>a zygote will develop to have a complex, fully functioning brain
potential humans don't get actual rights.
>>
File: Rq689rN.jpg (42KB, 610x430px) Image search: [Google]
Rq689rN.jpg
42KB, 610x430px
really jingles my keychain
>>
File: 1472280890850.gif (1MB, 406x226px) Image search: [Google]
1472280890850.gif
1MB, 406x226px
>>385826012
no
>>
>>385823926

You're against abortion, but I bet you complain about single moms on welfare and poor minorites that keep breeding. And I doubt you care about the unwanted baby that are killed/abused after birth.
>>
>>385827221
I'm not the guy you're talking to, but the thought of this gave me a good laugh.
>>
>>385812872
Common core, and that way of doing it is currently in highschools; Let that sink in, if you are doing calc and you don't show the common core methodology of counting 10s in some schools you get the answer wrong.
>>
>>385825854

Because once they're born they're an individual being and don't require being inside and attached to another human for survival. A fetus can only survive on it's own at around 22 weeks, before then it will always die even with medical intervention.
>>
>>385823727
I can see the argument. Like if we kill animals that have the same mental capacity as a fetus then what's the issue? We are just a more intelligent animal. What makes it a quandary for me is that if we don't kill it, it is pretty much guaranteed to become a sentient human. So your action is leading to the murder of a person.

That being said if i knocked someone up and the child was gonna ruin my life I'd def consider it as i'm selfish like that.
>>
>>385827235
You're delusional if you think DNA isn't a blueprint for a human being. Environmental factors play a role in shaping a person, but even the way an individual reacts to environmental stimuli can be read from their DNA. The chemical reactions within the brain that result from stimuli and constitute a personality are mapped out well enough with very few details left to real mystery.

These chemicals reactions as a result of stimuli are determined on a genetic level, that is to say that they stem from a person's DNA.

To say that human complexity goes beyond DNA is disingenuous bullshit, if not outright bullshit.
>>
>>385826012
https://youtu.be/nECsWAqMJgo?t=1m8s
>>
>>385823339
The solution you provided is not even optimal.
Easier way :
23x15 =
20x15 + 3x15 =
300+45 = 345

Its generaly easier to do something x20 and something x3 than something x10 and something x5
>>
File: standards.jpg (63KB, 588x309px) Image search: [Google]
standards.jpg
63KB, 588x309px
>>
>>385812435
You clearly need some common core in your life anon. It might help with your reading comprehension.
>>
ITT: Brainlets
>>
>>385827606
Listen nigga, why does needing another human's help to exist make you not a human? first off, they were individual being the second the zygote formed (genetically speaking). Babies cannot survive on their own after they leave their mothers womb. They needed constant help. I'm asking you what makes them more human than a pile of cells? Just existing without another human's help doesn't make you human.
>>
>>385817439
The first.
or as it is done in real peoples head
568-293->5,(4)7,2 -> 275
fucking done
>>
>>385824965
Jesus man read the thread. No one here gives a fuck about videogames
>>
>>385822781
I thought Chicago and Detroit were the death penalty.
>>
>>385828192

>Listen nigga, why does needing another human's help to exist make you not a human?
When did I say they're not human? I answered
why babies that are born are treated differently than a mass of cells.

>Babies cannot survive on their own after they leave their mothers womb.
I think you're misunderstanding me. Yes, babies need to be fed and cared for. But a fetus LITERALLY cannot continue growing or developing and WILL die if taken out before certain period of time passes. Completely different situations.
>>
>>385827817
what is 11.112121112121*20?
what is 11.112121112121*10?
what is 11.112121112121*3?
what is 11.112121112121*5?

go to hell
>>
>>385825557
interesting, i have never heard of those types of schools. i experienced being placed in the "advanced" classes and it was exactly as you described: a bunch of white kids plus a couple blacks. it seems our education system cannot handle the differences caused by racial divide, opting instead to make it absolutely retard-proof.

i do think the common core math taught in the OP is good for making even the dumbest of kids understand math.
>>
>>385828703
222.24242224242
111.12121112121
33.336363336363
55.560605560605
ezpz
>>
>>385828703
222.24242224242
111.12121112121
33.336363336363
i don't fucking know
because multiplying things by 5 is harder than by 3
>>
>>385827698
>You're delusional if you think DNA isn't a blueprint for a human being
ahahahah Jesus Christ it's so obviously painful you've never studied biology
>that fucking pop-sci vocabulary
drop the fucking discovery channel docs. There is a difference between genes and genes expression, it's painful to see someone who doesn't know that talk shit about genetics.

>To say that human complexity goes beyond DNA is disingenuous bullshit
lol
good luck getting a human from just DNA, some nutrients and without a womb
bruh you don't understand shit about human development
>>
>>385829153
I found the retard!
>>
>>385827698
>twins have the same personality bruv
nice 0 research you did there
>>
>>385827221
Gametes aren't zygotes, idiot. A gamete will become nothing if it isn't fertilized.
>>
File: 1499560059085.png (346KB, 439x500px) Image search: [Google]
1499560059085.png
346KB, 439x500px
>>385822416
Reminder that we currently live in a world of relatively low crime because the death penalty has bred the propensity to commit violence out of our genome.
http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/147470491501300114
>>
>>385827235
So again, you don't get actual rights, because your period of "potential" is long past?
>>
>>385827698
Just stop man, this nature vs nurture argument was concluded years ago.
>>
>>385826103
Well tipping or not is different all over the world. Some countries even consider it an insult. Just because I'm against it doesn't mean I'm from Europe.

And yeah the insult is fun. I have others if you'd like?
>>
>>385829648
right; nature won.
why are you arguing that?
>>
>>385829630
I don't think you understand what "potential" means.
You should go back to watching animes.
>>
>>385827351
>but I bet
>And I doubt
Operative words to your entire "argument". You don't have one, so you're creating a strawman composed of other issues because you can't defend abortion in itself. But I'll play along.
>single moms on welfare and poor minorites that keep breeding
I'm not sure why you think abortion is the only acceptable solution to poor decision making. Condoms and spermicides exist. So does abstaining from sex. Shocking, I know.
>the unwanted baby that are killed/abused after birth
I'm not sure why you even bring this up, other than to baselessly and embarrassingly attempt to discredit me. There are unwanted babies that are killed or abused after birth, so that's just cause to kill them before they're born? Are you insane?
>>
>>385827138
Hahaha you got em mate. They are part of you. That's like you standing in front of the mirror and saying "Now show me without the tic tac dick".
Thread posts: 524
Thread images: 61


[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / bant / biz / c / can / cgl / ck / cm / co / cock / d / diy / e / fa / fap / fit / fitlit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mlpol / mo / mtv / mu / n / news / o / out / outsoc / p / po / pol / qa / qst / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / spa / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vint / vip / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y] [Search | Top | Home]

I'm aware that Imgur.com will stop allowing adult images since 15th of May. I'm taking actions to backup as much data as possible.
Read more on this topic here - https://archived.moe/talk/thread/1694/


If you need a post removed click on it's [Report] button and follow the instruction.
DMCA Content Takedown via dmca.com
All images are hosted on imgur.com.
If you like this website please support us by donating with Bitcoins at 16mKtbZiwW52BLkibtCr8jUg2KVUMTxVQ5
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties.
Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.
This is a 4chan archive - all of the content originated from that site.
This means that RandomArchive shows their content, archived.
If you need information for a Poster - contact them.