When will LCDs catch up to CRTs?
>shit contrast
>shitty ghosting
>looks like shit on any non-native resolution
>can't do more than 60Hz unless it was specifically designed for it while also being expensive as fuck
Fuck off grandpa, we're putting you in a retirement home
>>385541391
You're like ten years too late grandpa.
>>385541391
well not in like 2004, which is about when that LCD is from.
Also no shit a matte finish screen will look worse than a glass one with a lot of light coming in from the side. Doesnt matter what display tech you use.
Both good for different things. I enjoy my broadcast tier crt as much as anything but I would never give up my 1440p 144hz benq
>>385542021
>well not in like 2004, which is about when that LCD is from.
The blacks on that 2001FP are better than any I've seen on newer LCDs.
>>385541391
>no
>no
>why the fuck would you ever not use native resolution
>expensive compared to shitty budget LCDs, not compared to CRTs of similar size
>>385542407
You would like staring at black wouldn't you faggot
LCDs wont.
OLED will replace LCD far before LCD can catch up to CRT
>>385541391
How did you take a picture like that without the screen flickering.
>>385542448
No LCD techonology can match a CRT, only OLED
The ghosting is fucking everywhere, just load any emulator and play a relatively fast side-scroller and watch the blur fest
>why the fuck would you ever not use native resolution
I don't know, maybe I want to play a game or a movie that is not in the exact same resolution as my monitor?