i've never played a zelda game before, but i just found

>Reddit spacing
ISHYGDDT

>>385526969

>autism spacing

shig etc

>>385527170
>Actually being autistic
Shiggyhiggydiggy

>>385526909
If only the switch had this much technology.

it is an incredible game OP, glad you started Zelda

File: 1408954094412.jpg (24KB, 400x500px) Image search: [Google]

24KB, 400x500px

>>385526909
The engine Nintendo's created is a masterpiece. Was worth the long wait indeed!

>>385526909
well glad ya like it.
Yeah, BotW has clearly inherited Koji-bro's knack for small details & integrated, interactive systems.
Keep in mind that BotW is quite literally the "MGS5" of the Zelda series - with the exception being that this is actually very good and finished game. So don't expect the same degree of freedom in past games.

>>385526909
It's not really technology, just attention to details but yes, BOTW's level of details is extreme.

>>385527795
>BotW is quite literally the "MGS5" of the Zelda series
I don't get why people keep saying this, BotW is simply Zelda 1 realised in 3D more accurately after years of LttP/OoT clones.

>>385527972
>I don't get why people keep saying this
I don't recall having to take out numerous enemy guard bases more or less stealthily in Zelda 1. Not to mention the endless crazy exploits and tricks you can pull out, that are quite on the same vein as MGSV in general.

>>385527972
kojima copied zelda 1 confirmed!

>>385528167
Nobody with a brain actually plays BotW like a stealth game though, it's a fucking Zelda game. It's easy enough to just walk into the camps and whack shit until it dies that stealth isn't even a necessity.

>>385528316
>Nobody with a brain actually plays BotW like a stealth game though
It's the most satisfying AND safest way to approach situations, especially in the beginning.

>It's easy enough to just walk into the camps and whack shit until it dies that stealth isn't even a necessity.
maybe after 200h with all-Royal Guard gear and 88 defense. Facing a single black Bokoblin or Moblin, not to mention a Lizalfos, while wearing nothing but worn clothes and Bokoblin gear ... yeah, you're not going to make it.

>>385526909
ya its great. until the honeymoon phase is over. Then you'll realize its major flaw, the great plateau is literal the entire game.

>>385526909
Every other game is vastly different, so you won't get a feel of what the Zelda franchise is like just yet. But keep enjoying the game.

>>385529572

How high does the Cryonis blocks boost your jump?

I wanna try some shield surfing shenanigans.

File: 1501063644027-v.png (353KB, 710x842px) Image search: [Google]

353KB, 710x842px

>>385526909
This is the 3rd shill thread for BotW in an hour. Stop.

The Switch will sell like shit no matter how much you try to change this.

>>385529572
Cryonis really shined in the Waterblight Ganon fight. I'm on Master Quest now and cryonis is way more useful than I remember. I can cross any large body of water without a raft in a timely manner now. There's no reason to swim at all. Its range is nearly limitless too.

File: coop.png (1MB, 1236x1440px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1236x1440px

>game is supposedly full of technology
>still can't run at 60 FPS
>needed multiple day 1 patches just so it wouldn't drop from 30 FPS

I haven't been so disappointed with a Zelda game since Skyward Sword.

>>385529420
While cool, this is actually more effort than just completing the challenge.

>>385528316
Yeah right. Start a new game and try doing this.

>>385530454
>playing console games at 60 fps
Most console don't run at 60 fps, you fps fags all spout the same shit when 30 is fine for these games

File: Hank.jpg (6KB, 204x258px) Image search: [Google]

6KB, 204x258px

>>385530851
>Most console don't run at 60 fps,
Is that why you brag about Splatoon and Mario Kart being 60 FPS?

File: 1501318877594.gif (215KB, 400x400px) Image search: [Google]

215KB, 400x400px

>>385530454
>playing any Zelda game for the tech

File: BotW_zelda.jpg (110KB, 700x913px) Image search: [Google]

110KB, 700x913px

>>385530158
It's literally sold out everywhere

Post Guardian .webms

>>385530979
OP said he found it at walmart

>>385530939
They wouldn't brag about it if it was normal.

>>385531191
But it is normal, on the PC at least. So why should I lower my standards for Nintendo's bottom line?

>>385530979
Apart from my local GAME and CEX. Plenty of second hand switches available

>>385531283
You shouldn't. I'm just saying they are bragging about their few 60FPS games because for them it is good.

For those of us that can afford decent PCs it is baseline.

>>385531156
He must have went in right after they restocked. Units sell out within a few hours.
http://www.nowinstock.net/videogaming/consoles/nintendoswitch/

>>385531528
For 60 dollars it is far from baseline. I expect a game that works and isn't a piece of crap for that price. And yet this is the "savior of all video games that's so perfect that all dissenters need to be round up and killed"? I don't buy it.

That stuff has been done ten years ago. Zelda Breath of The Wild is overrated.

>>385526909
> Master Mode
> Chasing Rudania up Death Mountain
> Want to kill all of the sentries for their parts
> First one
> Can't use Bomb Arrows because of the heat
> Try Shock Arrows
> Barely do any damage
> Wtf
> Check its HP with the Champion's Tunic
> 1000 HP
> Too high to reach with weapons or bombs
> Remember that there are giant metal crates further up that will instakill them with Magnesis
> Go get one
> Bring it back
> Accidentally drop it into the lava when I set it down
> Fuck
> Get an idea
> Drop my spare Drillshaft and Magnesis it
> Start poking the Sentry with it
> 100 damage, neat
> Whack x9
> Boom

As someone who's played this game and all the Assassin's Creed game I think Assassin's Creed does open world better than Zelda Breath of The Wild.

>>385532002
As some who does too played all those games BotW handled openworld much better because of interactivity
In AC games all you can do is fuckup npcs or just climb every shit out there
In Zelda you can do much more than that

>>385530454
I play with a 144hz monitor on my computer never dropping below 120 frames when playing, but I enjoyed the hell out of BotW on the Wii U with frames dropping to 20 sometimes. Case in point, you are a fucking retard.

>>385532229
>As some who does too played all those games BotW handled openworld much better because of interactivity
Really? Can I kill any NPC in the game? Can I dig underground at any point? Can I rip Link's arm off and use that as a makeshift weapon? Can I join Ganon and violently destroy the world?

No? Then you've not even reached the level of an indie game like Dwarf Fortress. So much for "interactivity."

>>385532634
We were talking about AC and Zelda there, dumb anon

File: Dwarf Fort.jpg (5KB, 122x177px) Image search: [Google]

5KB, 122x177px

>>385532838
And AC and Zelda suffer the same problem: they're rigid and restricted pieces of crap. When one guy in his basement can create objective perfection over two multi-billion dollar corporations, you know you've messed up.

>>385533008
>can create objective perfection over two multi-billion dollar corporations, you know you've messed up.
Does dwarf fortress has good artstyle, graphics, animations and physics?

>>385530158
Lol half my co workers have bought a switch now, keep kidding yourself

File: 1500532041378-bant.jpg (14KB, 480x474px) Image search: [Google]

14KB, 480x474px

>>385531546
If this were true, the Switch would have already outsold the Xbone in it's first five months.
More likely, this is just Nintendo doing artificial stock shortages akin to how they did it with the Wii, so that the Switch looks like it's selling much faster than it actually is.
This fact is further corroborated by looking at universal game and system sales for the Switch, which are actually miserable.

>>385531671
damn imagine being so nitpicky that botw becomes literally an unplayable piece of useless garbage to you just because it doesn't run at 60fps

>>385530386
kEK

>>385533426
>T. Hipster working at some shitty organic food company

>>385533327
>>385533487
>Does dwarf fortress has good artstyle, graphics, animations and physics?
Video games don't need those things. Someone fell for the hollywood marketing I see. Literally, LITERALLY, all you need for a game is good gameplay. If you cannot nail that, your game does not deserve to exist.

>>385533467
I think nintendo is just very very careful of not producing too much hardware

they have been burned before with hardware stuff

>>385530675
Isn't that a speedrunning strat or some shit? Guess it comes down to: It's faster though.

>>385533426
where the fuck do you work at?

>>385533601
Well, both AC and Zelda BotW have that
So you can just fuck off, dumb fanboy

>>385533896
Would you say that if someone took out all the graphics, story, music, sexualized characters, and other gimmicks? According to every single bit of discussing surrouding Zelda, not a single soul would ever like the game if they couldn't masturbate to trap link, or make BRAP posts about Zelda. They don't talk about the game unless it's shitposting.

>>385534257
Cherrypicking, but this thread is talking about the gameplay quite a bit
>>385526807

>>385533640
Doesn't change the fact that the Switch isn't flying off shelves because it's selling well, but because there aren't many in stock to begin with.

>>385528167

there are no fucking exploits and tricks in mgs5, just guards that have the visual capability of a blind crab and the A.I. of a toddler


>oh someone threw a thing on the ground let's go check it out even thous it's circular shaped like a mine
>oh no it exploded and I'm now stunned from an inflatable big boss XDDDD
>hey comrades come res me but first make sure you check out the inflatable big boos and make it explode so you get electrocuted XDDD
>hey comrades we are 2 stunned guys and you saw the whole scene but please proceed to do exactly as we did LOLOLOLOLOL
>whole base in 1 spot all stunned and all I did was throwing decoys in a spot and activating them every 10 seconds


HOLY SHIT I'M LITERALLY BEAR GRIZZ THIS IS THE ULTIMATE STEALTH GAME SO CHALLENGING HOLY FUCKING SHIT CALL HOLLYWOOD

>>385534502
>not even 5 posts in, the drones are attacking everyone for not thinking Zelda is the best game ever, the term autism being thrown around like it's candy
Thank you for proving my point?

>>385530675
I guess if you're hell bent on not using motion controls it's the best option.

>>385528167
>MGS invented stealth
end this meme

>>385534649
>no exploits or tricks in mgs5
true, until you take down an attack helicopter with a fultoned guard with tons of C4 stuck up his ass.

>>385534916
>I am LITERALLY retarded and suck cocks!
you should at least play the games mentioned in the post before making a fool out of yourself.

Nintendo fans think Nintendo games invent everything about they don't play anything else. Meanwhile games have been doing what Zelda Breath of The Wild did ten years ago.

>>385535035
none of what that post mentioned is exclusive to MGSV or even MGS as a whole.

>>385534769
That wasn't your argument though, your argument was that
>they don't talk about the game unless it's shitposting
and there are posts in that thread explaining the design philosophy behind the game to an anon who doesn't get it

>>385535242
I wasn't talking about MGS as a whole, just V.
Open world + literal guard checkpoints / bases sprinkled around is so MGSV as one can be.

>>385530224
=D

>>385535263
They're not explaining anything. They're just parroting news articles before throwing in strawmen like "only sub-human sonybros wouldn't understand such masterful game design."

For me to accept that as legitimate gameplay discussion, there can't be console warring or shilling allowed.

>>385535481
Sure they are. These
>>385531485
>>385531908
>>385532016
>>385532080
>>385532117
>>385532121
>>385532329
>>385532562
>>385532854
show that, though he does sound like a typical game journalist, and the webms in this thread give credence to what he's saying. The keywords in your argument I'm disputing are
>they don't talk about the game
and the fact that there's a thread disproving it right this minute makes them more erroneous in my eyes

>>385535375
those aren't exclusive to MGSV, they're basically standard in any open world game.

>>385536190
>very first post is someone saying they're a sad sonybro who's "in denial" just because he doesn't like the game

Thanks again for proving my point? If that was actual game discussion, then insults like that wouldn't be necessary. Rest of the post discarded.

File: disgust.jpg (18KB, 260x384px) Image search: [Google]

18KB, 260x384px

>>385537343

>very first post is someone saying they're a sad sonybro

No? Dude get your glasses because the only one saying "sonybro" or insults is yourself. Holy crap you are an embarrasment.

>>385537807
>This is same sad denial I've seen since the game launched. Haters have to jump through an assault course of mental gymnastic hoops
Quoted directly from the first post you linked. I refuse to acknowledge any other discussion he might've brought up if this console warring garbage is the first thing he's going to use to open up his post.

>>385537343
>>385534257
>Would you say that if someone took out all the graphics, story, music, sexualized characters, and other gimmicks? According to every single bit of discussing surrouding Zelda, not a single soul would ever like the game if they couldn't masturbate to trap link, or make BRAP posts about Zelda. They don't talk about the game unless it's shitposting.
I don't understand your issue here. Those posts talk exclusively about the gameplay and the game design. Not the graphics, story, music, sexualized characters and other gimmicks. The first post makes no mention of trap Link or BRAP posts about Zelda. Again, he sounds like a fag, and he does come off as very insulting, but fundamentally, he's still trying to discuss the gameplay, and so are the other posts I quoted. Gameplay discussion doesn't stop being gameplay discussion because it doesn't fit your arbitrary parameters of legitimacy. On a fundamental level, there are BoTW players right now talking about the gameplay and the actual game. That's enough to disprove your point.

>>385538069
Unfortunately that;'s on you to prove. If they were talking about the game instead of spewing marketing buzzwords and lingo, they wouldn't bring console warring into it via shitposting. As it stands, every post that does not respect the """haters""" in this situation is not gameplay discussion at all. It's the work of redditors who want a hugbox without criticism or "wrongthink".

>>385538313
not that anon, but the "haters" and "fanboys" in this case would both be in the wrong as they both desire a hugbox supporting their views, rather than discussion about the actual games. The only difference is whether they're talking of the game in a negative or positive light.

>>385538705
I'm in that thread as a matter of fact, and the difference between me and a "hater" is that I don't mind people liking the game. I just get unnerved when people refuse any and all criticism and resort to console war shitposting.

>>385538313
I did prove it. He used a lot of marketing buzzwords the first time around, yes, but that doesn't take away from the potential validity of what he's trying to say (and he does have a point based on the webms in this thread), or from the fact that it's a post discussing the gameplay. A post discussing the gameplay doesn't stop being a post discussing the gameplay because you don't like the terminology it uses or find it problematic. In fact, he and another anon even tried to explain it again using less pretension in a later post. The first quote still has buzzwords, but again, it's still a post discussing the game no matter how much you don't like the wording. Deeming certain gameplay discussion legitimate solely based on the diction it uses is creating the arbitrary parameters I speak of, and that's what I take an issue with.
>>385532329
>>385532562

>>385538823
this problem occurs both sides. In short, /v/ just has a habit of turning any thread into consolewar shitposts.

>>385537919
He didn't say sonybro once so maybe all the console war faggotry is in your head. Sounds like you're projecting. And basically saying the game has been shitposted to hell by non specific people since its release is not console war anything. It's just true. It does not mean you can't properly criticise the game and discuss it.

>>385539197
>>385539601
>but that doesn't take away from the potential validity of what he's trying to say
Oh, I'm afraid it does. He's using copypasted articles from kotaku and gamespot and cherrypicked webms to hide his console war shitposting, so I'm afraid not a single thing he says is valid. He doesn't even apologize for using the console war mentality of a 5 year old, so as far as I'm concerned, his words are nothing but dust in the wind.

And even if we carve out the console warring part of his post, he refuses to discuss these points with anyone in the thread. Someone responds to him, and they're immediately ignored and called an "autistic faggot". So it sounds like he doesn't want gameplay discussion. he just wants a circlejerk.

I grew up playing Super Nintendo, 64, and GameCube. Also all Handhelds. Never played any Zelda game ever. Which ones should I get. I am eventually getting a switch and botw

>>385530454
>needed multiple day 1 patches just so it wouldn't drop from 30 FPS
it still drops below 30fps frequently although most of the long 20fps stretches that existed at launch are gone.

Master mode sword trials are kicking my ass

I think I have to make a normal mode run just so I can practice them at normal difficulty, then come back and finish them later

>>385539827
>I'm afraid it does.
It doesn't in the context of disproving your argument. It doesn't matter where the info comes from, who's saying it, or what their intentions are. The fact of the matter is, there are posts that exist at this very second that are discussing the gameplay. He's bringing up points and other anons are trying to address or agree with his points, call him out on the validity of his viewpoints, get him to explain further, or put forward that the design philosophy has led to flaws in other areas compared to other games. That's what a discussion is. Again, the diction doesn't matter because, once more, there are posts right now discussing the game and not any of the other stuff from your original post. That's enough to dispute your argument.

I'm super excited to play this after i get a switch but that probably won't happen for years.

>>385540450
>there are posts that exist at this very second that are discussing the gameplay.
I'm afraid you have to prove that. Just talking about it isn't enough. He has to prove that he believes it and isn't just being a console warring shitposter, which means he has to maintain discussion with it. We've had far too many blatant marketing threads as of late, so I'm no loonger considering such posts as valid gameplay discussion. They are marketers until they prove otherwise.

If you think that is unfair, then you are welcome to blame the 500,000 Zelda threads that have popped up since BOTW's release.

>>385534649
i hardly ever used those, not the games fault you play it like autistic exploiter

Any other games with TECHNOLOGY like mgsv and botw??

>>385540676
I do think it's unfair, I see that you're trying to set arbitrary parameters again
>I'm no longer considering such posts as valid gameplay discussion because marketers even though the posts are still discussing the gameplay
and we'll have to agree to disagree on that front. No matter the diction used or the intentions behind the posts or the lack of proof that he believes what he's saying, they are discussing the game design philosophy of Breath of the Wild and why it sets the game apart from open world games that came before it. That disputes your claim that they don't talk about the actual gameplay, and that's the end of it.

>>385526909
>bunch of details that dont make the game any more enjoyable and just work as dangling keys in front of a child
k

File: 390472903.gif (1011KB, 500x225px) Image search: [Google]

1011KB, 500x225px

>>385527339

>>385541013
GTA IV and GTA V are particularly famous for it, GTA IV moreso among /v/, but can't find additional proof atm
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CeuOBWIyxiQ
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3kDVwRyCq0s
http://www.ign.com/articles/2013/09/30/100-little-things-in-gta-5-that-will-blow-your-mind

>>385541047
I'm sorry, but that proves absolutely nothing. They're doing nothing but jerking off Zelda, and then crying about "da evil trolls" whenever someone brings up other games. Shoot, someone attempted to claim how Zelda was good because it was so popular, and then when someone brought up that minecraft was even more popular, at least "150 million units sold" popular, they were called a faggot and an autist. How's that for gameplay discussion, hmm? If it's console warring, it's not gameplay discussion.

>>385541504
If the content of your post was supposed to prove that there's console warring instead of gameplay discussion, you didn't present it well. The posts you mention are about the games, and not the consoles. Nobody's arguing that X console is better than Y console. The posts are discussing the gameplay. It doesn't matter if there is shitposting in that thread as well. There are posts discussing the gameplay, not the graphics, story, music, sexualized characters and other gimmicks. The existence of those posts, and especially the latter of the two posts I quoted at the end of
>>385539197
and the anon he's responding to are enough to disprove your argument that
>they don't talk about the game unless it's shitposting
Those two aren't shitposting, and they're talking about the gameplay. That's it.

Also, in general, console warring may be shitposting a lot of the time, but that doesn't mean there aren't serious discussions about which console is better in certain areas. To assume they don't exist is something that's very close-minded in nature.

I also just got a switch. Got zeldo, mario kart, Splatoon and binding of Isaac. I'm enjoying it so far. Any good downloadable only titles to look for?

>>385542494
>It doesn't matter if there is shitposting in that thread as well.
But it does matter. If your "gameplay discussion" needs to have rampant shitposting following it, then it's not gameplay discussion. It's just bait. I've seen these posts before in many threads. The people behind them will never actually defend their points. They'll say "Zelda is innovative and it does XX mechanic, which no other game has ever done before". And then when someone brings up examples of other games doing it, they backtrack and say "NO, BUT THEY DON'T ALSO DO THIS AS WELL." And then they go back and say how X game is trash because it's not Zelda, and how all games that aren't Zelda should be culled because they don't have Nintendo's divine blessing. So I will not consider anything from them as gameplay discussion. They ruined their argument the moment they brought in console warring.

>>385542653
Puyo Puyo Tetris and Super Bomberman R are good entries in their respective series.

File: 1465970593921.jpg (3MB, 1846x2639px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 1846x2639px

>>385542949
>They'll say "Zelda is innovative and it does XX mechanic, which no other game has ever done before"
Except people haven't been saying this at all. For fucks sake, this thing was made long before its release even.

>>385542949
It doesn't matter because there are still posts in that thread that show that there are a few BotW players who are discussing the gameplay and the game design, like the sandbox aspects, the exploration, the boss fights, etc., without shitposting. Your argument was that "they don't," i.e. "they never do." But there are a few anons in that thread, like the two I just talked about, that tried to have their own little discussion about the game design, as shown by them replying to and addressing each other, amidst the whole "who has autism" debacle in that thread. The existence of those anons is enough to dispute that "never."

>>385544145
>there are a few BotW players who are discussing the gameplay and the game design, like the sandbox aspects, the exploration, the boss fights, etc.,
Until they can prove they're not marketers just spewing the same rhetoric over and over again, it's not legitimate gameplay discussion. It's spam. So my point still stands.Much like how Nintendo fans will claim that nobody likes Uncharted or Horizon or TLOU, and even if there are threads discussing them they'll say "that's not REAL discussion, it's just sony hiring marketers to shill their game." So I'm afraid you have to own up for that.

>But there are a few anons in that thread, like the two I just talked about, that tried to have their own little discussion about the game design, as shown by them replying to and addressing each other
Again, they're not talking about the game. They're just parroting articles from kotaku and refusing to address criticisms and flaws in their arguments. So I refuse to count them as valid.

>>385543613
>of the cooking xenomama chronicles
The best part.

Nice manbun, Link.

>>385544470
>Until they can prove they're not marketers just spewing the same rhetoric over and over again, it's not legitimate gameplay discussion. It's spam.
What kind of bullshit claim is this?
I feel like we're treading into tinfoil territory here. Can you claim that you're not a marketer yourself? How would I prove that I am not a marketer? Are our posts spam?

And I don't see people calling Uncharted, Horizon, or TLOU discussions nothing but spam and marketing either. Except for when it's obvious, like when that dude posted the Horizon vs Zelda comparison threads hailing Horizon as the Zelda killer, 2-4+ times a day for a total of about 400 threads prior to Horizon's launch. But that's not the norm for any of these games. And even then, that guy might have just been a stubborn shitposter.

>>385544470
It doesn't matter if they're marketers. Gameplay discussion is gameplay discussion, even if someone's trying to shill that gameplay. Your parameters don't stop those posts from being about BotW's gameplay. And if you're trying to imply that I'm a Nintendo fan, you're wrong. I do not have either a Nintendo or a Sony console. I was interested in the TECHNOLOGY this game had to offer, so I came into this thread, and I saw your original post, which I took issue to.

>>385545225
>Can you claim that you're not a marketer yourself?
Gladly. Any game I like is more than welcome for criticism. You can even say you hate the games I like. At most I'll respond with "I don't agree, but I see where you're coming from." Or if it's something I can prove, I'll bring up facts and statistics, like if the game has framerate issues, or if the game has DLC. A marketer will just call you a faggot and continue to herald their game as god's gift to the industry. And unfortunately, that's 99% of every single console warring thread that's ever existed.

>Except for when it's obvious, like when that dude posted the Horizon vs Zelda comparison threads hailing Horizon as the Zelda killer, 2-4+ times a day for a total of about 400 threads prior to Horizon's launch.
And you don't see the same thing happening with Zelda, with 20+ threads in the catalog at any given time? That's how I see all of these Zelda threads.

>>385545381
>Gameplay discussion is gameplay discussion
I'm sorry, I can't agree. If I detect the taint of a marketer, it stops being gameplay discussion and becomes a shill thread. Otherwise these same people wouldn't have a problem with critique regarding the game in question, instead of sperging out angrily at anything they deem as "wrong think".

>>385545840
>Or if it's something I can prove, I'll bring up facts and statistics, like if the game has framerate issues, or if the game has DLC.
But people have been doing this. And yet you just reduce their discussion as nothing as "marketing" and "spam".

>>385545840
>And you don't see the same thing happening with Zelda, with 20+ threads in the catalog at any given time?
Now that's hyperbole. I can admit that the "can we all agree x?" threads are suspect. But I really do believe that most threads are genuine. As do I believe that most threads about the aforementioned games from earlier are genuine too. Like, I am not denying that there are threads spammed by mindless shitposters and or marketers with no real intent to discuss the contents of the games. But I do not think it it's the majority. It'd be hard to convince me of that.

>>385545840
I guess we'll have to agree to disagree then. Over the years I've become able to ignore or not give a shit about marketers because I prefer the unfiltered 4chan experience, because I see it as an inevitability of the nature of an anonymous imageboard, and because the marketer threads can provide a vehicle for those wanting to discuss the gameplay to do so. If I can find one guy in a console warring or shill thread who seems like he wants to discuss something, I will indulge, and then I will think that the thread had good discussion because of my own convo with that guy.

>>385546760
>>385546763
>But people have been doing this.
No, they haven't. Every time someone brought up a criticism, the so called level headed posters called them sony faggots and autists.

>But I really do believe that most threads are genuine.
See my above point. Where's the level headedness in the thread you've been linking to? I count no less than 5 posts in the last half hour that were literally just "this game will win awards, go fucking kill yourselves sonybros, haha nintendo wins again." Therefore I'm discarding any other posts that might've possibly discussed the gameplay. The shitposters have ruined it for you, I'm sorry. If you can't at least attempt to keep that filth out of your threads, then you're actively inviting it.

>>385548131
>Therefore I'm discarding any other posts that might've possibly discussed the gameplay.
What? So because of shitposters you disregard everything else?

How can you not simply disregard all of 4chan then? I am not quite sure of the last time I saw a thread run to completion without shitposting or other bullshit.

>>385548705
>What? So because of shitposters you disregard everything else?
The sheer volume of shitposters and marketers will mean that I'm discarding any gameplay discussion that might've occurred, if only because I don't consider a toxic fanbase worth my time. If the more moderate posters cared, they would be calling out the shitposters, instead of encouraging them. Do you see those level headed posters you linked to? Do you see even a hint of them trying to call out the console war baiters and shitposters? No, they're not. They're serving the purpose of glorifying zelda, so why would they be called out? See, that's why I discard all of them.

>How can you not simply disregard all of 4chan then?
Because 4chan can, on occasion, have good threads. But the people within must exercise restraint and orderly function. If a shitposter appears, even if they're "on your side" you call them out for shitposting. If someone is posting porn, you report them. It doesn't matter if it's porn you like, it doesn't belong on this board.

>>385530158

Anally ravaged.

>>385529420

Am I supposed to be impressed by these dumb webms? What is so impressive about sequence breaking? People have been doing this shit for decades. I could post lots of webms of people exploiting the engine in OoT to skip dungeons

>>385550240
You don't get it do you? Did you even play the game?

>>385533467
>in it's first five months
We only have data for four months. Which also happens to be pre-Splatoon.