>Wikipedia editors fighting over Boob physics in video ga

File: 1501269658105.gif (2MB, 259x205px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 259x205px

>>385514047

File: IMG_6217.jpg (64KB, 505x616px) Image search: [Google]

64KB, 505x616px

Wikipedia researchers hard at work

They need this man
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8i1HWbY-HFc

What's to fight about? Opinions don't belong on wikipedia, and articles are supposed to be written as such.

>>385515417
Apparently a kotaku article complaining about breast physics is a reputable enough source to base an entire wikipedia page on. There's also a video of an under-endowed ballerina to demonstrate real life breast physics.

>>385515417
Some vidya wikipedia editor circlejerk decided that opinion blogs from kotaku are "reliable sources" so now they're allowed on Wikipedia.

lel
did this begin because of that thread the other day? talk is very recent

>>385516516
Yes

>>385516516
what thread was this?

> Sources:
> Kotaku
> Kotaku
> Eurogamer
> theboobjam.com
> "'Boob Jam' explores unsexy side of breasts"
> Wired
> Destructoid
This is why Wikipedia is not even allowed in highschool homeworks.

>>385514373
Let's forgot age and skin type while we're at it right. Oh and let's forgot clothes too, and underwears.

>>385516812
A thread about this wikipedia page yesterday. There was a public outcry for anyone with a wikipedia account to go and change it to make less absurdly biased.

>>385517292
>implying the thread wasn't purposefully made by SJWs so that those who edited it could be outed and banned
It's bait 101 and /v/, being composed primarily of room temperature IQ retards, fell for it.

> tfw you will never relive the golden days of wikipedia vandalism
It's all locked articles, bots and asspies camping articles 24/7 looking for any edit to immediately revert it

>>385514373
>Put a flat board jumping arround as an example of real life boob physics

Do breastlets have any self awareness?

>>385517493
It's actually because wikipedia added a bot that automatically alerts admins whenever someone edits an article that they reached from a 4chan link.

>>385517138
> theboobjam.com
wft, I love jam now

>>385517581
In the talk article the retarded admin is saying "well we don't have a free licensed video of a woman with breasts jumping around so this should stay"

>"That's exactly the problem. Kotaku, and the entire Gawker media is uttery trash. Low quality, click-bait blogging masquerading as journalism."

This sound like us, yeah.

>>385517592
[citation needed]

>>385517635
sounds like the truth, more like

What are good alternatives to Wikipedia? I'm getting sick of their shit.

>>385517765
even a broken clock is right twice a day

>>385517943
Conservapedia.
But i think Metapedia might be more of your liking

>>385517983
How about something that is more fact based?

>>385517982
yup

>>385518082
Britannica. But honestly as long as your not looking up controversial shit, Wikipedia is very accurate

>>385518082
Rational Wiki.

>Kotaku
>has been discussed over at WP:VG/S many times, and every time
>consensus is reached that
>it is a reliable source.

>>385517943
Encyclopedia Dramatica?

>>385517943
Published academic papers

>>385517635
It is 100% certain a /v/irgin or a gamergater, most likely both.

File: 1500378634441.jpg (62KB, 542x540px) Image search: [Google]

62KB, 542x540px

>>385514373
why are they under the impression that someone who's flat as a board is a good frame of reference for real life breast physics when practically all of the examples of breast physics in vidya feature well-endowed women?
like honestly I am unable to wrap my head around their logic

Is there a single thing sadder on God's Earth than a Wikipedia "contributor"?

>>385518165
I'll try that.

>>385518193
Harhar

>>385518384
Us.

>>385518552
>Featured picture candidates/Man masturbating

>>385518552
Those filenames intrigue and scare me.

>>385518552
>Masturbation Techniques

>>385514373
>Wikipedia researchers hard

>>385518552
>Masturbation.ogg
isn't ogg sound?

>>385518776
Can be a video too

>>385518193
>fact based
>thinks GG was all about harrassing women

Anyways, no one source is going to be free of biases. Your best bet is to look at as much infoi you can from as man opposing sources as you can and draw your own conclusions

Did you guys know that Arkham City's Catwoman's breasts jiggle when moving? I'm not sure if they used breast physics or just a predefined animation there, but I gotta say it looks pretty awesome. (You can see it best when moving a little and then stopping, the boobs jiggle for a short moment after stopping)

>>385514373
Hahaha fucking virgins!

>>385514047
We did it, Reddit!

>>385517138
Are these people gays?

>>385518873
>thinks GG was all about harrassing women
Well, that's what an unbiased observation of the facts shows. You can say you're doing it for world peace for all anyone cares, if all you actually do is lash out angrily at people on the internet you're not going to held up as a champion of world peace.

>>385514047
>morons arguing to keep the video because there's no better freely licensed example of real breast movement

It would be better off not being there at all.

>>385514047
>wikipedia
[citation needed]
prove it
source
source

fuck those guys.

>>385519070
>if all you actually do is lash out angrily at people on the internet you're not going to held up as a champion of world peace.
Source?
>inb4 kotaku

>>385518873
While the initial outrage on /v/ was about journalism standards, it quickly devolved into full-on "SHE FUCKED FIVE GUYS FUCKING SLUT REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE DIE ZOE QUINN"

>sandstein acting like a jew
You cant make this up

>>385518552
SOURCE ON LIST

>>385519316
Try an imagine someone never heard of GG. Where is your proof this is what GG was?

>>385519425
>responding to it

>>385519425
4chan archives

>>385517983
>Conservapedia.

Is this site supposed to be satirical because it reads exactly like that

>>385519346
Bad image list

>>385519316
I mean the two are intrinsically linked as she was already an unpopular character. Anything I saw on it was about what terrible human beings female 'journalists' are- because that was the argument being made about why standards are so low.

>>385519284
>Source?
I don't fucking know man, I didn't bother keeping a record when I was watching it all go down in person. I'm sure plenty of people have made meticulous timelines you could find as easily as I could but you consider them all biased.

Seriously though GG was all fur coat and no knickers. I don't think it even accomplished anything related to its mission statement after getting a bunch of sites to include a disclaimer outlining pre-existing policies. But the incidental bullshit was on-going, for months. Who the fuck honestly thought that gathering up the worst of 4chan would actually result in any kind of positive change? Couldn't have been someone who had spent more than a week here.

>>385519425
Kotaku. After all, when you're accusing a clickbait shithole of being journalistically corrupt, who better to believe than the very people who are being accused?

>>385519517
Okay but the archives will show conflicting information. Some will say to stop focusing on fiveguys which will contradict your argument.

>>385519316
Other way around. The "ethics in journalism" was supposed to be just another angle of attack, because surely normies had to take it seriously? Who is against ethics? But as is usually the case with 4chan's clever ruses only 4chan actually fell for it.

>>385519316
No it started with everyone laughing about how she fucked five guys and making burger jokes, then someone pointed out that they could use that stuff to get someone from Kotaku fired and /v/ jumped on it

>>385517138
>unsexy side of breasts

Is this like the girl fetish meme

>>385514047

I just want nice boob physics in games. Exaggerated is okay, like arcade racers, but I want a meticulous recreation: a Gran Turismo of titties.

>>385519587
Zoe Quinn was not a journalist. In fact I'm not sure why you're bringing gender into the discussion about journalistic standards.

>>385519539
100% serious

>>385519714
>I don't fucking know man
Well if this is the standards of rationalwiki and wikipedia I will not be using their sites.

>>385519757
Yeah, some will piss against the firestorm but it won't make a difference.

>>385519909
Oh hey, yeah, I'm sure rationalwiki has what you're looking for. Good thinking.

See I've never had to look it up or take anyone else's word for it.

Wikipedia can be such fucking trash at times. I tried editing an article about the powers of US Congress because the article was objectively incorrect and was stating information that was the exact opposite of what Congress's website was saying. Some autist who was obsessed with looking over that page reverted my edit a few hours later because I didn't jump through the right hoops and apparently didn't suck his cock hard enough.

>>385519901
You solved the riddle

>>385519972
Do you not see my point? All of your "sources" are just vague bullshit that you can't draw true conclusions from. Wikipedia should just delete the gamergate article because it is unproffessional and just a stain on their credibility

MODS HELP GOOBERGATERS ARE DELETING MY EDITS PROVING SAMUS IS A PROUD TRANSWOMAN

Link to more entertaining edit wars?

>>385514047
Wikipedia editors are 99.9% male, it's way more lopsided than 4chan even.
So this is purely white knights vs. pervs.

>>385520049
>not following the reply chain you are in

>>385520120
I see your point, but considering it's a bullshit point I've elected to ignore it. I also see you don't see my point, which is that a few contradictory posts don't put a dent in the overwhelming consensus.

>>385520120
>expecting a logical discussion with a guy cherry-picking anecdotes as his argument
You're just as bad as he is for consistently enabling his behavior.

>>385518270
This

Okay that Sandstein shitter is some seriously delusional freak, he pretty much never even fucking address any of the posters' actual point.

>>385520257
There is no overwhelming consensus. That was my point, that you have no evidence for that claim.

>>385520094

I've had the same happen on different pages. Absolutely frustrating and why I rarely visit the place.

>>385519714
>Seriously though GG was all fur coat and no knickers.
It was the first stage to a global phenomenon causing people to wake up and second guess the media that is now affecting politics.

>>385520185
Aren't most white knights just beta pervs?

>>385520356
M8, I don't even care to look up those threads, I was in them, and for every single one saying "guys maybe we shouldn't be rash about this and think through the consequences of our actions and perhaps leave some of the more clearly bullshit stuff alone" there were 10 "STFU SHILL WE'RE WINNING KEEP SENDING EMAILS OMG YOU WON'T BELIEVE WHAT LITERALLY WHO #34 HAD FOR LUNCH"

File: video games.jpg (344KB, 2523x509px) Image search: [Google]

344KB, 2523x509px

>>385519539
>Conservapedia

File: attheUN.jpg (628KB, 2048x1363px) Image search: [Google]

628KB, 2048x1363px

>>385520413
>global phenomenon causing people to wake up and second guess the media that is now affecting politics.
hahaha

>>385518384
A Smogon Tier Council member.

>>385520508
Okay the other anon was right I'm done replying to you. You don't want to have a real discussion.

>>385520416

Dickless dishonesty. Most white knights are terrible hypocrites.

>>385520575
>implying the UN is important in any way

>>385520413
A global phenomenon of idiots thinking Breitbart is a credible news source and consequently everything that disagrees with Breitbart isn't, more like. The term "first stage" is very appropriate to such cancer.

But yeah sure when it came to fulminating against SJWs GG was in full stride. It's the ethics in journalism stuff that never really cut it. You know, what it purported to be actually about.

>>385520552
>Videogames are a gateway drug to godlessness
Fucking gold.

>>385520416
meh, people play roles on the internet that don't define them IRL, shouldn't be surprising.

>>385520635
What's a "real" discussion to you? A discussion wherein I ignore all the facts and suck your cock for being such a good ethics watchdog?

>>385519891
There are a lot of boobs types being completely disgusting.

>>385519539
No, but also yes. There's some deep cover trolls but the admin and some of the core contributors are 100% serious. And Poe's Law is in full effect.

>>385520913
>those girls with the fucked up breasts that are like two skinny tubes coming out of the middle of the chest

>>385520681
>Implying that anybody other than SJW and trolls gave a single fuck about a unknown games dev's affair
>Implying that video game review sites constitutes 'the media'
>Implying that this controversy lead to anything other than a examination about cyber harassment

>>385520413

Nah, people think any news that contradicts their worldview is fake news, and anything that confirms their worldview is unbiased true news.

>>385520913
https://youtu.be/NtB_jvznaNM

>>385517943
http://en.rightpedia.info/w/Main_Page

>>385521208
>jew trying to trademark the swastika and the word 'nigga'
what a surprise

>>385521208
cringe

>>385521208

What the fuck is this

File: Brock Samson.png (155KB, 555x599px) Image search: [Google]

155KB, 555x599px

>>385521136

new season when?

>>385521208
>Did you know that...
>…A low-flow toilet is a urinal disguised as a toilet. Like a urinal, it cannot handle feces.
>…the terrorist group, ISIS, was created by and is supported by non-Muslims to destroy Muslim nations in support of Israel. It's a terrible group full of fake Muslims. The group is analogous to the Bolshevists, who were created by non-Europeans to destroy first the Russian and later on other European and Asian people.
>…Every 30 minutes, Windows 10 sends all typed text to Microsoft.

hm yes quite

>>385521208
>In other languages
>Magyar
That's the full list.

>>385518349
This
I'm going to miss my university research search engine

>>385521709
sci-hub.io

>>385517943

Wikipedia was never meant to be a source in the first place.

>>385521208

Embarrassing

File: worry.png (48KB, 379x520px) Image search: [Google]

48KB, 379x520px

>Kotaku has been discussed over at WP:VG/S many times, and every time consensus is reached that it is a reliable source. If you want to see this changed, I recommend you bring it up for discussion over there, though I would note that it is unlikely to be changed, as many have tried before. ~Mable (chat) 10:44, 29 July 2017 (UTC)

>every time consensus is reached that it is a reliable source

There are only three (3) fucking people verifying wikipedia videogame article sources and one of them actually didn't want to include Kotaku as a reliable source but rather a situational source because of their yellow journalism. And they still went for it.

>>385521709
Literally Google Scholar. I wish someone told me about how amazing it is in first year- but they just spouted crap about using the library which does the same thing only with a worse algorithm

File: 1500336833397.gif (3MB, 500x500px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 500x500px

>>385517493
The fucking remember, be subtle threads were absolutely godlike.

>>385517493
>edit the Wikipedia article on habeus corpus while writing a research paper because the article mentioned that it had been suspended under President Obama (among other presidents) but failed to mention it was currently suspended
>2 days later the article is changed back.

>>385522393
STOP BEING FACTUAL

>>385518384
Pokemon Showdown mod

>>385516457
Wikipedia is actually awful about that. You can have legit first hand research about a topic and they won't let you post about it. However, they'll let you link to garbage websites because it's some external source.

>>385517138
Smart people don't use Wikipedia as a direct source but follow where Wikipedia gets its sources from. In this case though, those sources look like trash at a glance.

>>385517983
Good lord, don't joke like that. People might take you seriously.

File: 1498593709947.png (81KB, 500x371px) Image search: [Google]

81KB, 500x371px

>>385518552
>necrotizing facetis
>middle finger salute
>mircopenis
>masturbation.ogg
>all those masturbation images

>>385523098

It's an article about breast physics in video games, what kind of scientific peer reviewed papers do you expect to be referenced?

File: 1501016613709.jpg (93KB, 680x840px) Image search: [Google]

93KB, 680x840px

>>385514148
That actually the best I've ever seen him look.

>>385518381
Wikipedia is really anal about these things, they don't want to be vulgar. Showing a girl playing volleyball wouldn't be "appropriate." The article is dumb as fuck anyway. Who the fuck cares about boob physics? Who's going to wake up in the middle of the night and go. HEY! I need to more about boob physics in games!

>>385520717
More credible than CNN or MSNBC or NYT.

>>385524550

No, it isn't.

>>385519714
Take a gander at who's president and gen z. Gamergate gave a lot of steam to the y

>>385524634

Nobody expect for internet nerds even give a shit about gamergate or know what it is.

>>385524634
-oung right.
Oops.

>>385524625
Sorry, but objectively it is.
>>385524693
Yeah, it's not like more people play video games that ever or anything. All the sjw screeching about it just drew attention to it.

>>385524791
>objectively it is.
I see you get your definition of objectively from Breitbart too.

>>385524634
>>385524791
Gamergate was just a symptom. The anti-SJW currents were already there. It's what allowed GG to become a thing at all.

>>385524693
>According to US consultants Sparks and Honey in 2014, 41% of Generation Z spend more than three hours per day using computers for purposes other than schoolwork, compared with 22% in 2004

>>385524791

>objectively

kek

File: IMG_0033.jpg (168KB, 750x1057px) Image search: [Google]

168KB, 750x1057px

Kek

>>385524957

90% of which is facebook.

>>385517138
It's because it discourages doing "actual" research, nobody is using an article on titty physics for a serious paper

>>385524859
And I see you get your definition from an anonymous source familiar with the thinking of somebody, then quietly issue a retraction a week later.

it starts with silly stuff like this and before you know it, they are rewriting history to fit their modern standards.
same thing happened with games, it started with a few complainers and people ignored them, now companies adjust their games to an audience that doesn't even support them and those that do get the short end of the stick.

You give them an inch and they take a mile.

>>385524054
>him

Ugh. Can we just like...not?

>>385525149
Better than completely unfounded speculation which is retracted never.

>>385516812
It was something about Mario having jiggly nose physics, the OP was some meme image of Shiggy saying no to breast physics but yes to nose physics.

One thing led to another and the Wikipedia article on Breast Physics and how shitty it was written with lines like, "improperly modeled breast physics probably because the animator is a virgin nerd[sic]".

>>385524791

Go pick any article there right now and read it.
It's absolute garbage with zero journalistic integrity. They're a website that exists to make money off of clickbaity headlines to rile up their userbase so they share it everywhere.

If you actually spend time to read their 'articles' there's nothing of value there, completely unsourced and obviously highly biased.

>>385525285
Care to post an example to prove you aren't projecting?

>>385525397
Okay, post an example. Because it sounds like your describing CNN to me.

File: 14451941255112.jpg (125KB, 780x749px) Image search: [Google]

125KB, 780x749px

Friendly reminder that they're STILL arguing over if Samus Aran should be branded as transexual.

>>385522806
I've yet to find mods more autistic on any community than in Showdown. They are truly garbage disguised as people.

>>385517592

Disable referrers.

>>385525451
I dunno, are Milo Yiannopoulos's posts blaming video games for spree shootings still up?

Damn, Wikipedia dramas are always fun

>>385525553
who's they? retarded trannies? why should we take their opinions seriously?

>>385525451

Literally all of their 'articles'.

>>385525872
Because most of the Wikipedia editors are trannies trying to scrawl their opinions onto the biggest digital wall.

It's the ending to MGS2, only the Patriots are worrying about their pronouns.

>>385525156
>same thing happened with games, it started with a few complainers and people ignored them, now companies adjust their games to an audience that doesn't even support them and those that do get the short end of the stick

t. underage faggot

Marketing is what happened to video games. A lot of this sexual pandering (e.g. boobs physics) was purely the result of marketing teams injecting themselves into the developmental process and overriding the developers' creative vision. Go look up the history of Tomb Raider, starting with Core. Lara's creators wanted her to be the opposite of what Eidos' marketing team turned her into.

>>385524026
I mean, you got me there but that doesn't make the sources referenced any better.

>>385524026
If there is no sources to reference, don't write an article. Referencing literal opinion blogs is fucking retarded.

gamergate sort of fell into the problem of any movement without a clearly defined accomplishable goal. same as the sjw's, really.
without any particular goal, it just turned into another movement with no purpose but to prolong its own existence.

File: whathefuckisthis.jpg (132KB, 678x751px) Image search: [Google]

132KB, 678x751px

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=29vjQwnt-Fw

>>385518193
Nope, it's corrupted as well.

File: chestlets.webm (2MB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1280x720px

>>385518381
>Chestlets
Honestly, just replace that with "American" or "African" or "Middle Eastern" or "Asian" and it would be far more accurate. Everywhere else in the world the average cup size adjusted for obesity is a lot larger on average.

File: masturbationtechnique.jpg (34KB, 681x120px) Image search: [Google]

34KB, 681x120px

Which is your method, /v/?

>>385526652
Where's the female version. Also, who is contributing these to Wikipedia. We need to check the sources.

>>385526574
Reality has a left-wing bias.

>>385514148
What's wrong with your faaaaaace?

File: l41lXPwHWohc2kxGg.gif (3MB, 500x500px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 500x500px

>>385526810

>>385526456
I always saw gamergate as an explosion of anger towards the game journalism industry triggered by a controversy that had just been building up for a long time and so like you said it didn't really have a goal. But it still had a big impact regardless since people still talk about etc.

>>385526810
Trump's election was a leftist plot

>>385526039
>Most
easy there friend.

>>385525065
>he thinks Gen Z use Facebook

>>385526810
tru

>>385525872
>>385526039
I remember this, Brianna Wu (a tranny) was writing the Wikipedia article on Samus and citing her own paper as a source.
I thing her evidence was some guy at Nintendo saying Samus was "mixed" or something like that, which could be interpreted as trans. I think it's more likely referring to how she's part chozo though.

File: 1471086117989.png (636KB, 673x680px) Image search: [Google]

636KB, 673x680px

>I do like to note that Kotaku has been discussed plenty of times over at WP:VG/S and is considered a reliable source.

>I agree. If there are reliable sources stating that there are no or few cases in which breast wobbling is intentional or exaggerated, then by all means let's cite them. But as it is we only have reliable sources stating the opposite.

>I've now integrated content from the Wired and Fox news articles, thanks, Mable!

>>385525065
I thought all the kids these days used Instagram.

>>385518193
>post your view point
>call it rational
>it is suddenly rational

I have more respect for conservapedia as a result

>>385526810
Imagine being this indoctrinated.

>>385527685
Yeah imagine picking an ideology which you think reflects reality, what a strange thing to think.

>>385526810
Reality has a "generalizations are retarded" bias

>>385520575
at it did was propel these two lesbo's influence into the stratosphere
this bitches are set for life
if gg didn't happen ms zoé would be selling his next round of nudes and ms anita would be working at starbucks
they played it good, real good, and nothing ever good was accomplished

>>385525156
They changed the definition of fascism not to kong ago.

File: a.webm (3MB, 640x360px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 640x360px

>>385514148

File: 1500888785173.gif (5KB, 500x300px) Image search: [Google]

5KB, 500x300px

>>385518552
>File: Mi ano 3.JPG

File: ded.jpg (30KB, 480x360px) Image search: [Google]

30KB, 480x360px

>>385514047

Holy shit. Shit like this wouldn't even be possible on German Wikipedia.

>>385527853
nothing "good" could have been accomplished
GG was the equivalent of a makeup artist for a B-horror movie sleeping with the movie critic for the huffington post and people pointing at it as proof of a new world order.

>>385528164
> Welcome to the velvet room.

Seeing as you can fuck for reviews, who would you lot fuck for a good review on your game?

>>385528164
What in the actual fuck?
Is that thing possessed? Did you find this on /x/?!

>>385521549
>>…Every 30 minutes, Windows 10 sends all typed text to Microsoft.
I'd believe it.

>Ultimately, however, according to game developer Tim Dawson

lol.... WHO!?

File: why.png (30KB, 214x200px) Image search: [Google]

30KB, 214x200px

>>385528164
...uh...

File: t3_m28ev.jpg (42KB, 280x490px) Image search: [Google]

42KB, 280x490px

>>385518552
Wikipedia was my first porn site.

>>385529407
This.
>tfw that stripper article

>>385529467
And I think we can all thank whatever donger made those sex-position cartoons.

>>385527685
>go outside
>half the people you see are black
>corner shop is run by a gay guy
>women wearing jeans or miniskirts only
>the cars on the street are electrical
>guy outside your train station is handing out anti-trump propaganda
Ah of course

I'm the indoctrinated one. Fucking retard.

>>385528690
That girl with the jiggly titties and the cthulu shirt.

File: liberal check.webm (3MB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 1280x720px

Reminder that trannies are pretty too, you perverts!

>>385529940
Proven wrong on the very same thread>>385528164

>>385529467
Mine was masturbation.

>>385530146
Eh, never had good pics. Always some girl's roast beef.

>>385530182
That's not what I remember.

And even if it were the case, you'd be amazed what a 12 year old can get off to.

>>385529551
>electric cars and homos are a liberal agenda
>living in a black neighborhood
>wanting sharia law
what the fuck am i reading

File: k.webm (3MB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 1920x1080px

>>385514047
>game is bad because it's not realistic

everytime with this shit.

>>385529551
I would hate to live where you do
>when I go outside everyone is white
>the corner store is run by a married couple
>no one is handing out propaganda
feels good

>>385530425
And then

>oh no what a sexist game where a woman gets beaten and killed

It's like how they reduced Game of Thrones to tumblr fanfic because SJWs couldn't stand watch their female heroes get beat up like in the books.

>>385530425
>left's underarms are jiggling harder than her chest

>>385530878
I'm excited for when that happens. Finally we can treat women as equal in games by protecting them from scary plot and gameplay elements.

File: 1498082129598.jpg (58KB, 500x487px) Image search: [Google]

58KB, 500x487px

>>385514047
What are strong sources for video game research?
Is there anyone who can claim to know shit about video games without falling into subjectivity?
Are videogames being studied by actual scientists for anything but their effects on humans?

>>385528618
Kek, anon, thank you for the laugh

File: 1.jpg (45KB, 330x319px) Image search: [Google]

45KB, 330x319px

>using a ballerina as an example

They are all flat

>>385517493
>Find article about local abandoned building
>Incorrectly says it was demolished
>Correct article with reference to structure it was confused with
>Reverted
Every time.

>>385529407
>>385529467
Spotted the underage.

>>385514373
>talk about breast physics
>reference a women without breasts as "proof"

>>385531572
What, you think wikipedia couldn't possibly have existed in the childhoods of people who can post here?

>>385526810
How so?

File: 1375728241326.png (28KB, 115x127px) Image search: [Google]

28KB, 115x127px

>>385514373
Jesus Christ. We need to gas these uptight cucks

>me at the pool. Showing female Mons pubis.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mons_pubis#/media/File:Poolside_anterior_view_of_mons_pubis.jpg

>>385531713
What is 2017-2007, and what is 12+10?

>>385514373
>use ballerina as example
>have truly ridiculous body standards
>have low body fat
>ware oppressive clothing to prevent any unnecessary boob movement they have that could throw them off.

The amount of irony lost on these people knows no bounds.

>>385520416
Yes.

>>385520552
And this is why I'm not mainstream conservative.

>that Samus wiki war a couple years ago when an enraged tranny tried to recategorize her as a trans woman

File: 1500145536617.jpg (63KB, 1187x668px) Image search: [Google]

63KB, 1187x668px

>they actually removed the stupid ballerina video

>>385521549
>…Every 30 minutes, Windows 10 sends all typed text to Microsoft.

Doesn't sound that improbable to be honest

File: I LIKE THAT JUMP.jpg (9KB, 400x400px) Image search: [Google]

9KB, 400x400px

>>385514148
>>385528164
TROOOOOLL IN THE DUNGEONNN

>>385514373
Most women also do not have crushed mangled toes, but ballerinas do, so.

File: 1491248201229.jpg (20KB, 480x480px) Image search: [Google]

20KB, 480x480px

>>385535615
>Removing video file per talk page discussion. The ballarina's relatively small breast size indeed does not make for a good example.

Based Maplestrip

>>385535615
I've had autistic arguments with retarded Wikipedia editors before so I'm hoping I can win here too. I don't know why I even bother.

>>385514047
>kotaku as source

>>385514047
breast physics. article only addresses exaggerated breast physics in video games

this is why anyone uses wikipedia as a source gets meme arrowed.

>>385532412
>the talk section of that article
holy fuck i didn't know wikifags were this autistic

one of you fatties jiggle your moobs for the camera and upload that to the article

>ywn get all these butthurt passive agressive faggots in a Colosseum and release the lions

feels bad

>>385536430
The Coliseum is called Southern California and it's gonna happen on the day of the rope/of the rake/when Yellowstone erupts/when NK nukes it

>>385519539
Its actually very serious.
I know it might sound like a bunch of trolls are pretending to be hardcore conservatives but its actually, literally what a wikipedia written by conservatives looks like.

Just read this and you'll know what im talking about
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conservapedia

>>385517943
If you're brazillian: http://desciclopedia.org/wiki/Página_principal

>>385514373
>use ballet as an example
>despite the fact ballet dancers need no tits to even be taken seriously
really?

>>385519539
Poe's law.
Its actually really fucking serious. Not even joking.
I dunno why you ask this question when people like Mike Pence exists.

File: MWC.webm (2MB, 640x480px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 640x480px

>>385514047
Not sure I understand, even average tits bounce when not properly secure. Women know this, the only ones that have an issue are angry lesbians who hate women with better bodies than them, or cucks.

>>385538231
thats a tv show, thats not real, dumbass.

File: Tit lift.webm (754KB, 640x798px) Image search: [Google]

754KB, 640x798px

>>385538427
Ok

File: 1494344785327.jpg (55KB, 616x478px) Image search: [Google]

55KB, 616x478px

>>385531107
Was going to make this exact same post.

>>385518381
I dunno. Why would you think that you're a good judge of this sort of thing when you've never seen a tit in real life, faggot?

File: G4 was good once.webm (2MB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1280x720px

Hay kids, remember G4?

>>385528618
underrated, I had a good chuckle

>>385529386
seek help

>>385539534
You're right. I should.

>>385538967
What is this poor girl trying to do

>>385528164
He was fucking disgusting enough before he started speedrunning hormones. Jesus fuck.

File: breast physics.webm (2MB, 1220x1080px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1220x1080px

>>385514047
>thread about breast physics yet nobody posted any examples.
come on

>>385539779
I dunno but my dick likes it.

>>385540826
damn i love stairs

File: 1483602264559.jpg (87KB, 300x360px) Image search: [Google]

87KB, 300x360px

>>385519714
>I don't fucking know, but I'm going to continue to ramble like I do
only thing dumber than rabid GGers is retards who don't know the first thing about it

>>385539779
Antagonizing her gay co-host and flirting with camera guy

>>385540354
I bet that wouldn't be that comfy.

>>385540876
Because not having a source handy that sums up a year-long shitstorm proves you don't know what you're talking about. Fuck, I'm not sure there is a single comprehensive source.

>>385525778
Not sure, but CNN has mutliple articles up implying the same thing as the first Google results, and there was a bunch of people were pissed at a CNN host for blaming the Cleveland shooting earlier this year on first person shooters.

>>385541079
>I'm not going to go through the effort, instead I'll blow smoke out my ass like I usually do
reminds me of anti gg journos

>>385525889
Not how this works. Provide evidence to back up your claim. Should be easy if it's every article.

>>385541139
Okay those tits are too big.

File: 1494899267419.jpg (21KB, 600x600px) Image search: [Google]

21KB, 600x600px

>>385540960
Feeling a little toasty there roasty?

File: sauce.gif (2MB, 349x252px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 349x252px

>>385541139

>>385541206
I don't need a source, you twat. I was there. A source would only be for your benefit.

File: 1493386043829.jpg (59KB, 675x450px) Image search: [Google]

59KB, 675x450px

>>385541129
>CNN
>Trustworthy source

>On occasion, this aspect of fighting games has caused particular attention, such as when the 2015 game Street Fighter V had the fighter Chun-Li's breasts move like large water balloons when she was chosen as the second player's character in the selection screen.
I'm no wikipedia expert but this sentence doesn't sound "wiki professional"

>>385538567
>>385540354
>Too small bras
>>385540826
>No bra
>>385540942
>latex body suit
of course that shits gonna bounce.

File: 1395154350686.jpg (27KB, 342x401px) Image search: [Google]

27KB, 342x401px

>Sandstein

>>385541416
Naw I'm just being realistic. The bra is too small, probably isn't comfy. You act as if I have a dog in this fight.

>>385521791
True blessed russian site

>>385541641
Too small then no bra? Your analysis is flawed my friend. Surely holding her breast in a more secure fashion should ease bounce right? Plus why does it matter if she has no bra? Boob physics should be measured before a bra is a factor first.

>>385541482
>I don't need a source
reminds me a LOT of anti gg journos
we're done here

File: 1476658127214.png (322KB, 678x720px) Image search: [Google]

322KB, 678x720px

Take a step back and realize how insane it is that people tried to argue that breasts don't bounce

>>385541972
Hey Anon do you have a source to show you're not an annoying twat who keeps intentionally missing the point? No? Reminds me a LOT of gamergate.

>>385541862
>Surely holding her breast in a more secure fashion should ease bounce right?
That isn't what a too small bra does.

>>385542235
>deflection of the point to avoid posting source
reminds me astronomically of anti gg journos
I'm sensing a pattern

>>385538967
I remember its death

>>385541641
more like
>literally just sacs of fat
of course that shits gonna bounce
any other perspective is autistic screeching, as this shitshow "article" shows

>>385524026
So if you were to do a comprehensive, unbiased paper on breast physics in animation you would be breaking new ground?

File: 1494702881830.jpg (48KB, 541x498px) Image search: [Google]

48KB, 541x498px

>>385541753
>Anon posts an example of breast physics on a attractive female with large breasts that are jiggling
>YEAH WELL THEY LOOK UNCOMFORTABLE

>>385542324
Do you have a source? Do you need a source?

http://hikipedia.info/wiki/Etusivu

The only good pedia.

>>385542727
>Those are large breasts
Kek.

>>385542729
>retarded shitflinging to draw attention away from the fact that you're so full of shit it's a wonder your eyes don't turn brown
wait I finally figured it out
you're an anti gg journo

>>385541419
i think her name is amanda love, she has zero ass or hips btw, sad

>>385542791
For the average American female that is not obese, they are.
Which is what this whole issue boils down to - flat chested feminists (who are primarily only found in America) complaining about what they perceive to be "unrealistic" because the only cup sizes they ever see is B cup or smaller. Also why other countries don't have this issue, they have on average larger chested women who can see past the bullshit because of the average cup size they see every day.

>>385541378
fag.

File: tagged - video games, breast envy.webm (3MB, 854x480px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 854x480px

>>385540354

>>385542885
So you're full of shit, you don't have a source, and you're trying to deflect. What does that make you?

>>385538427

Her titties were real back then. They're fake now

File: 1405567906191.gif (1MB, 360x240px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 360x240px

what the fuck, are people seriously arguing the breast don't bounce.

All the dudes arguing about it probably have nice titty bounces if they would ever run.

>>385543251
its a SCRIPTED TV SHOW

tfw no paizuri gf

>>385543431
scripted titty bouncing just like in video games

File: 1488093713621.webm (3MB, 450x800px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 450x800px

>>385541378
>t.homo

>>385528164
GOLEM GET YE GONE

the best pedia is boobpedia

>>385541378
candyass faggot, its a fact that tits are never too big.

File: oh41ek2umi1t2nn1.png (73KB, 323x297px) Image search: [Google]

73KB, 323x297px

Does Fatal Fury 2 actually include tit physics? Meaning, are the tits moving simulated and not hand animated or is Patricia talking shit as usual in that Kotaku article?

>>385516457
And people wonder why Wikipedia is not taken seriously. Is there any alternative version to Wikipedia?

>>385517138
When I was in highschool I'd use wikipedia but just list the sources on the bottom of the page as my sources.

>>385517943
We need a Wikipedia fork one that emphasizes facts over opinions.

>>385544432
That's wikipedia.

>>385517635
No it doesn't that shit sounds like a glubbernubber trying to push their bullshit instead of staying on 8gag where they belong.

File: 1495743810658.png (63KB, 367x253px) Image search: [Google]

63KB, 367x253px

>>385541641
>No bra

>>385533195
Because you're a godless druggie?

>>385538967
>So random Cthulhu-type wearing glasses shirt
Burn it

>>385543317
Dude, the feeling of a full slice of cool cheese on your face is a dank feeling.

File: Maiffs.gif (6KB, 77x98px) Image search: [Google]

6KB, 77x98px

>>385544024
It's just hand-drawn sprites.

>>385544283
Truly the most red-pilled of high school.

>>385517943
Fox News

>>385543182
The fuck is up with that twink in the background.

>>385545518
I figured.

>>385543317
I'm a male skinnyfat and just by shaking my arms forward and back it can be seen that my chest isn't static. Shit's simple physics and not animating it looks strange.

>>385544861
Lmao someone got triggered.

>>385545974
The only trigger I got is the one at the end of this gun beeyotch.

>>385545752
Looks like a degenerate convention thats whats up. Im all for that shit though

>>385529407
Cleft of Venus was always my go-to

>>385517635
Where the fuck were they when gamergate was a thing??

>>385529551
>my reality is the only one that exists

typical libshit mentality

>>385546235
That being said, the image they use these days is fucking shit, the original one was a close-up of a really nice smooth innie

>>385520717
>A global phenomenon of idiots thinking Breitbart is a credible news source
This, I only trust the fact checkers at CNN and Correct The Record™. They provide the hard-hitting coverage you can't get anywhere else.

File: 1300837095495.jpg (12KB, 146x255px) Image search: [Google]

12KB, 146x255px

>caring about breasts large enough to have physics

>>385546578
It's an objective fact that left-wingers tend to get their new from a greater variety of sources all over the spectrum whereas right-wingers tend to stick to a couple of very right-wing sources, so it looks to me like you're a hypocrite

>>385546620
>Committing a crime

>>385546790
>implying there are no flat adult women

>>385546679
>Objective fact
>Gives an opinion
Wew lad.

>>385517493
Editing the list of Notable Jewish Texans to Thomas Albin and Ghost from True Capitalist Radio will usually stay up for a good couple of weeks. Depends on how much traffic the article has.

>>385527601
>I thing her evidence was some guy at Nintendo saying Samus was "mixed" or something like that, which could be interpreted as trans
...
what?

>>385546679
To be fair, there are ignorant faggots and well informed people on both sides of the aisle
That being said I do think leftists not liberals, leftists tend to be better informed

>>385546679
Damn right. Us liberals are the really smart people. I can't believe Donald Trump won the election. Nobody I know even voted for him. Those damn Russians hacked the election and stole it from the rightful first woman president. I hope Obama forms Dumbledore's army and takes down that damn racist sexist cheeto.

>>385546936
Facts are just opinions that are correct.

File: Ch8VgWyWsAEjaE3.jpg (84KB, 561x633px) Image search: [Google]

84KB, 561x633px

There's a reason why even the most liberal of colleges don't allow students to use Wikipedia as a creditable source

>>385541641
>>Too small bras
the first one is wearing a sports bra, and the second one is from a literal fashion show. Anon, those are correct size.
>chestlets

>>385546936
No, my opinion followed after the fact and was based on the fact.

>>385547280
Because there are many different kinds of white people. Do something like "Irish Pride"

>>385526810
That's true. It's that damn dirty vast, right-wing conspiracy that unfairly stole the election from Hillary Clinton. #I'mWithHer

>>385547379
What's your point?

>>385546909
>flat
>women
I think you mean Women (Male)

>>385547502
No, I do not.
Homosexuals please go.

>>385547280
But that's right. Maybe you need to go back to /pol/, kid.

File: 1501187039440.jpg (259KB, 1000x1500px) Image search: [Google]

259KB, 1000x1500px

Shut up and post hotties

>>385547581
Flat women aren't women, I'm not gay either

>>385547396
Reality is not a popularity contest. Lots of people being in denial is a worrying development, not a victory that will allow you to reshape reality as you see fit.

>>385547612
>no thigh gap
Obesity isn't healthy, anon

>>385547628
You're totally gay and probably retarded.

>>385547585
t. ashamed whitey

File: 1496941222528.png (20KB, 695x515px) Image search: [Google]

20KB, 695x515px

>>385547326
>yfw women never know if they're wearing the correct size and need a national newspaper to tell them they are and how to find the correct size
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/youve-probably-been-wearing-the-wrong-bra-size-for_us_59494134e4b09edb4c91f2ba
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/01/27/wrong-bras-fitting-help_n_4673417.html