Am I the only one who thought about bringing a 80s or 90s kid

>>385322141
Why not the 60's?

>>385322141
Am I the only one who thinks they wouldn't be impressed?

>>385322275
because in the 60s, they haven't played videogames yet, it's basically to show the huge leap

>>385322356
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spacewar!
Underage fuck off.

>>385322331
No, I thought the same thing too. I think most of them would be wondering why the games aren't fun over how good they look.

>>385322141
i want to go back in time to the 90s and show off what 7th gen pokemon look like. i dont think anyone would believe me

File: really thinking.webm (75KB, 422x416px) Image search: [Google]

75KB, 422x416px

>>385322331
>>385322560
t. brain damaged nostalgia fags

Uh, yeah. Why did I never think about that before? Hell, I just thought of something new: Why not go back in time and win the lottery? Am I really the first one to think of this?
Oh wait, time travel isn't possible. Dumbass.

>>385323058
checkmate christians...... .. .. . .

>>385323058
>go back in time
>stick your dick in your high school crush
>people ask you "why didn't you go to God?," or "discover how the pyramids were built?"
>only reply you could muster is "her ass was so fat"

>>385323058

According to physics it is

>>385323058
>go back in time
>stick your dick in hitler
>give birth to yourself

>>385323483
do it then

>>385323483
I am pretty sure physics says we can only time travel into the future and at the most time travel back in time to the date the time machine was created.

>>385322440
To be fair dude, he's talking about video games as a commercial product that would be played by kids. Spacewar and other such early iterations of gaming were more of an academic experimental endeavor as opposed to something the general public would see.

Why not fiddle with a kid afterwards?

File: homs.jpg (17KB, 611x407px) Image search: [Google]

17KB, 611x407px

>>385324148
It can't be illegal if you're from the future

>>385323889
It would blow the mind of someone who created games more than some shitter

>>385324464
You're probably right, I was just annoyed by the "Underage fuck off" response to a somewhat reasonable post

>>385322952
They are right you know