Is Dark Souls 2 better than Demon Souls and Dark Souls 1?
I only have a PS3. So please don't mention/compare to the later games.
Worse than both in every way besides PvP.
No
DaS > DeS > DaS2
>>385194470
better than any other souls game except for Dark Souls 1
DS1 > DS2 > Bloodborne > Demon's Souls > DS3
>>385194616
Wrong
DaS > DaS3 > DeS > BB > DaS2
>>385194559
Thanks for calling it DaS2 instead of just DS2, would've thought you meant Demons Souls 2 which doesn't fucking exist.
Just play Dark Souls 1 first
If you like it enough play Demons or 2
>>385194665
Dark Souls 3 brings literally nothing except cool references. It's worse than any other game, also it looks like shit despite being the latest one
Demon's Souls is way too clumsy to be better than anything, but it's the first game that made the other games possible, so it's better than Dark Souls 3, which is the worst one
Dark Souls 2 has the best multiplayer, which is a big part of those games. The hate is irrelevant. It was obviously a disappontment since it wasnt as good as they promissed, but it happens with almost every game that gets hyped. Is this really a big problem anymore? Haven't you people got used to it yet? Also there's no way it's better than DS1, but it's the second best game in the series anyway.
>>385194972
No problem
It's a much more casual game, if only for being able to permanently clear enemies out of areas. Blows every other souls game out of the water in terms of framerate for some reason.
The only thing Dark Souls 2 has going for it is the best fashion in the entire series.
>>385196030
>the only thing
You mean aside from being better in every aspect than the other Souls games?
>>385196439
Yes I do mean aside from that, because that's bullshit.
>>385196501
>best covenants in the series
>all stats are useful as opposed to Res being useless in DS1 and Vit being useless in DS3
>bonfire ascetics
>best pvp
>fast ladder climb
>being able to avoid pvp without going offline
>best dlc
>powerstance
>infusing boss weapons
I'd like to get into this series soon, good game to start with for someone who's never played a Souls game?
>>385196781
The first one.
>>385196781
Start with DS2.
>>385196781
Demon's Souls if you have a PS3
Dark Souls 1 if you don't.
Play in release order, make sure to buy the version with all DLC.
>>385196781
Dark Souls probably.
Demon souls was my first but it can feel a little clunky at times when I come back to it. It's still amazing though and has the most diverse level design
>>385196665
>best DLC
>when Old Hunters exists
Also while the stuff you mentioned is nice and good Qol changes, that doesn't fix the godawful level design, combat, and infuriating shit like Soul Memory that Dark Souls 2 has in spades.
I'm getting into the series, I own Bloodborne and demon's souls, which should I start with?
>>385194470
2 has the best bosses and the best immersion and the best bonfire placement you cannot dispuite this
>>385197313
Only thing that's right there is the bonfire placement.
By far worst I'm series when it comes to bosses
Bloodborne for immersion
>>385194665
No, it's
BB > DaS > DeS > DaSIII > DaS II
>>385194470
only in terms of PvP (ratfagging is a lot of fun)
>>385197382
This 100%
It's DaS1 > BB > DaS3 > DeS >>> DaS2. You can't refute this.
inb4 DaS2 defence force and DeS nostalgiababbys
>>385197550
I'd say Bloodborne is overall the more solid game, but Dark Souls is a pretty special experience even if it has some notable flaws, so I can see why someone would put it as number one.
BB > DS2 > DS3 > DeS > DS1
with dlc obviously
>>385197237
I think you should start with BB because the game mechanics sort of teach you to be more aggressive/courageous which comes in handy for the DS series.
I played DS1, then bloodborne and went back to dark souls and I was so much better.
>>385194470
Not better, but it's not exactly bad. They all sit together, Dark Souls being only just slightly better.