Is there such a thing as someone "bad at video games"?

I've met tons of people that sucks at just about every game genre. Mostly girls though.

>>385057287
Are you retarded? An average 80 year old will suck at all sports and an average 18 year old might be decent at all sports. Same thing with video games. Skill is not subjective.

>>385057462
>Tfw get girlfriend into more vidya
>Starts getting better Smash and is able to beat me fairly
>Comes up with good strategies in Advance Wars and Fire Emblem
>Excited to play RPGs switching off with me

Literally the best feeling.

>>385057747
>using the word "getting better" with "Smash
>"Strategies" in Advance Wars and Fire Emblem other than common sense.

Go away, woman. You're not fooling anyone.

>>385057718
Skill actually is subjective. Not everyone has the same skill level, dumbass.

>>385057287
People who are bad at games usually haven't played very many, and thus get confused with mechanics, or only played a couple popular games and didn't do well. I have a friend who claims she's bad at games, but has only tried real time games. I keep telling her to try turn based, but meh.

>>385057287
"Being bad at all video games" is mostly about total lack of experience, being good on other hand is all about practice. Nobody is inherently good or bad at vidya because of some inherent limitation or excellence of their body or brain, anybody with normal functioning brain is just as good as how much they've practiced.

>>385058013
subjective means that measurements can't be used to differentiate between objects
Objective means that it can.

Everyone not having the same level => levels can be differentiated => Objective

Go back to middleschool, faggot.

I'd say it's all in how you apply yourself to the game.
If you don't take the time to practice or understand the mechanics you'll always be 'bad', unless you're just some super intuitive wizard.