>If you didn't like [GAME] then [GAME SEQUEL] wont change

>If you liked [UNRELATED SERIES], you'll love [GAME SEQUEL]

File: 1405404421542.png (223KB, 364x511px) Image search: [Google]

223KB, 364x511px

>>384941429
>[GAME]'s story is kinda anime(Pejorative)

but both of those are legitimate claims OP

>>384942007
Name a game that is for everyone.

also
>Man I didn't like Monster Hunter 3
>I wonder if I'll like 4
>oh it's still monster hunter, oh well

>>384942184
The context in that sentence says that it's even less for everyone than the average game.

>>384942184
checkers

and there are times a sequel to a series actually is a vast improvement to the first watch dogs 2 is a great example of that

>>384941162
>Being this mad about Splatoon reviews

>>384942184
Monster Hunter is a bad example because it's literally a game that's hardly changed over its iterations (until recently).

But take something like Final Fantasy. With 15 mainline games over 3 decades, there's all sorts of differences between them and it's entirely possible that someone who liked, say, FF6 might not like FF12 or vice versa.

>>384942489
Isn't FF a bad example too?

There are hardly any other game series with more than 6 numbered entries and FF main gimmick is how much it changes from game to game.