So I am a poorfag and I have enough net to torrent a game before I'm out of it again for probably over a month
I want to play the witcher; is the 2nd or 3rd game superior? Not interested in the first one right now
>inb4buttmad chronology people
2nd is better
3 is le epic game of thrones normalfag stuff
>>384351535
The second is better in some ways, but you'll get more playtime out of the third.
>even pirating games isn't free anymore
The autist nostalgia-blinded "holier than thou" contrarian /v/ users are going to tell you 2 is a masterpiece, it's so much better than 3 because it's older! But it's really not and you're going to have much more to do and have a lot more fun playing 3.
>>384351535
save your money and just watch free porn on pornhub.com
literally the only reason people play the witcher is for muh naked womens
Shitposting aside, get the third one. It's the best in the series and you don't need the other two to make sense out of it (although it could enhance your experience a bit).
>>384351535
Witcher 3
In Witcher 2 you barely do any witcher stuff and its just politics and shit
>>384351535
Like both but the second has more replay value and better pacing while the third is really crippled by the open world meme
>>384351589
>>384351865
>>384352035
What exactly do you guys mean by ''the open world meme''
Is it that; the universe suffers as a whole because instead of well designing a finite amount of areas to explore quality drops as a whole?
Is that what you mean?
>>384352030
By politics and shit; do you mean essentially worldbuilding?
I realise that I'm putting myself at a disadvantage because I'm starting the game from anywhere but the first; but will I still be able to follow what's going on?
Best example I can give is Mass Effect 2; whenever you meet someone from the first game they basically give you a brief history of who they are, what they want, and what you did with them in the second game
Can I expect this?