Just because you dont like a game doesn't mean its shit.
And
If you only play big budget AAA games or games that have universal praise your opinion on what is or is not a good game is of low or no value.
This is a fact.
Try and ague against it.
>>383843839
Kys fag
I can't, nobody else can't. Now let the thread die.
>>383843839
>Just because you dont like a game doesn't mean its shit.
true, I don't like most racing and sports games, but I know that it's because I don't like the genre
Animal Crossing is objectively bad, though
>>383844282
Animal crossing is a game about simulating a almost carefree life in an idyllic cartoony town surrounded by quirky characters.
Its a game made for people who specifically want this kind of thing.
Are you saying its doing a bad job at it.
What other game does this better?
As stated if you specifically want something like above mentioned than how is it a bad game.
There is almost no alternative. Other than sims i guess but that game is made to be somewhat realistic not cartoony.
>>383844638
I'm saying it's a shit videogame
>simulating a carefree life
all you do is collect trash to sell to buy furniture, repeat the same dialogues "I'm feeling so good today!" "bring me 5 apples and I'll give you a random piece of furniture", and finally, minigames with shit gameplay involving shooting balloons on the top screen with a slingshot
they could start by making fun jobs into the game like No More Heroes 1 and 2 have, but they couldn't even put that into the game
>starting a thread to argue about arguments