Should a remake of a game include changes to subvert the expectations

flip a coin, because you're going to piss people off either way

Former if they can do it good, latter if they're George Lucas

Depends on which aspects, and which games. Improving the framerate and making unskippable cutscenes skippable isn't going to be a problem. But changing what the devs consider flawed mechanics can ruin games. I don't trust devs to know what makes their game good. Even if it's the same team doing the remake, which almost never happens.

>>383774861

If you're doing the former why not just make a sequel?

they'll nitpick to hell anything you change in the slightest anyways (see Majora's Mask remake) so you might as well try to change a couple things you think genuinely need fixing, usually fro ma balance standpoint as opposed to a visual one.

>>383775403
Because then people complain it's too much of a retread.

It should preserve it, simply because most of the people who took over AAA are a bunch of retards.

Both add a original and remixed mode lik REmake

File: 1493887606463.png (525KB, 767x1036px) Image search: [Google]

525KB, 767x1036px

>>383774861
Yes to all.