>game gets ported from Wii U to Switch >"Its Switch

>>383695371
Naw, double standards.
Same thing with "No one owns a Wii U" despite more Wii U owners existing than Switch owners.

It's a new wave of delusional Nintendo fags that need the Switch to be relevant so their purchase can be worthwhile, meanwhile, even less developers care about it.

>>383695371
On one hand, I want to agree because you're snail, but it also seems wrong to not bully snail.

>>383695371
>So I guess Vita games that get ported to PS4 are also PS4 exclusives?
I don't see why not

>>383695371
You already posted this in another thread.
1. Nobody said this.
2. Stop being a console warrior.

>>383695716
>Same thing with "No one owns a Wii U" despite more Wii U owners existing than Switch owners.
So you're another retard.

>>383695716
Why can't the switch and PS4 be good? Why do PS4 owners crave everyone else's misery? Did you get bullied in high school my a Nintendo Chad?

File: mature games.gif (3MB, 137x244px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 137x244px

>>383697565
Because they're mature gamers.

LMAO NINTENDO DEFENSE FORCE ITT

>>383697753
Thank god the Sony attack squadron can keep those pesky Nintendo defense force members at bay.

>>383697554
not an argument