When is this coming? I bought a switch cause I was told

After Bloodborne comes to PC.

>buying a switch for multiplats

Thats like buying a car for the radio.

File: YoUkNoWnOtHInG.jpg (48KB, 490x490px) Image search: [Google]

48KB, 490x490px

>>383545772
>This shit again
No, it cant run them. and it would be a loss for fromsoftware.

File: IMG_0418.png (298KB, 600x512px) Image search: [Google]

298KB, 600x512px

>implying any of the Dark Souls games would run well on the Switch

Who told you that? Why did you purchase something purely for something which as of right now doesnt exist?

>>383545916
I buy alot of indies on a handheld
Id play the fuck outta ds1 on a portable

post yfw the Switch is the only console to get a remastered Demon's Souls

>>383546194
They dont run well on consoles at all. Fucking idiots buying a game for frame pacing lol

File: 7426027602.jpg (50KB, 320x232px) Image search: [Google]

50KB, 320x232px

>>383546410
>They dont run well on consoles at all.
>implying a tablet worse than other current gen consoles will do better
it'll probably do worse.

>>383546194
The switch cpu is on par with current gen
The switch has like 8X the ram of 360, thay ran ds1 and ds2
The gpu can run games well with modest cutbacks @ 720p in portable mode

I could see the switch running ds3 at a modest cutback in graphics

File: 53f.jpg (27KB, 600x765px) Image search: [Google]

27KB, 600x765px

>>383546371
Sony owns DeS

>>383546732
Fuck You

>>383546845
nintendo buys it

>>383545772
Stop this meme. No Nintendo user isn't remotely interested in SoulsBorne games. Besides, DS III could barely run on modern consoles, how on earth do you think the Switch port will fare?

>>383546371
>Demon's Souls

Considering Sony owns the trademark, I don't think so.