>Never Ever
SONY BTFO
Going to enjoy Red Dead Redemption in 4K/60FPS
https://youtu.be/Ogjqp6tTtbE
Have fun with our scraps from 2010?
>Requires a $400 CPU to run a game that you can play by buying a $40 PS3
>>383383994
Remember you paid 5 9 9 Dollars to play this game ;)
>>383384075
>implying I paid FIVE HUNDRED AND NINETY NINE DOLLARS at launch
silky smooth 0.5 FPS
everything comes to pc eventually
>>383383994
>>383383974
Did you guys even watch the video its a joke because the game runs like shit and doesn't work right
>>383383974
>>383383994
>>383384308
Retards who didn't watch the video but instinctively console warred on sight
>didn't like RDR nearly 10 years ago
PC faggot
>don't like RDR now
Sony brony
The game had a lot of potential but realised exactly none of it while making almost every mistake it possibly could. It was OK. I'm glad I played it, but I'd never be excited for the sequel.
>>383384352
do you understand what "first time going ingame" means?
>>383384496
This
>>383383916
>tfw finished the game before switching to PC
Am I the only one who doesn't give a fuck about the console vs PC whining, but is just legitimately impressed with the progress of PS3 emulation?
>>383384496
>Hating cowboy simulator
game isn't even that fun in 2017 anyway.
i would know i tried playing it on my old 360 for the first time and it's the most empty game ever.
maybe back in the day it was fun because there was nothing else
gave it away and got a ps4
>>383383916
720p 24 fps
it's the ps3 version
It's a slideshow on the PS3 as well, don't see any problems in the video
>Game forces me to twinstick aim or use the "mechanic" that literally does it for me
>Ever anything above shit tier
Doesn't matter how good you make everything else if you fail basic fundamentals like those
Hopefully i can finagle my Steam Controller with this emulator once it's further along so I can give the games no shit control schemes too.
Hopefully this is made playable in the future, because as it stands a remaster / port is never going to happen if the rumors regarding its shaky development and messed up code are any true.
>>383385137
Shhhh anon we can let the PCfats think Red Dead never came to PC for any other reason than Rockstar vehemently not wanting their money
>>383383916
>Can't tell the difference between 10FPS and 60
Man this game really needs a PC port or a current gen remaster. I'm playing it now for the first time since the release, this time on PS3 and it's pretty bad. The framerate hovers around 20 to 25 FPS, the resolution is below 720p and pretty blurry. I actually bought another copy for tthe 360 to play it properly.
THANKS FOR BETATESTING FAGGOTS
>>383384817
t. never played the gameof fucking course you are a pcfaggot hahahahah
RDR is a 360 exclusive
>>383383916
i don't understand why pcfags still want this, the game is mediocre
>>383386204
He's not wrong though. It's playable, but it's hardly satisfactory.
>>383384664
This, OPs vid is pretty amazing for the current state of development.
>>383384352
>Brand new emulator runs like shit before its even released to the public
>>383384273
So just like the PS3 version?
>>383384715
>>383384817
now say it without crying
>>383384352
Once it's up and running like that it's a matter of days-weeks to iron out the details
>>383389056
>crying
why would i cry i own a pc you know
Ultra wide screen
>>383384509
It means that it doesn't fucking work.