>/v/ claims $50 a year is too much for a service that pays

>>383030189
But as soon as psn expires you loose those games. Its cheaper just to pick up those games that are physical second hand at this point.

PCfats pirate all their games so they don't understand why you would pay for free ones

PSN "free" games are only good if you never intended to buy them in the first place.

The $50 should pay for itself in bonus discounts on games you'll actually get to keep.

You get $900 a year for $50. Worth it, if you own PS3, Vita and PS4, not so much if you only own one or another.

>>383030189
That implies that i both want to play all those games, would be willing to buy them at their retail price, and will continue buying psn for years to come so i wouldn't get my licenses rescinded at a later date.

File: 1495999347968.png (89KB, 1328x1140px) Image search: [Google]

89KB, 1328x1140px

>>383030189
>sonycücks don't understand that value is subjective, and that for most customers these games aren't worth their market prices, which is why they don't buy them
>sonycücks don't understand that they are paying $50 for filler games they most likely won't even touch

>>383030189

Steam must give out well over $1,000 worth of games each month, doesn't mean it's all indieshit no one cares about.

>>383034486
>>sonycücks don't understand that they are paying $50 for filler games they most likely won't even touch
They all know they're paying solely for multiplayer. They won't admit it on v thogh

>>383030189
Is Tokyo Jungle really a PSN game?
Is it for PS4?

Also, humble monthly is also technically worth it but buying PSN for the games is stupid. You don't even know what you'll get. >>383031575 is the only thing that matters. Discounts.

>>383032904
Vita is hacked all games are free