What should I expect /v/. I played through 4 a while ago and

New Vegas is the better game by leagues. They both run like shit on PS3. If you have a PC that was built/bought in the last five years you'll have a far better experience due to bugfix mods.

>>382696405
>PS3 versions

You already fucked up op

File: image.gif (2MB, 398x200px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 398x200px

>>382696405
>PS3

It's like you want to have a bad experience

>>382696405
For 3 you should expect an incoherent piece of shit

For new vegans i dunno

>>382696405
Should have gotten on PC for Tales of Two Wastelands

>ps3 versions
enjoy the save bloat that'll make them run at 2fps after 10 hours of playing

>PS3 Versions
Sorry OP but you should return them and buy them on Steam.

>3
Drop it

>New Vegas
Top Tier RPG

>>382696405
>bethesda games on console

>>382696405
3 is the exact same game as 4, but worse in every way.
NV uses the tech of 3 to make a game that is more like 1-2. Expect good dialogue, characters and complex quests with lots of branches.
Also, sell them both and buy them on PC instead. They're cheap on Steam right now and will run on a toaster.

>>382696572
Oh I already know they run like shit, I'm OK with making that sacrifice, seeing as it would be worse on my pc, which is falling apart at this point

>>382696405
>FO3 on PS3 and not even the GOTY version
>F:NV on PS3 and not even the Ultimate Edition
You're in for a bad time anon

>>382697204
you dont know what youre talking about, I have new vegas and that piece of shit is unplayable because fucking bug at vault 11 and the game is literay unpleayble after my save reaches certain weight

File: 1498282885900.png (587KB, 697x698px) Image search: [Google]

587KB, 697x698px

>>382697447
I can just buy the dlc, and besides, I live in Bethesda MD, I can't risk him coming to my door, better to buy the dlc for one of the games than risk having to buy Skyrim for the 5th time

>>382697620
Damn, so if I just save, there's a chance the game will just fucking break. That's pretty shitty, but I'm still very skeptical on getting it on pc

>>382698652
post specs

>>382696405
>Fallout 3: Even shittier gameplay than 4 with 3 times the bugs, shit tier (although slightly better than 4) writing
>New Vegas: Fallout 3 but with decent writing

>>382696405
>PS3
Expect them to become unplayable once you've played for awhile because your save file will get bloated and your framerate will tank to single digits.

>>382698836
That's just the thing, I don't know my specs. I got this PC when I was 7 (19 now) from my 65 year old uncle. I'm able to run the original fallout, which I'll start playing soon. I know he was into strategy games at the time. I'm afraid to play any game from 2005 onwards on this piece of shit. It was already in bad condition 12 years ago, now it can barely run chrome

>>382699727
Well thats a bit of an exaggeration at the chrome bit, but you get my point